Thank you! That worked.
From: Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 3:15 PM
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>, David Kramer
<david.kra...@shoebuy.com>
Subject: Re: Filtering results by minimum relevan
The idea is to not return poorly matching results, not to limit the number of
results returned. One query may have hundreds of excellent matches and another
query may have 7. So cutting off by the number of results is trivial but not
useful.
Again, we are not doing this for performance
I’ve done quite a bit of searching on this. Pretty much every page I find says
it’s a bad idea and won’t work well, but I’ve been asked to at least try it to
reduce the number of completely unrelated results returned. We are not trying
to normalize the number, or display it as a percentage,
ildren (if you need them).
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 20 March 2017 at 11:58, David Kramer <david.kra...@shoebuy.com> wrote:
> Hi. We’re just ramping up a product sear
Hi. We’re just ramping up a product search engine for our eCommerce site, so
this is all new development and we are slowly building up our Solr
knowledgebase, so thanks in advance for any guidance.
Our catalog (mostly shoes and apparel) has three objects nested: Products
(title, description,
worked!
Thanks for your time and help.
On 2/2/17, 4:35 PM, "David Kramer" <david.kra...@shoebuy.com> wrote:
Yes, think of the starving orphan records…
Ours is an eCommerce system, selling mostly shoes. We have three levels of
nested objects represent
I’m just setting that up now. I’m far from a Solr expert so I won’t swear we’re
doing it right though
Our issue is that we have documents, nested 3 deep. Products, Items, and SKUs.
Each has an ID field that’s unique within the document type, but unfortunately
we have products with the same
corrupts block structure: parent can't be deleted and left children orphans
(.. so touching, I'm sorry). Just make sure that number of deleted docs is
0 at first.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:20 PM, David Kramer <david.kra...@shoebuy.com>
wrote:
> Thanks
void having them in the index?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:29 AM, David Kramer <david.kra...@shoebuy.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Some background:
> · The data involved is catalog data, with three nested objects:
> Products, Items, and Skus, i
Some background:
· The data involved is catalog data, with three nested objects:
Products, Items, and Skus, in that order. We have a docType field on each
record as a differentiator.
· The "id" field in our data is unique within datatype, but not across
datatypes. We added a
10 matches
Mail list logo