Re: [spamdyke-users] How qmail works...

2009-05-04 Thread Davide Bozzelli
BC wrote: Thank you, Sam, for a very excellent explanation of how it all works. Have you considered writing an MTA to replace qmail which can use spamdyke? Looking forward to the next version... Bucky Why reinvent the wheel ? could be done just by rewriting only the qmail-smtpd.

Re: [spamdyke-users] Next Version

2008-05-16 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: The next major version will be 4.0.0. It does not include recipient validation. That feature is currently targeted for the following version, probably 4.1.0. I haven't yet decided how to implement it, but I think it won't be useful unless it supports (at

Re: [spamdyke-users] greeting-delay-check does not work properly ?

2008-01-25 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: If that explanation doesn't fit, could you send more details about the connections that aren't delayed? A full log would be perfect. - Yes Sam, it's a reasonable explanation, as is reasonable that i'm a dumb :) Thx again, Davide

Re: [spamdyke-users] Squirrelmail, different local server, mail not sent

2008-01-24 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Ionut Sandu ha scritto: Hello! Yestarday i discovered spamdyke and i can say its awesome. It cured my problems with spam and all other issues. But now i cant use the webmail. It gives the following error. Service not available, closing channel Server replied: 421 Refused. You have no

[spamdyke-users] New log feature

2008-01-24 Thread Davide Bozzelli
I see now is it possisibile to log on syslog OR stderr. Would be useful if i could log on both syslog AND stderr at the same time, so with stderr log i could mantain ALL the smtp stuff in multilog files, and with syslog i could manage the archival of log and something like that (via syslog-ng)

Re: [spamdyke-users] greeting-delay-check does not work properly ?

2008-01-24 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: If you're right about this, it's a bug. I'll work on reproducing it. I think this is an issue, As for the blocking, the delay is supposed to end as soon as the first characters are sent. This is by design -- if the remote server isn't going to follow the SMTP

Re: [spamdyke-users] greeting-delay-check does not work properly ?

2008-01-24 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: If you're right about this, it's a bug. I'll work on reproducing it. As for the blocking, the delay is supposed to end as soon as the first characters are sent. This is by design -- if the remote server isn't going to follow the SMTP protocol, there's no point

Re: [spamdyke-users] greeting-delay-check does not work properly ?

2008-01-24 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Ben Mills ha scritto: I'm using the rDNS filters and an RBL filter, but I still have a delay. You can telnet mail.hwy39.net on 25. What am I doing differently? Well, exactly i don't know, but i've the same beahavior on 2 servers. The delay works only when i disable:

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 3.1.4

2008-01-21 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: one and helping me debug it. Solaris compiling is also fixed. Again. Thanks to Davide Bozzelli for reporting this one. Hi Sam Dunno if the solaris bug you talk is the one related to getopt , but it persists also in 3.1.4 on solaris 5.8 due to the lack

Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 3.1.4

2008-01-21 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: No, the Solaris fixes were for compiling on Solaris 10. I don't have access to a Solaris 8 installation (and it's not available for download from sun.com), so I can't fix that issue. -- Sam Clippinger I can provide you an account on a sparc solaris 8 if you

[spamdyke-users] follow up on spamdyke tls accept problem.

2008-01-16 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Is it a bug ? I'll summarize the problem: Spamdyke , when tls is disabled, seems to require every time a tls connetion, and so forece the remote mta to talk tls. I understand that the problem could be fixed by enabling the tls support in spamdyke, but if i want to use the tls on qmail-smtpd

Re: [spamdyke-users] follow up on spamdyke tls accept problem.

2008-01-16 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: It sounds like a bug. I've seen several complaints about TLS passthrough but I've been unable to reproduce it myself. Out of curiosity, why do you want qmail to do the TLS instead of spamdyke? One of the reasons coul be for granularity of options: with the jms

[spamdyke-users] still problems compiling on solaris sparc 8/10

2007-12-10 Thread Davide Bozzelli
The problems affected both sol8 and sol10 . Here the output of configure script: checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables...

Re: [spamdyke-users] Rcpt address check

2007-11-23 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: Actually, spamdyke already does this. If qmail rejects the recipient, spamdyke logs the rejection as DENIED_OTHER. Unfortunately, qmail doesn't check recipients by default, though there are some patches available to add that ability. Instead, qmail accepts all

Re: [spamdyke-users] Rcpt address check

2007-11-23 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: I don't think those two suggestions are mutually exclusive. #1 is actually more complicated however, since DIR/DOMAIN/USER isn't always enough. vpopmail aliases can look like this: DIR/DOMAIN/.qmail-USER That's the point: the DIR tree must be populated

Re: [spamdyke-users] Graylisted denied

2007-11-17 Thread Davide Bozzelli
night duke ha scritto: I'm agree with your comments but people want fast email, zero spam and sometimes it's impossible... I have migrated the server and i stoped receiving spamgraylisting is a cool software but i'm afraid about how the people configure their mail servers of the retry

Re: [spamdyke-users] Graylisted denied

2007-11-16 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: If there are any domains you don't want graylisted, just list them in a file and use the never-graylist-rdns-file option. I'm confused about this option. If i put for example in the file something like domain.com And you say: domains you don't want graylisted,

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylisting

2007-11-12 Thread Davide Bozzelli
night duke ha scritto: I have not added at /var/qmail/graylist gmail.com but i still receiving emails from gmail. Well .. i think you have some problems to understand at least my poor english :) I'll try to re-explain all the stuff ... The domain you must add it's not the source domain ,

Re: [spamdyke-users] More robust wildcards in recipient-whitelist-file?

2007-10-30 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Marc Van Houwelingen ha scritto: I'm pretty sure that square brackets are not valid email address characters. Given this, maybe some sort of scheme where [] would delineate wildcards. Regular expressions may not be so easy, since [] are meaningful inside them, but perhaps something simple

Re: [spamdyke-users] another subject...

2007-10-30 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Steve Cole ha scritto: Yes, but the issue we have with qmail-scanner is that our e-mail system moves The last working version is 2.1-r1. You have been warned. :) Have you tried the r3 ? have fun, Davide ___ spamdyke-users mailing list

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylisting

2007-10-04 Thread davide bozzelli
night duke ha scritto: So i must add only my domains there.I must add the domains from where i want to receive? Yes, more precisely the domain(s) you want to enable graylist for. ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org

Re: [spamdyke-users] possible bug whith recipient-whitelist-file

2007-10-03 Thread davide bozzelli
nnight duke ha scritto: Davide can you do to me a favour. Cat nospamdykeip cat nospamdykefrom cat nospamdyketo cat badrnds cat nograyip For me it's to get an idea of how i must build this files.Why you didn't use /var/qmail/spamdyke/ and creat spamdykefrom spamdyketo there? How

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylisting

2007-10-03 Thread davide bozzelli
night duke ha scritto: Ok but i must add a directory on /var/qmail/spamdyke/graylisted/ Like gmail.com It's not done automactly?I must do with all the domains i want receive emails from? Thanks Nightduke I think you have'nt read the docs at all . You should create a folder for you

Re: [spamdyke-users] graylisting without vpopmail

2007-10-01 Thread davide bozzelli
night duke ha scritto: Hi i wish to know if i can use graylisting with spamdyke i don't have vpopmail. It's possible? Vpopmail is simply a user manager tool aka virtual user tool for qmail . Spamdyke does not speak at all with vpopmail for graylist. So the answer is: yes, you can,

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke options

2007-09-28 Thread davide bozzelli
night duke writes: So if i use /usr/local/bin/spamdyke -f /var/qmail/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf will check every rbl i have listed like dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org dnsrbl=bla bla bla But i still receiving spam from spammers that are listed on spamhaus for example... Thanks a lot Nightduke The

Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke options

2007-09-27 Thread davide bozzelli
night duke ha scritto: /usr/local/bin/spamdyke -x DNSRBL -f /var/qmail/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf it's good to use spamdyke with the option -x DNSRBL will check every line of the spamdyke.conf that has check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org,etc... Not exactly. -x is equivalent to add