[spamdyke-users] munin plugin

2007-10-30 Thread Seb
For those using munin, I've uploaded on MuninExchange a spamdyke plugin : http://muninexchange.projects.linpro.no/?searchcid=21pid=171phid=240 tested with munin debian package, works fine (plugin based on the postfix plugin, awful shell code but it works :) have a nice day -- Sébastien

Re: [spamdyke-users] More robust wildcards in recipient-whitelist-file?

2007-10-30 Thread Marc Van Houwelingen
I'm pretty sure that square brackets are not valid email address characters. Given this, maybe some sort of scheme where [] would delineate wildcards. Regular expressions may not be so easy, since [] are meaningful inside them, but perhaps something simple like and asterisk representing zero or

Re: [spamdyke-users] More robust wildcards in recipient-whitelist-file?

2007-10-30 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Marc Van Houwelingen ha scritto: I'm pretty sure that square brackets are not valid email address characters. Given this, maybe some sort of scheme where [] would delineate wildcards. Regular expressions may not be so easy, since [] are meaningful inside them, but perhaps something simple

Re: [spamdyke-users] More robust wildcards in recipient-whitelist-file?

2007-10-30 Thread Sam Clippinger
Actually, brackets are legal in email addresses. The full list of legal characters is (as far as I know): a-z A-Z 0-9 @ / : . # [ ] - \ _ = , ! On my keyboard, that doesn't leave much and I can't guarantee the remaining characters aren't legal either. I'm not sure I want to use a

[spamdyke-users] another subject...

2007-10-30 Thread Steve Cole
qsheff hasn't been updated in about a year, and the last released version will kill your mail server (literally) with e-mail eating bugs. if someone was willing to take this under their wing and maybe just rip out the functionality other than anti-virus, that would be cool ;) in all

Re: [spamdyke-users] More robust wildcardsin recipient-whitelist-file?

2007-10-30 Thread Marc Van Houwelingen
I was looking here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address, which does not list the brackets. Either way, the regexp flag sounds perfect. It may be a bit complicated, but of course does not have to be used. - Original Message - From: Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [spamdyke-users] More robust wildcardsin recipient-whitelist-file?

2007-10-30 Thread Sam Clippinger
OK, I'll add that to my TODO list. I guess I need to figure out how to parse regexps. :) -- Sam Clippinger Marc Van Houwelingen wrote: I was looking here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address, which does not list the brackets. Either way, the regexp flag sounds perfect. It may be

Re: [spamdyke-users] Morerobust wildcardsin recipient-whitelist-file?

2007-10-30 Thread Marc Van Houwelingen
Thanks. Possibly worth mentioning: it appears that parentheses are, in fact, illegal characters for an email address. - Original Message - From: Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:01 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [spamdyke-users] another subject...

2007-10-30 Thread Steve Cole
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Sam Clippinger wrote: I'm not familiar with qsheff, so I hadn't given any thought to trying to replace it. Personally, I use qmail-scanner (qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net). Yes, but the issue we have with qmail-scanner is that our e-mail system moves around 1.2M

Re: [spamdyke-users] another subject...

2007-10-30 Thread Davide Bozzelli
Steve Cole ha scritto: Yes, but the issue we have with qmail-scanner is that our e-mail system moves The last working version is 2.1-r1. You have been warned. :) Have you tried the r3 ? have fun, Davide ___ spamdyke-users mailing list