: Re: [spamdyke-users] yet another wishlist... :-)
I'd love to be able to do spam and virus scanning within spamdyke,
before the connection is complete. That would require spamdyke to
start
SpamAssassin and/or ClamAV (or another AV) and capture their output.
It
shouldn't be too hard, since
Sam Clippinger wrote:
I'd love to be able to do spam and virus scanning within spamdyke,
But what for? There's couple of tools you can use to scan (for whatever
you want) incoming mails before they go to the user mailbox and drop
mails when needed. Absolutely pointless feature to be added to
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:39:15PM +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Sam Clippinger wrote:
I'd love to be able to do spam and virus scanning within spamdyke,
But what for? There's couple of tools you can use to scan (for whatever
you want) incoming mails before they go to the user mailbox and
Well said. It wouldn't be spamDYKE at that point. ;)
Bgs wrote:
Spamdyke is an smtp level filtering system while virus filtering is at
the data level. Absolutely different by design. Spamdyke is fast because
it does not bother to handle data. If you add virus filtering to it, it
would be
Olivier Mueller wrote:
I'd love to be able to do spam and virus scanning within spamdyke,
But what for? There's couple of tools you can use to scan (for whatever
you want) incoming mails before they go to the user mailbox and drop
mails when needed. Absolutely pointless feature to be added
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 17:56 +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote:
What SMTP-level you talk about? You need to get all the data prior checks
we talk about. And this makes *huge* difference.
SMTP-Level = during the SMTP Session, before the mail is accepted in the
local qmail queue.
Once the mail is in
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] yet another wishlist... :-)
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 14:31 +0100, Faris Raouf wrote:
Forgive me if I'm missing something here, but qmail-scanner already
does
spamassassin and AV checking, and can be configured to reject (as
opposed to
drop) any
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam
Clippinger
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:29 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] yet another wishlist... :-)
Actually, I've been thinking about adding queuing in two
stages for other reasons. Queuing just the message header
would allow spamdyke
I'd love to be able to do spam and virus scanning within spamdyke,
before the connection is complete. That would require spamdyke to start
SpamAssassin and/or ClamAV (or another AV) and capture their output. It
shouldn't be too hard, since both of those programs are designed to be
run this
