Again, as I said: this is from my own personal experience, but after
having started using since 2 Dec 2013, it's consistently been giving
good results, and I have yet to encounter a single false positive.
I'm not saying anyone else should use the DNSBL, but I will say that
anyone who blindly
I tend to agree. The lists I've chosen have been the result of many
years of tuning. Actually shlink.org wasn't even in my radar and isn't
on many of the multi-rbl test sites so I need to test it.
I'd be curious to hear about Sam's blacklist setup.
Gary
On 03/09/2014 09:24 AM, Dossy
I only use b.barracudacentral.org, zen.spamhaus.org and
fresh.spameatingmonkey.com, plus my private list that's generated by the
hunter_seeker script. My logs from just today show Barracuda is responsible
for 90% of the RBL rejections. Spamhaus generated 10% and Spam Eating Monkey
is 0%. My
On 3/9/2014 1:21 PM, Sam Clippinger wrote:
plus my private list that's generated by the hunter_seeker script.
My private list has blocked about 4.5 times more connections today
than the DNS RBLs.
Sam -
Is a functionality that could be built into spamdyke with a .conf
configuration option?
Hey Friends of Spamdyke, and Hello Sam, Godfather of spam blocking!
I use
dns-blacklist-entry=ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org
so far and the only false positives i get are delivered using accounts
from m$, yahoo, gmx, web.de, t-online. Not many false positives though,
