Dear all,
Forgive me for asking this question - I'm not a coder.
I've noticed that a few systems I look after use Spamdyke 4.3.1, compiled
back in 2012 or 2013.
Are there any security issues with this version?
Would any of the various vulnerabilities found in certain ancillary linu
Thanks Sam. That's put my mind at ease.
To my knowledge, there are no security issues in version 4.3.1. I've since
fixed several bugs that can cause crashes, but nothing I can imagine could
be a security risk.
There have been recent bugs in OpenSSL and glibc; those libraries should
definit
Dear Sam/everyone,
With verbose logging enabled, is it reasonable to assume that the only time
the RBLs Spamdyke is configured to use are actually queried is when a
FILTER_RBL_MATCH appears in the log?
The reason I'm asking is that there seem to be an order of magnitude more
DENIED_RBL_MAT
Thanks Sam!
From: spamdyke-users [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of
Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users
Sent: 17 January 2016 19:49
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] RBL DNS query numbers
I think you're exactly right -- the filter was triggered once
Dear all,
I'm stuck with a qmail installation that doesn't support TLS, so I'm trying
to get Spamdyke to deal with it on incoming connections.
Unfortunately I've not managed to get it to work - I get the following error
in the maillog when testing:
**
unable to start SSL/TLS connec
> From: spamdyke-users [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On
> Behalf Of Alessio Cecchi via spamdyke-users
> For me works fine with:
>
> tls-level=smtp-no-passthrough
> tls-certificate-file=/var/ssl/wildcard.pem
>
> and in /var/ssl/wildcard.pem there is a chain like this:
>
> CERTIFICA
> Behalf Of Alessio Cecchi via spamdyke-users
> Sent: 10 March 2016 08:00
>
> Hi,
>
> if you use spamdyke fixcrio is no more necessary.
> --
Ah, that's what I thought. The notes I have say that spamdyke takes care of
the bare LFs.
But because I could not remember if I added it to the tcpserver
Dear all,
Recently I've noticed that massive numbers of (presumably botnet) senders
are blocked by the earlytalker filter when greeting-delay-secs=11 but only a
fraction as many if I set it to 10 or less.
I'm guessing that the current main botnets are set to start talking after 10
seconds eve
Dear all,
Does ip-in-rdns-keyword-* only look for IPs delimited by periods, or does it
allow hyphens too?
The reason I'm asking is that I want to block senders with rDNS that look
similar to this:
dsl-111-222-333-444-dyn.domain.tld
So if it does look for hyphens as well as periods,
Aha! Thanks Gary. I'd missed the vital "the dots in the examples below can
be any single character" when reading this.
Thank you!
From: Gary Gendel [mailto:g...@genashor.com]
Sent: 06 May 2016 16:24
To: Faris Raouf ; spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] ip-in-rdns-keyword -
Dear all,
I'm having a bit of an issue trying to block messages based on the envelope
sender. Basically it doesn't seem to work at all, so I'm obviously doing
something wrong.
All the other types of blacklists and whitelists seem to work just fine.
I understand the difference between the "From"
Thanks Sam. That's brilliant and hugely helpful.
I'll try to do this this evening, and failing that over the weekend.
I will also check the whitelists again in case I missed something.
Yes, ms2 is the edge server and that's where the sender is backlisted,
although I've just added it to
Hi Sam,
I just had a chance to have a go with the tests, and just as you expected it
was down to the rDNS of the sender being whitelisted.
I don't know how many times I'd checked, and missed seeing it :)
Unfortunately I can't remember why I whitelisted it :( It belongs to an ESP.
If they
Yup! That would be great. I just think it would be useful to know it is
happening, and where to look, sort of thing.
From: spamdyke-users [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf
Of Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users
Sent: 25 July 2016 14:50
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdy
Dear all,
We're having problems with spam being allowed in from IPs with rDNS
resolving to "localhost".
This gets past the reject-empty-rdns filter.
Initially I thought these IPs has no rDNS - using dnsstuff, I get no result
(normally meaning no rDNS). But using host or dig I see the IPs r
other IPs.
-- Sam Clippinger
On Aug 9, 2016, at 5:02 AM, Faris Raouf via spamdyke-users
mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> > wrote:
Dear all,
We're having problems with spam being allowed in from IPs with rDNS
resolving to "localhost".
This gets past the reje
Dear all,
I'm absolutely confounded by a problem I'm having after upgrading five
systems from Spamdyke 4.3.1 to 5.0.1
On two of them, webmail (running locally, connecting from 127.0.0.1 to
127.0.0.1 port 25 via smtp, no authentication) works fine and can send
messages.
On the other thre
t on disk, it'll probably just
get overwritten the next time Plesk saves a change.
-- Sam Clippinger
On Oct 3, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Faris Raouf via spamdyke-users
mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> > wrote:
Dear all,
I'm absolutely confounded by a problem I'
18 matches
Mail list logo
