Let the time zone given by user
+0530
Therefore its 330 minutes / 13200 seconds
select datetime( StartTime,'unixepoch','+13200.0 seconds') from mytable
--- gives you the local time
Select datetime( StartTime,'unixepoch')gives u universal time
Where StartTime is an integer(unixtimestamp
Thanks Karthick. My code too works fine... (I made a small typo mistake in
query, which executed silently)
But I guess your method is the right one.
Regards,
Lloyd
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 16:54 +0530, Karthick V - TLS , Chennai wrote:
Let the time zone given by user
+0530
Therefore its
Hi ,
I have two seperate triggers like,
CREATE TRIGGER cnt1
AFTER INSERT
ON tbl1
WHEN (new.Id =1 and new.priority 2 )
BEGIN
update cnt set Critical = (SELECT Critical from msgs_cnt where Id=1) + 1
where Id=1;
end;
CREATE TRIGGER cnt2
AFTER INSERT
ON tbl1
WHEN (new.Id =1 and
chetana bhargav
bhargav_chetana-/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two seperate triggers like,
CREATE TRIGGER cnt1
AFTER INSERT
ON tbl1
WHEN (new.Id =1 and new.priority 2 )
BEGIN
update cnt set Critical = (SELECT Critical from msgs_cnt where
Id=1) + 1 where Id=1;
end;
CREATE TRIGGER
Hi,
Look at the new loadable extension feature:
http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=LoadableExtensions
It also describe an example that could be really easy to convert to
your sqrt problem.
--
Julien
-
To unsubscribe,
On 12/20/06, Brodie Thiesfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static HANDLE loadLibraryUtf8(const char *z){
+ WCHAR zWide[MAX_PATH];
+ DWORD dwLen = MultiByteToWideChar(CP_UTF8,0,z,-1,zWide,MAX_PATH);
+ if (dwLen == 0 || dwLen MAX_PATH) return NULL;
+ return LoadLibraryW(zWide);
+}
I can't
Hi comunity,
i'm writing CGI pages (writeen in ANSI C) with SQLITE3 support, all work fine
using SELECT statement, but when i try to exec UPDATE or INSERT statement
i've the follow error:
unable to open database file
I've set all data base fle permission, but it don't work.
Thank a lot.
That may not be good enough. I actually do need the transactions within a
few seconds (for consistency and availablility for other clients) - It's
just that a few seconds of transaction loss is not a problem (on restart the
system would reset to a good state).
It seems nobody has ever done this
-Original Message-
From: Brodie Thiesfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:17 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Need a wince test
There are a few problems with your patch.
+# ifdef _WIN32_WCE
+static HANDLE
Francesco Andrisani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi comunity,
i'm writing CGI pages (writeen in ANSI C) with SQLITE3 support, all work fine
using SELECT statement, but when i try to exec UPDATE or INSERT
statement i've the follow error:
unable to open database file
I've set all data base
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:01:12AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laszlo Elteto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I DO need Durability, so I don't want to drop that. In fact, I need and want
normal transactional updates - just not immediately flushed to disk.
If the information is not flushed to
It is the same problem as trying to get a quart out of a pint bottle.
People looking for durability and higher performance might find that
using 15,000 RPM disks will do it without affecting durability or
requiring an application redesign. Experimentation with multiple disk
spindles so that
Nested transactions would solve my problem - but only if it worked across
different connections. As I said there are many transactions from various
clients, they may use multiple connections (eg. on a server). I think nested
transactions would still be for ONE particular connection only...
Laszlo
Robert, does the patch I provided work as is on Windows CE or not?
Robert Simpson wrote:
There's some flaws in your arguments, Brodie ...
1. There's no need to do this whole _UNICODE test, only the _WINCE test is
needed. All versions of Windows that support unicode also support the ANSI
Brodie Thiesfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I understand, sqlite changed sometime in the early 3.0
versions such that char* strings (input and output) are always assumed
to be UTF-8.
[...]
Yes. But this is a separate problem. Look at the code in os_win.c, e.g.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:22:06PM -0500, Laszlo Elteto wrote:
Nested transactions would solve my problem - but only if it worked across
different connections. As I said there are many transactions from various
clients, they may use multiple connections (eg. on a server). I think nested
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brodie Thiesfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
SQLite should never expect strings in any encoding other
than UTF-8 or UTF-16. (Note that ASCII is a proper subset
of UTF-8 so SQLite will also accept ASCII.) I do not know
what CP_ACP is, but if it is not a subset
Julien,
Thanks for the pointer. That does indeed look interesting, though I'm
not sure it completely solves my problem (though, there may be no good
solution to my problem). It would seem that, using the loadable
extension feature, I could easily create a compiled version of my
necessary
-Original Message-
From: Brodie Thiesfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 12:17 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Need a wince test
Robert, does the patch I provided work as is on Windows CE or not?
Robert Simpson wrote:
There's
Laszlo Elteto wrote:
Nested transactions would solve my problem - but only if it worked across
different connections. As I said there are many transactions from various
clients, they may use multiple connections (eg. on a server). I think nested
transactions would still be for ONE particular
Jeff Godfrey wrote:
I'm curious how others handle this.
A. You don't need or use any custom SQL functionality
B. You don't use a 3rd party SQLite management tool
C. Something else I haven't thought of?
Jeff,
I think it is mostly A, or B, or at least it alternates between A and B
Robert Simpson wrote:
From: Brodie Thiesfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert, you are missing the point. Because of the way this is being
defined, there is a need to check for _UNICODE. If you don't then a
build with _UNICODE defined will fail. If it was implemented like the
rest of the
-Original Message-
From: Brodie Thiesfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:43 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Need a wince test
Robert Simpson wrote:
From: Brodie Thiesfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert, you are missing
Robert Simpson wrote:
CP_UTF8 doesn't work on most CE platforms and hence your proposed patch
doesn't work.
Then neither did drh's. Which then only leaves the option of
implementing it in os_win.c which I have been wanting to do all along.
Robert wrote:
Brodie wrote:
Robert wrote:
win95/nt/ce users, please test check-in [3541] to see if extension
loading now works on wince and to make sure that nothing broke on
win95/nt. Tnx.
http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/chngview?cn=3541
--
D. Richard Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wince users, please verify that the code still works after
applying patch [3542]. This patch reduces the number of
utf8-unicode conversions required on wince.
http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/chngview?cn=3542
--
D. Richard Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another wince change... Wince users, please verify patch [3543]
for me. http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/chngview?cn=2123
--
D. Richard Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The utf8ToUnicode function uses MultiByteToWideChar(CP_UTF8) which it
seems from recent comments isn't supported on all versions of Windows
CE. This may need to be changed to use the internal UTF-8 to UTF-16
conversion routines.
To be safe, the unicodeToMbcs needs to determine which codepage to
Brodie Thiesfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be safe, the unicodeToMbcs needs to determine which codepage to
convert to in the WideCharToMultiByte calls. This is done by calling the
AreFileApisANSI() http://snipurl.com/arefileapisansi like:
UINT codepage = AreFileApisANSI() ? CP_ACP :
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 04:03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My compiler does not define CP_OEM. Can somebody please tell me
what the literal value of that macro is?
I think, the name of the constant is CP_OEMCP, its value is 1. Don't have a
CP_OEM on my disk.
- Uwe
Uwe Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 04:03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My compiler does not define CP_OEM. Can somebody please tell me
what the literal value of that macro is?
I think, the name of the constant is CP_OEMCP,
Yes. I figured that out
One of the strengths of SQLite is having the flexability to
hook it up to any language you like. But it would make life easier
for everyone if there was some sort of standard built-in simple
scripting language to create stored procedures and custom functions
within the standard SQLite distro to
I'd be surprised if a port to a non-mainstream OS was available for free,
but you never know. This may be your best bet:
see 6.0 Custom Modifications
http://www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/prosupport.html
--- panslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that SQLite was written in C and I'm sure it's
33 matches
Mail list logo
