Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 15:24 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
- I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 18:29 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The real solution is a tree for offset lookups, and a linear walk of order
O(1) for subsequent sequential accesses.
Walking a tree is usually a cheap operation, unless the tree is wrongly
designed. You just need to remember the current
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix memory leak in Linux builds.
This one seems to break outgoing IPv4 connects (on a dualstacked Squid)
bzr trunk revision 8902 fails with
| While trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.heise.de/
|
| The following error was
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 00:16 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I care about every potential cause of trouble in squid. Particularly
avoidable ones that pop up all the time. 'Zero errors' policy and all that.
It may be that this is fixable by setting the first byte of the buffer
to '\0'. I'm just
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 23:20 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Fix memory leak in Linux builds.
bb:approve
bb:approve
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 00:03 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Replace a goto with do-while.
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 21:29 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 15:24 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
- I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only
The following page has been changed by Amos Jeffries:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SourceLayout?action=diffrev2=9rev1=8
Original:
Question: Can we remove Foo prefix from FOO/!FooSomething.h file
names? The prefix carries no additional information and is probably
not required for
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 13:57 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 23:20 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Fix memory leak in Linux builds.
bb:comment
Just testing whether voting works now. Please ignore.
Alex.
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 14:30 -0600, Bundle Buggy wrote:
Submitter Alex Rousskov [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not
have voting rights
Nope.
Alex.
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 00:16 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I care about every potential cause of trouble in squid. Particularly
avoidable ones that pop up all the time. 'Zero errors' policy and all that.
It may be that this is fixable by setting the first byte of the
Alex Rousskov wrote:
The following page has been changed by Amos Jeffries:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SourceLayout?action=diffrev2=9rev1=8
Original:
Question: Can we remove Foo prefix from FOO/!FooSomething.h file
names? The prefix carries no additional information and is probably
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 11:25 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 18:29 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The real solution is a tree for offset lookups, and a linear walk of order
O(1) for subsequent sequential accesses.
Walking a tree is usually a cheap operation, unless the
Robert Henrik,
Some of us have found a knowledge-hole in the bzr revert process.
We can easily reverse a patch using for example:
bzr revert -r 8902
But then when its fixed we don't know how to undo the undo.
The local branch is left with code apparently up-to-date but is actually
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
Oh drat. I mis-configured my new test setup. Sorry.
Revision 8903 has had a more careful set of tests done and fixes that
problem.
Confirmed. At least I think so, there was quite some trial and error
involved to force the dreaded bzr to sync the trees again
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:29 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
The following page has been changed by Amos Jeffries:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SourceLayout?action=diffrev2=9rev1=8
Original:
Question: Can we remove Foo prefix from FOO/!FooSomething.h file
16 matches
Mail list logo
