Well, I based my argument from the 10 instances of reverse proxies
I'm running. It has 266,268,230 objects and 3.7 TB of space. CPU
usage is always around 0.2 according to ganglia. So unless you have
some other statistics to prove CPU is that important, I'm stick w/ my
argument that disk
On mån, 2008-07-07 at 07:34 -0300, Michel wrote:
ok, reverse proxy does not so very much, so sure it depends on what you do
with the
machine
The known configurations which can easily push Squid to CPU bound limits
is
a) reverse proxy setups with a reasonably small but very frequently
On lör, 2008-07-05 at 12:44 -0300, Michel wrote:
I am not understanding why you keep suggesting single core as preferred cpu
Did I? Not what I can tell.
I said Squid uses only one core.
even if squid's core is actually not multi-thread capable a faster cpu is
better -
there are also other
The cpu doesn't do any IO, it's WAITING for the disk most of the
time. If you want fast squid performance, CPU speed/count is
irrelevant; get more disks and ram. When I mean more disk, I mean
more spindles. eg: 2x 100GB will is better than a 200GB disk.
well well, get prepared ... take
On lör, 2008-07-05 at 12:44 -0300, Michel wrote:
I am not understanding why you keep suggesting single core as preferred cpu
Did I? Not what I can tell.
I said Squid uses only one core.
:) good answer ... but often it does not matter what we say but what is beeing
understood, what I
* Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
diskd also isn't very cpu hungry. In fact probably a bit less than aufs.
But diskd can not push the drives as far as aufs, and is still plauged
some instability issues..
So you say aufs is defacto FASTER than diskd?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des
2008/7/6 Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Until I see any numbers indicating quad core gives a significant
increase outperforming what the same price configuration using dual core
I will continue propagating that quad core is not beneficial to Squid.
My numbers here say, if your Squid
Well, I based my argument from the 10 instances of reverse proxies
I'm running. It has 266,268,230 objects and 3.7 TB of space. CPU
usage is always around 0.2 according to ganglia. So unless you have
some other statistics to prove CPU is that important, I'm stick w/ my
argument that disk and
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 12:04 +0800, Roy M. wrote:
We are planning to replace this testing server with two or three
cheaper 1U servers (sort of redundancy!)
Intel Dual Core or Quad Core CPU x1 (no SMP)
Squid uses only one core, so rather Dual core than Quad...
I am not understanding why
Michel wrote:
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 12:04 +0800, Roy M. wrote:
We are planning to replace this testing server with two or three
cheaper 1U servers (sort of redundancy!)
Intel Dual Core or Quad Core CPU x1 (no SMP)
Squid uses only one core, so rather Dual core than Quad...
I am not
At 12:09 PM 7/5/2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
Michel wrote:
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 12:04 +0800, Roy M. wrote:
We are planning to replace this testing server with two or three
cheaper 1U servers (sort of redundancy!)
Intel Dual Core or Quad Core CPU x1 (no SMP)
Squid uses only one core, so
Squid is IO and memory bounded, not cpu bounded. Use the CPU money to
buy more RAM/disks
mike
At 12:09 PM 7/5/2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
Michel wrote:
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 12:04 +0800, Roy M. wrote:
We are planning to replace this testing server with two or three
cheaper 1U servers (sort
Squid is IO and memory bounded, not cpu bounded. Use the CPU money to
buy more RAM/disks
guess who is doing the IO ... :)
and get yourself a pricelist, the diff between X2 and phenom is irrelevant and
whatever, hardware is cheap
michel
The cpu doesn't do any IO, it's WAITING for the disk most of the
time. If you want fast squid performance, CPU speed/count is
irrelevant; get more disks and ram. When I mean more disk, I mean
more spindles. eg: 2x 100GB will is better than a 200GB disk.
mike
At 01:51 PM 7/5/2008, Michel
lör 2008-07-05 klockan 17:51 -0300 skrev Michel:
and get yourself a pricelist, the diff between X2 and phenom is irrelevant and
whatever, hardware is cheap
True, but the wattage difference is not irrelevant. For the lifetime of
the server that adds up quite significantly in power and cooling.
Hi all,
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Henrik Nordstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The fastest quad core Opteron you can get is the Opteron 2360 SE at
2.5GHz. The fastest dual core Opteron is the Opteron 2224 SE at 3.2GHz.
Regards
Henrik
Why you guy need such a fast Squid?
I believe
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 12:04 +0800, Roy M. wrote:
We are planning to replace this testing server with two or three
cheaper 1U servers (sort of redundancy!)
Intel Dual Core or Quad Core CPU x1 (no SMP)
Squid uses only one core, so rather Dual core than Quad...
4GB DDR2 800 RAM
500GB or
Hi,
On 7/3/08, Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 12:04 +0800, Roy M. wrote:
Squid uses only one core, so rather Dual core than Quad...
But will it help if I am using external redirector? (Currently I don't
but maybe later)
For Squid it's easier with JBOD
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 22:11 +0800, Roy M. wrote:
Squid uses only one core, so rather Dual core than Quad...
But will it help if I am using external redirector? (Currently I don't
but maybe later)
url rewriters generally do not use a lot of CPU.
If I only have 2 slots of disks, should I
19 matches
Mail list logo
