Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:36:25AM +0100, laurent bernabe wrote: Hello, thank you Aleksey, - As I am under Xubuntu 11.10, and I have already a package installer, I did not try to install package kit. - I've done the sweets sdk installation without error : wget

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread laurent bernabe
Ok, I did not install Package Kit, because I had done it once before, and the result was that I got two packages managers in my system instead of only one. Is there a way to install missing dependencies without package kit ? regards Le 11 mars 2012 12:07, Aleksey Lim alsr...@sugarlabs.org a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:55:41PM +0100, laurent bernabe wrote: Ok, I did not install Package Kit, because I had done it once before, and the result was that I got two packages managers in my system instead of only one. Is there a way to install missing dependencies without package kit ?

Re: [Sugar-devel] New Icon for Deducto

2012-03-11 Thread Walter Bender
2012/3/10 Ariel Calzada ar...@activitycentral.com: Hi! We needed to change Deducto icon because the svg had an image embedded, so SUGAR couldn't colorish it when user clicked in it. We remade the icon. Also we have to modify activity.info because it had an old syntax style that don't let

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread laurent bernabe
Ok, so I installed gnome-packagekit, then Sugar SDK 0.84 But I have two troubleshoots : - I have no way to log off the sugar emulator (version 0.84) - The terminal activity seems to take a lot of time to start (I cancelled it) Regards Le 11 mars 2012 13:05, Aleksey Lim

Re: [Sugar-devel] Butia 2.0 first tests

2012-03-11 Thread Chris Leonard
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, We have some progress with the butia 2.0 platform [1], including some related to the new board I / O USB4bot [2] Is working the motors of the robot, an example video: 

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:49:45PM +0100, laurent bernabe wrote: Ok, so I installed gnome-packagekit, then Sugar SDK 0.84 But I have two troubleshoots : - I have no way to log off the sugar emulator (version 0.84) Thats because sugar-0.84 was relying on Hal for such work. Hal was

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread laurent bernabe
Hello, The problem with the emulator (0.84 version) is that it is in *fullscreen mode* : can I launch it in a little window, as with the new sweets emulator ? Regards Le 11 mars 2012 15:55, Aleksey Lim alsr...@sugarlabs.org a écrit : On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:49:45PM +0100, laurent bernabe

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
On 03/11/2012 08:13 AM, laurent bernabe wrote: Hello, The problem with the emulator (0.84 version) is that it is in *fullscreen mode* : can I launch it in a little window, as with the new sweets emulator ?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
On 03/11/2012 07:55 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:49:45PM +0100, laurent bernabe wrote: Ok, so I installed gnome-packagekit, then Sugar SDK 0.84 But I have two troubleshoots : - I have no way to log off the sugar emulator (version 0.84) Thats because sugar-0.84 was

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread laurent bernabe
Thank you, I managed with the command sweets sdk/sugar:emulator=0.84 -i 800x600 Le 11 mars 2012 16:29, Aleksey Lim alsr...@sugarlabs.org a écrit : On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:13:31PM +0100, laurent bernabe wrote: Hello, The problem with the emulator (0.84 version) is that it is in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread laurent bernabe
Thank you, I've fixed the problem (with 800x600 window size) Le 11 mars 2012 16:34, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com a écrit : ** http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/The_Undiscoverable#Sugar-Emulator_Screen_Size_Adjustment Regards -- Aleksey

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sweets 0.86 ?

2012-03-11 Thread laurent bernabe
But the table says that Terminal should work for all Sugar versions ? (yes*yes31) The log activity does not work either, but that seems normal according to the table (no yes 23) Le 11 mars 2012 16:36, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com a écrit : On 03/11/2012 07:55 AM, Aleksey Lim

[Sugar-devel] Disable the XO keyboard

2012-03-11 Thread Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez
Hello, I've a XO with a broken keyboard (writes: ] steadily) I have to wait a week to send to fix, and I thought I could connect an external keyboard so I have to disable the internal keyboard... ¿Somebody can help me to disable the XO keyboard? Thanks! Sorry, my English isn't good...

Re: [Sugar-devel] Disable the XO keyboard

2012-03-11 Thread Walter Bender
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez a...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hello, I've a XO with a broken keyboard (writes: ] steadily) I have to wait a week to send to fix, and I thought I could connect an external keyboard so I have to disable the internal keyboard...

Re: [Sugar-devel] Disable the XO keyboard

2012-03-11 Thread Paul Fox
walter wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez a...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hello, I've a XO with a broken keyboard (writes: ] steadily) I have to wait a week to send to fix, and I thought I could connect an external keyboard so I have to disable the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Implode activity patches, maintainership and release

2012-03-11 Thread joe
Hi Manuel, Sorry, I've been meaning to review the patches, but I haven't had time to get a testing environment set up. I've added you to the repo, so you should be able to review and commit now. Thanks, -- Joe Manuq, Great if you can help with maintainership. Joe, Can you give access to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Disable the XO keyboard

2012-03-11 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Looking for other alternatives, can anybody confirm if the keyboard in the XO-1.5 and in the XO-1 are the same or compatible? Gonzalo On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote: walter wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez

Re: [Sugar-devel] Disable the XO keyboard

2012-03-11 Thread Paul Fox
gonzalo wrote: Looking for other alternatives, can anybody confirm if the keyboard in the XO-1.5 and in the XO-1 are the same or compatible? compatible. some are the same, but all are compatible. for 1.75, it's a little more complicated -- i'm not sure whether the old XO-1 ALPS touchpad is

[Sugar-devel] Bulletin Boards

2012-03-11 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
We have recently started work on a new activity, which we called Noteboard [1]. I have since discovered that there is a very similar concept mentioned in the Sugar HIG, Bulletin Boards [2]. Is this idea implemented anywhere? I don't want us duplicating effort. If it doesn't exist, does anyone

Re: [Sugar-devel] Disable the XO keyboard

2012-03-11 Thread Danny Iland
I'm thinking one solution for Augustin could be a small activity that had two buttons. One button would Disable Keyboard when clicked, which would execute the commands you gave. The other would Enable Keyboard. Each would just trigger the appropriate commands via os.system() . Can a sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Disable the XO keyboard

2012-03-11 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
And a option in the control panel?? Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:05:41 -0700 From: il...@cs.ucsb.edu To: p...@laptop.org CC: a...@sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; walter.ben...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Disable the XO keyboard I'm thinking one solution for Augustin could

Re: [Sugar-devel] Implode activity patches, maintainership and release

2012-03-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Joe, do will an XO-1.75 be a good testing environment? :-) It's easy to apply for one... cheers, m On Mar 11, 2012 3:34 PM, j...@jotaro.com wrote: Hi Manuel, Sorry, I've been meaning to review the patches, but I haven't had time to get a testing environment set up. I've added you to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Butia 2.0 first tests

2012-03-11 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
The most expensive is the motors.. We use Dynamixel AX-12.. The board: use a 18F pic that is relative cheap and the circuit can be made with your hands.. http://www.fing.edu.uy/inco/proyectos/butia/mediawiki/index.php/Usb4butia

Re: [Sugar-devel] virtual appliances are virtualiser specific?

2012-03-11 Thread James Cameron
Okay, so it is probably worth referring to them as virtual appliances alone, rather than VirtualBox virtual appliances. No need to constrain their use to only VirtualBox. Thanks, but I wasn't asking how you made them, but what they could be used on. On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:48:03AM -0800,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Implode activity patches, maintainership and release

2012-03-11 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Thanks Joe. I hope we can count with you when you have more time! Gonzalo 2012/3/11 j...@jotaro.com Hi Manuel, Sorry, I've been meaning to review the patches, but I haven't had time to get a testing environment set up. I've added you to the repo, so you should be able to review and commit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse is old

2012-03-11 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 3 March 2012 23:52, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@laptop.org.au wrote: Browse is old and not useful for a lot of newer content. Our communities are creating content in HTML5, an effort that we want to encourage. However, Browse is based on the Gecko in engine in Firefox 3.6, which is far