The Short Version: As many of you might have noticed, my activities within
Sugar Labs have been fading lately. I'd like to take the only responsible
step and hand my responsibilities off.
The Long Version: I didn't expect to see myself writing this email. I'm
currently a student at Olin working
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Reinier,
On 20 Jul 2010, at 00:45, Reinier Heeres wrote:
Hi Gary,
I agree that the AstParser class is a bit scary, but I still believe
it's a good ingredient for Calculate: it allows us to do symbolic
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 20-07-2010 a las 03:07 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió:
rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and
we could use some testing.
You can get it from here
Hi all,
I'd like us to get a coherent way in terms of user interfaces for
creating Sugar on a Stick on as many distributions as possible. I do
have a first iteration of such a release using Fedora's LiveUSB
Creator ready and need some testers with - preferably different -
distributions. There are
Here are the minutes (follow the link at the bottom for the logs):
http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100719_1506.html
Bernie, what's the state of the VM we had been talking about for Mel
and me (I'd really like to have a real bot there).
Points raised:
* Raffael asked
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 09:37 -0400, Frederick Grose escribió:
Anything else we would like feedback on?
Please also consider http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/503.
I don't know... if we drop the Restart
Sorry that it took me a bit to reply. Catching up on email backlog
once again. I dropped a couple of replies inline. :)
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Sebastian Dziallas's message of Sun Jun 27 21:07:11 +0200 2010:
I've
I've been working on an integration of Smolt
(https://fedorahosted.org/smolt/) into Sugar as part of my GSoC. The
purpose of this is to help us gather information about the hardware
Sugar is running on, as well as to help users filing bug reports to
simplify the process of providing said
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Thomas C Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
I just made a 4 GB USB with persistence from soas-i386-20100623.03.iso
In testing:
Read 86, it still fails to start
log showed unable to find/open evince
[...]
Read does not work because the way it
I'm moving this from IAEP to sugar-devel. Aleksey, do you have an idea
what's going on here? I haven't tried GCompris in SoaS lately, but
could this be 0sugar-related?
--Sebastian
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Werner Westermann werne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, regards from Chile.
Working
releases and look forward to working with you!
Please email the SoaS list or our release team with any concerns.
--Sebastian Dziallas
[1] http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100607_1510.html
[2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/SoaS_Activity_Criteria
[3]
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go
Regards
Harriet
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
wrote:
Hi Sean,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastian, I guess you want to drop the name we had chosen together
previously, Cloudberry? If you remember we
We'd like to kick off the process for the upcoming Sugar on a Stick
v.4 already, while gearing up for the SoaS PR at LinuxTag, too. And so
we're looking forward to your ideas and suggestions on the codename
and colour selections for the next release iteration. These will be
discussed at the next
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:22 PM, samy boutayeb s.bouta...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
I tried to use the Read activity (version 86) in Mirabelle (either
running from within Virtualbox on a USB stick) and got the following
error: Failed to start.
However, the same activity (same version) do launch
the people
involved for their awesome work on this release!
Sebastian Dziallas
Sugar on a Stick Project Lead
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
Yes it has jabber.sugarlabs.org in Control Panel / Network
It looks very much like this, which seems to be pretty much a blocker,
yup: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585413
Tom Gilliard
satellit
Hi folks,
I have been busy lately and will continue to be for the next couple of
weeks. However, summer possibility exploration happens, too. So. Here's
a GSoC proposal. Comments appreciated! :)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/Improved_Sugar_on_a_Stick
Cheers!
--Sebastian
Hi all,
as you may have noticed, there are a couple of changes coming to Sugar
on a Stick to keep the whole project sustainable. In the upcoming month,
from March 28 (I'll be off starting Sunday night) to May 7, my ability
to devote time to the project will cease. I have to prepare for my
SoaS engineering just proposed a major change-in-direction for the
upcoming (Mirabelle) release. See
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2010-March/000906.html and
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2010-March/002727.html for
more information - the short version is that instead
Art Hunkins wrote:
I am unable to test my activities (Our Music, Our Music MC) on recent daily
builds because Browse doesn't work, and other USB drives are not recognized.
(The neighborhood view shows nothing except me.) These are my only ready
ways of getting activities into the system.
Art Hunkins wrote:
Can we be certain that csound-python is included, please?
Art Hunkins
This is SoaS related, I'd say (and not for Sugar itself).
As stated in a previous e-mail, I've pushed an appropriate commit
earlier [1]. If you want to make sure, you can check the current
kickstart
Art Hunkins wrote:
It would be most helpful to me to know whether SoaS v3 will be called
Cloudberry or something else.
This was the original plan, as far as I'm aware. However, the final
release name will be determined through consideration of the various
involved teams, such as the Marketing
Daniel Drake wrote:
On 22 February 2010 03:13, Tomeu Vizosoto...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
You may want to ask in the soas ml, but in 0.88 we are going to make
it easier to users to change the default font size, so apps shouldn't
make any assumptions based on a fixed value for that.
But, in
I've a conflict coming up for the next weeks with our current meeting
time and would need to start something like half an hour later.
If you're interested in attending, please take a second to put down when
you're available here: http://whenisgood.net/fedora-sugar-mtg-1
Make sure to select
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 12.02.2010, at 12:11, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1],
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558617
This should also depend on #520294.
- Bert -
Cool! Wasn't aware
James Cameron wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
In other news, we're being blocked by licensing issues for some
activities and the boot screen, as I've posted before.
I've recently submitted patches to bugs.sugarlabs.org for two activities
because we
Hi all,
I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1],
as well as the activity wiki page [2]. Recently, TamTam has been posted
for review, too. I'm a little disappointed with the speed we're
progressing with.
Here's a list of the currently most important things we need
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi folks,
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
licensed. I'd like
Tim McNamara wrote:
On 13 February 2010 09:15, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
mailto:sebast...@when.com wrote:
If nobody complains by the end of this weekend, I'll just upload the
images, put a GPLv2+ license in the archive and make a tarball, as this
is what they've been
Title says it all, it should be in tomorrows build.
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
James Cameron wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:13:40PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Title says it all, it should be in tomorrows build.
Briefly, how do I swing across to this on an OLPC XO-1.5 that is
installed with an OLPC F11 build? (There are several problems I'm
investigating where
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi folks,
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
licensed. I'd like to encourage activity authors
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.12.2009, at 00:57, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.12.2009, at 00:22, James Cameron wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:11:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
The changes look okay, though I'd just remove the read-only check,
that should make it work on both Mac OS
Please join us in #sugar-meeting tomorrow - directly after the SLOBs
meeting (so around 1600 UTC) - for a SoaS meeting. Topic will obviously
be the future of SoaS for v3.
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Hi all,
thanks everybody for attending! It was a great with cool questions and
discussions. We're currently readying the logs, notes and docs which Mel
logged in a GIT repo. So if you're interested in a practical step by
step guide, looking at the repository would already be a good start.
The
Hi Wade,
thanks a lot for sharing your concerns that openly! I've dropped a few
comments inline...
Wade Brainerd wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
I'm concerned that you guys are planning to require activity authors
to package their activities in Fedora, in order to see them shipped in
SoaS. Is this
This is it. First meeting after some time, quite some folks joined.
Thanks to all those who dropped by! Here are the minutes and logs:
http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.minutes.20091231_1013.html
http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.log.20091231_1013.html
Next
Walter Bender wrote:
What channel? #fedora-edu? #sugar-meeting?
Oh, right! I'd say let's just go for #fedora-olpc for now...
See you there!
--Sebastian
-walter
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com
wrote:
Hi all,
you've probably heard the rumor, that
Hi everybody,
by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though (this will change
in the
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi everybody,
by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though
Hi all,
you've probably heard the rumor, that SoaS v3 will only ship Fedora
packages. Now let me tell you this: It's true.
What this means is that we can use a lot of help with packaging all
kinds of crazy-awesome activities and other stuff for Fedora - which
will get a Sugar environment with
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though (this
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
Confirmed that Read v78 has a jumpy cursor issue which can be
avoided by reverting back to v77.
Can't reproduce crash yet (trying to get hold of a F12 based system).
I can reproduce it using v77, too. The log is here: pastebin.be/22280
--Sebastian
-sdg-
On Thu,
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
Confirmed that Read v78 has a jumpy cursor issue which can be
avoided by reverting back to v77.
Can't reproduce crash yet (trying to get hold of a F12 based system).
I can reproduce it using v77, too. The log is here: pastebin.be/22280
Sean DALY wrote:
My call is we leave them out and concentrate on the wiki page.
(http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/ebooks). We can't keep
slipping the master as I'm sure you'll agree Sebastian :-)
+1 - to both! :) That's really reasonable.
Ideally, the default Browse homepage
Hi all,
this is a very quick update on the current state of SoaS v2.
We discovered on Tuesday that we wouldn't be able to ship content due to
legal concerns that was originally intended to be included and discussed
how to proceed in the last two days. Specifically, we won't include
anything
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 24.11.2009, at 22:13, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
new snapshot ready for you. It includes a lot of fixes and smaller
Sean DALY wrote:
that's the thing, there are no .img and .crc files for soas05xo that I can
find?
True, actually (sorry for the confusion). There are currently some
issues with the image creation for the XO, which just need to be worked
around (no big deal, really not) - we just need to get
Carlo Falciola wrote:
Hi,
I think that customization support is going to be an key point for Sugar/SOAS
deployement efforts and for nanaging relationship with field structures. So
I'm trying to start an effort in order to write down in as much as possible
detail all the potentially
Sean DALY wrote:
I did manage to generate the .img and .crc files with the
live-iso-t-xo.sh script, but after successful nand-copy of
soas05xo.img the XO-1 does not boot, freezes at avatar with no dots
:-(
Sorry for the late reply. I was a bit busy with writing docs and fixing
bugs over the
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
new snapshot ready for you. It includes a lot of fixes and smaller
adjustments. It's currently only available as a general .iso build,
others will
Jim Simmons wrote:
Aleksey,
It would be helpful to have a way to distribute things like the
gstreamer espeak plugin you wrote. Fedora doesn't currently include
it. It would be even better if you could distribute versions that
work on the XO running .82, as well as versions for current
Sorry for the late reply... I'm quite behind my e-mail. :/
Just add --nogpg to your yum call, and it should work for now. We're
looking to get this generally to work in Blueberry.
--Sebastian
Art Hunkins wrote:
I'd really appreciate a response about this.
On sticks make with snapshots
Hi everybody,
after considering input from the various teams involved in Sugar Labs
and the Sugar on a Stick creation, we're shifting the SoaS as followed.
2009-11-17 Fedora 12 Final Release
in the time between: wiki documentation must be readied!
2009-11-29 Image Gold Master Creation
The file /etc/fedora-release might be where you want to look...
--Sebastian
Art Hunkins wrote:
I can't seem to find either the lsb_release command, or a file by that name.
Typing lsb_release in the Terminal gives me file not found.
Find doesn't locate the file either, nor does a listing of
Art Hunkins wrote:
Please do include csound-python. I'd like my new activities to work right
out of the box.
On a side-note, we've already included it in the latest SoaS snapshots,
so it'll make it's way into the Blueberry release.
--Sebastian
Hopefully, doing so will also encourage others
Hi all,
here's the next snapshot on our way to SoaS v2 Blueberry. This one fixes
some issues and introduces new features, namely:
* the updated FoodForce2, Slideruler and SocialCalc activities
* the gtk-recordmydesktop tool - execute it from the terminal
* new sample content - Alice's
). However, it
looks like when Kernel Mode Setting is enabled (which is the case by
default), the screen might vanish. Not yet sure what's causing it...
--Sebastian
Art Hunkins
- Original Message - From: Sebastian Dziallas
sebast...@when.com
To: SoaS s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; Sugar Devel
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce the availability of a new SoaS snapshot! We're
only one month away from our release, so testing is very much
appreciated to find the latest blockers now.
Get your copy from here: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/
This release incorporates the
Hi everybody,
there is a new, true SoaS snapshot ready for you, awaiting testing. You
can grab it here: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/
Note that the XO images have apparently an issue (my fault!), which
prevents them from booting, but will be addressed in the next build.
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 14:59, Rawhide Reportrawh...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Compose started at Sat Oct 10 06:15:04 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
konversation-1.2-1.fc12.i686 requires
to these efforts,
--Sebastian Dziallas
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
David Farning wrote:
As promised, we have started work on the XO operating system SIG at
Sugar Labs. The SIG pages are at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Xoos .
Based on feedback from the current developers working in this space,
the most valuable starting point will be to start making daily
Hi all,
so here it is, finally, a mailing list for the Sugar on a Stick project.
If you're interested in its future, technical discussions or just want
to talk about ideas you've, this is the place to go!
Jump in, say hi and introduce yourself - that's it.
Join the fun here:
Mel Chua wrote:
There's a lot going on in this thread, so here is my attempt to
summarize discussions so far. If I've missed or misstated anything, my
apologies - and it's a wiki, so go fix it. ;-)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugar_on_a_Stick
By my count, there are 4 things we need to
Chris Ball wrote:
Please volunteer by replying to this mail if you're interested, and
please do so by Thursday September 24th so that we can run the vote
at the Friday September 25th SLOBs meeting.
Thanks!
- Chris.
Thanks for getting this process off the ground! :)
Well, I'd obviously
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com:
Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an
official answer on this. Soon.
Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs
just a volunteer. I don't get money for this.
--Sebastian
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org
mailto:d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/16 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org mailto:d...@laptop.org:
2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
mailto:sebast
mailing list.
* We establish the SoaS development team.
Thanks,
Sebastian Dziallas
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Sean DALY wrote:
Sebastian, what's your take? Can we retire SoaS-{1,2,3} or fold them
into the public v1, v2 numbers?
Okay, let me shed some light in here, though I think this has already
been discussed in length.
In the early days when I started working on SoaS, we still had internal
builds
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:47:21PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
sebast...@when.com wrote:
Short Term Action Items:
* We create a SoaS mailing list.
* We establish the SoaS development team.
if you split off sugar
Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
re marketing course: in fact I have accepted Mel's invitation to do a
classroom for Fedora.
Congratulations.
re logos: Strawberry=6, Blueberry=4, and 5 we'll use some other time
Very clear - thanks.
[Have
From looking at the currently available documentation for Sugar on a
Stick, I think it makes sense to collaborate on writing well written
official instructions for it. So I've entered a Blueprint in Launchpad
on it: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/soas/+spec/better-docs-for-soas
I'd like to
David Farning wrote:
The project guidelines are now on the wiki at
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Project_Guidelines .
Please edit as necessary. When it looks like the editing has
stopped, I ask the board the ratify the guidelines.
david
I just looked into this, sorry for the
As announced before, the SoaS QA test day [1] is coming up quickly and
will already take place tomorrow. We're still looking for people willing
to join the team, which will support the testers in #fedora-test-day.
If you'd like to jump on the train, please enter your availability here
[2] so
Greetings,
sorry for the late notice and the cross-post. This test day will focus
on Sugar Labs' Sugar on a Stick, a downstream project based on Fedora.
Sugar on a Stick has launched it's first version codenamed Strawberry
successfully in June and has recently announced the beta release of its
Hi everybody,
as noted in our roadmap for Sugar on a Stick [1], we are going to have a
joint test day with the folks from Fedora's Quality Assurance [2] to
improve the quality of SoaS on its way to version 2 (in November).
The test day is scheduled to take place on September 3, which is this
Dave Bauer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
mailto:sebast...@when.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've a new SoaS snapshot ready for testing. Here are the major changes:
- We just made the switch to Rawhide (which is supposed to become F12
Hi everybody,
with the imminent release of the SoaS v2 Beta in just ten days, I would
like to announce the switch to Launchpad as our bug tracker.
We have been evaluating an instance Luke Faraone set us up with lately
and are confident that it will fit our needs. The upcoming beta release
is
The SoaS v2 Beta Readiness Meeting is going to take place on Sunday,
August 23, 1400 UTC (making it 1000 EDT and 1600 CEST) in
#sugar-meeting. Looking forward to seeing everybody there!
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Just a quick heads-up to note that daily builds of our education spin
based on Rawhide are available thanks to the great work of the Infra
Spin SIG folks.
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
Those builds conclude what is supposed to become the Fedora Education
Spin for F12
to send bugreports(especially for
non-tech users), so if someone interested in please pick [1] up.
From what I've seen on IRC, Sebastian Dziallas is currently working on a
solution, either by porting Apport to Sugar, using GNOME's bug-buddy, or the
Fedora bug reporter. (still
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
Regarding getting auto-login to work after restarting X.
Yesterday I looked at the slim sources and it seems at first sight easy
to add auto login of the default user after the first login.
Any interest in me trying to implement this?
If we use an extra option to slim
Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:46:50PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
A few lines up from the last boot message, it says:
mount: unknown filesystem type 'jffs2'
That can't be a good sign.
This is indeed not a good sign. We've had this some time ago with the
Rawhide-XO
Hi everybody,
we've a new snapshot ready for you including the latest Sugar 0.85.2
release (except etoys, which is still being packaged). Also, this
release ships now with the firstboot wizard, as discussed during FUDCon.
The latter one allows you to change your keyboard settings before
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've a new snapshot ready for you including the latest Sugar 0.85.2
release (except etoys, which is still being packaged). Also, this
release ships now with the firstboot wizard, as discussed during FUDCon.
The latter one allows you to change your
Hi everybody,
as I've recently mentioned on-list SoaS now ships firstboot, which is a
tool to configure some system-related stuff at... well, first boot! ;)
So as this is usually quite Fedora-branded and since we aren't able to
ship that trademarked logo, it would be great if we could get some
Hi everybody,
I'm looking for some volunteers to test the hard disk installation with
the latest SoaS snapshot and newly designed installer. Since this
upstream project is really in the early stages of development but also
concerns a pretty critical part of SoaS, I'd prefer getting some
Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:11:31PM +0930, Bill Kerr wrote:
The sticks I have with SD cards have started to fail on the older
computers
at school (after working ok for 2 weeks of lessons). But they still work
fine on my newer Dell mini inspiron.
The older ones are not
Hi everybody,
I'm very happy to announce the availability of a new SoaS snapshot,
today now especially with the latest Sugar release 0.85.3, freshly off
the press (thanks to all the devs packagers here)!
This release includes a number of new features, awaiting to be tested!
* SoaS switches
this working by yourself?
Yup, fixed! :)
Thanks,
--Sebastian
Regards,
Tomeu
Thanks,
--Sebastian Dziallas for the SoaS Team
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
to
work again, any help is greatly appreciated. We can also provide the
current snapshot pre-built as an .iso file, if required.
Feel free to contact me directly, too.
Thanks,
--Sebastian Dziallas for the SoaS Team
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
Caroline Meeks wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com
mailto:g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 29 Jul 2009, at 21:35, Walter Bender wrote:
Begin handwaving.
LiveUSB came from the world of LiveCD and with it came an overlay
Philippe Clérié wrote:
Fedora 11 works just fine. As soon as I've resolved my wireless
problem (the Mini 110 uses a Broadcom chip and I missed that before
placing the order.) I'll install Sugar and give that a try.
Hi Philippe,
thanks for your continuous tries and reports here - those are
to make them depend on
our tracker: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=EducationTracker
Thanks,
Sebastian Dziallas for the Education SIG
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Sorry for the short notice, but please join if you can. That's in half
an hour from now! Topics will include the roadmap features for v2.
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Well, that's certainly understandable, given that I rushed the whole
thing quite a bit. 30 Minutes is not that much time... ;)
Fred was still quicker with posting the logs... thanks!
--Sebastian
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Sorry I missed this one. Will the minutes be published
Bryan Berry wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 07:45 +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
Our current trac instance is missing some basic functionality:
- versions per component: a really simple enhancement would be to have a
text field (maybe some versions (sugar core) you can select from) but
Dave Bauer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 16:05, Greg Smithgregsmit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I created a Feature request for backup and restore here:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Back_Up_and_Restore
Greg Smith wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
Looks great! You guys are really cranking.
Three questions:
1 - Where do I see all the Features that have been proposed,
regardless of target release?
Speaking for SoaS? Heh. ;)
I tried to list some under Preliminary Features (v2) on the Roadmap
page. Then
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
