Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote:
I'd also like to know which rl cards these are. Can you send the output
of pciconf -lv?
Glad to oblige
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x13011186 chip=0x13001186 rev=0x10
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'D-Link System Inc'
device = 'DL 10038C or
The specific command I ran was iperf -i 1 -N -d -P3 -c 192.168.0.1 -
from the options on my Gentoo box, -d says it does a bidirectional test
simultaneously, testing (I presumed) duplex.
ah yeah, it is full duplex with that option. I assumed you were doing
nothing but a -c and -s.
rl's
Chris Buechler wrote:
hah Well...that's probably the best you can get on that. :) With rl
NIC's at least, since they're interrupt happy.
Wow. That was certainly it. Ran top and showed 0% idle CPU with over
70% interrupt dedicated to interrupts and ~25% system. I knew the RL
NICs were
On 8/18/05, Randy B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
Not unless you're running both a client and server at each end.
Unfortunately, not the case -
Yes it is. iperf doesn't test full duplex, it's one direction only
(with one connection, run a server and a client on each side
I'd also like to know which rl cards these are. Can you send the output
of pciconf -lv?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:31 AM
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] iperf question
On 8/18/05, Randy
subnet24/subnet
bridge/
enable/
/opt1
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Randy B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. August 2005 04:51
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] iperf
On 8/17/05, Randy B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this isn't likely the best forum for this question, but please
bear with me.
I've been seeing a lot of these iperf comments/questions, and decided to
try to track down why my connection to my home firewall seems *so slow*.
Installed the
