why
?
just
wash it
Neil
-Original Message-From: Richard Keith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2005 2:41
PMTo: Biofuel@sustainablelists.orgSubject: [Biofuel]
Reprocessing Biodiesel
Hi All, I posed this question back on the 5th and didn't get
any
Hi Keith
Inherent human laziness and egoism are a woefully inadequate explanation for
corporate predation
Absolutely. If I have somehow conveyed this through my words, I will
work more carefully in the future to be more clear.
Whatever your intention, you didn't talk about many aspects of
Link for free stickers at;
http://www.chelseagreen.com/2004/items/biodiesel/BumperSticker
More news; Willie Nelson opens new Biodiesel pump in South Carolina
http://www.biodiesel.org/news/events/SC_TruckStop/default.shtm
Myk Hill
Environmental Builder Professional
Mike,
Very interesting idea. If you try this or get
information, please post to the list.
Thanks,
Tony Marzolino
Berkshire, NY
--- robert luis rabello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike wrote:
H, what's process through customs for buying a
car
in Canada and driving it back to the US
Hi Marc
Hi Keith
Inherent human laziness and egoism are a woefully inadequate
explanation for corporate predation
Absolutely. If I have somehow conveyed this through my words, I
will work more carefully in the future to be more clear.
Whatever your intention, you didn't talk about many
Richard,
No reprocessing should be necessary. If all the little bits came from
skimmings from wash stages or accumulations from base reactions then
they've already been processed suffciently.
Take a sample and wash it. If it separates quickly and cleanly there
should be no reason to be
Mel,
Your fuel filter must be have no bypass ability, should be of the same
micron as the original fuel filter for your vehicle and all of the fuel that is
used should be pre filtered to a micron smaller than the fuel filter.
As an example my original fuel filter is 10 micron so my new
Thanks Jon.
My tanks are now pretty clean and I am not
cleaning any more filters.
I have been in touch with the guys at
Greasecar.com as well as greasel.com.
The racor heated
filters seem to be the best.
mel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hello happy people!
Thank you for all the beautiful information that is being shared here in
this forum!
I just wanted to share ma dad's joy: after two months waiting, he got his
Smart yesterday! By the way, he's 6 foot 4 inches and very comfortable in
it!
And I should have my 1997 VW
Dear Balaji
If we can produce Methonol from saw dust we can use
it for petrol engines to be used as petrol substitute ok, what will be the
procedure to extract Methonol like
can you please direct me or how can we generate
electricity is it viable to do in small scale
My concern is to find a
Maybe if there's enough interest, I could go on a
shopping spree and bring them in for y'all.
--- Tony Marzolino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
Very interesting idea. If you try this or get
information, please post to the list.
Thanks,
Tony Marzolino
Berkshire, NY
--- robert luis
so much for congress' new tort reform eliminating frivolous lawsuits!
-chris
In a message dated 6/9/05 10:48:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Farmers buying GM seeds are required to sign technology agreements
that relinquish to Monsanto their right to plant, harvest and sell
the GM seeds.
--- Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken,
Are you saying that the refining of uranium and
nuclear power in general
does not contribute to greenhouse gases?
No, my point was that arguing that coal was used in
its production was spurious since everthing uses
fossil fuel to some
Hakan,
Your argument that conservation would eliminate the
need for building nuclear power has merit but does not
speak to the use of fossil fuel as a reason to scrap
nuclear.
The problem is that many people do not care to
conserve. Look at the facts - Bush's energy plan is
simply to drill for
A, But Ken, you used the term ludicrous, although you did qualify
the degree with the words a bit. By all accounts, that still generally
means the thought having no merit. And if we discount one very energy
intensive endeavor so readily, then we might as well just all throw our
hands up in
We have basically two arguments against nuclear power
in the referenced article. 1) It is a fallicy that
production of nuclear energy does not contribute to
greenhouse gases. 2) Nuclear energy takes so much
investment energy to get started that it will take 18
years before there is a net gain in
16 matches
Mail list logo
