look up the IP address and do it that way... I believe it is
http://213.30.180.219/
it looks like a DNS entry problem... deliberate or otherwise it is a
relatively easy thing to achieve from outside... e.g. if you actually knew
what you were doing you could actually close the site down very
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:49:17 +1000, paul van den bergen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the previous IP address reaches the non-english (arabic) site...
http://213.30.180.219/english
give the correct redirect to the english language version...
--
Dr Paul van den Bergen
Centre for Advanced
Hi Keith,
It's well known that CNN and Fox news will give you a slanted,
incomplete and unbalanced picture, very much toeing the (war)party
line.
Yes we both agree that CNN and FOX are not the best source of information
and that one always has to check, as best they can, information
Hi Vern
Hi Keith,
It's well known that CNN and Fox news will give you a slanted,
incomplete and unbalanced picture, very much toeing the (war)party
line.
Yes we both agree that CNN and FOX are not the best source of information
and that one always has to check, as best they can, information
http://www.tompaine.com/feature.cfm/ID/7524
Honesty: The Worst Policy
When Telling The Truth Will Get You Fired From The Networks
Doug Ireland is a New York-based media critic and commentator.
When NBC -- which is owned by General Electric, a prime
military-industrial complex contractor --
Vern
Re: The BBC
I watch the BBC regularly here in UK. To get some idea of the level
of bias both on it, and certainly the other UK terrestrial stations
(I don't have access to satellite), I mentally note the frequency
of 'us' 'our' 'we' amongst the various presenters, reporters,
interviewers,
Hi Andrew,
You make a very good point. It is sad that we all around the world can not
get fair and balanced reporting of the news so that the individual can
think and form their own thoughts on any given issue.
I have found to their credit that BBC does seem to do a better job on
issues
Re: Censorship...
Funny, I've been trying all week to access the new Al Jazeera english
language site..
http://english.aljazeera.net
without success. I was aware that the site had been the subject of
repeated hacker, and denial of service attacks, sI hadn't taken a
close look at the error
Hi Andrew
Al-Jazeera's English site seems to have been taken offline following
the hacking - I got there once, not again. Same message as you got.
Hm.
Anyway, there's these:
http://www.cursor.org/aljazeera.htm
Cursor's Al-Jazeera Link
Interesting home page too:
http://www.cursor.org/
Andrew Preston wrote:
Re: Censorship...
Funny, I've been trying all week to access the new Al Jazeera english
language site..
http://english.aljazeera.net
without success. I was aware that the site had been the subject of
repeated hacker, and denial of service attacks, sI hadn't taken a
I tried the link from New Zealand, and all I got was a blank screen, so you got
further than I did!
Kiwi Gary
- Original Message -
From: martin
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: more coverage of Iraq
Andrew
-
From: Gary Gluyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: more coverage of Iraq
I tried the link from New Zealand, and all I got was a blank screen, so
you got further than I did!
Kiwi Gary
- Original Message
* The Qatar-based Al-Jazeera news network's attempts to set up an
English-language website were foiled by unidentified U.S.-based
hackers who launched a denial-of-service attack. Al-Jazeera is
expected to try to relaunch its site in mid-April. The station's
reporters also had their press
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 01:35, you wrote:
Re: Censorship...
Funny, I've been trying all week to access the new Al Jazeera english
language site..
http://english.aljazeera.net
without success. I was aware that the site had been the subject of
repeated hacker, and denial of service attacks, sI
makes you wonder why iraq kicked out some of there reporters
-Original Message-
From: martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: more coverage of Iraq
Andrew Preston wrote:
Re
Andrew,
I made no slur on the so called 'usual suspects' of 'Lefties', 'pinkos',
'Arab-lovers', 'pro-Castro'. I only sent along for the group to review
an article that had some interesting information in it. If the opposition
is
as wide and deep as you indicate that it is then we would see much
Hi Keith,
Just to use the material you provided as an example of what I see it
indicates that hundreds of thousands of people are demonstrating. For this
I will except that but I have not seen that on CNN or Fox news the only USA
news services we get here in Riyadh. So hundreds of thousands
Hi Vern
It's well known that CNN and Fox news will give you a slanted,
incomplete and unbalanced picture, very much toeing the (war)party
line. Studies showing that have been posted here, I guess you didn't
read them. The same applies to US mainstream media in general -
again, much info on
Vern,
For me, one human life is important and I do not like any
number game. Terror bombing is for me a crime against
humanity. Preemptive aggression is disgusting, with or
without numbers and cannot have any valid excuses. I can
not accept collateral damages at all and those are caused
by the
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:53:54 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am sure some here will find this of interest.
Not really. Only the blind, or those who don't wish to see,
can have failed to realize that the opposition to the assault
on Iraq has a constituency far wider, and deeper,
Hakan,
I do agree with your position but we see lots of press about the people who
are killed by the military action and a lot less about the ones who are
being killed by their own government in Iraq. They also count and being
killed for no reason by your own government would seem to be a
Andrew,
I made no slur on the so called 'usual suspects' of 'Lefties', 'pinkos',
'Arab-lovers', 'pro-Castro'. I only sent along for the group to review
an article that had some interesting information in it. If the opposition
is
as wide and deep as you indicate that it is then we would see
I am sure some here will find this of interest.
Vern
Hm, yes, interesting... only:
The truth about casualties
... it isn't, it's warped.
This is a lot better, and more interesting:
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15509
Not a Pretty Picture
By Rami Khouri, Pacific News Service
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:27 AM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: more coverage of Iraq
.
This is a lot better, and more interesting:
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15509
Not a Pretty Picture
By Rami Khouri, Pacific News Service
March 31, 2003
BEIRUT, Lebanon
I am sure some here will find this of interest.
Vern
Mr Leo says:
The news agencies of our chief non-allies--France, Russia, China, and
Germany--were quick off the mark. Agence France Presse may have established
Let's try to get this straight - your chief non-allies are the entire
world with
I am sure some here will find this of interest.
Vern
And all this other stuff just doesn't matter, eh, Vern? Never mind
that they're people, and now they're dead? Not important at all?
Can't make an omelette without breaking eggs?
The bridge of death
U.S. Marines killed 12 civilians trying
26 matches
Mail list logo
