[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mean that the article that is on the 'The Nature Institute website,
at: http://www.netfuture.org should be removed from public viewing.
Thank you for your opinion, Dr. Lysenko...
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuels
Paul,
I mean that the article that is on the 'The Nature Institute website,
at: http://www.netfuture.org should be removed from public viewing.
I do not mean that the reference you made to it should be removed.
The article has far too many falsehoods. It confuses readers
about facts that
I wasn't refering to the reference ether.Iam also aware of some misleading
statments in the article.But as Thomas Payne put it I will defend his right to
make those mistakes.I live in a country that is being consumed by censorship in
all venues.This may be the last place for free speech.It
Hello Paul
I wasn't refering to the reference ether.Iam also aware of some
misleading statments in the article.But as Thomas Payne put it I
will defend his right to make those mistakes.
I think that was Voltaire, but maybe Tom Payne said something
similar. I may disagree with what you say,
Patrick Neuman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Pedro Victor Cuesta/LABEIN wrote:
Look at this article:
Water, Energy and Global Warming
D'Aleo, M. and Edelglass, E.
http://www.netfuture.org/ni/misc/pub/daleo/warm/warm.html#daleo
Pedro
Pedro, at your suggestion, I reviewed the article
x-charset ISO-8859-1--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com,
Could you do that, by checking the
historical humidity, or dew point?
Greg H.
From: Jeff
I think that one of the bench marks of global
warming would be to see how much more water vapor
is in the air now, then 20 years ago. It would
x-charset ISO-8859-1--- Pedro Victor Cuesta/LABEIN wrote:
Look at this article:
Water, Energy and Global Warming
D'Aleo, M. and Edelglass, E.
http://www.netfuture.org/ni/misc/pub/daleo/warm/warm.html#daleo
Pedro
Pedro, at your suggestion, I reviewed the article titled 'Water,
Energy and
Water is a unique substance. It is the only substance, in the world, that
expands when it gets hot as well as expands when it gets cold. I think a lot of
people are not taking this into account on the global warming debate. The earth
starts getting hot, the water absorbs the heat. Water is a
Could you do that, by checking the historical humidity, or dew point?
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From: Jeff
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 08:40
Subject: [biofuel] Re: Global Warming Alarmists Are the Ones Filled with Hot
Air
I think
x-charset ISO-8859-1--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Ken Gotberg [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Another journalistic point of view?
What the data shows is not warming but cooling: The
lower [troposphere] data are often cited as evidence
against global warming, because they have as yet
failed
Hi Robert
Actually Luis and Walter Alvarez found an iridium
spike attributable to exterritorial causes that
happened about the time dinosaurs are thought to have
died out.
http://town.morrison.co.us/dinosaur/extinction/meteor.html
Also Buckyballs
I have heard that some parts of Yellowstone Park are now close due to activity
underneath the surface. They say it is like a big pancake that keeps expanding
and contracting.
That is an interesting theory on the Bermuda Triangle. I have never heard that
one before. The theories that I have
x-charset ISO-8859-1Very timely news for this topic...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/02/040204000254.htm
Astronomers Unravel A Mystery Of The Dark Ages: Undergraduates' Work
Blames Comet For 6th-century 'Nuclear Winter'
Scientists at Cardiff University, UK, believe they have
x-charset ISO-8859-1
eric12856 wrote:
Very timely news for this topic...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/02/040204000254.htm
Astronomers Unravel A Mystery Of The Dark Ages: Undergraduates' Work
Blames Comet For 6th-century 'Nuclear Winter'
Scientists at Cardiff University, UK,
x-charset ISO-8859-1Jeff, I think you need to do some more research.
Citing:http://www.technocarb.com/natgasproperties.htm
The composition of natural gas is never constant. However, Methane
is by far the largest component, its presence accounting for about 95%
of the total volume. Other
x-charset ISO-8859-1methane from bio sources - waste treatment etc - often
has hydrogen
sulfide in it, which is corrosive. I think this is where you go
tconfused. methane itself is odorless, colorless, and non-corrosive.
The 'gas smell' is added for safety reasons. Same with propane.
--- In
x-charset ISO-8859-1I would like to say that I read an article in Dicovery
magazine on methane. It hinted that there is a lot of methane at the bottom of
the ocean, buried deep in the mud, and that global warming could cause it to be
released. The article hinted that methane could of cause
x-charset ISO-8859-1Methane Hydrate actually, and there is a lot of it on the
planet.
Discovery likes to point out all the things that can kill us off.
Meteors, methane, Yellowstone National Park (seriously), the list goes
on. Methane Hydrates could be the next big fuel source.
By the way,
x-charset ISO-8859-1is that similar to those carbonated lakes in africa. when
the water
turns over it releases the dissolved gasses. It killed a bunch of
people a few years ago, and potentially could do the same in
yellowstone. The way they fixed it in africa was to put pipes into
the lake and
Keith Addison
I am at the point where I would almost welcome some fairly extreme
evidence of worldwide global warming effects just to end the debate.
I have simply had it with some of the folks who say that their goal
is
to remain scientifically objective, but whose real goal is to
On the report from the National Academy of Sciences this may or may
not be of interest. Depending upon your own beliefs.
Quoted from:
http://www.boortz.com/nealznuz.htm
THE GLOBAL WARMING DEBATE CONTINUES
Last week the National Academy of Sciences released a report on so-
called global
...not saying that global warming is not happening, I just question
the belief that it is completely caused by man. I do however think we
need to do our part though. That is one of the reasons I am here.
Trying to do my part.
Wayne
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the
:-)
One inevitably gets shoved to one side or the other, eh? If you
ain't for us you're against us. Actually I wasn't arguing for or
against global warming, I was talking about propaganda, in response
to two messages about propaganda.
Anyway, if all you've seen so far is computer models, I'd
This statement by Steitz alludes to an important issue in human
influence re climate. I agree that human activities may not have been
warming the earth for the last 50 years. The reasons however are
important. Surface temperature measurments in Europe did not show
rises for most of this
There is a very simple explanation for this. The satellite data are
more comprehensive and more accurate than the surface data. They are
telling us that claims that the earth is overheating are just hot
air. If the global warming modelers admitted that, their gravy train
would derail.
The gram
- A little stir about burning biomass- If it rots instead it also
produces some CO2. More importantly it produces methane that has 20
times the glasshouse effect of CO2 and is lighter.
Regards Harry.
Depends what you mean by rot. I think rot = putrefaction
(anaerobic, without oxygen) produces
Slowly catching up on the number of posts at the end of last week and
over the weekend. I don't know whether anyone has responded to this
or not yet, but I couldn't wait to read further, I had to respond now.
I am usually not rude, and I will attempt to keep myself in check,
but...are you
27 matches
Mail list logo
