This is a good question about what can be done with
CO2 besides putting it back into the atmosphere.
Lets say energy is no problem from solar, nuclear,
can things like polymers etc be made out of this
stuff?
But what was important to me was to develop a sense
of where we stand
as far as
!
-BRAH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:15 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Breakthrough Purports Answer to Global Warming
Hi all
I'd like to have a few hundred lbs of carbon black to go dust
No you don't
You will have a black house,barn,car dog and cat .
it will be in every little crack in your skin as well.
it is a great cheap pigment but it is attracted to every thing else as
well
Ken
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
x-charset ISO-8859-1murdoch wrote:
http://www.solaraccess.com/news/story?storyid=6001
I was intruiged by it. The point to me wasn't the spin that the
snip
1. How much energy would it take to separate Carbon from Oxygen?
The laws of thermodynamics are clear: more than you get by
Hi all
I'd like to have a few hundred lbs of carbon black to go dust the two
feet of snow in my driveway with on sunny mornings.
Fred
On Thursday, Feb 12, 2004, at 14:51 US/Eastern, bob allen wrote:
2. What would be done with the Carbon? I don't think there's enough
of a market for the
x-charset ISO-8859-1http://www.solaraccess.com/news/story?storyid=6001
I was intruiged by it. The point to me wasn't the spin that the
inventors were putting on it. That is par for the course. Many
inventors (not all, but many) fall prey to stupid worthless thinking
that their achievement is
Hi Bob
This looks silly to me as well and came across it
while doing a google news search for global warming,
about 1,600 hits with all manner of things presented.
Regards,
Ken
this seems very silly, at least in thermodynamic
terms. I don't care
what magical process you use it
x-charset ISO-8859-1
this seems very silly, at least in thermodynamic terms. I don't care
what magical process you use it requires just as much (actually more)
energy to to reduce carbon dioxide to carbon as you get from oxidizing
it in the first place.
Ken Gotberg wrote:
Ken Gotberg wrote:
Apologies if this has already been posted.
Wonderful! So we (of the advanced industrialised societies) can go
right on burning up our greedy and wasteful share of energy
resources that aren't even ours as if there's no tomorrow, let's all
get even bigger SUVs, and, hey, we
