ocking. Because the
users are poor sheep that we have to protect from evil information. And
it's not the users who decide what information is evil.
Best Regards
Oli
--
Automatic-Server AG •
Oliver Schad
Geschäftsführer
Hardstr. 46
9434 Au | Schweiz
www.automatic-server.com | oliver.sc...@au
o rely on that platform? Maybe to avoid suicide?
Are you sure, that this mechanism is "smart"? Maybe protection against
malware is less important, than you think when you don't know the
consequences of your actions.
Best Regards
Oli
--
Automatic-Server AG •••••
Oliver Schad
Geschäftsfü
Hi everybody
If someone is interested in buying a /23 IPv4, feel free to
send me an offer via PM.
Reply-To is set.
Best Regards
Oli
--
Automatic-Server AG •
Oliver Schad
Geschäftsführer
Hardstr. 46
9434 Au | Schweiz
www.automatic-server.com | oliver.sc...@automatic-server.com
Tel: +41 71
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:33:51 +
Müller Urs (IT-OM-SDP-SDN) wrote:
> Yesterday, I was contacted by Silvia (and others) about that task. I
> was then not registered with that list.
@Silvia: Great!
Thanks for quick response, Urs.
> We were struggling with convincing the management to fund
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:54:26 +
Aviolat Romain romain.avio...@nagra.com wrote:
We're looking for a provider with more or less the same reachability
(ipv4+ipv6) and presence to have a well-balanced setup (inbound).
I saw that UPC was interesting in term of reachability compared to
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:47:09 +0200
Lukas Meyer (TSG Codebase) lu...@codebase.ch wrote:
Its been a while since the last activity on this thread, it was
holiday season. Im aware that this list is usually for admin
purposes, [...]
[...] but I think I'm a so awesome guy, that I can ignore the
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:52:35 +0200
Andreas Fink af...@list.fink.org wrote:
Doesnt matter. Switch is only following the rules in the law.
I don't blame switch to follow foolish laws. But there are two
interesting questions:
1) why should I use switch when they can't offer a reliable service
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:05:19 +0200
Serge Droz serge.d...@switch.ch wrote:
I am a bit surprised at your reply.
In fact, the domain take down process is described in the law:
http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/784_104/a14bist.html
Besides the rather strict legal framework we operate in, we must
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:55:04 +0200
Guillaume Leclanche guilla...@leclanche.net wrote:
I think the law makes a good job of delimiting the cases where the
block can be done. In addition, I think Switch makes a good job
applying this law.
I'd be happy that switch blocks one of my domains to
On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:55:04 +0200
Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch wrote:
We have business customers with an own mailservers asking us to
provide a backup MX for their mailserver.
Usualy we deny such request, because such a backup MX would bounce
all spam which cannot be relayed, and
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:07:58 +0200
Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch wrote:
Business Customer with own Mailserver. They ofter want to know, which
of our mailservers they can use as smarthost. We usualy tell them,
that they operate an own fully connected mailserver which does not
need any
Hello,
we are looking for a System and Network Administrator, job description in
german at http://www.automatic-server.com/jobs.html
Regards
Oli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
swinog mailing list
Am Monday 06 June 2011 schrieb mir Jeroen Massar:
The only thing where it might not be compatible is the user interface
for making it easy to configure them.
While I agree to your point of view that 6rd and 6to4 are very close to
each other and it shoudln't take much time to implement all
Am Monday 06 June 2011 schrieb mir Jeroen Massar:
On 2011-Jun-06 15:55, Oliver Schad wrote:
Am Monday 06 June 2011 schrieb mir Jeroen Massar:
The only thing where it might not be compatible is the user
interface for making it easy to configure them.
While I agree to your point of view
On Thursday 31 March 2011 09:44:27 Mike Kellenberger wrote:
One of our customers got a .255 IPv4 address assigned by sunrise. I know
that this can be a valid host address with a netmask of /23 or greater,
but the strange thing is, that he can't reach any of our Windows Server
2003 hosts with
Am Monday 14 March 2011 schrieb mir Benoit Panizzon:
We got two customers (one is another ISP) pretending that they have
observed, that Google, Sunrise and other Services have startet
flagging their customer's emails as spam, because the sender domain
has not SPF record. Not an 'non matching'
Am Monday 15 November 2010 schrieb mir Roque Gagliano:
I believe Tim has a point in this comment, we already analyze it
positively internally to add that capability.
Does somebody at cisco try to build a standard from that filtering stuff
mabye together with other player on the market or do we
Am Monday 15 November 2010 schrieb mir Jeroen Massar:
On 2010-11-15 13:05, Oliver Schad wrote:
Am Monday 15 November 2010 schrieb mir Roque Gagliano:
I believe Tim has a point in this comment, we already analyze it
positively internally to add that capability.
Does somebody at cisco
Hello Serge, hello all without Serge,
On Thursday 11 November 2010 08:22:53 Serge Droz wrote:
On 25 November 2010 SWITCH will launch an new initiative to maintain the
high security standards of Swiss websites.
Let me briefly explain what we will do, as it is relevant to the SWINOG
Am Wednesday 10 November 2010 schrieb mir Rolf Sommerhalder:
... Then please contact me today as I am interested in buying your
seat.
So if there is a second one who is unable to come I would join the meeting
instead.
Kind Regards
Oli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
20 matches
Mail list logo
