On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:52:35 +0200 Andreas Fink <af...@list.fink.org> wrote:
> Doesnt matter. Switch is only following the rules in the law. I don't blame switch to follow foolish laws. But there are two interesting questions: 1) why should I use switch when they can't offer a reliable service because they has to apply the law? 2) who did acknowledge from switch, that this would be a good idea before it became a law? In this form, it's a potential censorship infrastructure which can be used against anybody and can be used for pressure. It's very easy to create a case where any domain can be killed. The intention of some people for a law doesn't matter, it matters what you can do with a law (but my point of view is that the intention is a censorship infrastructure as in many other countries today). The term post-democracy law fits very good for this law. You can't protect yourself from applying it against you - that's a clear sign for a anti-democratic law. Regards Oli _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
