Welcome to the SWORD Technical Advisory Panel list archive
http://swordapp.org/
--
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Date: 11 January 2011 03:04
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
We're looking at two things here, are we not?
1) we want the data returned in s specific media type
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Tarrant d...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Date: 11 January 2011 03:20
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Cc: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
I agree with Ian, why can we just use the existing x-packaging
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com
Date: 11 January 2011 03:55
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
To answer the CMIS question - AFAIK CMIS doesn't explicitly support
external packaging
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Date: 11 January 2011 04:01
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
More specifically. the Open Access Repository Junction Discovery
APIs use the Accept header to
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Jones rich...@oneoverzero.com
Date: 12 January 2011 09:52
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: Graham Klyne g...@ninebynine.org
Cc: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
Hi Graham,
On 11/01/11 19:05, Graham Klyne wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Date: 19 January 2011 01:11
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
On 10/01/11 18:49, Richard Jones wrote:
It's looking like a separate header is the way to do this,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Jones rich...@oneoverzero.com
Date: 19 January 2011 21:06
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Cc: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
Hi Ian,
On 18/01/11 12:11, Ian Stuart wrote:
On 10/01/11
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Date: 19 January 2011 21:44
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
On 19/01/11 08:06, Richard Jones wrote:
and your content negotiation header says:
Accept: A; q=1.0,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Date: 19 January 2011 23:33
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com
Cc: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
On 19/01/11 10:16, Scott Wilson wrote:
I have an
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert D. Sanderson rsander...@lanl.gov
Date: 20 January 2011 04:53
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
I don't think you can ever get away from a degree of content negotiation,
but it doesn't
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Jones rich...@oneoverzero.com
Date: 20 January 2011 06:26
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: Ed Summers e...@pobox.com
Cc: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
Hi Ed,
On 19/01/11 13:27, Ed Summers wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Date: 20 January 2011 22:00
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
On 19/01/11 17:26, Richard Jones wrote:
Also, as per my earlier comment about export plugins in
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Stuart ian.stu...@ed.ac.uk
Date: 21 January 2011 21:46
Subject: Re: content negotiating for package formats
To: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
On 20/01/11 18:11, Julie Allinson wrote:
I might be talking nonsense here, but is this something that
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Jones rich...@oneoverzero.com
Date: 20 January 2011 02:30
Subject: Re: Key Changes and Justifications
To: rsander...@lanl.gov
Cc: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
Hi Folks,
* Content Negotiating for Package Formats
RFC2533 seems massive
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Jones rich...@oneoverzero.com
Date: 22 January 2011 01:57
Subject: Re: Key Changes and Justifications
To: Tim Brody t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: techadvisorypa...@swordapp.org
Hi Tim,
While this is all lovely...
Why is it that Google docs API
Hi all,
We're now brining the SWORD v2 project to a close - thanks to your
help, and the help of the whole advisory group, we have been able to
successfully develop the SWORD v2 standard. This has now been
published, and implemented in several different repository platforms,
along with
17 matches
Mail list logo
