RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-07-06 Thread Rainer Gerhards
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim inline Tom Petch - Original Message - From: Chris Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darren Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 6:25 PM Subject: Re: [Syslog

RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-07-06 Thread David Harrington
- From: Tom Petch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:56 AM To: Chris Lonvick Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim inline Tom Petch - Original Message - From: Chris Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darren Reed

Re: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-07-05 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 05:27 +1000, Darren Reed wrote: Chris, The approach I'd like to take is to see what Balazs Scheidler can come up with, that is different to the proposed approach, to make syslog function over a TLS transport in syslog-ng and look at turning that into an i-d. While

RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-07-04 Thread David Harrington
); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim David: Please clarify... Are you suggesting we drop syslog-protocol, which actually defines message format, and just do a generic secure transport for events? Something that just does framing, app-level

RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-06-30 Thread Rainer Gerhards
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim Besides the somewhat political issue, I think there is also technical issue that affects the question. I think we should consider that question in parallel to the IPR question. This question is if this WG

RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-06-30 Thread David Harrington
] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 6:11 AM To: David Harrington; Chris Lonvick; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim David, I fully agree with your

RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-06-30 Thread John Calcote
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 6:11 AM To: David Harrington; Chris Lonvick; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim David, I fully agree with your thought. I, too, think we must put emphasison the delivery of documents. In my personal opinion, th

RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-06-30 Thread Anton Okmianski \(aokmians\)
: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 8:32 PM To: Rainer Gerhards; 'Chris Lonvick'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim Hi Rainer, [speaking as a contributor] This WG needs to deliver

RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-06-30 Thread Anton Okmianski \(aokmians\)
. Thanks, Anton. From: John Calcote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 2:23 PMTo: Chris Lonvick (clonvick); David Harrington; 'Rainer Gerhards'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim Jumping in to add my two

RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim

2006-06-30 Thread John Calcote
y, June 30, 2006 2:23 PMTo: Chris Lonvick (clonvick); David Harrington; 'Rainer Gerhards'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim Jumping in to add my two cents... I quite agree with David on this point. If the syslog WG chose to begin work on network