RE: [Syslog] TCP and SSH Discussion

of authentication). David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 8:48 AM To: David B Harrington Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] TCP and SSH Discussion Hi David, I'd also recommend that people

RE: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input

I see that there is a lot of work around SSH connection protocol and its potential use in new protocols. I have not followed these developments. There must have been a good reason for it. I would like to understand why people object to SSL, which is a well established technology. Any

Re: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input

Hi, As this WG struggles with the question of which secure transport to use, I recommend reading RFC3535 - Overview of the 2002 IAB Network Management Workshop. This workshop, a world tour of ISP organizations, and the survey of which Tom speaks were part of an effort by the IAB and the OM Area

RE: [Syslog] Unicode - was: AD Review fordraft-ietf-syslog-protocol-14

see note above. Do you recommend we should actually make English an requirement? I think that would be a mistake. For a vendor, e.g. a Chinese vendor, who produces switches that are sold only to the Chinese market, whose customers speak primarily Chinese and have limited English skills,

RE: [Syslog] Revised proposed charter

Hi, It would be a good thing to enumerate in the charter the select set of mechanisms to be standardized and included in the charter deliverables by the charter deadlines. That would severely limit any possibility of mission creep, something this group needs to constrain. I am concerned about

[Syslog] Forward compatibility

Rainer wrote: I am an IETF freshman. Anyhow, I often read that the IETF was driven by rough consensus and running code. I say was, because my impression is that this is no longer the case. I would prefer it were... While the IETF has increased its theoretical discussions, I think a major part of

RE: [Syslog] Consensus on Charter?

Hi Darren, I suggest you work with some other implementors of TCP-based syslog to write a TCP transport mapping I-D that can be considered as the starting point for future WG work, if the current work ever gets completed. At a minimum, the document could probably be published as Informational.

RE: [Syslog] #7 field order

Hi, Can you please ask those who are sending you private messages to make their points on the mailing list, as is appropriate for IETF WG discussions? dbh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards Sent: Wednesday, November 30,

[Syslog] #7 field order

Hi, Better yet, **I'll** change the subject to #7 field order. Thanks, dbh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Reed Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:43 PM To: Darren Reed Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] RE:

RE: [Syslog] #7, field order

the differentiation. I'd appreciate any comments on this. Rainer -Original Message- From: David B Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:50 PM To: Rainer Gerhards; 'Darren Reed' Subject: RE: [Syslog] #7, field order Hi, Having

RE: [Syslog] implementing -protocol and -transport-udp

Hi, Just a point. -transport-udp and -transport-tls should be independent of each other, since one is based on udp and the other on tcp. I just want to be sure that is understood. -transport-udp and transport-tls should have a comparable interface to the rest of the syslog documents. Do we

RE: [Syslog] WG Review: Recharter of Security Issues in Network EventLogging (syslog)

At Huawei, we plan to develop a prototype of syslog/TLS. David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 1:59 AM To: iesg@ietf.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: [Syslog] WG Review: Recharter

[Syslog] RE: Call for David Harrington to resign from syslog as co-chair

] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Darren Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 1:23 PM To: David B Harrington Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Call for David Harrington to resign from syslog as co-chair As someone who works fr

[Syslog] MIB document decision needed

Hi, Tomorrow is the deadline for establishing consensus on whether draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib represents WG consensus on what needs to be managed in the protocol, udp, tls, and sign documents, and if not, what needs to be changed to represent WG consensus. Tom has pointed out that the

[Syslog] Dbh re-review of Mib-11-, part 2

Hi this is a review of the requested changes from part 2 of my earlier review. -Original Message- From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mib-09- review, part 2 Continued ... 1) syslEntCtlTable

RE: [Syslog] Doubts on definitions

, January 10, 2007 4:17 PM To: David B Harrington; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Syslog] Doubts on definitions David, -Original Message- From: David B Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Syslog

[Syslog] RE: MIB Doctor review of draft-ietf-syslog-tc-mib-04.txt

Hi, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: 1. I do not believe that it is necessary to carry all the duplicated text in the MIB module as commented text, as it does not provide any significant implementation information. I will agree with this. Are there any other opinions / suggestions on this