On Thu, 04.08.16 09:45, Stéphane ANCELOT (sance...@free.fr) wrote:
> You are right, but that's only systemd that is incompatible with
> this feature (and some more).
No, that has little to do with systemd. It's a systematic change how
today's hardware works, and that probing is asynchronous and
You are right, but that's only systemd that is incompatible with this feature
(and some more).
As some people and some articles I have read on the web, it is time for myself
switching my system to a professional initscript service.
- Mail original -
De: "Lennart Poettering"
On 08/04/2016 07:45 AM, Stéphane ANCELOT wrote:
You are right, but that's only systemd that is incompatible with this feature
(and some more).
Actually all initsystems are incompatible with this.
As some people and some articles I have read on the web, it is time for myself
switching my
Hi,
I am already doing this with other init systems with modern usb , I am able
doing this with my TV, soundbar...
The only bad thing is that systemd has sprayed in some recent distributions
(where are the benefits ?)
Unfortunately in today's world, there are more commercial people than
Hi,
sorry for bothering you with a fairly uncommon issue, but I haven't been
able to find a solution so far and Google turned up empty.
I have some CentOS 7.2 machines with systemd 219 which are members of an
IBM GPFS cluster and need to start up some services only after a
specific GPFS
Hi Lennart and Werner,
On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 16:56 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 03.08.16 14:46, Dr. Werner Fink (werner at suse.de) wrote:
> > problem with v228 (and I guess this is also later AFAICS from logs of
> > current git) that repeating CPU hotplug events (offline/online).
On Thu, 04.08.16 16:34, Matteo Panella (matteo.pane...@cnaf.infn.it) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for bothering you with a fairly uncommon issue, but I haven't been
> able to find a solution so far and Google turned up empty.
>
> I have some CentOS 7.2 machines with systemd 219 which are members of
On Thu, 04.08.16 22:00, Matteo Panella (matteo.pane...@cnaf.infn.it) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/08/2016 16:43, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > Then add an After= instead. Unit ordering is already specified
> > separately from dependencies.
>
> That does not work, unfortunately: since the entry in
Hi,
On 04/08/2016 16:43, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> Then add an After= instead. Unit ordering is already specified
> separately from dependencies.
That does not work, unfortunately: since the entry in fstab is marked
"noauto" systemd ignores the mount and fires up the service once the
other
Hi,
On 04/08/2016 22:03, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> How does GPFS suggest that apps wait for the mounts?
It "grew" official support for systemd only in very recent releases, so
up until now most people just threw a busy wait in rc.?d between S*gpfs
and other services[1].
> You could probably
10 matches
Mail list logo
