Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-30 Thread Vlad
I'd like to summarize all the thought about this issue. The systemd behavior regarding PAM stack has been changed: 1. systemd-232: if PAM stack fails service unit is still started, so PAM errors are ignored. 2. systemd-233: if PAM stack fails service unit fails as well. The second is IMO the

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-30 Thread Vlad
I suppose you meant pam_keyinit, not pam_keyring, right? Although I saw that the new version of default "systemd-user" pam configuration file added pam_keyinit, I tested migration of systemd from 232 to 233 with exactly the same pam.d configuration (as I mentioned below). The _only_ thing that

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 29.04.17 16:59, Vlad (vo...@vovan.nl) wrote: > Thanks for the answer. I'd then rephrase my original question: I'd like > to know what has been changed in the systemd (pam_systemd?) version 233, > that now it fails to start user@xxx.service? If I downgrade to the > version 232, then

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-29 Thread Vlad
Thanks for the answer. I'd then rephrase my original question: I'd like to know what has been changed in the systemd (pam_systemd?) version 233, that now it fails to start user@xxx.service? If I downgrade to the version 232, then systemd gives the same error, but still starts user@xxx.service

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 29.04.17 13:25, Vlad (vo...@vovan.nl) wrote: > Lennart, > > I've just tried your suggestion as well, but it doesn't change behavior. > I'm just wondering how it would be possible to investigate the error. > The message "user@xxx.service: Failed at step PAM spawning >

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-29 Thread Vlad
Lennart, I've just tried your suggestion as well, but it doesn't change behavior. I'm just wondering how it would be possible to investigate the error. The message "user@xxx.service: Failed at step PAM spawning /usr/lib/systemd/systemd: Operation not permitted" isn't very descriptive. I enabled

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-29 Thread Vlad
Lennart, As I can see pam_systemd is "optional" everywhere in pam.d configuration. Is that what you meant? grep pam_systemd * system-auth:session optionalpam_systemd.so debug systemd-user:session optional pam_systemd.so Regards, Vlad. On 29/04/17 12:21, Lennart Poettering wrote: >

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 29.04.17 11:13, Vlad (vo...@vovan.nl) wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently updated systemd and now user session is failing to start: > Apr 29 11:04:02 xxx systemd[550]: user@xxx.service: Failed at step PAM > spawning /usr/lib/systemd/systemd: Operation not permitted > Apr 29 11:04:02 xxx