It is most likely impossible to predict the benefits because many are
training aid benfits eg quicker recovery so an athlete can train harder.
Apparently Growth Hormone is brillinat for this. Werner Reiterer in
"positive" states that he felt younger , recovered better , old injuries to
knees felt
Why was he so much better than the rest? There are two possible
explanations:
1. He was on drugs and no-one else was
2. Others were on drugs too but Johnson was better anyway
So you have to argue EITHER that Johnson was truly a great sprinter OR that
he was the only one who took drugs.
No,
--- Jay Ulfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One can't simply compare Ben Johnson's
pre-bust and post-bust times and chalk up the entire difference to
drugs. The guy was away from competition for some time, and I would
think his mental game (so important for the 100m) was pretty much
crushed by
Title: Ja'Warren Hooker article from the Seattle
Times...
Wednesday, October 18, 2000,
12:00 a.m. Pacific
UW Football
Notebook: Hooker to hold off on any return to football until
'01
by Bud
Withers
Seattle Times staff reporter
Ja'Warren Hooker, the Washington
I received several nice replies to my pseudo Olympic trivia question:
Who is Mebrahtom Keflezighi?
Who is Abdi Abdirahman?
They provided me with even more information about these two remarkable
African-American athletes.
And although everyone on this list probably knows these two runners
well,
Tony wrote:
You omitted one fact.Christie tested positive for
ephedrine at Seoul, but they let him keep his medal anyway.And...Ben
was NOT busted for 'roids at Seoul. He was convicted because one man, the
late Dr. Manfred Donike, subjectively felt that Ben had an aberrant "endocrine
Steve wrote:
Since we're ranking sprinters and a lot of listers place mucho importance
on
winning gold medals at OG and WC where does Merlene Ottey fit into the
woman's side of the greatest ever debate? She certainly should be
considered
but has always ended up with a "lessor" medal.
Steve Bennett wrote:
It is most likely impossible to predict the benefits because many are
training aid benfits eg quicker recovery so an athlete can train harder.
Apparently Growth Hormone is brillinat for this. Werner Reiterer in
"positive" states that he felt younger , recovered better ,
Dan wrote:
--- Jay Ulfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One can't simply compare Ben Johnson's
pre-bust and post-bust times and chalk up the entire difference to
drugs. The guy was away from competition for some time, and I would
think his mental game (so important for the 100m) was pretty
At 06:14 PM 10/17/2000 -0700, malmo wrote..
As a child, there was no movie scarier to me than "The Wizard of Oz". Those
crazy flying monkeys scared the bejeezus out of me! Children do watch this
movie don't they? They "have trouble distinguishing reality and fantasy"?
Bullsh!t police here. You're
I did answer the question to best of my knowledge--he is the only top end
sprinter that we KNOW was using drugs. (We know many East Germans were
using as well at the time.) You can then draw whatever conclusion you want
from that statement. I will only make this statement based on what
The difference for Johnson is that he admitted under oath to long-term
usage that extended back to 1981. Neither Christie nor Mitchell admitted
to similar usage. That is a very important distinction in how we treat
Johnson.
There is a reasonable case to be made that both Christie and
I've added seasonal best performances to the startlist for this afternoon
women's vault. They identify, for me, an interesting question: Why is it
that USA doesn't have an entrant over 4.00m (13' 1 1/2")?
When I checked the world list, it would appear that Donoghue and
Rosenberger are, indeed
- Original Message -
From: Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tend to agree with this point of view .. That the benefits of drug use
is
in the training room/practice track .. And if this is the case then my
original question still stands .. What does this translate to on the
competitive
From: "Conway" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since we're ranking sprinters and a lot of listers place mucho
importance
on
winning gold medals at OG and WC where does Merlene Ottey fit into the
woman's side of the greatest ever debate? She certainly should be
considered but has always ended up with a
In a message dated 10/18/0 11:42:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And although everyone on this list probably knows these two runners
well, when NBC "covered" the distance events like the 10K at two o'clock
in the morning, their cameras scanned right past these two young men as
if they were
At 09:38 AM 10/18/00 -0700, you wrote:
The difference for Johnson is that he admitted under oath to long-term
usage that extended back to 1981. Neither Christie nor Mitchell admitted
to similar usage. That is a very important distinction in how we treat
Johnson.
Agreed. My point was that
The USA Fall Cross Country Championship will be held on Saturday, November
25, at Boston's historic Franklin Park
This will be the fourth time since 1984 that the fall nationals will be
held in Boston. Acting as presenting sponsors, the Boston Athletic
Association and adidas will work with
--- Richard McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will only make this statement based on what
evidence I can draw on. I will not make any further conclusions, even
though it seems that I should. I refuse to speculate, which is what you
are asking me to do.
C'mon Richard, you're an economist!
Again I go back to all of the technical aspects of the race .. I look back
and Carl Lewis coming out of
high school .. And Carl Lewis after a season or so of tutelage from his
coaches and the mechanical changes .. The same for Mo Greene pre and post
John Smith .. Ato Boldon pre and post UCLA
Ed wrote:
Most likely the same role strength plays in other events where skill is
important, which is most of them. Take the shot put. Now when I pick up
a
16 lb shot, it is heavy. When I put it on my shoulder and begin to put
it,
I am weak enough that it is hard to get the shot put
In a 10 second sprint however, holding one's form is not nearly as
difficult over the 40 to
45 steps taken as say in a 400 or 800 .. Not that I am arguing that
strength
doesn't help, because it obviously does ... But as with supersaturated
sugar
water at what point is enough strength enough
And a side note on a distantly related subject--namely, Mo on Millionaire:
Why is everyone assuming Mo Greene is such an idiot?
- - Jay Ulfelder
Thats exactly what I was thinking Jay! I wonder what the REAL reason is.
DMC
Integrity is the cornerstone of trust
1, In 1988 at the Seoul Olympics, Christie
claimed that the positive for ephedrine was because he
had drunk ginseng tea (a local herbal infusion). Christie refused
to give to
the drug testers any residual ginseng so that he might be
vindicated. When
Prof Arnold Beckett tested a version of
Due to their greater number of receptor sites in
the muscles, the good sprinters actually respond proportionally better to
drugs than the bad ones. So it is very hard to compare apples with
apples when comparing arbitrarily selected supposedly clean or dirty
sprinters, assuming there are any
There may be some broad correlation between an increase in the number of
androgen receptor sites on muscles and sprinting ability, in the sense that
sprinters on-average have more than non-sprinters or slow sprinters, but the
studies to show that a 9.8 sprinter has more than a 9.9 sprinter who
Day two has come to a close, not a great day for the USA.
Updated results, commentary, photos and tidbits can be found at
www.NationalScholastic.org
Drop us an email and let us know what you think of the coverage.
Your humble correspondents--
Jim Spier Jesse Rosen
Oh boy! I heard a lot about Darrell, and now I see why.
Dennis a big timer? You have got to be joking! Linford served him lunch
except for 91, and they implemented a new rule after that .09 reaction.
Now the Ben issue is amusing. Ben has a bronze medal to his name, and drugs
stamped
Y ask Y:
John Cosgrove of the Southern California Association of USATF shares this
memo with me. He sent it to Craig Masback in early February 2000. Cosgrove is
toying with the idea of running for USATF Masters chairman.
The memo is prefaced by some explanatory comments:
Cosgrove writes:
Certain list members seem to have forgotten something: Johnson was busted
TWICE. Just prior to the second time he had recovered to be a sub 10.10
performer and appeared to be a medal contender again. But again he was
caught. He almost certainly went back because he had reverted to being
I also believe that holding one's form correctly in
a maximal sprint like
the 100m is actually more difficult than doing it in
a 400/800.
- Ed Parrot
I can't say it is "more difficult", but you are
correct in that it does take much more absolute
strength to "hold one's form" in the 100
Michael Bartolina wrote:
I can't say it is "more difficult", but you are
correct in that it does take much more absolute
strength to "hold one's form" in the 100 than in the
800.
As for the original argument that after a certain
point a given individual might be strong enough, it
might
A lot of good points by John Cosgrove in terms of the idea of creating a
"track club in a box". But the concepts as I read them are long on theory
and short on addressing the key issues that are limiting clubs - lack of
funds and lack of competition opportunites (TF and RW in particular). Very
When NBC's Tom Hammond gave the results of the 10k, he gave due credit to
both Meb and Abdi. I also seem to recall him mentioning them during the
"live" call, but I don't know what actually made "air".
Walt Murphy
Tom Hammond mentioned that the two Americans were in the race and later on
I read through this 379-line e-mail, and have yet to
figure out what exactly the writers are asking USATF
to do.
Maybe I overlooked it.
Start channelling all USATF development money through
clubs which meet the definitions outlined? (which would
force all elite athletes to become members of
no bob, you're not the only one. where are the informative and insightful
email's we've been missing. i.e. meet schedules, website names, etc...
Netters
I must say this is among the best dialogues on any topic I have seen
in a very long time. No accusatations, insults or innuendoes. Just a
frank discussion with what I think are some excellent points made.
Michael Bartolina wrote:
Maximum efficiency per stride
taken is what
Netters
Now back to the drugs. It is my feeling that IF I took drugs and I
took the right ones correctly here is what would happen. This is
based on what I have read about the drugs themselves and what
others have said they could do. then again I might be way off!
A drug like
I have recently been told of an experiment of one by a chemist in England
(read pharmacist for chemist) who decided to see what Nadrolone would do for
his training after reading about all the recent positives. He was a distance
runner in his mid-40's having a limit of 40 miles per week in
I don't think Christie can be considered among the top 5 because he wasn't
dominant in his era. I think we're giving short shrift to the pre 1964
sprinters. What about Bobby Morrow, Jesse Owens or Charlie Paddock? I
suspect Cordner Nelson has some thoughts on that.
I agree
40 matches
Mail list logo