On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 03/02/2011 05:01 PM, Richard Mann wrote:
I reckon the voting is running at about 24000 a handful for, and a
handful against.
Oh, come on. If you’re going to count every element tagged with
designation=* as a “vote
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Yes, I know rewriting a page at this stage isn't the Done Thing. So sue me.
Wikifiddler, first class.
;)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 1 March 2011 21:47, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
You'all are welcome to:
1) Make another proposal
2) Vote yes or no to the proposal as it stands
It's not appropriate to fine-tune the proposal during the voting stage
- you either approve or oppose it as it stands.
2011/3/2 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
My proposal is simply to use an other key, and once a better name for
the key is agreed upon to change the existing tags to use the new key
it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
uk:public_bridleway
instead of
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
uk:public_bridleway
instead of public_bridleway
So I presume you're planning to do that for other tags whose meaning varies
by country, like highway=uk:trunk, highway=de:motorway...
OSM. For People Who Don't
2011/3/2 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
uk:public_bridleway
instead of public_bridleway
So I presume you're planning to do that for other tags whose meaning varies
by country, like
Tordanik wrote:
I'm still not quite sure whether I understand what designation=*
is supposed to do.
It's to record the legal status, or designation, of a given object - whether
that object be a footpath, a waterway, or whatever.
Having now looked at the wiki voting page I'm afraid the
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Tordanik wrote:
I'm still not quite sure whether I understand what designation=*
is supposed to do.
It's to record the legal status, or designation, of a given object - whether
that object be a footpath, a
On 03/02/2011 05:01 PM, Richard Mann wrote:
I reckon the voting is running at about 24000 a handful for, and a
handful against.
Oh, come on. If you’re going to count every element tagged with
designation=* as a “vote for” you really ought to count every element
*not* tagged with
24000 uses so far, so I guess it's time to put it to a vote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Designation
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 01/03/11 17:12, Richard Mann wrote:
24000 uses so far, so I guess it's time to put it to a vote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Designation
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2011/3/1 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com:
24000 uses so far, so I guess it's time to put it to a vote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Designation
The RFC is from 2009, IMHO there is an established alternative for this:
foot=designated
bicycle=designated
On 03/01/2011 11:30 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
do we really need a duplication in designation? Or is there some
details that I don't get?
As I understand it, while there is some overlap (especially in Germany)
it’s not exactly a duplicate of the access=designated tag.
Designation=* is
2011/3/1 Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net:
For better or worse, in Germany it looks like they’re one and the same
thing: a route’s official classification is basically “officially designated
for [xxx] traffic”. There’s nothing like the UK’s “Restricted Byway”
classification.
There is tracks
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
There is already 2 alternative ways to tag these (path and
foot/cycle/bridleway), I feel we don't need a third one.
Do try and keep up. This is not a third way of tagging. This is _additional_
information that can be used with either existing scheme. There is no
On 1 March 2011 20:04, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
There is already 2 alternative ways to tag these (path and
foot/cycle/bridleway), I feel we don't need a third one.
Do try and keep up. This is not a third way of tagging. This is _additional_
Markus Lindholm wrote:
If this tag designation is about formal status in the UK
It isn't. It's about formal status, full stop. You could just as easily use
it to record that a European waterway is UNECE Class Vb.
Richard
--
View this message in context:
On 1 March 2011 20:51, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Markus Lindholm wrote:
If this tag designation is about formal status in the UK
It isn't. It's about formal status, full stop. You could just as easily use
it to record that a European waterway is UNECE Class Vb.
Well, the
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Markus Lindholm wrote:
If this tag designation is about formal status in the UK
It isn't. It's about formal status, full stop. You could just as
easily use it to record that a European waterway is UNECE
You'all are welcome to:
1) Make another proposal
2) Vote yes or no to the proposal as it stands
It's not appropriate to fine-tune the proposal during the voting stage
- you either approve or oppose it as it stands.
If there's an appropriate majority after 2 weeks, I'll move it to
approved.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:47:04 +
Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
If there's an appropriate majority after 2 weeks, I'll move it to
approved. Otherwise we'll just carry on waiting for a better idea
(it might be a long wait).
Appropriate majority on the wiki of how many
On 03/01/2011 03:14 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
Appropriate majority on the wiki of how many votes?
With the tagging numbers being in their thousands, how will you decide
on an appropriate number?
Well, the wiki says “8 unanimous approval votes or 15 total votes with a
majority approval”
But
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:47:04 +
Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
If there's an appropriate majority after 2 weeks, I'll move it to
approved. Otherwise we'll just carry on waiting for a better idea
2011/3/1 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com:
You'all are welcome to:
1) Make another proposal
2) Vote yes or no to the proposal as it stands
It's not appropriate to fine-tune the proposal during the voting stage
- you either approve or oppose it as it stands.
Comments were
24 matches
Mail list logo
