Hi,
Have there been many projects/companies which improved TIGER and
released the results as PD?
None that I know of; I suppose they have all spent a lot of money to
be able to process and improve TIGER and they probably want to recoup
that investment through proprietary licensing.
Is it
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:03:20PM +0100, Gervase Markham wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
None that I know of; I suppose they have all spent a lot of money to
be able to process and improve TIGER and they probably want to recoup
that investment through proprietary licensing.
Is it
Hi,
Is it relevant to us?
Surely it's highly relevant to your assertion that we would build a
strong community around OSM if it was PD?
I thought OJW was not talking about communities but about corporations.
Which generally have a bad track record of working for free (perhaps
because they
On Fri, 9 May 2008 00:24:11 -0600
Simon Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I've had a stab at this, probably the worlds worst python script but it
does work
Cleaned up version added to SVN, browsable here:
On Monday 12 May 2008, Skywave wrote:
Freek recently created this image which shows how much of the AND data is
untouched:
http://www.vanwal.nl/osm/author_density_nl_20080502_full.png(warning 3 MB
image).
(Blue is untouched AND, green and red have relatively more changes by the
community.)
elvin ibbotson wrote:
Typos in real words are easier to detect than a mistake in entering a
number.
In the scenario I was suggesting numbers would only replace words for
type tags and users would never see the numbers but would just see words
(in their own language) mapped to/from numbers
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
This demonstrates that really there is no one method that fits all. I map
urban areas out completely in one go, including the cycleways and footways
because just about all are accessible by bike. Occasionally I have a footway
I have to go back and do on
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Alex Mauer wrote:
IMO if it's sufficiently unknown that it will have to be revisited
anyway for more accurate classification, marking it as a road rather
than a complete unknown isn't really going to be helpful to anyone.
Sure it is - I know I can drive down a road, I
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Verification is a whole new ballgame.
I think throughout this discussion there is tendency to get hung up on
the word complete, which has been used as a shorthand but is being
interpreted differently. In everyday use it has an implication of
perfection
I've come across a problematic way near me: It is a reasonably wide
road, but the signs at each end say it is a bridleway. It has a gate
across the east end end so you can't drive along it from the east, but you
can drive along it from the west end. The west end has no restrictions
other
Steve Hill wrote:
Sent: 13 May 2008 9:47 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Tagging bridleways
I've come across a problematic way near me: It is a reasonably wide
road, but the signs at each end say it is a bridleway. It has a gate
across the east end end so you can't drive along
GPSBabel 1.3.5 was released a few days ago, and for those of you using
the popular NaviGPS units I am pleased to be able to say that the new
release of GPSBabel includes native support for the NaviGPS.
This includes both direct access to stored tracks, routes and
waypoints via the USB cable as
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 10:10 PM
To: Jeffrey Martin
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to helpprovide
completeness tools
Hi,
I'm very far from this in Korea, but I would guess in time some
parts of the UK will need to be rechecked
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of us map out an area completely in one go rather than doing it
piecemeal. Even if I come across some existing roads in a new area I ignore
them and do a new survey so that the whole area makes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The name for the new driver is navilink, so to recover waypoints
over the USB cable on linux you would do something like:
gpsbabel -w -f navilink -i /dev/ttyUSB0 -F gpx -o waypoints.gpx
or even:
gpsbabel -w -i
Steve Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 13 May 2008 10:31 AM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Tagging bridleways
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
This is an example of confusing the physical space with
Steve Hill wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
This is an example of confusing the physical space with the legal
administrative description.
Yes, but sadly the highway tag is defined in Map Features to encompass
that confusing mixture of physical and legal
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
This is an example of confusing the physical space with the legal
administrative description.
Yes, but sadly the highway tag is defined in Map Features to encompass
that confusing mixture of physical and legal descriptions. :)
(It
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
(The High Street in Oxford is nominally the A420, so we tag
ref=A420, but it's no good as a through-route - the bollards are a bit
of a giveaway - so we tag highway=tertiary.)
I'm left wondering why they haven't removed the A-road designation if
Brian Quinion wrote:
island=yes|no
I like the idea of marking this, but may I suggest traffic_island or
pedestrian_refuge instead? Does this mean any pedestrian refuge in the
road, or just those with some other crossing stuff like traffic signals
or zebra striping?
I'd love to be able to re-use
Steve Hill wrote:
I'm left wondering why they haven't removed the A-road designation if
they put bollards in... Anyway, I'm going a bit off topic now. :)
We had a thread about it on talk-gb which I think concluded it would
have been better designated as the WTF420.
horse=yes seems as
Steve Hill wrote:
bicycle=yes|no
foot=yes|no
horse=yes|no
Doing this for crossings is not right, IMO. It's a bad usage of
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:access , or more
specifically its 'helper' tags like foot=yes|no or bicycle=*. Consider:
* If two ways cross at a crossing
At 11:11 AM 13/05/2008, Raphael Studer wrote:
I've formally written up my Bridge proposal, as mentioned here a week or
two ago:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Bridge
Does someone care about this proposal?
Regards
Rapahel
It seems so:
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) wrote:
* If two ways cross at a crossing Node, access keys would logically
apply to both. Declaring that crossings are somehow special and that
access tags on them apply only to the crossing traffic is worse.
Ok, sounds like we would need
Please excuse me if this is a FAQ, I just didn't find an answer in the
wiki (possibly because it is obvious) ...
In topological GISses like grass, borders are shared between adjacent
(vector) areas. However, I wonder how adjacent areas should be digitized
in OSM (let's say, forests and
Steve Hill wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) wrote:
* If two ways cross at a crossing Node, access keys would logically
apply to both. Declaring that crossings are somehow special and that
access tags on them apply only to the crossing traffic is worse.
Ok,
Ulf Mehlig wrote:
I think that using a street as a border of a plaza (or a block of
buildings) is not wanted. Does one digitize double ways, leading along
the same nodes, or does one make a separate area in a small distance to
the existing line (street/stream), which might be topologically
On 13 May 2008, at 14:06, Ulf Mehlig wrote:
Please excuse me if this is a FAQ, I just didn't find an answer in the
wiki (possibly because it is obvious) ...
In topological GISses like grass, borders are shared between adjacent
(vector) areas. However, I wonder how adjacent areas should be
Hi,
Am I right in assuming that OSM ways always belong
to one single area?
Yes and no.
Normally we don't map the borders between areas - we map tha areas
themselves. So you would have one way that encloses the forest, and
one way that encloses the adjacent farmland, and they would meet
Hi,
i'm new in this list (i write in the italian mailing list) but i
thought it would be better to write my doubts here. I'm having a look
at OSM APIs and i'm not able to find out how to download all my gpx
traces i've uploaded so far. I can only find how to retrieve all
trackpoints in a bounding
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danilo Abbate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm new in this list (i write in the italian mailing list) but i
thought it would be better to write my doubts here. I'm having a look
at OSM APIs and i'm not able to find out how to download all my gpx
traces i've
Shaun McDonald wrote:
If you have a road and stream running parallel they would be entered
as 2 ways that are parallel. The same happens for the carriageways of
a motorway that are separated by a barrier.
Well, let's say that this is also controversial and we had that
discussion before.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many*
people, we could just have a button somewhere along the margin of the
page that says: I know the area and what I see here looks correct.
Given that this will be the default very soon ( :-) ), I'd rather
Hello!
I'm trying to accomplish something and I was hoping someone could assist
me on this. Basically I have created an isometric 3d render of the
floor plan of my company's building. I would like to make a map with
multiple layers on which users can identify key points, like the big
After text, pictures, and videos, China starts regulating Internet map
publishing (here is the google translation.) The government believes that
Internet maps can represent the state's sovereignty and its political and
diplomatic positions in the international community . and consequently,
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:31:32PM +0100, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) wrote:
I subscribe to the view that areas should correspond to the real area on
the ground and mostly be kept clear of roadways. Placing an Area's Nodes
near the adjacent Way's nodes helps make the map easier to maintain.
You will probably have more luck with the following application, which
does the tile cutting you need:
http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/software/googlemapimagecutter.asp
Mapnik is not meant as a tile cutter, but renders data from a XML file,
so I think it wouldnt be off much use for you.
Cheers
On 13/05/2008 15:35, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many*
people, we could just have a button somewhere along the margin of the
page that says: I know the area and what I see here looks correct.
Given that this will
Great !!
On Dienstag 13 Mai 2008, Tom Hughes wrote:
GPSBabel 1.3.5 was released a few days ago, and for those of you using
the popular NaviGPS units I am pleased to be able to say that the new
release of GPSBabel includes native support for the NaviGPS.
This includes both direct access to
David Earl wrote:
Sent: 13 May 2008 6:48 PM
To: Sebastian Spaeth
Cc: OSM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On 13/05/2008 15:35, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many*
Hi,
The issue is especially contended when it comes to linear features
straddling areas, like a road that forms the forest boundary for a
bit. I would re-use the same nodes here, but there are people who say
that this would indicate the forest stretching up to the road
centreline
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Simon Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2008 00:24:11 -0600
Simon Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I've had a stab at this, probably the worlds worst python script
but it does work
Cleaned up version added to SVN, browsable here:
Christoph Eckert wrote:
Hi,
The issue is especially contended when it comes to linear features
straddling areas, like a road that forms the forest boundary for a
bit. I would re-use the same nodes here, but there are people who say
that this would indicate the forest stretching up to
Thanks Tim for your feedback, I appreciate.
Concerning World Wind it looks like you can visualize KML with placemarks
since version 1.3.4. I just had a quick try, it seems to work fine for
placemarks (but it doesn't seem to show the extrusion for lines in my v2
KMLs, just the top):
Hey, I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, but I just opened up the
input file in a text editor and saw:
Copyright=THIS MAP CANNOT BE SOLD
I think this is incompatible with our license (commercial use is okay). Is
the author/maintainer that gave you permission aware of this?
I did
Says who? The boundary of the forest IS the road. :)
This is one of religious discussions - both sides KNOW they are right,
and no amount of discussion is going to change things. Unless we have
a central decision making force of some sort lay down the law, (in OSM
- hah!) you'll continue to
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, but I just opened up
the
input file in a text editor and saw:
Copyright=THIS MAP CANNOT BE SOLD
I think this is incompatible with our license (commercial use is okay).
Is
the
Hallo,
Kan iemand me vertellen hoe ik een brug aanmaak in JOSM?
Het gaat om de situatie
- straat A
- brug met naam B
- straat C
Ik snap niet helemaal hoe ik dat stuk in 3 aaneensluitende nodes met
telkens een verschillende naam kan splitsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:bridge
Hallo Dieter,
Het opsplitsen van een way gaat in JOSM als volgt:
- selecteer de way en de node waar je de opsplitsing wilt maken.
- kies uit het menu Tools Split way
Je hebt nu de geselecteerde way opgedeeld in twee verschillende.
Uiteraard kun je ook meerdere nodes selecteren. In dat geval
Met het keyboard gaat dat nog handiger:
Plaats een node: A-U-A-U-A-U 3 nodes geplaatst, met de muis mikken
natuurlijk (alleen waar nodig natuurlijk)
Splitsen : U - S - ctrl klik - klik (2 nodes geselecteerd) - P
A= selecteer draw mode
U= Unselect
S= Selectie mode
P= split road
Probeer
In relation to our copyright discussions, the following might be of interest:
http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2008/05/12/how-to-free-your-facts/
attribution stacking is an interesting concept...
jim
--
_
Jim Croft
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know why we are here, but
Ich habs gerade mal getestet und bisher sieht es sehr gut aus. Abestürzt
ist bisher nichts. Allerdings ist es immer noch extrem ruckelig. Ich
bekomme geschätzt max. 1 FPS.
Könnte man die FPS nicht noch unten einblenden, da wo die Winkel etc schon sind?
Ok, ich schau ob ich das über Mittag
Nächste Woche Montag und Dienstag (19./20.5.) mache ich eine
Mapping-Aktion mit Schülern des Elisabeth-von-Thüringen-Gymnasiums in
Köln. Am Dienstag abend gibt es dann dort einen öffentlichen Vortrag zu
OSM von mir und die Schüler stellen vor, was sie in den beiden Tagen
erreicht haben.
Mehr Info
Nicht direkt OSM, aber sicher auch interessant:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/289027884/yahoo_geolocation_api.php
--
Gruß
Steffen
http://kaffeeringe.de - Internet Kreativität
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo,
mir fiel gerade mal wieder eine Straßenlücke bei [EMAIL PROTECTED] auf. in JOSM
sah
ich dann, daß dort ein Straßentunnel war, dummerweise mit layer -1 in einem
landuse=residential ohne layer (also 0). Mapnik zeichnet den Tunnel,
richtig. Kann man [EMAIL PROTECTED] auch mal beibringen,
hallo allesamt,
welchen tag hat eine luftseilbahn? im wiki sah ich cable car. dies wäre
jedoch eher eine standseilbahn und nicht die variante in der luft.
was schlagt ihr mir vo zu nehmen? ich würde gerne meinen ausflug von
gestern auf der karte erfassen.
grüsse mariner
welchen tag hat eine luftseilbahn? im wiki sah ich cable car. dies wäre
jedoch eher eine standseilbahn und nicht die variante in der luft.
was schlagt ihr mir vo zu nehmen? ich würde gerne meinen ausflug von
gestern auf der karte erfassen.
aerialway=cable_car ist schon das richtige Tag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| kann mal jemand einen Blick auf
klar
|
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.40245457787084lon=9.630160076313922zoom=17layers=B000F000F
| werfen?
| Was stimmt da mit der Fußgänger-Brücke nicht?
also unter mapnik hat er es gerendert. Ich habe
Raphael Studer wrote:
aerialway=cable_car ist schon das richtige Tag für die Luftseilbahn.
Jepp, die Luft steckt da schon im Tag. Allerdings frage ich mich, warum
es railway=cable_car nicht gibt laut Features-Seite...
cu
Henry
___
Talk-de mailing
Dimitri Junker wrote:
ich dann, daß dort ein Straßentunnel war, dummerweise mit layer -1 in einem
richtig. Kann man [EMAIL PROTECTED] auch mal beibringen, daß eine Fläche
keine ways
überdecken sollte.
Mmmmh, eher andersrum. Tunnel sollten über alles (außer Icons und
Beschriftungen)
Die drei Zeichen am Anfang sind der erste Fehlergrund weil nach den
XML-Spezifikationen vor dem ?xml version=1.0? nichts anderes
erlaubt ist und der verwendete XML-Parser eine Content-Prüfung macht.
Das sagt auch die Fehlermeldung aus (Content is not allowed in prolog).
Am 10.05.2008 um
Hallo Christian,
schön dass Du Dich gemeldet hast. :-)
Das Meeting ist ein Kennenlernen anderer Hamburger Kollegen, welche
Inhalte unter freien/ freieren Lizenzen veröffentlichen. Das heißt, es
muss dort nicht erst die Reihe an Vorteilen der Nutzungsrechte erklärt
werden.
Wir kommen alle
Moin,
On Tue, 06 May 2008 22:05:40 +0200
Dirk-Lüder Kreie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
[...]
Auch beim Mappen der Wege eines Friedhofs bin ich misstrauisch beäugt
worden. Ein netter Gruß hat die meisten Situationen sofort in das totale
Fabian -Patzi- Patzke schrieb:
Zusätzlich habe ich noch das highway tag auf cycleway gesetzt, damit
es auch zu den angrenzenden besser passt und dann bicycle=yes
rausgenommen, da ein highway=cycleway automatisch bicycle=yes aussagt.
Gilt auch so für highway=footway das foot=yes automatisch
Hallo
Mmmmh, eher andersrum. Tunnel sollten über alles (außer Icons und
Beschriftungen) gerendert werden
Und was wäre wenn die Straße nicht durch einen Tunnel führt, sondern einfach
durch ein Tal und darüber eine Brücke führt? Gibt man dann der unteren
Straße layer -1 und der oberen 0, so würde
Dimitri Junker wrote:
Und was wäre wenn die Straße nicht durch einen Tunnel führt, sondern einfach
durch ein Tal und darüber eine Brücke führt? Gibt man dann der unteren
Straße layer -1 und der oberen 0, so würde die untere auch nicht gezeichnet.
Das wird jetzt auch nicht richtig
andrea giacomelli wrote:
2. su http://www.pibinko.org/out/proposta_tocati.png ho riportato la
mappa che mi hanno dato loro come zona che sarebbe da coprire.
chi è più veronologo di me saprà se lì c'è poca o tanta roba.
...ho provato a inserire la figura sul wiki OSM nella sezione delle
Salve a tutti,
io sarò assente anche questa volta, ma conto negli altri.
Pensavo si potrebbe mappare Sesto San Giovanni o Bresso. Che ne dite?
Conoscete locali aperti di domenica che abbiano connessione Internet?
Edoardo
--
Edoardo Marascalchi
ICT Consultant
website:
Cercherò anche io di fare il possibile per partecipare basta che non sia
per domenica 8.
Già la domenica successiva sarebbe ottima.
Edoardo
--
Edoardo Marascalchi
ICT Consultant
website: http://www.edoardomarascalchi.it
skype: My status skype:asca_edom?call
Il giorno mar, 13/05/2008 alle 18.09 +0200, Bighi ha scritto:
Uso questo post anche per presentarmi, sono nuovo qui e non nemmeno se
funziona cosi' la scrittura di messaggi nella talk list: speriamo sia
arrivato.
Arrivato senza problemi!
Sono di Verona, diciamo per precisione che lo ero
Hola a todos!
pregunta fácil (para quien lo sepa): cuándo usar abutters y cuando landuse?
saludos!
Rummidge
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-es
Hola, pues tal como yo lo entiendo es esto:
Imagínate que vas de viaje por una carretera que no conoces con tu GPS y al
pasar cierto cruce, empiezas a atravesar una zona industrial que es desconocida
para ti y te apuntas en la libreta: al salir a la N-XXX, empieza zona
industrial y dura 2
El ejemplo de landuse=forest también está hecho igual, y un bosque no suele
ocupar una manzana. Esos ejemplitos los han hecho en serie sin pensar mucho.
Yo creo que muchos landuse como por ejemplo industrial, residential,
commercial, retail y forest están pensados para ser usados en zonas
Ahoj,
jako napad se mi to libi. Prosim, napis to jako navrh namisto soucasne
stranky na wiki do proposed features.
Porad ale zustava otazka, jak to renderovat, protoze soucasna jedina
pouzitelna relace je multipolygon a ta se do DB uklada jako polygon.
Jak ulozit do databaze nepodporujici relace
Odvolavam, co jsem odvolal a slibuji, co jsem slibil - podle wiki je vse
uz jinak - zustal jsem s informacemi nekde pred pul rokem :]
Ano - navrh se mi libi :]
K
Tomáš Tichý napsal(a):
Ahoj,
vzhledem k tomu, ze podpora relaci v editorech se pomalu dostava do
pouzitelneho stavu, myslim, ze je
Ahoj!
vzhledem k tomu, ze podpora relaci v editorech se pomalu dostava do
pouzitelneho stavu, myslim, ze je cas oprasit myslenku mapovani
turistickych znacek pomoci relaci.
Navrhuji pouzit podobne schema tagu, jako u cyklotras, tedy:
relation = route
route = marked_trail (nebo
Ma to vsechny vyhody relace :-) Tedy nezapleveluji se cesty dalsimi
tagy a nemusi se resit duplicitni tagy (jako treba ref) obskurnimi
pseudonamespacy a podobnymi zverstvy. Neni problem s vice relacemi nad
jednou cestou. Navrh je konzistentni se soucasnym znacenim cyklotras.
Navic relace je
Ahoj,
no to teda tak neni - s cyklotrasami. Muzes je renderovat pres relation, ale
normalne
se znaci pres ncn_ref a podobne.
Vasek
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Tomáš Tichý [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ma to vsechny vyhody relace :-) Tedy nezapleveluji se cesty dalsimi
tagy a nemusi se resit
Dosud byl problem s tim, ze relace nebyly moc podporovany a spatne se s
nimi pracovalo. Pokud se tohle zmeni, tak i semanticky je to spravnejsi
zpusob...
K
Tomáš Tichý napsal(a):
Asi jsem se spatne vyjadril, prave cyklotrasy je krasny priklad
koexistence obou zpusobu znaceni - pres tagy cest a
Ahoj,
minuly tyden jsem si povidal s Vratou Fillerem, z valne casti autorem obsahu
mapy na Prahounakole.
Co z toho vypadlo zajimaveho o mape:
- mapa je realizovana jako vicevrstva bitmapa - je mapovy podklad, ten je
Shocartu, nad tim
jsou cyklostezky coby cary a pismenka a jeste nad tim jsou
Super, to je skvělá zpráva, ale potřebovali bychom teda ty dvě samotné
vrstvy :-) Na webu to je všechno sloučené a georeferencované, ale
vzhledem k vrstvě Shocartu není košer podle toho kreslit.
Dalsi otazka je, jak tagovat ty neoficialni cyklotrasy a cyklozajimave
POI, IMHO to bude potrebovat
Ahoj,
zkusim za chvilku delsi odpoved - zkousim shrnout do Wiki znaceni.
Vasek
2008/5/13 Tomáš Tichý [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Super, to je skvělá zpráva, ale potřebovali bychom teda ty dvě samotné
vrstvy :-) Na webu to je všechno sloučené a georeferencované, ale
vzhledem k vrstvě Shocartu není
Relace jsou super ale ani mapnik ani osmarender je nepodporuje krome
der v polygonech, takze resit je momentalne nema smysl.
Ovsem myslim ze nikomu nic nebrani kct_* cpat do mapy jako relaci.
Hlavne aby casem nas renderer (nebot osm osmarender ani mapnik v
blizke dobe nase stezky renderova
Ahoj,
jo, o samostatne vrstvy jsem uz poprosil. K tagum - navrhuju zkusit to
shrnout
do Wiki do tabulky, uvidime, co chybi.
Vasek
2008/5/13 Tomáš Tichý [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Super, to je skvělá zpráva, ale potřebovali bychom teda ty dvě samotné
vrstvy :-) Na webu to je všechno sloučené a
OK, chvilku strpeni a hodim to na wiki.
=TT=
2008/5/13 Vaclav Stepan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ahoj,
jo, o samostatne vrstvy jsem uz poprosil. K tagum - navrhuju zkusit to
shrnout
do Wiki do tabulky, uvidime, co chybi.
Vasek
2008/5/13 Tomáš Tichý [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Super, to je skvělá
Ahoj,
zkusil jsem shrnout současné značení sítí v Praze na Wiki, je to tu:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/WikiProjekt_Czechia/cycle_ways
Na stránku je link z Czechia editing rules. Je to OK, nebo s tím mám počkat,
kdyby byly protesty (vaše :-))?
Přemýšlel jsem nad značením cyklotras.
Neosuhlasím s návrhem,
hlavní rozdíl mezi oficiálními a neoficiálními trasami je právě to
značení v terénu, takže to může vést ke zmatení, protože se to
vyrenderuje na cyklomapě stejně jako oficiální trasy. Rozhodně bych
nemíchal značené a neznačené trasy. Značená a neznačená trasa musí být
na
Tak jsem na wiki dal návrh konvezní tabulky PNK-OSM, zatím do talku,
prosím doplňujte a komentujte.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Talk:WikiProjekt_Czechia/cycle_ways
=TT=
2008/5/13 Vaclav Stepan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ahoj,
jo, o samostatne vrstvy jsem uz poprosil. K tagum -
Ahoj,
díky za připomínky. Rozběhneš renderer, nebo protlačíš úpravu mapniku, aby
se to taky dalo zobrazovat?
Vašek
2008/5/13 Tomáš Tichý [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neosuhlasím s návrhem,
hlavní rozdíl mezi oficiálními a neoficiálními trasami je právě to
značení v terénu, takže to může vést ke
Cyklistický pruh je popsaný tu:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:cycleway
v tom moc nejasnosti nejsou, ne?
Vašek
2008/5/13 Tomáš Tichý [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tak jsem na wiki dal návrh konvezní tabulky PNK-OSM, zatím do talku,
prosím doplňujte a komentujte.
Ok, doplněno pár značek, přehodil jsem tam poznámky k sítím v Praze.
K network přístupu - souhlasím, že rozlišit značené a neznačené trasy by
bylo dobré a je to dobrá abstrakce.
Otázka ale je, jak v dohledné době zajistit, aby z toho byla i nějaká mapa a
navíc zohledňující páteřní a nepáteřní
Zdravim
Pouziva nekdo UHUL mapy v Merkaartoru? Popripadne jake jine mapy jsou v
Merkaartoru pouzitelne pro CR, kraj jihomoravsky.
Diky ToMik
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Merkaartor nepouzivam, ale dotaz mi pripomel, ze bych mel zkontrolovat
jestli uz bezi UHUL ortofoto - ukazalo se, ze opet funguje.
Nova url je:
Skvělé, díky! Hlavně, že jak trouba, každý den pingám tu starou IP
adresu :-)
Jiří
Jiri Klement wrote:
Merkaartor nepouzivam, ale dotaz mi pripomel, ze bych mel zkontrolovat
jestli uz bezi UHUL ortofoto - ukazalo se, ze opet funguje.
Nova url je:
http://geoportal2.uhul.cz/cgi-bin/oprl.asp?SERVICE=WMSVERSION=1.1.1REQUEST=GetMapSRS=EPSG:4326LAYERS=Ortofoto_cbSTYLES=defaultFORMAT=image/jpegTRANSPARENT=TRUE
Kde delam chybu ze zadne orthofoto v JOSM nevidim ? Vytvori se vrstva ale je
prazdna, zadny timeout jako kdybych mel spatne adresu. Data
Ahoj!
Merkaartor nepouzivam, ale dotaz mi pripomel, ze bych mel zkontrolovat
jestli uz bezi UHUL ortofoto - ukazalo se, ze opet funguje.
Nova url je:
A tous,
Je travaille depuis quelques temps déjà sur un prototype de nouvelle page
d'accueil francophone sur le wiki.
La 1ere réunion IRC francophone avait montré que beaucoup de gens étaient
frustrés par le manque d'organisation du wiki aussi ais-je pensé qu'une page
d'accueil avec d'avantages de
2008/5/13 Pieren Pieren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Donc, ma proposition serait de remplacer la page actuelle:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Fr:Main_Page
par celle-ci:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/User:Pieren/sandbox
Super cool :) c'est beaucoup mieux que l'actuel
--
Julien
Je vote pour X 100,
Super idée et belle réalisation.
Jean-Yves
2008/5/13 Julien Langlois [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/5/13 Pieren Pieren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Donc, ma proposition serait de remplacer la page actuelle:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Fr:Main_Page
par celle-ci:
j'aime beaucoup.
Bon travail !
Axel
A tous,
Je travaille depuis quelques temps déjà sur un prototype de nouvelle
page d'accueil francophone sur le wiki.
La 1ere réunion IRC francophone avait montré que beaucoup de gens
étaient frustrés par le manque d'organisation du wiki aussi ais-je
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
