Hi,
This concerns me:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.35855lon=120.53538zoom=16layers=B000FTF
See screenshot:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3127/3289629754_381c35989a_b.jpg
Upper left - OSM Map
Upper right - same are over merkaator with the existing yahoo image
(no high-res yahoo image)
Eugene - not Feb 28
Michael Cole - March 14
Maning - March 7
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Michael Cole colemic...@gmail.com wrote:
March 14
regards
On Monday 16 February 2009 19:28:05 maning sambale wrote:
So there's:
maning, eugene, mike cole and
YOU!
Please vote for
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 11:38:40 maning sambale wrote:
Hi,
This concerns me:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.35855lon=120.53538zoom=16layers=B00
0FTF
See screenshot:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3127/3289629754_381c35989a_b.jpg
Upper left - OSM Map
Upper right - same are
I've sent the mapper a message via the osm messaging on another topic,
but got no reply so far.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Michael Cole colemic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 11:38:40 maning sambale wrote:
Hi,
This concerns me:
On 17 Feb 2009, at 00:18, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
As you both know several years of work went in to that blog, and
not just by me. Maybe you should both think twice before
dismissing it all.
It would help if, instead of
* singling out participants (you both),
*
Hi all,
Mapnik already support this,see:
http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/24849/
But production osmarender not yet:
http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.6758lon=15.9996zoom=12layers=0B00FTF
What's the problem with osmarender patch?
The problem is that neither bobkare nor I really can
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:18 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Because 80n knows the answers Frederik, this is called politics.
But I, and many others, don't know the answer. I was asking a question.
- Gustav
___
talk mailing list
2009/2/12 George Styles geo...@ripnet.co.uk:
At the moment its simply freeware. I want to GPL it, but need to open a
sourceforge account etc etc, and havent had time yet...
If you just need a place for source version control, you can request
an OSM SVN account and use that as a repository for
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Norbert Hoffmann
nhoffm...@spamfence.net wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
And every time using :left and :right comes up, we all have a big
discussion about it and then nobody pays any attention and it comes up
again a few months later.
Perhaps this is because the
I'm trying to render some buildings with holes in and using
multipolygon relations to do it, but they don't always render. See,
for example Whitehall[1], where the HMRC/Treasury building is rendered
with its holes but the Foreign Office building to the north of it
doesn't have its multiple holes
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:50:07 +0100, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
For long waterways, it is absoutely usual to split them into a number of
ways of manageable size (think not only of the API limit but of someone
downloading an area touched by the river in JOSM!).
Optionally, use
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:18 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 17 Feb 2009, at 00:18, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
As you both know several years of work went in to that blog, and
not just by me. Maybe you should both think twice before
dismissing it all.
It
On 17/02/2009 10:36, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Norbert Hoffmann
nhoffm...@spamfence.net wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
And every time using :left and :right comes up, we all have a big
discussion about it and then nobody pays any attention and it comes up
again a few
Dan Karran schrieb:
I'm trying to render some buildings with holes in and using
multipolygon relations to do it, but they don't always render. See,
for example Whitehall[1], where the HMRC/Treasury building is rendered
with its holes but the Foreign Office building to the north of it
doesn't
Regarding http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/left_name
, Andy Allan wrote:
And nobody pays attention.
Probably as a result of there being no software support (because nobody
paid attention...), and because it's historically been a comparatively
rare use case. Though I'm
A few points to throw in the mix:
* Do we have people who want to write a blog for the project as a
whole? - Blogging requires quite a bit of commitment, especially for
such a fast moving project, if things get busy elsewhere, the blogs
tend to suffer.
* Assuming we have enough people
2009/2/17 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Norbert Hoffmann
nhoffm...@spamfence.net wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
And every time using :left and :right comes up, we all have a big
discussion about it and then nobody pays any attention and it comes up
again a few
2009/2/16 Norbert Hoffmann nhoffm...@spamfence.net:
Andy Allan wrote:
And every time using :left and :right comes up, we all have a big
discussion about it and then nobody pays any attention and it comes up
again a few months later.
Perhaps this is because the concept leftright is so simple -
Having thought about this a bit overnight I personally feel that the project
should have an OSM specific blog that gets used for OSM community
announcements, worthy news items and OSMF announcements. Announcements are
easy as they report fact and it's just a matter of deciding if the
announcement
I'm trying to render some buildings with holes in and using
multipolygon relations to do it, but they don't always render. See,
for example Whitehall[1], where the HMRC/Treasury building is rendered
with its holes but the Foreign Office building to the north of it
doesn't have its multiple
Yes and at the board meeting we should talk about osmf just owning the ogd
site. Ogd has great traffic and ranking and id suggest not throwing the baby
out with the bathwater.
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:
Having thought about this a bit overnight I
nor does the smaller building to the east of this which only has one inner
and one outer part.
The smaller building has an error in the outer part (double node at the
top left outer corner). This probably causes the error in not displaying
the inner hole.
Cheers,
Michael
[1]
Dave Stubbs wrote:
The only way of avoiding this issue in some non-confusing way is to
not use tagging as the answer. Some complex relation with a this
side member which still needs editor support. Or just adding another
way to the database for each left/right feature, which becomes hard
2009/2/17 Michael Telgkamp michael.telgk...@gmail.com:
nor does the smaller building to the east of this which only has one inner
and one outer part.
The smaller building has an error in the outer part (double node at the
top left outer corner). This probably causes the error in not
Editor support is less
important
- and far easier to fix - than explaining to all the people who
don't
even realise that all roads have a direction in openstreetmap -
and
except for oneway roads, I have no idea which ways are pointing
in
which directions, and it shouldn't be important
On Tuesday, 17 February 2009 10:36:16 +,
Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Norbert Hoffmann
nhoffm...@spamfence.net wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
And every time using :left and :right comes up, we all have a big
discussion about it and then
Andy Allan wrote:
And nobody pays attention. The main problem is that two-way roads have
no inherent, real-world, direction - neither side of the road is the
right or the left. Or rather, both sides of the road are the right or
the left, depending on which way you are facing.
And that's why in
While sympathetic to the underlying need being discussed in this thread, I
suspect there is a further problem. Although a way has an intrinsic sense in
OSM, this is fairly volatile! All it needs is someone to reverse a way - and
this can happen rather easily, say, when combining two ways with the
In my original post, I hadn't realised that blog links tended to be
only official project announcements. I assumed that blog would show
all the stuff which is happening in the OSM project, in a
community-led way that reflects the wiki-like nature of the project.
However, the OSM front page seems
Mike Harris wrote:
While sympathetic to the underlying need being discussed in this thread, I
suspect there is a further problem. Although a way has an intrinsic sense in
OSM, this is fairly volatile! All it needs is someone to reverse a way - and
this can happen rather easily, say, when
OJ W wrote:
p.s. how come the OSM front page doesn't contain a link to the
foundation website?
Hysterical Raisins.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
and how come sidebars on the map can be opened by:
* clicking on one of the external links (map key)
* selecting a map layer (data viewer)
* selecting a tab (export)
* submitting a form (search)
it seems we like to give people a nice surprise when they use certain
UI elements, different to what
OJ W wrote:
and how come sidebars on the map can be opened by:
* clicking on one of the external links (map key)
* selecting a map layer (data viewer)
* selecting a tab (export)
* submitting a form (search)
Because those are the things which need them?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists andrewc-email-lists at piffle.org writes:
Further to Tobias's raising of :mode, :wet, :direction etc. for
pseudovoting, I'd like to raise a general method for tagging properties
of the two sides of the road:
Much encouraged that there is a coder (?) view that it's pretty simple to
implement automated left /right tag reversal if a way is reversed (and I assume
the main renderers are sense-aware where ways are concerned?). This was my main
concern and if this is generally agreed to be the case I'll
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists andrewc-email-lists at piffle.org writes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/right_left
The proposal suggests an interpretation of suffixes like
property:left=value
property:right=value
I see one big trouble.
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:50:04 +, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
OJ W wrote:
and how come sidebars on the map can be opened by:
* clicking on one of the external links (map key)
* selecting a map layer (data viewer)
* selecting a tab (export)
* submitting a form (search)
Because
Tom Chance wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:50:04 +, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
OJ W wrote:
and how come sidebars on the map can be opened by:
* clicking on one of the external links (map key)
* selecting a map layer (data viewer)
* selecting a tab (export)
* submitting a form
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk writes:
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
So, we have a pile of good intentioned legacy here. OGD carries posts on all
sorts of open geo data stuff in the early days (Aug 2004) including the most
important one http://www.opengeodata.org/?p=2 relating to
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Equally permalink is a fairly standard name for that concept now, even
though (originally at least) it clearly wasn't something that most
people could be expected to know.
I get complaints about the lack of permalink on
I see one big trouble. If not so clever editor (program or
human being) is
changing the direction of the road withour swapping left/right
keys, nobody can
correct the situation without local knowlegde of the area
mapped. Left or right
are not enough by themselves but there must be some
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) schrieb:
Having thought about this a bit overnight I personally feel that the project
should have an OSM specific blog that gets used for OSM community
announcements, worthy news items and OSMF announcements. Announcements are
easy as they report fact and it's
On Feb 17, 2009, at 6:02 AM, 80n wrote:
Steve, I don't normally write rhetorical questions, its not my usual
writing style, so I'm sure you misread my post and responded
impulsively. But, perhaps you can provide some ideas or suggestions
about how to make it clearer what each blog
Regarding http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/right_left ,
Ed Loach wrote:
As I understand it (from last time this discussion cropped up here)
JOSM and Potlatch already handle the reversals of :left and :right
tags, which covers most users.
This is not the case with either
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
There really is not much other choice, as areas grow larger and the old
idea of simply drawing touching polygons relies on a rendering style
without a casing around the polygon.
Yep, please avoid making one polygon by
Mike Harris wrote:
Much encouraged that there is a coder (?)
Well, coder of a sort. It certainly would help if the suffixes were
generally well known, documented and consistent so that if something has
a :left on the end of it, software doing reversals knows that it should
flip it to a :right
This is not the case with either JOSM 1318 or JOSM 1418 (the
current
josm-latest.jar). I've tested with cycleway:left=track as well
as
foo:left=42. Probably this would need to be raised as a
separate bug if
people express general satisfaction.
Can't speak for Potla(t)ch, not tried.
I
This is not the case with either JOSM 1318 or JOSM 1418 (the
current
josm-latest.jar). I've tested with cycleway:left=track as well
as
foo:left=42. Probably this would need to be raised as a
separate bug if
people express general satisfaction.
Actually, I've now checked the source, and it
On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:50 AM, Mike Harris wrote:
Reversing the ways then, of course, reverses the 'left' and
'right' descriptors with their differing tags!
Well, of course. I would expect that all editors would rename right -
left and left - right when a way is reversed. Don't they do
After discussions on both the mailing list and the wiki we (that is myself
and Skippern) have opened the proposed boundary=maritime for voting at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maritime_borders
We think this is the best way suggested to tag the whole hiearchy of
maritime borders, in a way
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com wrote:
I would suggest that maritime borders are not tagged the same way as land
borders. Should we have a new tag for maritime borders? Stop tagging them?
Ignore the problem?
The proposal authored by Aun (Skippern) is now
Hello all,
My friend asked me this question:
Does anybody know how to download the local copy of OSM wiki? For instance,
Wikipedia guys do provide DB dumps (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_database) but i've found no such
thing on wiki.openstreetmap.org . I've failed with Wget -
Oneway is strange in that as well as yes/no you can have oneway=-1
for one way in the opposite direction of the way, and I still can't
work out why that is necessary.
Because none of the editors had a reverse way tool :-). I think JOSM
could reverse a segment, but that's was about it.
Oxford, Oxfordshire and the Cotswolds have as many mappers as anywhere
in Britain, and such things as Mapnik, Potlatch and npemap.org.uk hail
from our county - but we didn't have a mailing list.
Now Mike Collinson has kindly set one up. The address is
Hi
I have written a proposal for Marketplace, a regulated area outdoor (or
indoor) for trade of various commodities. I have used a couple of days in
Draft, but have decided to push the proposal forward to RFC, and if there
are few suggestions to improvements I will open it for vote in a couple of
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:45:00PM -, Ed Loach wrote:
Oneway is strange in that as well as yes/no you can have oneway=-1
for one way in the opposite direction of the way, and I still can't
work out why that is necessary.
It used to be the case that the renderers wrote the name of the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:48:17AM -, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
wrote:
Having thought about this a bit overnight I personally feel that the project
should have an OSM specific blog that gets used for OSM community
announcements, worthy news items and OSMF announcements.
This could
Hi All,
The latest beta version of OpenStreetMap Translator is now available
from http://www http://www.polygongis.com.polygongis.com
http://www.polygongis.com. This version includes shp file export and
data filtering. We would appreciate it if you could try this application
out and let us
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:51:12PM +, Dave Stubbs wrote:
Oneway is strange in that as well as yes/no you can have oneway=-1
for one way in the opposite direction of the way, and I still can't
work out why that is necessary.
Because none of the editors had a reverse way tool :-). I
Dave Stubbs wrote:
2009/2/9 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk:
Where does the Cycle Map get it's coastlines from? I happened to notice that
some of the paths I mapped along the sea front near here, which required
some adjustment to the coastline, have let to Mapnik and Osmarender layers
having
Hi,
this is probably a niche application but I have just played around a
bit with the aim to create large (as in 5000x5000 pixel or bigger)
globe-shaped images with ti...@home tiles.
On a whole-world level, ti...@home tiles give a better impression of
where we have something than the
Hi all,
I've started adding architects names to buildings in Manchester (based on a
combination of local history sources and Wikipedia), and so thought I'd
better document the tag I'm using in case others want to do the same:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:architect
The only problem I
Hi,
Many city governments in Massachusetts publish their parcel (lot) data
for free reuse, either individually or through MassGIS. This data is
appropriately licensed for re-use in OSM, and is informative -- in most
cases, it has addresses which can be used for geocoding.
I'm curious as to
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Christopher Schmidt
crschm...@metacarta.com wrote:
Hi,
Many city governments in Massachusetts publish their parcel (lot) data
for free reuse, either individually or through MassGIS.
In my quest to find free data to import in the US, I discovered that parcel
Property boundaries are definitely something that belongs in OSM, it's
just boundary=administrative at a different level.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Christopher Schmidt
crschm...@metacarta.com wrote:
Hi,
Many city governments in Massachusetts publish their parcel (lot) data
for free reuse, either individually or through MassGIS. This data is
appropriately licensed for re-use in OSM, and is informative --
On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
cases, it has addresses which can be used for geocoding
For completely unrelated reasons (I was searching for an unfinished
railroad and was looking to see if it existed in any property lines)
(no, it didn't) (sigh) I had a copy of
Hi,
Maarten Deen wrote:
That's nice! And now 360 pictures, all one degree rotated and a nice java
application that you can rotate the globe.
Oh, you need images for rotation around the poles too. I guess this is not
something that can be rendered realtime?
Well, the ti...@home tile creation
Hi,
ya, its certainly worth creating a tag proposal page for it.
I would (imo) would like to see it only rendered when zooming in real close.
Some other renderer might want to see it at a different zoom.
When buying a house, you should know what land your getting :)
p.s. I think a variation of
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Als NC hebben we er als OSM helaas niets aan. Dus denk er eens over
na of BY-SA genoeg juridische en promotionele waarde kan bieden :)
Maarten Hilferink wrote:
Nav je opmerking over NC voorwaarden, heb ik besloten per 01-03-2009
de 3dShapes databank onder
Dat zou inderdaad geweldig zijn, als vaststaat dat 3D shapes niet als een
afgeleid werk wordt gezien van Top10NL en het AHN. Ik kijk liever eerst de kat
uit de boom...
Frank
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Als NC hebben we er als OSM helaas niets aan. Dus denk er eens over
BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
I also like Jack's suggestion on name old_name, plus the is_in tag.
+1 for the is_in tag from me, definitely with , Australia appended.
My reasons are pretty selfish - My choice of GPS software is Navit and
it requires the is_in tag to search for towns.
Hallo Holger,
ich würde gern mal wissen welche Straßen in Erfurt noch fehlen. Dazu
gibt es ja irgendwie eine Möglichkeit das herauszubekommen. Ich habe
aber absolut keine Ahnung wie das geht.
Im Netz gibt es ein Tool mit dem man eine Liste der vorhandenen
OSM Straßen generieren kann:
Frank Huebner hf...@arcormail.de wrote:
Habt ihr andere Ideen?
Ich hätte gerne was routingfähiges um ehrlich zu sein. Für kurze Touren und
wenns anfängt zu regnen. Routing zum nächsten amenity=shelter :)
Am besten von ganz Deutschland und einige Kilometer ins benachbarte Ausland
rein. Keine
Hallo,
ich hätte mal ne Frage zu Naturschutzgebiet, Naturpark, Nationalpark.
Laut MapFeatures kann man ja das NSG als leisure=nature_reserve bzw. als
boundary=national_park (gleichzeitig für Nationalpark) rendern.
Warum ist der boundary-tag für beide, sind doch ziemlich verschiedene
Sachen?
Hermann Kraus h...@scribus.info wrote:
Wandinger: 'Bei weiteren Kooperationen würden wir natürlich
Lizenz-Gebühren verlangen.'
ROTFL! Das Projekt wäre natürlich ganz bestimmt bereit diese zu bezahlen.
OpenStreetMap aber verspricht auf seiner Homepage: 'Unsere Daten sind frei
und werden es
Am 17. Februar 2009 10:28 schrieb Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de:
Frank Huebner hf...@arcormail.de wrote:
Habt ihr andere Ideen?
Ich hätte gerne was routingfähiges um ehrlich zu sein. Für kurze Touren und
wenns anfängt zu regnen. Routing zum nächsten amenity=shelter :)
ja, das
Am 16. Februar 2009 02:16 schrieb Johann H. Addicks addi...@gmx.net:
Die einen zählen reale Stockwerke (Straße über Tunnel, unter Brücke),
das ist ja auch, wie es gedacht ist, sind topologische Stockwerke,
also ist ueber/unter
für andere reicht ein Belang (Tennisplatz auf Freizeitgelände) und
Hi,
From: Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de
[..]
Ich frage mich warum die Daten ?berhaupt k?nstlich runterskaliert wurden.
In der Originalaufl?sung w?re das abzeichnen von H?usern m?glich gewesen!
[..]
vielleicht darum!?
/Andreas
___
Kleine Frage zum Betreff: Was tut der Notlandeplatz in der Aufstellung von
Naturreservaten?
Ich vermute mal, dass diese inzwischen zumindest in Deutschland nicht nur
abandonned sind, sondern auch sämtlicherweise rückgebaut wurden und daher
auch das Rendering der Autobahnen nicht dadurch
Hi,
Kleine Frage zum Betreff: Was tut der Notlandeplatz in der Aufstellung von
Naturreservaten?
naja, laut meiner Karte ist das die Abkürzung für Nationalpark. Im
ersten Satz meiner mail hab ich die 4 Abkürzungen ja auch ausgeschrieben ;-)
schönen Gruß
Alex
Tobias,
danke für Deine Klarstellung!
Es ging mir darum, ob man die Erdoberfläche *oder* die Erdoberfläche
inklusive aller auf der Erdoberfläche befindlichen Objekte haben möchte.
Ich denke, Kunstobjekte (Bauwerke...) sollten eher vermieden werden.
OpenDEM.org wäre dann sicher besser.
Gruß
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
Was der Autor einfordert ist jedoch eine Generalisierung. Und das wird
nicht einfach. Neben Entwicklungsaufwand für einen zweiten Pass wird
es vermutlich riesige Regelsetze brauchen, um Kriterien für zuträgliche
Element-Dichten im Umkreis von zu bestimmen und zudem
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Mir faellt ein, dass die aktuellste (eventuell Beta-) Version von QGIS
einen OSM-Editor als Plugin haben soll. Dann kannst Du Dir sogar den
JOSM sparen ,-)
Ach, ehrlich? *runterlad*
___
Talk-de mailing list
Hallo Sven,
Lizenzgebühren für die Nutzung der Luftbilder
Luftbilder wurden bisher nur gegen Lizenzgebühr zur Nutzung abgegeben.
Im Pilotprojekt soll geprüft werden, ob die freie Nutzung von DOP-2m
künftig ermöglicht werden soll.
Die (ungeschickte) Formulierung der Presseabteilung wird gerade
Hallo DrFrJoBe,
Dr. Franz-Josef Behr schrieb:
Es ging mir darum, ob man die Erdoberfläche *oder* die Erdoberfläche
inklusive aller auf der Erdoberfläche befindlichen Objekte haben möchte.
Ich denke, Kunstobjekte (Bauwerke...) sollten eher vermieden werden.
OpenDEM.org wäre dann sicher
Hallo,
Tobias Wendorff wrote:
Was der Autor einfordert ist jedoch eine Generalisierung. Und das wird
nicht einfach. Neben Entwicklungsaufwand für einen zweiten Pass wird
es vermutlich riesige Regelsetze brauchen, um Kriterien für zuträgliche
Element-Dichten im Umkreis von zu bestimmen und
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Tobias hat recht;
^
Dööt Dööt Dööt Dööt.
Man kann PostGIS die problemlos Generalisierung rauslocken, was
das Kartographiebild massiv verschönern würde,
Wuerde ich so nicht unterschreiben; erstens ganz gewiss nicht
problemlos, zweitens vermute ich,
Wer eine inzwischen etwas längere Diskussion um die Beschilderung von Straßen
durch nicht umfriedete Hafenbereiche nachlesen möchte:
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/
index.php?title=Wikipedia:Auskunft#Unbefugter_Aufenthalt_nicht_erlaubt.
(kurz: http://tinyurl.com/bfs967 )
Frage hier: access=private
Tobias Wendorff schrieb:
OpenDEM.org wäre dann sicher besser.
Das sehe ich genauso, denn die Kunstobjekte haben wir ja schon in
OSM.
Nein, moment ... dann wäre es ja doch DTM, also openDTM.org?!
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo Community,
wäre es möglich, unserem Wiki einen URL-Service beizubringen?
eine Art: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/?id=1234 mit Weiterleitung zum
richtigen Artikel, z.B. .../index.php/Georeferenzierung
So könnte man an bestimmten Nodes einfach etwas kurzes drantaggen:
note:wiki_id = 1234
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
Das wird aber nicht automatisiert erstellt. Wenn ich die Vorgehensweise
richtig verstanden habe basiert die Erstellung der Karten auf zwei
Datensätzen. Einmal der reinen Geometrie und einmal den Render-Hints.
Diese Render-Hints wollen wir ja nicht in der Datenbank...
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
Das wird aber nicht automatisiert erstellt. Wenn ich die Vorgehensweise
richtig verstanden habe basiert die Erstellung der Karten auf zwei
Datensätzen. Einmal der reinen Geometrie und einmal den Render-Hints.
Diese
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
Man kann PostGIS die problemlos Generalisierung rauslocken, was
das Kartographiebild massiv verschönern würde,
Wuerde ich so nicht unterschreiben; erstens ganz gewiss nicht
problemlos, zweitens vermute ich, dass eine gute Generalisierung
niemals
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
Warum wollen wir die nicht? Die Render-Fixes wollen wir nicht. Aber
Hints halte ich schon für sinnvoll.
Ich bin mir ganz sicher, dass ich für sowas in meinen OSM-Anfängen
häufig kritisiert wurde, weil ein Hint nichts mit den eigentlichen
Geodaten zu tun hat.
Statt
Zitat Tobias Wendorff:
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
[...]. Nur muss auch dafür OSM noch viel lernen. Erstmal
sollten wir die Grunddaten erfassen.
Salami-Taktik also? Erste Welle zeichnet die Straßen ein, zweite
Welle die Hausnummern, dritte Welle die Rendering-Hints?
Genau so. Anders wird es
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
Warum wollen wir die nicht? Die Render-Fixes wollen wir nicht. Aber
Hints halte ich schon für sinnvoll.
Ich bin mir ganz sicher, dass ich für sowas in meinen OSM-Anfängen
häufig kritisiert wurde, weil ein Hint nichts mit den
Michael Buege schrieb:
weil die Chance sehr gering sein kann, dass jemandem auffällt, dass etwas
fehlt.
-v bitte
Ach, die Straße ist bei OSM ja schon drin; da muss ich nicht mehr hin.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo,
Tobias Wendorff wrote:
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
Warum wollen wir die nicht? Die Render-Fixes wollen wir nicht. Aber
Hints halte ich schon für sinnvoll.
Ich bin mir ganz sicher, dass ich für sowas in meinen OSM-Anfängen
häufig kritisiert wurde, weil ein Hint nichts mit den eigentlichen
Andreas Fritsche schrieb:
From: Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de
[..]
Ich frage mich warum die Daten ?berhaupt k?nstlich runterskaliert wurden.
In der Originalaufl?sung w?re das abzeichnen von H?usern m?glich gewesen!
[..]
vielleicht darum!?
Das würde keinen Sinn ergeben. Uns
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
