hello everyone,
can anyone please tell me why cloudmade does not want to navigate
on/via
http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=48.894913lng=17.708158zoom=15directions=48.89702927061499,17.7099609375,48.89101950595075,17.71249294281006travel=footstyleId=1opened_tab=1
?
i see nothing wrong with
Hello Jozef,
I don't believe this is the right list to ask about Cloudmade services. I
have forwarded your email to our support team, you should hear from them
shortly.
BR,
Sergiy
--
Sergiy Drapiko
Product Manager
Cloudmade
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jozef Riha jose1...@gmail.com wrote:
Daklem, korisnik http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/uhs01/edits i
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/uhs02/edits koristi Google ili neku drugu
podlogu za iscrtavanje, što je čisti piratluk. Činjenica da se to može
napraviti ne znači da se to smije napraviti.
Također to što se prijavio jučer i što
Really cool debugging tool
-- Forwarded message --
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Date: Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] OSM Inspector now world-wide and with additional views
To: Talk Openstreetmap t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
the Geofabrik OSM
English version below
Dag allemaal,
Ik ben Paul Cardinaels, 25 jaar en ik ben al enkele jaren bezig met mappen
voor OSM.
Eerst heb ik de omgeving van Neerpelt gedaan, en nu wil ik beginnen aan de
omgeving Meerle/Hoogstraten.
Omdat ik verhuisd ben kan ik de TomTom van mijn ouders niet meer
Op 1 december 2009 12:29 heeft Paul Cardinaels
p.cardina...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven:
Since I moved I can't use my parents TomTom anymore, and so I'm searching
for a cheap GPS reciever (navigation isn't necessary) with USB-connection
and wich stores the tracks in .gpx-format.
Do you
You can create a new relation with the alternate path and the parameter
state=alternate (see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route). Maybe add a note
to the description parameter. If the reference is the same, keep it
that way, but if the name is different use it for the name
Dag Paul,
Als het enkel is om je tracks te loggen en te gebruiken kan je
- een gps receiver kopen - het goedkoopst - die de data doorstuurt naar
laptop of dergelijke en ze dan loggen op de laptop,
- een tracker nemen, die hetzelfde kan, maar ook zelfstandig de data kan
opslaan.
Op deze pagina
I think I was a little bit to fast.
It is about http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=51.0466lon=5.0184zoom=13
The street is called Diestsebaan between Diest and Veerle-Laakdal. The
way is also tagged as cycleway. Because I use josm the way was drawn as
a cycleway. In the online editor
According to sattelite imagery, the cycleway is not separated ...
It might be a JOSM bug do display it as a cycleway ... I'll check tonight on
a similar road in my neighbourhood ...
2009/12/1 Bart Vanherck vanherck.b...@telenet.be
I think I was a little bit to fast.
It is about
I think I did. I think it serves no purpose, also, it was connected wrong on
most
of the junctions. After reading a bit, I found a page (from Ben?) that
describes it
not being a good idea do to so.
I also think it should never ne drawn seperate, as, logically it's the same
road,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have data derived from OSM data, do I have to distribute it? The
This may be too England-oriented to be generally useful but for what it is
worth ...
If the area of grass is a meadow or park over which there exists a large
number of equivalent 'invisible' routes that could physically walked I would
only use an area tag such as 'meadow' or 'park' and add 'path'
Broadly agree but why is 'meadow' not a land use? I believe that it is - in
rural England at least ... See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meadow
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Anthony [mailto:o...@inbox.org]
Sent: 01 December 2009 00:12
To: Roy Wallace
Cc:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Mike Harris wrote:
Broadly agree but why is 'meadow' not a land use? I believe that it is - in
rural England at least ... See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meadow
meadow is a statement of what grows there
landuse could be grazing or recreation or hay production
Is this a bug in cloudmade routing or is there some problem with the
tagging of our roads in this example?
See
http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=58.41374lng=15.623503zoom=15directions=58.41259318415956,15.63929557800293,58.41565019567137,15.625476837158203travel=carstyleId=1opened_tab=1
The routing
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com
Edit the coastline so that it joins the islands instead of separating
them
but won't this operation make one island instead of 2 that they are?
cheers,
Martin
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 00:20:20 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there is a proposal for it since March 2007, you can simply find it by
typing causeway in search.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Causeway
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Svensson
Sent: 1 December 2009 09:08
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Cloudmade routing
Is this a bug in cloudmade routing or is there some problem
2009/12/1 Gregory Williams gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk
B over each end of the bridge. So, my guess is that the bridge isn't in
Cloudmade's underlying routing data for some reason.
+1. Looking on other places on the map I guess the data is at least 1 week
old.
cheers,
Martin
Hi
I just submitted a bugreport for Potlatch 1.3a:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2528
When you try to repostion the Yahoo-Background-Image via space+left
mouse the image jumps.
Could somebody comfirm?
___
talk mailing list
On Tue, December 1, 2009 19:24, Peter Herison wrote:
Hi
I just submitted a bugreport for Potlatch 1.3a:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2528
When you try to repostion the Yahoo-Background-Image via space+left
mouse the image jumps.
Could somebody comfirm?
Yes, I noticed this. I
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Andrew Errington wrote:
Yes, I noticed this. I reported it via the mailing list, but not very
clearly, and I never submitted a bug report as I am a bad person.
an extra hours mapping as penance
___
talk mailing list
2009/12/1 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com
Edit the coastline so that it joins the islands instead of separating
them
but won't this operation make one island
2009/12/1 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 00:20:20 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there is a proposal for it since March 2007, you can simply find it by
typing causeway in search.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Causeway
That page says:
Status:
Peter Herison wrote:
When you try to repostion the Yahoo-Background-Image via
space+left mouse the image jumps.
Could somebody comfirm?
It would be helpful to have the URL of somewhere where this happens - i.e.
lat, lon and crucially, zoom level. I haven't been able to reproduce it on a
Hi all,
I'm aware that this topic is somehow delicate, but I was quite astonished
when I had a look at Cloudmade's Terms and Conditions
http://cloudmade.com/terms_conditions
espescially Part 6:
*
###
6. Ownership; Proprietary Rights.* As between the Parties, the CloudMade
Site including the
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have data derived from OSM data, do I have to distribute it? The
licence does not force you to distribute or make any data available. But if
you do choose to distribute it, or anything derived from it, it
2009/12/1 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
And then both axes are not really boolean. Between the physically
possible and the physically impossible may lie an area that requires
more skill, better vehicles or simply means a higher risk of accidents.
amenity=footway, surface=wire,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
The claim copyright on graphics and design and restrict just the map data
to cc-by-sa. IMHO that inhebits e.g. that I take a screenshot of their map
and put it on my website. Looking at the legal faq in the
To quote from the wikipedia link I included
Especially in the United Kingdom and Ireland, the term meadow is commonly
used in its original sense to mean a haymeadow; grassland cut annually for
hay
I cannot see the difference between grassland cut annually for hay and
hay production. By
2009/12/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
If so, that's just silly.
really?
This term here: (but excluding the Map Data, which are governed solely
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 2.0
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/) seems to do
2009/12/1 Liz ed...@billiau.net
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Mike Harris wrote:
Broadly agree but why is 'meadow' not a land use? I believe that it is -
in
rural England at least ... See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meadow
meadow is a statement of what grows there
landuse could be grazing or
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:58:35 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
fine, but to me it seems it doesn't care for the viral aspects of our
current license, that is: every derived work (derived from our data) must
have the same license: cc-by-sa 2.0
A website is no derived work
Hi all,
Is it ever correct for two roads to cross physically, at the same level,
but not create a junction between them?
The situation I have looks like:
C
|
A---+---B
|
v
|
D
With apologies for ASCII art. Cars go from A
2009/12/1 marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com
A website is no derived work of a map presented in it.
It is not adding any data to the map or changing the map
itself in a significant way.
Merely including something is not relevant.
Just like Linux-Distributions containing non-free software
and
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
really?
Ja rly. If every website that wanted to use OSM data was forced to open
license the entire rest of their site, all their artwork etc, it would be a
massive disencentive to using it.
Also, don't
In your special case I guess it would be OK to not create a junction.
That will however lead to (false) warnings in OSM data validators and
there is a chance that someone else will insert that junction later
on, so I'll recommend putting the junction there now and use
restriction relations. (e.g.
Am 30.11.2009 11:03, Richard Fairhurst:
I’d like to tell you about Potlatch 2, the all-new version of the
OpenStreetMap online editor.
(...)
So have a play, let us know what you think, and grab the source. You can
find a read-only running version at:
http://www.geowiki.com/potlatch2/
Yes there should be a node at the crossing.
Most of those ways are one way , so routing software would not allow many
turns anyway. The only turn I could see being currently as valid would be when
going south on Lakeside Drive and turning right onto the northbound
carriageway. To stop this
- Original Message -
From: David Groom
To: Steve Bennett ; Open Street Map mailing list
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Non-junctioning crossing roads
Yes there should be a node at the crossing.
Most of those ways are one way , so routing
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:39 AM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.netwrote:
Alternatively the whole junction restriction could be accomplished as
konrad
said by a couple of only_straight_on restrictions
Ok, I've done that. About time I learnt how to create relations :)
Anyone want to check
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 Gregory Williams gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk
B over each end of the bridge. So, my guess is that the bridge isn't in
Cloudmade's underlying routing data for some reason.
+1. Looking on
Hi,
the Geofabrik OSM Inspector (tools.geofabrik.de/osmi), a debugging
tool, now supports worldwide daily data (previously Europe only) for the
important views, as well as several other new features.
If you are interested, there's more about it on:
http://blog.geofabrik.de/?p=27
Bye
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
the Geofabrik OSM Inspector (tools.geofabrik.de/osmi), a debugging
tool, now supports worldwide daily data (previously Europe only) for the
important views, as well as several other new features.
If you are
2009/12/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
Ja rly. If every website that wanted to use OSM data was forced to open
license the entire rest of their site, all their artwork etc, it would be a
massive disencentive to using it.
If I
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 Liz ed...@billiau.net
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Mike Harris wrote:
Broadly agree but why is 'meadow' not a land use? I believe that it is -
in
rural England at least ... See
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Steve Bennett
Be careful. The question about the junction node is NOT about routing
but about physical modeling. Even if both roads are not allowing
turning left or right, you have to add a junction node (and the
relations about turning restrictions), othewise we
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns
lafr...@gmail.comwrote:
If I understand him correctly he is not talking about website or any
additional tools but about rastered MAP tiles!
but excluding the Map Data
It's pretty clear.
Steve
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Richard Weait wrote:
So if, in fact, CloudMade has week-old data that is giving sub-optimal
routing results in this case, I think that we should congratulate
ourselves and them.
The bridge itself has not been changed for almost a month and it has been
around since 2006 in
Thanks Pieren, that's the kind of answer I was looking for: NO it's never a
good idea to have two highways cross at the same level without an explicit
junction.
Steve
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Steve Bennett
Be careful. The
Just thought I'd ask - the Osmarender layer isn't displaying for me, as of
the last 24 hours or so, maybe more. I just get a white page that keeps
trying to load...
(This is through the normal openstreetmap.org view...)
___
talk mailing list
Frederik
Big thanks from me for the update.
Particularly for adding Places.
Can you pass my personal thanks to Jochen?
He shared draft with me (was my original request) and I was just too sloppy to
have responded to him personally on it.
Cheers
STEVE
Steve Chilton, Learning Support Fellow
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Lauris Bukis-Haberkorns
lafriks at gmail.comwrote:
If I understand him correctly he is not talking about website or any
additional tools but about rastered MAP tiles!
but excluding the Map Data
It's pretty clear.
Martin is correct.
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Peter Herison wrote:
When you try to repostion the Yahoo-Background-Image via space+left
mouse the image jumps. Could somebody comfirm?
It would be helpful to have the URL of somewhere where this happens -
i.e. lat, lon and crucially, zoom level. I haven't been
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have data derived from OSM data, do I have to distribute it? The
licence does not force you to distribute or make any data available.
I'm using osmosis to download replicate diffs via the --rii task and write
them out to change files using --wxc. Is there any way to have osmosis name
the output file with the sequence ID or timestamp of the last replicate it
downloaded? I'm using a script to name them with the current system
Hi,
Jeremy Adams wrote:
I'm using osmosis to download replicate diffs via the --rii task and
write them out to change files using --wxc. Is there any way to have
osmosis name the output file with the sequence ID or timestamp of the
last replicate it downloaded? I'm using a script to name
Hi,
I was told today by a bicycle commuter that openstreemap is interesting but
unsuccessful because opencyclemap is wrong.
His point was:
opencyclemap show the directions for cars but not for cyclists:
in his city, there are a lot of streets where car can only go one way, but
cyclists can go
Hi,
Jeremy Adams wrote:
I'm using osmosis to download replicate diffs via the --rii task and write
them out to change files using --wxc. Is there any way to have osmosis name
the output file with the sequence ID or timestamp of the last replicate it
downloaded? I'm using a script to name
Cartinus wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 00:20:20 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there is a proposal for it since March 2007, you can simply find it by
typing causeway in search.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Causeway
That page says:
Status: Abandoned
That search shows you
Liz wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Cartinus wrote:
Where do you get the idea that a causeway is periodically inundated from?
When it is an Australian causeway in a dry creek bed.
That would not be a causeway in US English. Is the byway running along the
creek or just crossing it (what we in Texas
OJ W wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com
Edit the coastline so that it joins the islands instead of separating
them
but won't this operation make one island instead of 2 that they are?
cheers,
Hi,
Jeremy Adams wrote:
That's my plan B. I'm not a superstar when it comes to bash, so I'll
have to do some research on how to read the state.txt file and pull the
sequence number out.
SEQUENCE=`grep sequenceNumber state.txt|cut -d= -f2`
mv osmosis-out.osc $SEQUENCE.osc
Bye
Frederik
--
Jeremy Adams wrote:
That's my plan B. I'm not a superstar when it comes to bash, so I'll
have to do some research on how to read the state.txt file and pull the
sequence number out.
SEQUENCE=`grep sequenceNumber state.txt|cut -d= -f2`
mv osmosis-out.osc $SEQUENCE.osc
Bye
Frederik
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Just thought I'd ask - the Osmarender layer isn't displaying for me, as of
the last 24 hours or so, maybe more. I just get a white page that keeps
trying to load...
It's working just fine for me.
--Ciprian
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
And then both axes are not really boolean. Between the physically
possible and the physically impossible may lie an area that requires
more skill, better vehicles
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Randy wrote:
Liz wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Cartinus wrote:
Where do you get the idea that a causeway is periodically inundated from?
When it is an Australian causeway in a dry creek bed.
That would not be a causeway in US English. Is the byway running along the
creek
Yes, US English would also call that a ford.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to
think at all. -- Hypatia of Alexandria
-Original Message-
From: Liz ed...@billiau.net
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:12:49
To:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
With apologies for ASCII art. Cars go from A to B, or from C to D, but they
can't turn. It's controlled by traffic lights. So, do I create the junction
represented by the +, or just let them cross over? If I create the
junction, how do I stop routing
I think I might write up some cross-cutting wiki pages like vegetation,
pointing people in the right directions for the subtle distinctions between
natural= and landuse= etc.
Ok, I did it.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vegetation
Lots of common bush/tree words link there.
Steve
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Swap back to your pushbike, or your legs only, mentally.
On foot you can definitely and legally turn left or right.
So its a valid junction for pedestrian routing.
Ah yes, that's a very valid point.
Queens Rd is a horrible road
I think this is a case where the different versions of English are not
quite the same. To me:
A ford is a crossing that is usually underwater all the time. However
the water is shallow enough that you can cross anyway, just expect to
get a bit wet. It may be dry if the whole river dries up, or
IMHO, the US English/Australian English issue here is spurious. Australians
certainly understand and use the word ford to mean a low water crossing.
We also use the word causeway to mean an embankment with a road on top of
it. We sometimes also use the word causeway to mean a ford (particularly
2009/12/2 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
IMHO, the US English/Australian English issue here is spurious. Australians
certainly understand and use the word ford to mean a low water crossing.
I disagree, I've only ever heard them refered to as causeways and
fords up until I started mapping
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
we have persistent trouble with the eurocentric view of the world projected
by
OSM
so when they are arguing about various terms, its important to let them
know
that UK English ain't what we use
Be grateful it's UK english and
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
no no no
a causeway need not have a road
the devil's causeway in eire and all the rest of those examples
This? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant%27s_Causeway
Looks like natural=coastline to me!
Again, are you not confusing the
How do you make a style that depends on two attributes? Eg,
highway=residential *and* cycleway=lane?
I know that this works:
way[highway=residentia] { ... }
way[cycleway=lane] { ... }
And the two will be combined, if that makes sense. But how do you make the
style depend on that specific
I have totally renovated the 2007 proposal for a causeway tag and placed
it in Proposal status. Comments are encouraged.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Causeway
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Was doing a survey around the outskirts of Thirlmere (a small town in
NSW), and came across a difficult road to survey and tag.
It's called Rays Lane
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.15725lon=150.56322zoom=16layers=B000FTF
It has 6 gates, 3 of which are usually closed - to help control any
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:08 PM, cam_...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Also, what's the best thing to do when you've discovered that 2 ends of
the same road have slightly different spellings on their physical road
signs?
Heh, I've seen that in Canberra. There's a street called
Bolderwood/Boldrewood St.
2009/12/1 cam_...@fastmail.fm:
I've tagged that section of road that's overgrown as being: disused =
yes
I would tag that highway=disused, since this is more consistent with
railway=disused etc.
Also, what's the best thing to do when you've discovered that 2 ends of
the same road have
cam_...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Also, what's the best thing to do when you've discovered that 2 ends of
the same road have slightly different spellings on their physical road
signs?
I've tried to tag the road as best I can
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/45369647
Do you think it'd be
On 28/11/2009, at 19:04, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
And what about JOSM? So far I've just been using Potlatch because it
just works. What do I have to do to get Nearmap going in JOSM?
As Leon said, first go to
Liz wrote:
I never noticed that anyone had changed Garry Owen that I had put in - I know
I'd tagged the road and ignored it from there.
It's a small world :)
John
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Fernando,
uma coisa importante a se ressaltar é que a licença do OpenStreetMap é
aberta, mas os dados utilizados na confecção dos mapas também devem ser. Por
este motivo, não é possível utilizar dados do Google Maps nem de sites que
utilizem o Google Maps para obter seus dados (por exemplo
Oi,
Você fez de maneira correta. O problema é que a restrição de conversão é
bastante complicada de fazer corretamente e eu não tenho certeza que os
softwares de cálculo de rota atuais utilizam as restrições corretamente.
Se não me engano o novo mapzen deveria facilitar a criação de restrições.
Bráulio e Arlindo,
talvez não tenha sido muito claro em minhas idéias. O que cogitei foi o uso
de ferramenta para correção de mapas, no caso desta
http://www.caxiasdigital.com.br/mapas/tools/achaendereco.html
Na realidade nem sei se serviria.
No caso de transporte público e focos de dengue,
Obrigado Flavio. Vou testar.
--
Rodrigo de Avila
Analista de Desenvolvimento
+55 51 9733.3488 • rodr...@avila.net.br • www.avila.net.br
2009/12/1 Flavio Bello Fialho be...@cnpuv.embrapa.br
Rodrigo,
Coloquei as restrições nos dois pontos problemáticos da junção, conforme
as orientações em:
Am 30. November 2009 13:24 schrieb marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:04:06 +0100, Ana Luisa Paldos Garcia
analuisapaldosgar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Die Frage nun .. was tun:
1) davon ausgehen, dass das Problem bei der Navigationssoftware liegt und
auch dort gelöst wird
Liebe Kenner der Materie,
Nachdem meine Anfrage nun seit Monaten Kreise zieht, habe ich mal den
Betreff geändert und ein konkretes Ziel formuliert:
*Wie kann ein Anwender die Datenherkunft sinnvoll angeben*
Mit sinnvoll meine ich:
- als Werbung für OSM
- informativ
- verständlich
- unserer
Hallo,
Am Dienstag 01 Dezember 2009 03:45:58 schrieb Mirko Küster:
Am Dienstag 01 Dezember 2009 03:11 schrieb Wolfgang:
Wer interpretiert da wo und wie? Ist mir noch nirgends untergekommen das da
einer Breite über alles eingetragen hätte, schon garnicht absurderweise
zwischen
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:39:44 +0100, Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com
wrote:
2) die parallelen Verbindungsstücke nur als motorway_link taggen ohne
jegliche Autobahnzurodnung (ohne ref-tag), damit das Navi einen
Abbiegevorgang erkennt.
Entweder kein Ref-Tag oder das der Autobahn auf die der
Hallo,
Markus wrote:
*Wie kann ein Anwender die Datenherkunft sinnvoll angeben*
Im englischen FAQ gibt es dazu einen Eintrag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#I_would_like_to_use_OpenStreetMap_maps._How_should_I_credit_you.3F
Die deutsche Version dieser Seite
Martin Simon schrieb:
Zu guter letzt verstehe ich das Problem nicht so ganz, ich erhalte mit
meinen Karten immer rechts halten auf ... - Meldungen an diesen
Stellen.
In mkgmap gibt es aber auch eine Funktion, die das Navi glauben lässt,
der Abbiegewinkel sei größer, was solche Probleme
Am 1. Dezember 2009 10:24 schrieb Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de:
Beispiele für solche Anwendungsfälle:
_Screenshot und Permalink zur Karte_
Jeder darf aus der OSM-Webite einen Screenshot von der Karte machen,
diesen als Bild auf seine Website stellen, und das Bild direkt mit einem
Permalink
Am Di Dezember 1 2009 glaubte Markus zu wissen:
Ich füge es unten mal an - vielleicht hilft es ja als Grundlage für:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/de:Datenherkunft_richtig_angeben
Ich hab mal die Diskussion eröffnet:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Datenherkunft_richtig_angeben
Hallo Marcus.
Am Dienstag 01 Dezember 2009 10:59:40 schrieb marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com:
Das erste Stück führt aus der Autobahn heraus
= Ref der anderen Autobahn.
Das mittlere Stück führt in die Gegenrichtung der anderen
Autobahn und von der Hin-Richtung der anderen in die eigene
Autobahn
Am Dienstag 01 Dezember 2009 11:39:14 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Im Wiki steht auch bereits jetzt klar, welchen Hinweis man
dazupacken muss
Hast du für diese sehr gewagte Behauptung einen Beweis?
Ich habe selbst nichts gefunden und Frederik weist auch darauf hin, dass dies
nur auf der
Am Di Dezember 1 2009 glaubte Martin Koppenhoefer zu wissen:
Vorneweg:
Sorry, aber deine Art zu quoten ist furchtbar. Nimm es mir nicht
übel, aber bei deinen mails finde ich einiges erst, wenn ich mit
der mail vergleiche, auf die du geantwortet hast.
Wenn du deinen Text schreibst, acht doch
1 - 100 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
