Vào 2012-12-28 11:01 PM, Khánh Lê viết:
Trích thư của anh Tuệ Huỳnh
(quangtue_hu...@yahoo.com
mailto:quangtue_hu...@yahoo.com):
Xin chào anh Khánh,
Hôm nay mình lên bản đồ của OSM trên http://www.openstreetmap.vn/
thì thấy quần đảo Hoàng Sa chỉ có tên Việt khi zoom vào, còn bình
I was using a train from the Erzgebirgsbahn in Germany yesterday
(Annaberg-Buchholz - Chemnitz) when I noticed the information display.
This was an OSM background on which the trains from the Erzgebirgsbahn
were overlayed. I took a few photos but I now also see that they have an
internet
Hi,
Am 30.12.2012 um 22:53 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
According to this list, 208 accounts have added more than 10k house numbers -
if any one of them has actually surveyed that many houses they should be
awarded a prize! A further ~ 1400 have done between 1k and 10k numbers,
According to this list, 208 accounts have added more than 10k
house
numbers - if any one of them has actually surveyed that many
houses they
should be awarded a prize!
While I'm surprised that my entry is as high as it is, it is
entirely possible that I've added almost 40,000 house numbers
Hi,
yes, that's cool. see http://blog.openstreetmap.de/2012/12/wochennotiz-nr-126/
Marc
Am 31.12.2012 um 08:59 schrieb Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl:
I was using a train from the Erzgebirgsbahn in Germany yesterday
(Annaberg-Buchholz - Chemnitz) when I noticed the information display. This
Maarten Deen writes:
I was using a train from the Erzgebirgsbahn in Germany yesterday
(Annaberg-Buchholz - Chemnitz) when I noticed the information display.
This was an OSM background on which the trains from the Erzgebirgsbahn
were overlayed. I took a few photos but I now also see that
Boa tarde pessoal.
Gostaria de saber quais tags atribuir a trechos de estradas que passam por
dentro do leito natural de um rio, sem nenhum tipo de estrutura construída
pelo homem.
Além disso, gostaria de saber quais tags atribuir a uma laje de concreto
construída dentro do leito de um rio
Boatarde
Como eu saber o cruzamento do um rio e um estrada, onde nao ha ponte, e um nó
com highway=ford, ou um trecho do highway com ford=yes
Aun Johnsen
On 31. des. 2012, at 14:10, Claiton Neisse claiton.nei...@gmail.com wrote:
Boa tarde pessoal.
Gostaria de saber quais tags atribuir a
+1
Em 31/12/2012 14:24, Aun Yngve Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org escreveu:
Boatarde
Como eu saber o cruzamento do um rio e um estrada, onde nao ha ponte, e um
nó com highway=ford, ou um trecho do highway com ford=yes
Aun Johnsen
On 31. des. 2012, at 14:10, Claiton Neisse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/30/12 19:29, Tobias Hobmeier wrote:
An einer anderen stelle habe ich das problem dass der keks von
Wanderweg 1 (relation ref=1) vom Weg des Wanderweges 0 (relation ref=0)
überdeckt wird...
Ha!
ads problem bah ich mitlerweile durch einen
Hallo,
die Wochennotiz Nr. 128 mit allen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap
Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/2012/12/wochennotiz-nr-128/
Viel Spaß beim Lesen!
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Per far prima puoi usare DBpedia (la versione semantica).
http://it.dbpedia.org/sparql
Questa query tira fuori tutti i nomi e cognomi di Italiani presenti su
Wikipedia
SELECT ?name, ?surname WHERE {
?person a http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person .
?person http://it.dbpedia.org/property/nome
Ottimo, non lo conoscevo.
Se permetti io escluderei il filtro sulla nazionalità, in Italia esistono
strade intitolate a personaggi stranieri.
Ciao
/niubii/
Il giorno 31 dicembre 2012 12:14, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Per far prima puoi usare DBpedia (la versione semantica).
Il giorno 31 dicembre 2012 12:19, Francesco Pelullo
f.pelu...@gmail.comha scritto:
Ottimo, non lo conoscevo.
Se permetti io escluderei il filtro sulla nazionalità, in Italia esistono
strade intitolate a personaggi stranieri.
Non e' vero: esistono vie John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Konrad Adenauer,
2012/12/31 Fabrizio Tambussa ftambu...@gmail.com
Il giorno 31 dicembre 2012 12:19, Francesco Pelullo f.pelu...@gmail.comha
scritto:
Ottimo, non lo conoscevo.
Se permetti io escluderei il filtro sulla nazionalità, in Italia esistono
strade intitolate a personaggi stranieri.
Non e' vero:
come di rende una strada statale - originariamente a doppio senso di
marcia - che, a causa di una frana che ha ristretto la carreggiata, è
attualmente percorribile solo in uno dei due sensi (con contemporaneo
suggerimento di percorso alternativo al senso vietato)?
grazie, Calogero.
Chiedo scusa, non avevo letto bene.
Saluti
Il giorno 31/dic/2012 17:40, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
2012/12/31 Fabrizio Tambussa ftambu...@gmail.com
Il giorno 31 dicembre 2012 12:19, Francesco Pelullo f.pelu...@gmail.comha
scritto:
Ottimo, non lo conoscevo.
Se permetti
Hola a todos,
Entiendo que los problemas que se mencionan aquí obedecen a un error
grosero de Bing. Pero hay un problema latente que a muy largo plazo
dará que hablar. La ortofoto PNOA y la cartografía oficial en España y
Europa usa el sistema de referencia ETRS89 (anclado a la placa
tectónica
Hola,
He creado una pagina en el wiki para el proyecto de mapear los combis en
Cusco:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Perú:Transporte_público_en_Cusco
Me doy cuenta que las rutas no están completas, pero no tendré la
oportunidad de volver para mejorarles ya.
Feliz año nuevo,
Polyglot
I have successfully used TrekBuddy on a BB: it can show map tiles from OSM
- you can create the necessary atlas using mobac. It can also record tracks
and geocode pictures that you take while recording a track. Quite useful
for mapping, although not as good as Vespucci.
On Dec 22, 2012 2:37 PM,
Hi OSM ZA,
Updated: http://aerial.openstreetmap.org.za/
Contains new imagery (collect from CD:NGI during November 2012) and
I've finally filled in most of the missing areas.
Percentage of the imagery captured in the year:
- 2012: 17.8%
- 2011: 27.6%
- 2010: 21.1%
- 2009: 28.8%
- 2008: 4.7%
Bonjour
Inscrit depuis plusieurs semaines, je me décide à me présenter.
Je m'appelle Christian Herbé. Je suis informaticien et élu local.
Ayant développé un SIG communal, je suis très sensible à tout ce qui
concerne l'infographie.
J'ai quelques questions su OSM que je vais poster par mèls
Bonjour
De manière générale, n'y a -t- il pas un risque d'asphyxie de la carte
en publiant trop de données ?
Je songe à contribuer à OSM en publiant le document graphiques du PLU de
ma Commune.
Est-ce souhaitable par la communauté ?
Si oui, quels attributs appliquer et comment distinguer
On 12/31/2012 11:47 AM, christian Herbé wrote:
De manière générale, n'y a -t- il pas un risque d'asphyxie de la
carte en publiant trop de données ?
Non - chaque utilisateur y pioche les données dont il a besoin pour le
traitement ou le rendu de son choix... Il a certes l'embarras du choix
mais
2012/12/31 christian Herbé che...@free.fr:
Bonjour
Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM.
De manière générale, n'y a -t- il pas un risque d'asphyxie de la carte en
publiant trop de données ?
Si. Mais au lieu de parler de d'asphyxie de la carte, il faut dire
asphyxie de la base de données ;-)
Parce
Bonjour Christian,
Je suis nouveau sur OSM et je serait curieux de voir à quoi ressemblerai un
PLU. Est ce que tu aurait un extrait à me partager afin que je me fasse une
idée sur la question ?
Tout comme toi je me suis posé la question au début de mes contributions et
je me suis rendu compte
Le 31 décembre 2012 12:45, Pieren pier...@gmail.com a écrit :
2012/12/31 christian Herbé che...@free.fr:
De manière générale, n'y a -t- il pas un risque d'asphyxie de la carte
en
publiant trop de données ?
Si. Mais au lieu de parler de d'asphyxie de la carte, il faut dire
asphyxie de
Les filtres de JOSM sont bien pratique mais à utiliser avec
prudence... car lorsqu'on filtre certaines données, on ne se rend pas
forcément compte de ce qu'on touche.
Le 31 décembre 2012 12:50, Jo. perche...@gmail.com a écrit :
Le 31 décembre 2012 12:45, Pieren pier...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 12/31/2012 12:50 PM, Jo. wrote:
Le 31 décembre 2012 12:45, Pieren pier...@gmail.com
mailto:pier...@gmail.com a écrit :
2012/12/31 christian Herbé che...@free.fr mailto:che...@free.fr:
De manière générale, n'y a -t- il pas un risque d'asphyxie de
la carte en
publiant
/Bonjour
De manière générale, n'y a -t- il pas un risque d'asphyxie de la carte
en publiant trop de données ?/
/Je songe à contribuer à OSM en publiant le document graphiques du PLU de
ma Commune./
Bonjour Christian, j'ai moi-même une formation d'urbaniste et je pense que
ton intuition est
Eric eric026@... writes:
Salut ! Je pense que ton probleme est lié à la v0.39 d'Osmosis. J'avais
ce meme genre d'erreur avant de migrer vers 0.41. La nouvelle version
permet de gerer les fichiers sources au delà du seuil des 2 Go
principalement (quand on traite France entière) mais
hayashiです。
今のところ伊豆大島のアイランドマッピングに参加しようと思っています。
アームチェアマッピングは不得意なので現地参加を考えています。
フェリー航路のマッピングの件ですが、熱海〜大島（元町）のGPXログがあったので描いてみました。
ジェット船でのログのようです。
他の航路のログは見当たりませんでした。
イベント日程では竹橋からジェット船で向かうようですね、当然GPXログは取得していただけると期待しています。
どうせなら行きと帰りの船ルートを変えるとか、参加者が別々の航路を使って集まるのもいいかもしれませんね。
東です。
2013/01/01 yuu hayashi hayashi@gmail.com:
hayashiです。
今のところ伊豆大島のアイランドマッピングに参加しようと思っています。
アームチェアマッピングは不得意なので現地参加を考えています。
私も参加予定です。お会いできることを楽しみにしています。
人数把握のために下記でお申込み頂けると良いようです。
http://oshima-hackathon.peatix.com/
フェリー航路のマッピングの件ですが、熱海〜大島（元町）のGPXログがあったので描いてみました。
ジェット船でのログのようです。
みなさま、あけましておめでとうございます。
清野です。
昨年はSotMなどもあり、日本においてOSMが非常に飛躍した年でしたね。
今年もみんなが使って参加してくれるOSMにしていきたいものです。
さて、1点だけ。
ところで、GPXログをなぞってウェイを書いた場合のsourceタグはどう書けばいいのでしょう？
他人のものでも
survey
で良いと思います。
この部分ですが、
昔はsource=GPSというのがあったような気がしていたのですが、
今はsource=surveyに統一されたんですね。
JOSMではまだsource=GPSというのがあるみたいですが…。
On 31 December 2012 09:36, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
Many police services are considering providing front counter services out of
post offices, cafes, supermarkets!
+ libraries as they have done in my town.
I would suggest that we continue to use amenity=police both for police
Hello,
I have been adding to OSM for about 18 months but more active in recent
weeks. I have requested the PRoW from Durham County Council, they currently
have not released their data but do have it electronically, just
not publicly available to download yet. Their response was more postive
than
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Steven Horner wrote:
I have been adding to OSM for about 18 months but more active in recent
weeks. I have requested the PRoW from Durham County Council, they currently
have not released their data but do have it electronically, just
not publicly available to download yet.
Barry: I applied on Nov 28th but contacted the PRoW team who I have some
contact with, I received the below response on Dec 10th. It's good to read
they have made some progress and applied for an exemption. Do you have any
thoughts on how you would tag the paths if adding to OSM as I mentioned.
I
Steven Horner wrote:
I have added several footpaths locally but I am often left wondering
how to tag these or how to break them into sections. I have followed
the guidelines at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines but
should I tag the footpath with the local
Please be careful with the ™doesn't actually exist™ as the owner may not have
maintained the access point in the hope that people will stop using the path.
I've seen this on a number of occasions. I would investigate further and raise
it with the PRoWO. I believe there is a deadline coming up
David Groom wrote:
Last time this was discussed on the list I think we favoured prow:ref
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2012-June/013424.html
Yes - well remembered - there are indeed lots more of those:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=prow_ref
Cheers,
Andy
Andy raised several good points regarding tagging and references but not
sure I would agree about ignoring paths if not existing on the ground.
Officially if a path exists on the Definitive map then you have the right
to walk it, this is the information I was given by the PRoW team when I
became a
Thanks Andy that's what I was looking for. The job of adding footpaths,
bridleways and byways gets more complicated if we want it to be as accurate
as possible. The prow=ref obviously isn't needed but good to have if it's
known.
--
www.stevenhorner.com http://www.stevenhorner.com
@stevenhorner
Dudley Ibbett wrote:
Please be careful with the ™doesn't actually exist™ as the owner may
not have maintained the access point in the hope that people will stop
using the path. I've seen this on a number of occasions.
If there's something visible on the ground then I'd definitely map it,
Apologies that this was never added to the wiki page, but you are correct
we discussed prow:ref and prow_ref. I believe tag info suggests we are
converging more on prow_ref=* so will update the wiki to reflect this.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_access_provisions#Public_Rights_of_Way
Steven Horner wrote:
A more interesting example of the differences between on the ground
and recorded PRoW exists here (just NE of your link):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.91864lon=-0.77876zoom=17layers=M
For information I've made the GPS trace public:
After 2026 a public right of way will only exist if it appears on the Local
Authorities Definitive Map. This means that irrespective of what is on
the ground, the legal right of way is that shown on the legal Definitive
Map.
What does this mean for OSM:
* As noted designation=public_footpath is
Arg! We were converging on prow_ref when I last looked at tag info a few
months back. Perhaps I should have checked before changing the wiki!!
Seeing that I have now updated the wiki (and it really doesn't make a shred
of difference) does anyone have an issue if I change the existing
prow:ref s
By Public Way Identifiers I presume you mean a public footpath or bridleway
sign and the direction they point. I had an angry confrontation once with a
farmer who would have would of worn my finger out if I had a bleep machine.
I had walked across his field according to the map which was a couple
I have had similar issues, but without the abusive farmer in your part of
the world? (Weardale). My old OS map said the Weardale w
Way went through this field, and there was a waymark at the junction with
the road, but once in the (very large!) field, there was no obvious way out
- just rusty
Hi Bill,
On 30 December 2012 22:52, Bill Chadwick bill.chadwi...@gmail.com wrote:
I would be interested to hear how council released prow data has / has not
been used within OSM to add to or replace existing contributed path data.
Hants and Devon have released PROW data but sadly many of the
It's a small world, the incident I described was also in Weardale near
Thimbleby Hill South of Stanhope. I didn't use OSM then and checking OSM
the path is not marked. A path on the opposite side of the wall where the
farmer was stood is marked which is incorrect and will lead to someone else
- Original Message -
From: Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM: prow_ref=
Arg! We were converging on prow_ref when I last looked at tag info a few
months
Even smaller - I am pretty sure the problem I had was just to the North of
Stanhope
You are right, there are plenty of opportunities to add footpaths to
Weardale.
I concentrated on the Weardale Way (which you can see on Lonvia's Hiking
Map if you are interested (
I find that quite often it helps to pull up the historic map layers. Here
is a screenshot showing the route of the road as shown on OS 25k 1st
series map:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bOXEtZE1XY01zcEE
(I'll try to keep this up online for a few months)
The local authority would
I tried searching on Weardale but there doesn't appear to be a POI marking the
Dale!
For those that know this area where would make a good base for walking and also
have a Pub with wifi for updating OSM in the evening?
Thanks
Dudley
Sent from my iPad
On 31 Dec 2012, at 16:47, Graham Jones
Fair point - I'm not really sure what I would tag it as though!
Frosterley and
Stanhopehttp://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=12lat=54.74591lon=-2.0121
are
fairly major places with pubs - not sure about wifi though.
Graham.
On 31 December 2012 18:56, Dudley Ibbett
Weardale is a bit hard to define. It is generally thought of as starting at
Wolsingham and running up to the edge of the County Boundary at the high
point above Killhope before dropping down to Nenthead and Cumbria. The
North and South are bounded by the hills above the valley with the
exception
Personally I would love to see fields (landuse) and the walls/fences that
make this up marked on OSM but as per the Wiki this is a complicated area:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use_and_areas_of_natural_land
I mapped a small area with landuse and some fences months ago but refrained
I would like to see field boundaries and land uses in OSM, for the same
reason as you. I think the main reason that there are not many in there,
is that they are very difficult to survey. I have just added them from
memory when I have been able to remember enough - it is more realistic to
add
Steven,
On 31 Dec 2012 21:19, Steven Horner ste...@stevenhorner.com wrote:
I mapped a small area with landuse and some fences months ago but
refrained from doing anymore because not many others appear to be doing it.
You can see what I did here:
On 31 December 2012 16:38, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Not that I'm overly bothered, but since the wiki was only changed a few
hours ago, and tag info statistics seem to show a greater usage of prow:ref,
I'd have thought standardising on that (and changing the wiki) would have
On Dec 31, 2012, at 3:21 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 31.12.2012 06:49, Steve Coast wrote:
Therefore I don't see why each
country or state (i.e. Mass. and their own imports) can't have it's
own solution which reflects the cultural realities there.
Your argument
Why does imports mean not crowdsourced, if the crowd determines which
imports are source-able?
Why doesn't public-domain data that the crowd has funded count as
crowdsourced?
No one has been able to provide directly observable verifiable
information about Ptolemy, yet there is still a Wikipedia
On Dec 31, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org wrote:
My concern about this entire discussion is that the whole import vs community
argument is employed even when there is a community behind an import.
… by people outside that community living on a different continent.
I mean, I wish
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org wrote:
Why does imports mean not crowdsourced, if the crowd determines which
imports are source-able?
Crowdsourced means that we survey the data indivdually.
Why doesn't public-domain data that the crowd has funded count as
Apparently my last reply was rejected from the Moderation police - and
it was probably a good thing...
Low wage? Low Skilled? Do as little as possible? That's not a good
description of public domain data or how that data came into existence.
There's a lot of good data collected by skilled
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Randal Hale
rjh...@northrivergeographic.com wrote:
Apparently my last reply was rejected from the Moderation police - and it
was probably a good thing...
Low wage? Low Skilled? Do as little as possible? That's not a good
description of public domain data or
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org wrote:
Why does imports mean not crowdsourced, if the crowd determines which
imports are source-able?
Crowdsourced means that we survey the data indivdually.
I have been pondering the use of the admin_level
key in the USA, and have come to the realization
that while values 2, 4, 6 and 8 are correct for
national, state, county and city boundaries
(respectively), it is more complicated than that.
It is likely time to end the pretending this
funny you should bring this up, i've been pondering CDPs a bit lately
and have come to very different conclusions from yours.
On 12/31/12 3:30 PM, stevea wrote:
I have been pondering the use of the admin_level key in the USA, and
have come to the realization that while values 2, 4, 6 and 8
On 2012-12-31 12:30 PM, stevea wrote:
However, there are boundary polygons in OSM which are an odd duck in the
USA: a notable one is Census Designated Places (CDPs), which came from
the TIGER import. These are a bit like cities in that they are often a
similar size and population of a town or
On 12/31/12 5:12 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
I'd argue that not all governmental boundaries need to be tagged as
boundary=administrative. In Ohio, we've started to retag CDP
boundaries with boundary=census and place=locality but without
admin_level. [1][2] They still show up in Nominatim as
Steve Coast writes:
Waze, last time I looked, was 5 times larger than OSM. Today, probably 10.
Nobody ever tells me about Waze.
Today it's hard to convince any consumer they should do so over
google or waze.
Go to anybody who travels through bad cell coverage. Show them OSMAnd
on a Nexus
On Dec 31, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Steve Coast writes:
Waze, last time I looked, was 5 times larger than OSM. Today, probably 10.
Nobody ever tells me about Waze.
You live in upstate New York, dude. :-)
Steve
___
On 12/31/12 9:38 PM, Steve Coast wrote:
On Dec 31, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Steve Coast writes:
Waze, last time I looked, was 5 times larger than OSM. Today, probably 10.
Nobody ever tells me about Waze.
You live in upstate New York, dude. :-)
beyond upstate.
Serge Wroclawski writes:
The result is that the data quality varies *a lot* and no one
should take it (or any data source) as gospel, just as OSM data is
not gospel.
New York State has 62 counties, and only have bad TIGER data in about
8 of them. The rest are frankly, gorgeous.
--
--my
Steve Coast writes:
On Dec 31, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Steve Coast writes:
Waze, last time I looked, was 5 times larger than OSM. Today, probably 10.
Nobody ever tells me about Waze.
You live in upstate New York, dude. :-)
I have a 100Mbps
Richard Welty writes:
On 12/31/12 9:38 PM, Steve Coast wrote:
On Dec 31, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Steve Coast writes:
Waze, last time I looked, was 5 times larger than OSM. Today, probably
10.
Nobody ever tells me about Waze.
You live in
On 12/20/2012 10:50 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
Now, the flip side of your idea of collaboration is that I knew about
OSM, knew that my county was largely empty, and knew that TIGER would
be a great starting point. So I DID NOT do any editing until TIGER got
uploaded. Your theory is great, but I'm a
Hi,
* Another is, the threat of importing crappy TIGER ranges is motivating people
to go look at available county data. That is fantastic. So as Ian alluded
to pushing the conversation forward is itself a motivator
The reason why I pushed the building import is that I am worried about
Hola,
aunque sea un poco vieja la respuesta, Ayer y hoy he estado probando
los mapas generados de alternativaslibres.es para la región de chile.
se ven muy completos. Funcionan bien en el etrex legend.
http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/descargas.php
saludos.
2012/8/2 EQP
82 matches
Mail list logo
