Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure I get your point about hint for router versus aid for
navigation. I suspect this may stem from the don't tag for the renderer
rule. If we look at the end use case the aim is to get a routing engine
that provides an optimal route
Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org writes:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
If you're lucky, you can find an Ohio city limit's legal definition in
county commissioners' minutes when an annexation is proposed. The most
authoritative data
Charles Samuels o...@charles.derkarl.org writes:
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 01:12:12 AM Andy Allan wrote:
Right now, if a tag doesn't match with supercharge.info, I overwrite
OSM's.
Could you explain this a bit further? For example, if supercharge.info
has capacity 6, and I correct this
I don't have time to wade into the controversy, but +1 to Russ's
comments. Old railroad grades really are features. The USGS shows
them on topos, and they're often really obvious.
More seriously, a wave of deletionism is really bad for the project in
terms of morale. Doing more than a
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 25/02/2015 05:00, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Any fixme in wide use I'm not interested in deleting.
I'd strongly oppose the mechanical deletion of low volume fixme values.
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
6) Lazy Requests to do cleanup that the note writer did not want to do
themselves.
That's unnecessarily perjorative. I've seen a number of notes around me
that could be characterized that way, and I've entered a number myself.
I view it as a public
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I think this is a good example of where notes are the way to go. A badly
positioned node is only likely to be spotted by a mapper who is
specifically interested in bike
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Also, if a tag isn't rendered in the default mapnik view, then those
elements are unlikely to be cleaned up (absent a special render for a
community of interest, which the cyclemap
(I'm writing from the perspective of having driven Route 6 from the
sagamore bridge to north eastham every summer for many years, and to
Provincetown a few years ago.)
If we're talking about where Route 6 goes from 2 lanes each direction
with a real median down to one lane in each direction with
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
Hi Same but different for the Kettleman Station node, this has been
imported 5 years ago from a GNIS data set and deserves no more respect
than the rest - if there's nobody living there then it's likely not a
hamlet.
It's true that it's not hamlet.
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
there is some bad data in the GNIS import. when i encounter obviously
bogus objects from the GNIS import, i just delete them. just the other
day i deleted a GNIS object which suggested someone had a heliport in
their back yard a little south of
Paul Norman penor...@mac.com writes:
From: Richard Welty [mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Admin borders in the US: CDPs
the latter, i think. there are parts of the US where the CDP boundaries
do contribute to the map.
I think there's two different cases that need to
Martijn van Exel marti...@telenav.com writes:
It's the other way around, really. We're adjusting our routing logic
to adapt to OSM. Referring to the wiki, a service road is 'Generally
for access to a building, motorway service station, beach, campsite,
industrial estate, business park, etc.'
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
first of all, CDPs. there's been an ongoing discussion about whether
they belong in OSM at all, or whether they deserve their admin_level
8 classification. i have mixed feelings about the first, and am pretty
sure we need a new way of classifying
Martijn van Exel marti...@telenav.com writes:
It turns out that this happens because some of the access roads to
these ferries are tagged as highway=service, sometimes
service=driveway. For various reasons we don't want to route folks
through service roads, so this poses a challenge. Here's
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk writes:
Lester Caine wrote:
Basically - does anybody have a smartphone option that correctly and safely
handles UK motorways and trunk roads?
Well I'm seeing some feedback off-list, and there have been a few
steps forward, but The one thing I have finally
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/specials/truck_crashes_storrow_memorial_drive/
The data looks like osm, and zooming in near Kendall Square and MGH
certainly makes it look like OSM.
Compare page 3 with:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36197
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com writes:
Track is used more and more for unpaved roads. Mapnik and other renderers
are probably a big reason, because they don't render
Surfacehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Surfaceand
Smoothness http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness tags. I
Pieren pier...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW osrm.at is helping in this campaign, because it doesn't route through
tracks
BTW I just discover that some people are tagging for routing (after
tagging for the renderer). They add
John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com writes:
So, how would you classify a one-lane road leading through a former
field, now overgrown with 30 years or so of bushes and saplings,
leading to a billboard adjoining a motorway? The only improvements the
road receives is to be mowed periodically
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
Switching focus to iD: there would be list of post edit notification
plugins one could drag into place.
Facebook, Twitter and G+ would be among those, along with whatever open
source version you happen to track down or create.
Anyone not wanting to
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
one notable omission from the list of openstreetmap mailing lists is
something like
jobs or talk-jobs. other communities have such lists.
is this something worth trying to get set up? i suspect that
jobs/consulting discussion
would seem out of
John Firebaugh john.fireba...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I'd like to see two things different; both of these are regressions from
the old way and I think easy to address
I believe that persisting the location and zoom in the URL
I'd like to see two things different; both of these are regressions from
the old way and I think easy to address
add the shortlink link in the lower right, so you can more easily use
it to get to a URL for the current view, so you can shift-reload to
see what yfou just edited. (Moving the
[catching up; sorry if this is really redundant]
Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com writes:
A true super two freeway, with no at-grade intersections whatsoever,
would be properly classified as a motorway under global OSM tagging
conventions. These may not be particularly common in the U.S.
That's great to hear - thanks for slogging through fixing all the bugs
and obtaining more acccurate data!
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
Again, I'm still not hearing a suggestion that would keep this valuable
information in OSM, or a compelling reason not to keep it.
It's not clear that it's valuable. If you want to propose a scheme for
desired corridors by only-slightly-authoritative
colliar colliar4e...@aol.com writes:
On 09.06.2013 20:33, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I agree that it should be possible to update notes after the fact.
malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote:
On 08.06.2013 22:22, James Mast wrote:
I'm curious, but does anybody think that notes should
stevea stevea...@softworkers.com writes:
To breathe a little fresh air into this discussion (and perhaps pour a
little oil on troubled waters): I have enjoyed in the last few hours
some email exchanges with both Kerry and Paul.
In short, Kerry and I are discussing how it is inappropriate
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
An argument *against* having proposed routes is the verifiability - we
usually try to have data where someone on the ground could easily
check the correctness by looking at signs. Since proposed routes are
unlikely to be signposted, having them in
Thomas Colson thomas_col...@nps.gov writes:
I'm confused: is the issue tagging a bike route with some sort of
official number when it really doesn’t have one,
The current discussion is about tagging a proposed bike route with a
number in USBR namespace, when the USBR naming authority has not
Thanks for pointing out the craigslist/notes connection.
A minor UI comment: I added a note about something that I know needs
fixing, just to see what it was like. I didn't realize that one had to
move the marker before clicking 'add', and the text box started out over
the area where the
So I propose a different schema:
New York Boroughs: 9
Cities (incl. NYC): 8
Counties: 6
and have separate relations for the counties and boroughs (e.g. Brooklyn
and Kings County), sharing the same ways.
Your proposal sounds entirely reasonable to me. The notion that cities
are
I do agree with Mike Thompson's statement: If neither of the two
tags being discussed (landuse=forest, natural=wood) are appropriate
for tagging a generic area covered by trees (regardless if it is
virgin, managed), it would be really helpful to have a tag that
could be used for this
Torsten Karzig torsten.kar...@web.de writes:
a forest. [The parts of the Angeles National forest that I have seen
so far are dominated by scrub] For me using the landuse=forest tag in
this case seems to contradict the fact that landuse=forest is supposed
to describe woodland.
Not quite;
Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us writes:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/29696644
What gives? Looks like an undesired / undesirable side effect of a
MassGIS import.
Requires further investigation? Doesn't look
James Umbanhowar jumba...@gmail.com writes:
The question is what network level should it, if at all, be tagged.
Currently, there are three network levels, local/regional/national
that have been used. In other countries, these apply to different
levels of government that officially sanction
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/3/30 Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
Define long-term.
I think you can't define this on a global level, it depends heavily on the
local activity whether it makes sense to enter a mid-term interruption into
OSM or ignore it.
Agreed that
I think Kerry's concern is about proposed routes being in the OSM db
(and renders) when no such proposed routes exist. Taking a line from
wikipedia (which I realize is tricky business), we shouldn't be doing
original research in determining things, but rather documenting things
that exist. If
I'm not sure it's useful to continue, but (ignoring wiki and existing
practice) I think of a boundary as closed line, not as an area. Yes,
you can talk about inside and outside, but really that's it. The notion
of all land inside this closed way has this property is distinct from
this line is a
It might be useful to look at existing GIS practice to see how boundary
objects are treated in terms of being LINESTRING vs POLYGON (thanks Paul
for reminding us of OGC simple features defined terminology). But, I
suspect that the GIS world has a layer and a text description of it,
and that has
stevea stevea...@softworkers.com writes:
So, a better direction for this thread to continue might be for it to
examine and discuss the syntax of park tagging. What might be an
ideal tagging today (for various park entities upon which we agree
have a standardized semantic understanding),
stevea stevea...@softworkers.com writes:
Each of those seven values for key boundary is documented to be of
element area (with the exception of boundary=user defined, where it
is given greater freedom to be assigned to primitives of points and
open polylines). So for Greg to assert that if
stevea stevea...@softworkers.com writes:
However, the tag boundary=national_park is confused, as it is widely
overused, especially on STATE parks. Arguments are valid either way
whether to include or exclude it on State Parks. The reason appears
to be that boundary=national_park is
Brian May b...@mapwise.com writes:
I also think we need a little bit more sophisticated Data Catalog than
a google spreadsheet.
Email and a wiki page sounds good to me for coordination. Maybe we can
bring it up in a Mappy Hour as well. And if there's enough of a need,
we could do a
Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com writes:
On Feb 21, 2013 1:19 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
The user who added the interchange has no GPS traces listed for his
account.
They could have been using someone else's traces in JOSM/Potlatch - you'd
have to load everyone's
Andreas Reuleaux reule...@web.de writes:
OK, thanks a lot. I am beginning to understand. But does that mean, the
nüvi 40, although it is the cheapest model, is the newest one?
I believe the 40/50 are the newest.
LM stands for lifetime maps, T for traffic - right?
Yes.
...which would
Andreas Reuleaux reule...@web.de writes:
I am about to get a newer Garmin nvi model for car navigation,
and want to use OSM maps with it.
I found several web pages, which suggest that in general
OSM maps on a nvi should not be any problem, but the models
listed on
Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com writes:
I would also add that the section on PDOP is rather technical for a
newbie. Perhaps this could be moved to a separate wiki page and the
answer to the question changed to be more general. If your GPS has a
display then this is more likely to be
Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com writes:
Why do you want to see outlines autogenerated from aerial imagery, you
could just look at the aerial imagery?
That's not true. For example, when converting to garmin format,
buildings render with very few bits, and let you know developed vs
Jonathan Bennett jonobenn...@gmail.com writes:
On 08/01/2013 21:31, Rovastar wrote:
My idea is simple can someone add modern social media networks logos/links
to the home page.
As a member of the OSMF Communications Working Group (CWG), I have
perhaps the greatest level of involvement in
Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com writes:
On 01/09/2013 03:24 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
While filling in townships in the Greater Cincinnati area, I've also
been working on TIGER's rather artful interpretation of the area's
municipal boundaries, motivated by the Mapnik style's prominent
Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com writes:
I think it would be great to make more tools support more external
data sets as opposed to dumping *everything* into OSM. You want county
borders on your garmin? Check a box while creating the file and mkgmap
downloads the most recent county borders
Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm writes:
Hi Julien,
Could it be possible to integrate the user classification visible
here ( http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc) by example by adding the
same coloured man icon on the right of OSM User link. IMHO it could
be very usefull to know if an edit
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/1/6 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
On 06/01/2013 16:24, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The problem is with the mapper mixing up linear and polygon features on
the same osm object.
I completely disagree with this. He mapped it accurately
Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr writes:
2013/1/5 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
I suppose the obvious question is: what was -your- source for the building
outlines? It is a fair assumption that google is simply using the same.
It is even more obvious that it is not a plain copy of OSM
Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Brian May b...@mapwise.com wrote:
And as Phil said, sometimes it doesn't make sense to follow the
parcel lines exactly, such as if the parcel boundary extends into a
road and it makes more sense to draw the boundary
Nathan Mixter nmix...@gmail.com writes:
For instance an open space parcel probably isn't that useful because
it is not represented in OSM. It could be broken up into meadow, wood,
scrub, forest, etc.
Jason and I are using 'open space' to mean land that is protected from
development with some
Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com writes:
Michal Migurski writes:
Also, what's the deal with the Massachusetts TIGER import?
Massachusetts had already made an improved version of the TIGER data,
so the decision was made to import that instead.
I'm not sure it's a version of the TIGER data,
Or if you'd like to join, and Google+ is a problem, please drop me a line.
I object to the use of google anything. That requires people to agree
to their privacy policies in order to participate in OSM, and I think
OSM should have a policy against such requirement or encouragement.
(That
Kathleen Danielson kathleen.daniel...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Greg,
That's an interesting point. What alternatives would you suggest for
virtual meetings?
KD
I do not know of alternatives. In open source groups I participate in,
it's email and IRC. At work, we pay for phone bridges (audio
Based on reaction to the mass buildings import (perceived as way too
fast, and I agree), I would suggest that you have a 2 week review period
From the latest time that there is either
- a change in the processing script
- new data being available
- a substantive change in the procedure
I
The result is that folks like myself and others are frustrated by the
import process, and folks who have good, useful datasets are frstrated
by the import process.
[import/mechanical-edit committee proposal]
I agree with your broad sentiments.
Having observed some recent discussion, I
Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org writes:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
2. If you cannot be bothered to fix problems then why should others be?
What is your plan for growing the community to a point where it can
maintain the data you plan to dump onto
Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org writes:
Paul - I've added a few comments and questions about changeset size and
revert policies on the Import Guidelines Plan Outline wiki pages.
Are there any recommended changeset size limits and/or revert plan
practices?
Tools support for reverting is a fair
I have few meta comments and then actual comments.
Meta:
In this case, the discussion has been entirely reasonable. But, in
general, I feel there's an unwarranted hostility to imports. I think
this comes from fear (often justified) that people who don't care about
following community norms
Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I would like to start a new thread to talk about merging building data.
My town Groton has mostly hand drawn buildings from bing. Like was
suggested previously, dumping them all and replacing them with the MassGIS
buildings would be a
Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com writes:
I would like start a new thread, to talk about the user account situation
for the import, but no policy discussion please!
Given that this is a distributed/community import, we will simply ask each
user to make their own import account and
Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com writes:
I am not sure if anybody is actually working on importing the tiger address
ranges or not. Just in case somebody is ... The Massachusetts mapping
department (MassGIS) just this week released data for all of the buildings
in the state!
MassGIS has parcel data available in a license-ok manner, and I have
been thinking about it, but not getting to it.
An idea is to have a common schema or schemas for non-imported parcel
data in osm format. Then people can write converters for their
state/whatever and publish the data, and
the Old Topo Depot oldto...@novacell.com writes:
If it is feasible to have a (mostly) unified parcel schema, a MapRoulette
challenge can be created to task the conversion work to the community.
I was thinking about just having a node with an address which is the
centroid of the parcel, and
Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com writes:
Hi All,
So I met with a group looking to link OSM data to other data. Meaning
have a link that says this village in OSM is equivalent to this
village in these 3 other datasets. Part of this process involves
having metadata for everything.
The people
The census bureau divided the unorganized borough into 11 census areas.
These have no legal significance but serve to sub-divided the state into
convenient parts. In spite of this they are in many ways like counties. I've
tagged them the same as counties (admin_level=6) but I'm not
Robin Paulson ro...@bumblepuppy.org writes:
i've done some quite detailed editing near where i live, i'd
appreciate anyone who is interested taking a look and responding.
i'm not sure what to make of the result. for one, my partner, a
non-mapper, has told me she finds it very confusing,
First, I think Martijn's points have all been right on.
1) I don't think it is a good idea to come up with a code of conduct
as a response to particular cases. When there's an actual dispute on
the table that might be addressed by an as yet imaginary code, we are
in reactionary mode and
Given what I've observed and heard about from other mappers, I am not
particularly surprised to hear that the DWG has been getting complaints
(although I have not filed a complaint myself). I think it's helpful to
talk about the general problem, separately from any identities.
My impression is
I noticed this morning a map on boston.com (which is part of the Globe,
it seems):
http://www.boston.com/news/weather/specials/hurricane_sandy_reports_mapped/
The map data looked like it was from nOSM, but there was no attribution
(only that it used leaflet), so I wondered. I sent a note to
Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org writes:
The newly elected US Chapter board will have its first official
meeting tonight at 5PM PDT / 8PM EDT. We're going to try a Google
Hangout. Everyone is welcome to listen in!
https://plus.google.com/events/c91rctgp4ia8cq3ffqo914lvvus
(I'm not a member,
Primary highways generally lack stop signs; however, stop signs may
control major intersections in rural areas with low traffic volumes
and occur rarely elsewhere.
The most notable example of this is North Willard Street[2]. It is part
of US Route 7, but as can be seen with Bing
Pieren pier...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Since you[1] are trying to revise guidelines that are found to be
acceptable across the community
Could you provide evidences about this ? Since the vast majority of
the community
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net writes:
At 2012-09-15 16:05, Greg Troxel wrote:
Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com writes:
I'm working on US 50 near Trenton, Ill. Here's the location:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=38.61248lon=-89.68529zoom=16
It looks
Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com writes:
I'm working on US 50 near Trenton, Ill. Here's the location:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=38.61248lon=-89.68529zoom=16
It looks like, at one point there were plans to turn this into
a motorway. In two spots in a 25-mile
Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com writes:
* Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com [2012-08-14 23:26 -0500]:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.117lon=-94.8924zoom=14layers=M
I know there is some disagreement about road classification,
especially when it comes to trunk but I'm pretty sure most
Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote:
So I'm somewhat confused about how nominatim actually works. A good example
is the building I work in (10 park plaza Boston ma) the version of nominitum
on
10, Park Plaza, Central Square, Bay Village, Middlesex, Massachusetts,
02116, United States of America.
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=21777524
The Central Square, Bay Village and Middlesex are what are
confusing me as they look to be points and I'm not sure
Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc...@state.ma.us writes:
So basically if we see nodes like that, get rid of them?
No, I think it's:
If there's a node for the place, it's progress to replace it with a
polygon.
Not
Just delete place nodes
pgpaHaOu9jRqT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Perhaps add a us: prefix to the value?
boundary=us:national_historic_site
boundary=us:national_historic_park
boundary=us:national_forest
I like that idea, in spite of the
Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com writes:
I agree 100%. I have a good bit of data from New York State on trails
that is surely incomplete and imperfect but better than anything we
have in OSM. I've not uploaded any of it because I've not convinced
myself that it's doing no harm. But most of
a search for 'Golden Spike' yields nada. I was about to draw a
boundary=national_park[3] around it with a name tag, so it would be a
little easier to find. But it turns out the NPS has a boundary
shapefile for all National Parks, Historic Sites, Rivers, Parkways,
Lakeshores and more
Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com writes:
A few months ago, I tried to get started on trying to resume the NHD
import in my area - and some of the places where I hike. I'm trying
to check results with both P2 and JOSM, and tripping over a lot of
things, which made me put the project back on
Fred Gifford fred.giff...@gmail.com writes:
I am starting the process of pulling together a group to focus on updating
and expanding trail data in OSM. The initial focus would be in the US
but we are hoping the model could expand to other areas as well.
You should first assess how things
I think it's important to separate there's a way in the db and
there's a line on some render.
Personally, I want to see old railway lines on the map. I find there's
almost always evidence along the line, but not always at some point.
So I think we need tags that are more like the USGS maps,
John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
To be honest, if a road has no classification, and is made of mud
and gravel, it's a track...
The ones I reclassified typically had two wheel-tracks of soil-colour
and grass
Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com writes:
In doing the remap in LA, I've run across parks, some schools
and other map features that are marked with both points and outlines.
For La Cienega Park, the park is outlined, coded park and
named. There also is a point for La Cienega
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet-120401.osm.bz2.md5
Is that going to be torrented? I would think many people want a copy...
pgpIVnbkpUs0J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
Hi,
On 01/28/2012 05:59 AM, Michal Migurski wrote:
Keeping in
mind that I am in support of the license switch, I think it's
completely reasonable to expect a technical plan for a switch just 60
days in the future.
You talk about reasonable - I
A common method of photo surveying in OSM is to take a picture of the
GPS while it displays the GPS Satellite time. On the eTrex 30, I can
only display the time to the nearest minute. Has anyone found a
screen to display the seconds? If not, it is useless as a reference
time
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com writes:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Ian ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI: Most of the information present on USGS Topo Maps should already be
present on the map due to an import of the GNIS dataset a couple years ago.
And fixing that import so that the GNIS
On that matter -- I've been working on an idea for a GNIS microtasking
platform. What it would do is:
* Show a random non-improved GNIS point in your neighborhood - name +
map
* Allow you to 1) drag the point to the correct location, 2) flag it
as no longer existing or 3) flag
I think the nuke/replace notion is sensible.
So I would suggest that you put up (github seems fine, doesn't really
matter as long as it's broadly accessible) several things:
a pointer to the massgis data, and maybe a copy
exact recipe for going from that to the .osm to upload (as scripts
201 - 300 of 433 matches
Mail list logo
