Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com writes:
A major road doesn't have to be wide by default. I hereby invite you
to visit Guadarrama, where a trunk road (the N-VI) has only two
lanes, and buildings are just one meter away from the asphalt.
Yes, I agree that the rendering is messed up at low
On Thu, December 18, 2008 07:27, maning sambale wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Wow, Naga City is full of buildings. How did they get so many? Are those
all building=yeses? Crazy.
NAGA City GIS released their data in public domain. We are
/
SoC conference 2008:
http://www.abdn.ac.uk/cartographers08/
_
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Mixter
Sent: 17 December 2008 05:50
To: openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] buildings and roads
Just wondering. Shouldn't
/
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
] On Behalf Of Nathan Mixter
Sent: 17 December 2008 05:50
To: openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] buildings and roads
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
Currently buildings are drawn above
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com wrote:
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
Not if the building is over the road
http://picasaweb.google.com/hemrajpathare/CopenhagenPhotos#5225837680766253506
OJ W wrote:
Sent: 18 December 2008 11:19 AM
To: Nathan Mixter
Cc: openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] buildings and roads
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
Not if the building is over
Or literally through the building !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gate_Tower_Building
This case is also interesting when it comes to tagging layers. what
takes precedence in rendering, the road or the building?
OJ W wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
i...@sanchezortega.es wrote:
Well, there is still a lot of data to import (land use and boundaries
IIRC), but I was too lazy to program the conversion script to take into
account the OSM relationships needed to correctly tag the
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Simone Cortesi escribió:
where can these boundary data be found?
The details can be found over here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Philippines_Data_Import#Naga
Cheers,
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
On Wed, December 17, 2008 06:49, Nathan Mixter wrote:
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads. Currently
buildings are drawn above a road when the road is wide like a highway or
major road. Obviously buildings don't cut into roads. If the road layer is
on top this won't
Wow, Naga City is full of buildings. How did they get so many? Are those all
building=yeses? Crazy. And I thought adding all the industrial and commercial
buildings was bad. Anyway I still think that if the building layers were set at
a lower layer level by default and the roads to a higher,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com wrote:
Wow, Naga City is full of buildings. How did they get so many? Are those all
building=yeses? Crazy.
NAGA City GIS released their data in public domain. We are still
encouraging the City government do continue adding
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads. Currently
buildings are drawn above a road when the road is wide like a highway or major
road. Obviously buildings don't cut into roads. If the road layer is on top
this won't happen.
___
On Wednesday 17 Dec 2008 11:19:44 am Nathan Mixter wrote:
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads. Currently
buildings are drawn above a road when the road is wide like a highway or
major road. Obviously buildings don't cut into roads. If the road layer is
on top this
14 matches
Mail list logo
