On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/15 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Could the definition of official be simplified to signed?? If not,
what would be the difference between bicycle=official and
bicycle=signed?
As I have understood,
can be minimised?
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Roy Wallace [mailto:waldo000...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 August 2009 00:12
To: Mike Harris
Cc: Jukka Rahkonen; talk@openstreetmap.org; m...@koppenhoefer.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Non-designated cycleway vs. designation info missing
On Fri
2009/8/15 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
The wiki says 'Official' is stronger than 'designated'...'Offical' is
only for ways marked with a legal traffic sign.
the map-features main page states for access:
* official is used for ways dedicated to a certain mode of travel
by law. Usually
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Bicycle=signed is IMHO not the best idea, because what do you do for
official or designated _and_ signed ways?
As I mentioned before, you would have to change the syntax to
something more like
access=official is a proposal (and one that appears to be in abeyance)
It's basically trying to create another access= value to try to sort out
some of the mess with access=designated, but I fear it just adds further to
the confusion.
Richard
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Roy Wallace
-Original Message-
From: Roy Wallace [mailto:waldo000...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 August 2009 23:15
To: Jukka Rahkonen
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Non-designated cycleway vs. designation info missing
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jukka
Rahkonenjukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi
2009/8/14 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
The problem is that some of us follow the wiki advice re designated= which
was developed after a lot of discussion in this group!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
If it ain't
broke don't fix it?
IMHO it IS BROKEN. The
: Re: [OSM-talk] Non-designated cycleway vs. designation info missing
2009/8/14 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
The problem is that some of us follow the wiki advice re designated=
which was developed after a lot of discussion in this group!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
To me, cycleway means path, designated means signed, and bicycle=yes
means it's suitable for bikes. So if you have a path that is suitable
for a bicycle but does not have a sign with a bicycle, I would use
highway=path
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Mike Harrismik...@googlemail.com wrote:
Tend to agree in part - I think the 'official' bit is actually redundant?
Would this improve the page?
I'm not sure you'd be successful in removing 'official' altogether,
but I think it could do with some clarification,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Mike Harrismik...@googlemail.com wrote:
The problem is that some of us follow the wiki advice re designated= which
was developed after a lot of discussion in this group!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
Designated= does not mean
2009/8/15 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Could the definition of official be simplified to signed?? If not,
what would be the difference between bicycle=official and
bicycle=signed?
As I have understood, official is intended to tag the formal
dedication (usually of the local administration
Hi,
What might be an unambiguous way to tell that some cycleway is NOT designated?
In theory if bicycle=designated means what it says then bicycle=yes might mean
that yes, it is a cycleway, but no, it is not a designated cycleway. However, I
feel that bicycle=yes means more often that nobody has
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jukka
Rahkonenjukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
Hi,
What might be an unambiguous way to tell that some cycleway is NOT designated?
In theory if bicycle=designated means what it says then bicycle=yes might mean
that yes, it is a cycleway, but no, it is not a
14 matches
Mail list logo
