Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:06 AM, nwastra wrote: > Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. The > source should be put on the changeset only. If you are doing edits that > involve several different sources, it is best to split the changes up > into

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

I, for one, use source tags extensively when tracing from multiple sources, e.g. when I trace buildings from a county's WMS layer, but supplement it with Bing / Geoportal when for whatever reason a building is omitted from the WMS. Using separate changesets for different sources seems pretty

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

sent from a phone > On 28 Mar 2017, at 13:21, nwastra wrote: > > Thanks for the link Martin. > It is well written and helps me a great deal on this matter. although you can put source tags on objects, there's much more sense* to adding the "bezier=yes/no" tag on ways,

[OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

Thanks for the link Martin. It is well written and helps me a great deal on this matter. Nev > On 28 Mar 2017, at 8:27 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > 2017-03-27 23:17 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > >: > Source tags on

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 23:17 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > Source tags on features within the OSM data base have not been depreciated > to my knowledge let's say it like this: their use is discouraged, because the concept doesn't work for OSM. You can see this reflected here:

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

> I didn't know that iD doesn't allow you to set the source on the changesets > as somebody mentioned. If that is true, I see this as a shortcoming of iD > that should be fixed. iD has changeset tag editing since a few weeks (which allows anyone to set the changeset's source tag). It just waits

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:41:38AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:56:43PM +1000, nwastra wrote: > > I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source > > for multipolygons. > > I currently put the source on the relation with all the rest of the tags,

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

You will have an objection from me! Source tags on features within the OSM data base have not been depreciated to my knowledge.. if they were I would more to revert that depreciation. On 28-Mar-17 01:06 AM, nwastra wrote: Jochen, ridding the osm of these unnecessary source tags seems like a

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 16:20 GMT+02:00 Dave F : > Individual entities can have multiple source tags added at different > times. It would be far harder to 'track' their sources if only add to > changesets. When editing an object you can instantaneously see the sources > if added

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

Comments inline: On 27/03/2017 09:41, Jochen Topf wrote: Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. Which wiki describes that? The source should be put on the changeset only. Apart from JOSM, which editors allow that? If you are doing edits that involve several

[OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

Jochen, ridding the osm of these unnecessary source tags seems like a good candidate for our MapRoulette challenge. :) Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. The source should be put on the changeset only. If you are doing edits that involve several different

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

end [mailto:ajt1...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 3:24 AM > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method > > Ahem. Just because _you_ don't do it, doesn't make it "wrong". > > Yes, where a whol

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

On 27/03/2017 09:41, Jochen Topf wrote: Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. Ahem. Just because _you_ don't do it, doesn't make it "wrong". Yes, where a whole bunch of stuff has been added from one source (or a combination of sources), of course it makes

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:56:43PM +1000, nwastra wrote: > I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source for > multipolygons. > I currently put the source on the relation with all the rest of the tags, and > only adding tags to individual ways or inner polygons if they

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 9:46 GMT+02:00 David Fox : > Amendments within changesets can have multiple sources. Each entity can > have multiple sources. sure, you can add multiple sources to the changeset. Cheers, Martin ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

Amendments within changesets can have multiple sources. Each entity can have multiple sources. On 27 March 2017, at 08:29, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone > On 27 Mar 2017, at 07:56, nwastra wrote: > > I am unsure what is the

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

sent from a phone > On 27 Mar 2017, at 07:56, nwastra wrote: > > I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source for > multipolygons. as with any edit, the source should be put on the changeset (i.e. the object which represents the edit), not on

[OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source for multipolygons. I currently put the source on the relation with all the rest of the tags, and only adding tags to individual ways or inner polygons if they are also part of a seperate entity like a fence or a body of