2009/9/28 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
And this seems to be the case here?
The problem is the ways are the best place to tag the ABS information,
and the ABS data just happens to follow rivers, islands, railways and
roads and so on which is very useful where people can't survey and
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:59 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
This bot:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BugBuster
Is removing all sorts of tags from ways, including attribution tags,
can it please be blocked immediately to prevent further damage.
Did you read this:
2009/9/27 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
Maybe he plans another extra run later. If you want to contact him to
know more about his work, do it.
I emailed him when I emailed the list, but no reply yet.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
John Smith wrote:
This bot:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BugBuster
Is removing all sorts of tags from ways, including attribution tags,
can it please be blocked immediately to prevent further damage.
Hi John
What are the tags that it/he is wrong to remove?
For my edits, he's
2009/9/28 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
What are the tags that it/he is wrong to remove?
ABS imported data was stripped from ways and moved to a relation which
is incorrect, I fixed a couple manually but I don't know how many more
times this has happened.
John Smith wrote:
2009/9/28 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
What are the tags that it/he is wrong to remove?
ABS imported data was stripped from ways and moved to a relation which
is incorrect, I fixed a couple manually but I don't know how many more
times this has happened.
John Smith wrote:
What are the tags that it/he is wrong to remove?
ABS imported data was stripped from ways and moved to a relation which
is incorrect, I fixed a couple manually but I don't know how many more
times this has happened.
Please post an example changeset where this bot did
2009/9/28 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Excuse my ignorance, what's ABS?
Australian Bureau of Statistics, they've donated a large data set of
postcode/suburb and other administrative boundaries.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/9/28 Matthias Versen s...@mversen.de:
Please post an example changeset where this bot did something wrong.
I've already fixed the mistakes I've found so far, but I don't know
how many other mistakes there are.
___
talk mailing list
John Smith wrote:
2009/9/28 Matthias Versen s...@mversen.de:
Please post an example changeset where this bot did something wrong.
I've already fixed the mistakes I've found so far, but I don't know
how many other mistakes there are.
Could you post a link to those please?
We can
2009/9/28 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Could you post a link to those please?
We can still see the errors within the history.
I've made a lot of edits today, this is one of the relations I deleted
and I had to retag the ways:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/253976/history
Hi John,
thank you for your report, but whats wrong with moving the tags to a
relation, this is the common way as far as I know, only all ways
together represent the border, so the relation should hold the tags.
Else if there is a change, not every way has to be edited.
Btw: The bot was not
Ruben Wisniewski wrote:
Hi John,
thank you for your report, but whats wrong with moving the tags to a
relation, this is the common way as far as I know, only all ways
together represent the border, so the relation should hold the tags.
Else if there is a change, not every way has to be
Matthias Versen wrote:
A border-way should contain admin_level=X where X is the highest number
of the border it represents and an boundary=administrative Tag.
Lowest
--
Lennard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/9/28 Ruben Wisniewski ru...@all-in-si.de:
Hi John,
thank you for your report, but whats wrong with moving the tags to a
relation, this is the common way as far as I know, only all ways
together represent the border, so the relation should hold the tags.
Else if there is a change, not
2009/9/28 Matthias Versen s...@mversen.de:
Ruben Wisniewski wrote:
Hi John,
thank you for your report, but whats wrong with moving the tags to a
relation, this is the common way as far as I know, only all ways
together represent the border, so the relation should hold the tags.
Else if
Lennard wrote:
Matthias Versen wrote:
A border-way should contain admin_level=X where X is the highest number
of the border it represents and an boundary=administrative Tag.
Lowest
Correct, my mistake.
I meant the highest importance which is the lowest number.
Matthias
John Smith wrote:
These aren't state borders these are administrative borders
(postcodes, town etc), and I'm filling in missing sections manually to
complete postcodes as these weren't imported manually, as a result the
relation isn't correct, each section of the way needs to be tagged
with
2009/9/28 Matthias Versen s...@mversen.de:
John Smith wrote:
These aren't state borders these are administrative borders
(postcodes, town etc), and I'm filling in missing sections manually to
complete postcodes as these weren't imported manually, as a result the
relation isn't correct, each
John Smith wrote:
2009/9/28 Ruben Wisniewski ru...@all-in-si.de:
Hi John,
thank you for your report, but whats wrong with moving the tags to a
relation, this is the common way as far as I know, only all ways
together represent the border, so the relation should hold the tags.
Else if there
2009/9/28 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
And this seems to be the case here?
The problem is the ways are the best place to tag the ABS information,
and the ABS data just happens to follow rivers, islands, railways and
roads and so on which is very useful where people can't survey and
there is
John Smith wrote:
2009/9/28 Ruben Wisniewski ru...@all-in-si.de:
Hi John,
thank you for your report, but whats wrong with moving the tags to a
relation, this is the common way as far as I know, only all ways
together represent the border, so the relation should hold the tags.
Else if there
John Smith wrote:
2009/9/28 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
And this seems to be the case here?
The problem is the ways are the best place to tag the ABS information,
and the ABS data just happens to follow rivers, islands, railways and
roads and so on which is very useful where people
23 matches
Mail list logo
