On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:24:46PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:13 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline
Hi,
I think we have to face it: The approach of allowing the user to add
anything to the map and later fix it has failed. I strongly believed in
it for the longest time. But I don't any more. We have to have stronger
guarantees in the data structures and more checks in editors and in
the
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:51 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:24:46PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent
On Friday 22 November 2013, Paul Norman wrote:
A particular square (400x400 mercator km, I think) containing
coastline can be evaluated without considering the rest of the
continent thanks to the directionality of coastline ways mattering.
You'd periodically get squares that would end up
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:49:36PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
BTW it seems that the inspector doesn't show icons on errors in the
lowest zoomlevel (experienced with Firefox and Opera).
Works for me. What you are seeing might be due to a different known bug
with OSMI: If the 180° line is in
From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:13 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates
through. The problem is that every day there is something broken
Jochen Topf wrote:
I have now changed the coastline update process from once a day to
once every 4 hours. This means updates show up quicker in the OSM
Inspector at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline .
Some mappers still break the coastlines faster than you check them. I
looked at a
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 06:53:15PM +0100, malenki wrote:
Jochen Topf wrote:
I have now changed the coastline update process from once a day to
once every 4 hours. This means updates show up quicker in the OSM
Inspector at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline .
Some mappers
On Monday 18 November 2013, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hi!
For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates
through. The problem is that every day there is something broken
somewhere with the coastline. Often problems get fixed the same day,
but new problems show up the next.
I
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 20:41 +0100, OJ W wrote:
Is there some problem with the coastline at Doha airport? The new
coastline (changed since February) doesn't yet appear in rendered
maps, but looks reasonable in the Edit view:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.24915lon=51.61024zoom=15layers=M
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:39:46 -, David Groom wrote:
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastline
share the same location in the data but show up differently on the map.)
Can you gave an
Is there any reason to still have the NPE layer accessible from the editors.
It was useful in the pre-OS/Bing days but seems like a liability now?
Kevin
On 25 February 2011 17:47, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are
still
not
- Original Message -
From: David Paleino da...@debian.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
David
the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, I would not necessarily
expect to see the results
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:35:41 -, David Groom wrote:
David
the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, [..]
You probably haven't read my whole message :)
The last changes are just added nodes, there is no change in the shape of the
coastline. The last changes in shape happened in
stuff
but that there are tiles that haven't been re-rendered for half a year!?
Jochen
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 05:39:46PM -, David Groom wrote:
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:39:46 -
From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:01 +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hi!
Falmouth:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.15364lon=-5.0639zoom=17layers=M
Looks ok now in this zoom level. Still some errors if you zoom in.
I had a look at it again and marked some tile manually as dirty and I
get the
On 25-2-2011 17:03, Jochen Topf wrote:
The coastline error checker says:
Last update of coastline errors: Wed Apr 14 13:19:17 UTC 2010
It also says it needs new hosting. I guess thats the problem.
The osm.org tile server generates its own coastline shapefiles. It
doesn't use the ones from
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Lennard wrote:
Can we get this going again? What exactly is needed?
A server with sufficient storage and bandwidth to process a weekly
planet, daily diffs, and many hours of single task processing per
coastline run.
We have a server that has planet
On 25-2-2011 22:02, Jochen Topf wrote:
We have a server that has planet file kept current each day for Taginfo.
Maybe it can do the coastline check, too. It only has PBF files, though
which the coastline checker doesn't understand. But we could work around
that or change it. Storage should also
21 matches
Mail list logo
