On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 21:41, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering which countries have actually _not_ seen any imports
so far?
Aside from Ásbrú (http://osm.org/go/e...@ty5m-) and buildings around
the University of Iceland (http://osm.org/go/e0UtNVRI--) Iceland has
had no
Luxembourg hasnt had any imports to my knowledge and I have been
active in mapping (mostly from Yahoo imagery) there since 2005.
Coverage is good for the areas with detailed imagery ...
On 1 October 2010 18:37, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Have there been any data imports in Northern
On 3 October 2010 19:43, Patrick Weber petzimil...@googlemail.com wrote:
Luxembourg hasnt had any imports to my knowledge and I have been
active in mapping (mostly from Yahoo imagery) there since 2005.
Coverage is good for the areas with detailed imagery ...
--
Cheers
Patrick
Have there been any data imports in Northern Ireland? It's not included in the
Ordnance Survey OpenData release (there is a separate Ordnance Survey of
Northern
Ireland), nor in the NaPTAN public transport database.
--
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Kai Krueger wrote:
with all the talk about imports recently, I am wondering which countries
have actually _not_ seen any imports so far? I.e. which communities have
chosen to build all their data from traditional surveying and ignored any
other
- Original Message -
From: Elena ``of Valhalla'' elena.valha...@gmail.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Countries that have NOT had any imports?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Kai Krueger wrote:
with all
On 09/29/2010 11:41 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
with all the talk about imports recently, I am wondering which countries
have actually_not_ seen any imports so far? I.e. which communities have
chosen to build all their data from traditional surveying and ignored any
other available data sources?
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:47:02 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Why not do it the other way round
Could you answer the question?
You cannot deduce the answer to the original question from the answer to
the corollary.
___
talk mailing
Here in Chile we have used and will use Government data in some import
processes, and it would have been a complete waste not to use it,
since they only asked us for an attribution tag.
One of the reasons to use government data here is that we have a
problem quite similar to the one in Australia,
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
With imports I thereby mean both full imports and tracing imports, i.e.
any data that has been copied one way or another over from a third party
source.
Including aerial imagery? Including stuff traced from Landsat?
Currently all of the active countries I can think of
On 29/09/10 22:58, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
With imports I thereby mean both full imports and tracing imports, i.e.
any data that has been copied one way or another over from a third party
source.
Including aerial imagery? Including stuff traced from Landsat?
Let's leave
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
Yes, more or less. Given that some people seem to be strongly arguing
that the use of third party data is crap, mindless and harmful,
... among them myself, as you probably have noticed ...
I would like to get a feel for how bad the situation is and where there
are
Well if you are willing to wait a week or two, I might be able to shed
some light on the issue.
I decided to take a cartography course this semester. One of our
projects is to create a thematic map of our choosing and I was hoping
to make one related to OSM. I just started playing with osmosis
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
Yes, more or less. Given that some people seem to be strongly arguing that
the use of third party data is crap, mindless and harmful,
... among them myself, as you probably have noticed ...
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote:
with all the talk about imports recently, I am wondering which countries
have actually _not_ seen any imports so far? I.e. which communities have
chosen to build all their data from traditional surveying and ignored any
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
PS: I don't think the US is going to be a wasteland in terms of OSM
community forever. I just think that without the TIGER import they'd have
less data but much more community today.
I think the relative lack of OSM
Yeah the physical spread of people out here in the middle part of the
country is pretty sparse and I think a lot of people don't quite get
that. There is a good chunk of Kansas where the population density is
5 people per square mile or less. And those 5 people have absolutely
no use for maps
On 30 September 2010 10:16, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I also think treating the US as though it's a single state (e.g.
comparing it to say Germany), is not all that useful.
Australia is worst, similar size, but much much much less people, and
Frederick seemed to think you could map out most
18 matches
Mail list logo
