Russ Nelson schrieb:
Oh, look, we have 99% of all roads in the US in OSM. Can you say that
about any other country besides the exceptional Germany and the (dare
I say it) imported Netherlands?
In German cities we have 90-100% of the roads, but it's not that good in
remote rural areas. There
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:05 +, Andy Allan wrote:
So please, turn away from imports and work on getting mappers in
charge, especially out pounding the streets. The outcome will be much,
much better in the end, and that end will come much, much quicker.
I think TIGER
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
tag k=addr:street v=Big Grove Rd /
tag k=addr:state v=MyState /
tag k=addr:county v=MyCity, ST /
tag k=addr:country v=US /
I believe people have been saying that this information is not necessary,
and is_in is also not
2009/11/16 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com
Yes. Please don't include this point is within such-and-such a
polygon data onto the point itself, it's redundant information and
not helpful. When a county border is changed by legislation, then
moving the border of the county should be
On Nov 14, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
What really needs to be done for TIGER addresses import is match the
streets from TIGER to those in OSM (which should be easy since they
all still have the TIGER id's) and generate the address geometry based
on these. Otherwise someone will
Hi,
2009/11/14 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
In Denver the houses are all set back a lot further, so some way to say 'on
north-south roads, set back X feet' might help a lot. Or, in JOSM just search
for all the ways that make up the addressing on one side of the street and
move them manually.
2009/11/14 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
I've done a similar import of address data in my area and when writing
the converter I forgot to do the projection the first time, this
resulted in a similar effect to what you describe. I've not seen
Dave's data but looking at the code he's
On Nov 14, 2009, at 5:49 AM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
2009/11/14 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
In Denver the houses are all set back a lot further, so some way to say 'on
north-south roads, set back X feet' might help a lot. Or, in JOSM just
search for all the ways that make up the
What really needs to be done for TIGER addresses import is match the
streets from TIGER to those in OSM (which should be easy since they
all still have the TIGER id's) and generate the address geometry based
on these. Otherwise someone will need to do all of the geometry
corrections that
2009/11/15 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
matching Tiger id's is a very bad idea. you need to compare geometries.
during edits ways are split, merged copied moved, deleted nodes added node,
Most of these operations are not a problem (except copying a whole way
to somewhere else), the
2009/11/15 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
I agree with
Anthony that these tags are useless *except* this one tag, the Id *is*
useful, please don't remove it.
To clarify what I mean, a good measure is probably whether you're
changing the name on the road. If you're changing the geometry
On 14 Nov 2009, at 18:05 , andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/11/15 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
matching Tiger id's is a very bad idea. you need to compare
geometries.
during edits ways are split, merged copied moved, deleted nodes
added node,
Most of these operations are not
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 9:05 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with
Anthony that these tags are useless *except* this one tag, the Id *is*
useful, please don't remove it.
What's useful about it? Or to ask the question a different way, what
is the tag supposed to mean?
2009/11/15 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
copying is very common for all motorways and other ways with separated
lanes.
And this is ok too, it means that both these ways in TIGER are one way
with the given Id, this is just the information any automated process
will be looking for.
2009/11/15 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 9:05 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with
Anthony that these tags are useless *except* this one tag, the Id *is*
useful, please don't remove it.
What's useful about it? Or to ask the question a different way,
Can I have SF county, CA please and Arapahoe County, CO...?
Yours c.
Steve
On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
So, just like the original TIGER import, I'm now grossly stealing
someone else's code:
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/import/tiger2osm/shape_to_osm-Tiger.py
We'll work on making sure that these data look good and I think some
people have some plans on how to get these integrated a bit at a time.
Thanks to those who worked on the namefinder - it worked GREAT
Dave
I've looked at the two you sent me and they're both basically fine but for two
things.
In Denver the houses are all set back a lot further, so some way to say 'on
north-south roads, set back X feet' might help a lot. Or, in JOSM just search
for all the ways that make up the addressing on
18 matches
Mail list logo
