On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Michal Migurski wrote:
I'm hesitant to blow away the existing guide, but I wonder if it
can be moved behind a disambiguation page? Something that
lets you understand different levels of involvement: found a
2009/1/15 Erik Johansson e...@kth.se:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Michal Migurski wrote:
I'm hesitant to blow away the existing guide, but I wonder if it
can be moved behind a disambiguation page? Something that
lets you understand
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Both of these are going to have to wait for the
AS3 rewrite,
Wait - who are you, and what have you done with RichardF?
Cheers,
Andy
___
talk mailing list
Andy Allan wrote:
Wait - who are you, and what have you done with RichardF?
I'm Fake SteveC. At least that's what people keep telling me.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Michal Migurski wrote:
I'm hesitant to blow away the existing guide, but I wonder if it
can be moved behind a disambiguation page? Something that
lets you understand different levels of involvement: found a
mistake, need to add a street, have a spreadsheet of local
amenities, live in the
imagining this?!).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: 12 January 2009 15:07
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch again
Gert Gremmen wrote:
Thank you Thomas,
The image you provided to prove your solution
Mike wrote:
Also - for what it's worth - I find that I use both Potlatch
and JOSM but
for different tasks. I use JOSM as my main editor and for doing
bulk work on
new routes. I find Potlatch is better for doing minor tweaks
and also for
Yahoo tracing (even with the JOSM plugins, the
[mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On
Behalf Of Ed Loach
Sent: 13 January 2009 13:41
To: 'Mike Harris'
Cc: 'OSM-Talk'
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch again
Mike wrote:
Also - for what it's worth - I find that I use both Potlatch
and JOSM but
for different tasks. I use JOSM as my main editor
Phillip Barnett wrote:
I believe Richard did the rectification for Potlatch and claims it to be
better than JOSM's.
True for NPE but not for Yahoo - Potlatch just uses the standard Yahoo Flash
component, it doesn't do any extra fiddling around (well, other than a tiny
tweak to get the
Mike Harris schrieb:
As a relative newbie I still remember my first experiences with both
Potlatch and JOSM. I have no idea whether my own experience is typical but I
did find the learning curve steeper on Potlatch than on JOSM even though the
wikis imply the opposite. I think that Richard may
Well, one of the reasons is that our beginners' documentation is the
weakest part of the whole caboodle. Put yourself in the position of a
newbie. You're not sure what to do (as Chris Schmidt observed on
#irc, editing topology is hard) - you may not even realise that the
roads have to link
Michal Migurski wrote:
I'm looking at replacing MS VEarth imagery in
http://oakland.crimespotting.org/crimes
with OSM, and I've been working on how to introduce the idea of an
editable map to our (non-technical) visitors. OpenStreetBugs offers an
obvious pathway in, though my
I'm looking at replacing MS VEarth imagery in
http://oakland.crimespotting.org/crimes
with OSM, and I've been working on how to introduce the idea of
an editable map to our (non-technical) visitors. OpenStreetBugs
offers an obvious pathway in, though my experience observing local
2009/1/12 Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl:
Thank you Thomas,
The image you provided to prove your solution
was a complete surprise to me and may contribute to a
solution for this everlasting Potlatch Critic.
You are right, and I am right.
My screen looks entirely different, due to the
)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Thomas Wood [mailto:grand.edgemas...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: Sunday, January 11, 2009 10:09 PM
Aan: Gert Gremmen
CC: Talk Openstreetmap
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch again
2009/1/11 Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl:
OSM fellows and friends,
Sorry
Gert Gremmen wrote:
Thank you Thomas,
The image you provided to prove your solution
was a complete surprise to me and may contribute to a
solution for this everlasting Potlatch Critic.
You are right, and I am right.
My screen looks entirely different, due to the missed option
(I mean: I
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
(There's even a case for having z20
as super-thin lines because, by definition, if you're editing at z20
you want precision.)
Or super-fat ones, to remind everyone that no matter how carefully
you're working,
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
So why do people get it wrong? And I'm not doubting that they do.
Well, one of the reasons is that our beginners' documentation is the
weakest part of the whole caboodle. Put yourself in the position of a
newbie. You're not sure what to do (as Chris Schmidt
2009/1/11 Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl:
OSM fellows and friends,
Sorry for bringing this up again….
We have been discussing Potlatch lately.
Take a look at this:
http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=18lat=52.05674lon=4.33844layers=B000F
and at this :
Gert Gremmen wrote:
POTLATCH NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Yeah, well spotted, genius. Where's your fucking patch?
Meanwhile - oh look, what's that on my screen? Fuck me if it isn't the
fucking Potlatch source. Maybe I'm improving the fucking thing.
http://www.systemeD.net/osm/screenshot.png
Maybe a
]
Verzonden: Sunday, January 11, 2009 10:09 PM
Aan: Gert Gremmen
CC: Talk Openstreetmap
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch again
2009/1/11 Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl:
OSM fellows and friends,
Sorry for bringing this up again
We have been discussing Potlatch lately.
Take a look
21 matches
Mail list logo
