Hi,
Russ Nelson wrote:
This is just wrong. If SteveC says that mountain=green means that
first there is a mountain, and that mountain=blue means there is no
mountain, then damnit, we should do it that way.
Are you mad?
Bye
Frederik
___
talk
Hi,
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
What's so hard about standardizing on the boolean values given
appropriate changes to editor presets, good wiki documentation, and a
deprecation period for other boolean values?
It's a kind of slippery slope situation. There is fear that once it has
been
When I say 'should', I mean 'should' in the sense of 'should if they
want to make the widest use of data possible'. Obviously, there's a
trade off between the amount of time/effort it takes to support more
tags, and the extra data this gives you. In the case of yes/no vs
true/false vs 1/0, I'm not
2009/10/1 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
It's a kind of slippery slope situation. There is fear that once it has
been proven that standardisation works for true/false values, there will
be demands to standardise everything else as well.
I think you are exagurating things a little, however
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
For starters if the maintainers of JOSM Potlatch and Merkaartor encouraged
the use of yes/no it would be a way forward.
Potlatch does indeed have 'yes' (rather than 'true'
2009/10/1 Alice Kaerast kaer...@qvox.org:
Hang on, it's October 1st not April 1st! In all seriousness though they
won't be giving you their floorplans because it's a terrorist risk
rather than the fact they're giving Google exclusive access.
The slashdot subject was misleading, Google isn't
Hi,
Was the answer to my question that nobody knows how long ODbL is protecting the
data and it is impossible to tell it exactly?
-Jukka Rahkonen-
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
NL is running on Cherokee, we have a 404 script that communicates with
renderd. I guess this can be used by lighttpd and nginx too.
Stefan
Op 1 okt 2009 om 03:58 heeft John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
het volgende geschreven:\
2009/10/1 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
hi,
I
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote:
No, he is a leader because we respect him. THAT is how leaders in
an anarchic state
2009/10/1 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de:
NL is running on Cherokee, we have a 404 script that communicates with
renderd. I guess this can be used by lighttpd and nginx too.
URL?
I tried to code something similar like this in php before but didn't
get very far at the time, can your script
And as I said before I am 99.9% certain that this is not breach of
copyright in the UK either. As I said before this is identical to the case
where someone plans a route using an atlas then uploads their traces to
OSM, using their own observations to tag the roads, not the atlas.
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:14:00 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
If we don't do that, then we'll get what we deserve: no leadership.
Yes please, this project needs an active leader. There is currently too
much undecided topics.
As a reference please look how Fedora Project [1] is doing things.
There
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:03:38 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Are you mad?
Bye
Frederik
You are taking this out of context, and you obviously missed the point.
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
John Smith schreef:
2009/10/1 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de:
NL is running on Cherokee, we have a 404 script that communicates with
renderd. I guess this can be used by lighttpd and nginx too.
URL?
I tried to code something similar like
Thanks,
For the below link I noticed that the demo outputs the tiles as an epsg of
900913 is it also possible to output as an epsg of 4326 since our data is as
4326, and if you can output as 4326 will it line up with our other data.
We found that with having google maps as the base layer that it
Hi,
Valent Turkovic wrote:
Are you mad?
You are taking this out of context, and you obviously missed the point.
Not at all. Russ has called for dictatorial leadership which the project
should follow even if there were absolutely nonsensical decisions. I
don't know how any context could
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Russ Nelson wrote:
This is wrong. There are times when any project needs leadership.
It's unreasonable for us to expect that every open source project
leader will be willing to subject himself to ad-hominem arguments.
We need to stand up for our leaders, and when they're
Russ Nelson wrote:
I'm tired of this silly true/false 1/0 yes/no up/down left/right
in/out fore/aft port/starboard debate/debacle. It's trivial, it's
stupid, we could just as easily toss a coin as engage in any rational
debate about how binary values should be expressed.
This is just wrong.
Picking up Ray's point that observing the back of the giveway sign is a
rather indirect way of saying follow the road round to the right, the
simplest/clearest is probably a relation on the through route linking the
ways before/after the junction, saying this is the priority route through
the
On 30/09/2009 22:05, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:35 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
wrote:
On 30/09/2009 10:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
you could model it like this (see attached, colours are just
indicating the ways, not highway-classes)
Yes, that's also what
Hi,
Somehow I feel that you are not interested in real WMS but you mainly
want tiles to be used as a background in some OpenLayers application.
In that case normal, uncached WMS in not what you want. But if you want
to get on-the-fly rendering with selectable layers, different
projections and
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I can't understand how some of you seem to be yearning for a power
figure that absolves you from thinking for yourselves just to make
things simpler.
You answered your own question: that's exactly what people want -
2009/10/1 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de:
I think it was on this list before;
May have been before I joined...
vserver!20!document_root = /var/www/tile.openstreetmap.nl/htdocs
vserver!20!error_handler = error_redir
vserver!20!error_handler!404!show = 0
vserver!20!error_handler!404!url =
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:05 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
It shows visually which the main road is at the junction and is a good
model of the physical arrangement.
IMHO it does not *explicitly* show the continuations of roads at the
junction. And even if you do think it
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote:
Dave F. writes:
Russ Nelson wrote:
-1. Don't confuse anarchy with chaos. SteveC is our leader (and
should behave as such by Giving Advice), but he's only our leader so
far as he gives Good Advice.
A leader in an
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
If the consumers had to do less work then OSM would get *more*
consumers. Which is half the point of the exercise, isn't it?
Stop thinking in these terms, they don't work for OSM. The data OSM has
to offer has a reasonable value; depending on who the customer is,
using
SteveC wrote:
On 30 Sep 2009, at 17:54, Dave F. wrote:
SteveC wrote:
On 30 Sep 2009, at 16:14, Russ Nelson wrote:
SteveC writes:
Yeah, OK Dave, we've got the message, you don't free-format tags.
Unfortunately you're going to have to get used to it, because it
is the basis of the
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote:
No, he is a leader because we respect him. THAT is how
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
a consumer of the data has to do a bit more work but this is a small
fee for free access to an amazing database.
but what does it say about us to the outside world?
are we portraying a forward looking group?
are we portraying an indecisive group?
On 01/10/2009 11:47, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:05 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
It shows visually which the main road is at the junction and is a good
model of the physical arrangement.
IMHO it does not *explicitly* show the continuations of roads at the
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
What's so hard about standardizing on the boolean values given
appropriate changes to editor presets, good wiki documentation, and a
deprecation period for other boolean values?
It's a kind of slippery slope situation. There
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
I find it very disappointing you feel there is a them us situation.
Yes, very disappointing but not every human being on earth happens to
have an OSM account. We're working on it.
Isn't that just putting an artificial middle man into the equation?
The cool thing about
John Smith wrote:
I emailed westfields and centro, both are operators of shopping
centres, about getting access to their floor plans in the various
shopping centres they operate to add to OSM, unfortunately I received
no reply at the time, maybe this is why.
-
An anonymous
...can we take the back-and-forths to IRC.
talk@ is the most important communication channel for OSM and it's
very rapidly becoming unreadable - all the I said, no you said,
no I meant, no you meant. I've spoken to a handful of people in
the last few days who have unsubscribed from talk@ as
* Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org [2009-10-01 11:50]:
If we have open issues in the community that we cannot find a good
solution to, then the reason for this is not that we simply lack a good
Führer who tells us what is right and what is wrong; it is because these
issues are difficult
2009/9/30 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:49 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
It's at http://www.openstreetmap.pl/wp (see caveats below).
Neat.
* Blue dots are wikipedia links, grey dots are other External Links
(website= and url= tags).
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Frederik Ramm writes:
In the long term, standardisation would kill the project, and thus not
be desirable even for our users. - Coming from the outside and not
having the knowledge about OSM that we have, users can be forgiven to
demand things that would ultimately destroy OSM,
That's
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
I find it very disappointing you feel there is a them us situation.
Yes, very disappointing but not every human being on earth happens to
have an OSM account. We're working on it.
Sorry Fredrik, but you /were/ talking about people already within
Hi
I notice some post the same message to multiple OSM forums.
In usenet I'd get flamed for it.
is it acceptable here?
Ta
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
I've now fixed Potlatch up so that it can be Translated on
Translatewiki. Now it just needs to be imported into Translatewiki.
I've put up a notice on the OSM wiki so that confused Translators
won't use it in
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
...can we take the back-and-forths to IRC.
talk@ is the most important communication channel for OSM and it's
very rapidly becoming unreadable - all the I said, no you said,
no I meant, no you meant. I've spoken to a handful of people in
the last
Frederik Ramm writes:
Not at all. Russ has called for dictatorial leadership which the project
should follow even if there were absolutely nonsensical decisions.
WHOA!! I never said that. What I said was that if we can't choose,
as a community, between yes/no, true/false, and 1/0, then
I'm tired of this silly true/false 1/0 yes/no up/down left/right
in/out fore/aft port/starboard debate/debacle. It's trivial, it's
stupid, we could just as easily toss a coin as engage in any rational
debate about how binary values should be expressed.
When it prevents flickr etc from
Andy Allan writes:
can win, and I decided about 6 months ago to ignore (or at least not
rise to) the eternally pointless tagging debate.
The reason it's eternal is because there's no one to choose. Steve
refuses to do it because too many people give him hell when he does,
and nobody defends
Frederik Ramm writes:
On the other side we have the mappers who do not save, or earn, any
money from OSM, and the programmers and server admins and everyone who
uses their spare time to create and run OSM.
On the other side you have mappers who want to create useful data, not
a pile of
SteveC wrote:
C'mon... freeform tags set the community free, if you have a better
alternative please outline it?
How about you stepping in where there is an unresolvable controvery,
editing the wiki, and saying I recommend this choice -- SteveC. No
Nazi goose-stepping required, no dictating,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:34 PM, andrzej zaborowski
I never understood these arguments and want to encourage using a single
wikipedia= tag.
I never understood people who wants to have wikipedia urls in OSM
data. It is not OSM role to point to wikipedia articles but wikipedia
to point to OSM
Dave F. writes:
This is just wrong. If SteveC says that mountain=green means that
first there is a mountain, and that mountain=blue means there is no
mountain, then damnit, we should do it that way.
Sheesh, has Donovan lost all his currency?
Oh my Lord, you've completely missed the
2009/10/1 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
let's have a
tagging list. But not here.
+1
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 01/10/2009 13:51, Russ Nelson wrote:
Frederik Ramm writes:
Not at all. Russ has called for dictatorial leadership which the project
should follow even if there were absolutely nonsensical decisions.
WHOA!! I never said that. What I said was that if we can't choose,
as a community,
2009/10/1 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
I never understood people who wants to have wikipedia urls in OSM
data. It is not OSM role to point to wikipedia articles but wikipedia
to point to OSM geodata. And this has to be done through lat/lon
coordinates.
in many cases it is interesting/usefull to
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Would it be a good compromise to say:
1. a software application should always check boolean against
yes/true/1 and not only yes
2. the wiki shoudl recommend the yes
3. a bot is setup to replace regularly all values true or 1 by
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/1 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
let's have a
tagging list. But not here.
+1
+1
cheers,
matt
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Andy Allan writes:
can win, and I decided about 6 months ago to ignore (or at least not
rise to) the eternally pointless tagging debate.
The reason it's eternal is because there's no one to choose.
surely it has more to
2009/10/1 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:34 PM, andrzej zaborowski
I never understood these arguments and want to encourage using a single
wikipedia= tag.
I never understood people who wants to have wikipedia urls in OSM
data. It is not OSM role to point to wikipedia
2009/10/1 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Would it be a good compromise to say:
1. a software application should always check boolean against
yes/true/1 and not only yes
2. the wiki shoudl recommend the yes
3. a bot is setup to
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 03:18:58PM +0200, Pieren wrote:
Would it be a good compromise to say:
1. a software application should always check boolean against
yes/true/1 and not only yes
2. the wiki shoudl recommend the yes
I agree on that.
3. a bot is setup to replace regularly all values
2009/10/1 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
I'm tired of this silly true/false 1/0 yes/no up/down left/right
in/out fore/aft port/starboard debate/debacle. It's trivial, it's
stupid, we could just as easily toss a coin as engage in any rational
debate about how binary values should be
2009/10/1 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
3. a bot is setup to replace regularly all values true or 1 by
yes and false or 0 by no (and nothing else).
Wouldn't that waste CPU cycles and bloat the change files for almost no benefit?
Wouldn't it be better if editors automated this before uploading?
There is one small problem with this suggestion, if most new users are
invited to join this and other lists and the number of users are
increasing at an exponential rate the number of messages will go up at
an equal or greater rate, then what?
___
talk
2009/10/1 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
Either that, or let's have a tagging list. But not here.
+1
Emilie Laffray
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
+1
I just submitted a ticket.
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2337
And made an entry in my diary about this
*Dear OSM users :
trac.openstreetmap.orghttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/acrosscanadatrails/diary/8129
*
Hope that helps,
Cheers
Sam
Twitter: @Acrosscanada
Facebook:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:28 PM, andrzej zaborowski
No, this is just stupid.
Uh, that's a good argument. I'm sure the group of wikipedian's setting
up their own osm maps server will be happy to hear that.
A page about a building or about a european route E30 has completely
nothing to do with
2009/10/1 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
There is one small problem with this suggestion, if most new users are
invited to join this and other lists and the number of users are
increasing at an exponential rate the number of messages will go up at
an equal or greater rate, then what?
+1
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org wrote:
The problem with this is that things are never that black and white
there are aways shades of Grey. Simple Parsing might be quite happy
with Yes/No or True/False, but 2 might mean something different to 1
while both can be
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I notice some post the same message to multiple OSM forums.
In usenet I'd get flamed for it.
is it acceptable here?
Yes. If it's applicable to the forums you're sending it to.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:38 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
There is one small problem with this suggestion, if most new users are
invited to join this and other lists and the number of users are
increasing at an exponential rate the number of messages will go up at
an equal or
2009/10/1 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org wrote:
The problem with this is that things are never that black and white
there are aways shades of Grey. Simple Parsing might be quite happy
with Yes/No or True/False, but 2 might mean something
Hi,
Matt Amos wrote:
i absolutely agree. i'd also defend frederik's right to say this is
the Frederik Ramm approved tagging scheme without catching grief, or
andy to say it's the One True Gravitystorm way, etc... etc...
Now we're getting somewhere. This goes back to an idea floated a while
Hello,
I hope i have picked the right list to ask these questions, please alow me to
explain myself;
I am a 4x4 off-roader and i have a laptop on the dash of my vehicle running
memory map. I have been searching the internet for cheap detailed maps. I
have had little success. I took the
2009/10/1 Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com:
But things are just the other way round in OSM. The mapper is always
right,
So there is no purpose to the JOSM validator? No purpose to
keepright? No purpose to having presets? I think you're exxagerating
too make a point, Fredrick.
they are
2009/10/2 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
The idea behind that (and correct me if I'm wrong) is that anyone makes
their own decisions (just like now) and in cases where people think they
have a good definition they put this on some kind of special wiki page
or database or whatever (tags I
Matt Amos wrote:
Sent: 01 October 2009 2:25 PM
To: Russ Nelson
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Andy Allan writes:
can win, and I decided about 6 months ago to ignore (or at least not
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sent: 01 October 2009 3:13 PM
To: Matt Amos
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide
Hi,
Matt Amos wrote:
i absolutely agree. i'd also defend frederik's right to say this is
the Frederik Ramm approved tagging scheme without catching grief, or
John Smith wrote:
Sent: 01 October 2009 3:23 PM
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide
2009/10/2 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
The idea behind that (and correct me if I'm wrong) is that anyone makes
their own decisions (just like now) and
2009/10/2 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com:
John Smith wrote:
Sent: 01 October 2009 3:23 PM
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] SteveC should decide
2009/10/2 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
The idea behind that (and correct me if I'm
2009/10/2 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com:
So I agree with Matt. To me its not the tags that need controls it’s the
process by which we select them. Mostly I guess tags (as the originator of
Map Features I can remember most of the basics and have a good idea, my
Russ Nelson wrote:
On the other side you have mappers who want to create useful data, not
a pile of random rubbish.
No-one wants to create random rubbish. What people do want is to be able
to describe what they've just mapped without needing prior approval from
the OpenStreetMap Tagging
Pieren wrote:
I never understood people who wants to have wikipedia urls in OSM
data. It is not OSM role to point to wikipedia articles but wikipedia
to point to OSM geodata. And this has to be done through lat/lon
coordinates.
lat/lon coordinates aren't an ideal solution for this. Imagine
yes he is a leader and as such deserves respect. he should lead some
useful and intelligent projects and don't loose a word about this
childish 1/0/yes/no/true/false discussions.
a consumer of the data has to do a bit more work but this is a small
fee for free access to an amazing database.
Liz wrote:
Thankyou for this suggestion, but it doesn't deal with the needs of
multiple time zones and asynchronous communication - or simply
catching up after a few days away.
What I would like to see is a search which looks only into osm*-stuff:
mails, forum and wiki.
With good hits it would
Ian Dees wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:29 AM, malenki o...@malenki.ch
mailto:o...@malenki.ch wrote:
Liz wrote:
Thankyou for this suggestion, but it doesn't deal with the needs of
multiple time zones and asynchronous communication - or simply
catching up after a few days
Ian Dees wrote:
http://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=015487330990472192076:qvmeg3q9qus
Thanks. (not mentioning the usual google-blah ;))
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/10/1 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:28 PM, andrzej zaborowski
Uh, that's a good argument. I'm sure the group of wikipedian's setting
up their own osm maps server will be happy to hear that.
That effort has completely different goals and again it's to prettify
the
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:38 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
There is one small problem with this suggestion, if most new users are
invited to join this and other lists and the number of users are
increasing at an exponential rate the number of messages will go up at
an equal or
2009/10/2 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
Then the people who are mailing more than their fair share of posts
will be asked to post less often. Hopefully they will realise that
every time they post to the list it's delivered to 1,000s of others
and they should keep their contributions under
Jonathan Bennett schrieb:
Russ Nelson wrote:
On the other side you have mappers who want to create useful data, not
a pile of random rubbish.
No-one wants to create random rubbish. What people do want is to be able
to describe what they've just mapped without needing prior approval from
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.comwrote:
All of the people I've talked to here in my area would love to see a
tagging scheme to be able to map the stuff they see on the ground. They
wouldn't care less where this standard was coming from - even if it
would
Roy Wallace schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
What you and others simply fail to explain is why the success story from
three years ago with a fraction of mappers and data must be the best
solution for the situation we have today ...
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:35 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Ah, so are you saying that, in Martin's attached image, the red way
and the yellow way should/could meet at the junction? If so, then IMHO
it is even *less* clear that, e.g. traveling from the red to the grey
way is
Hi All,
If there is no new comments for this proposal (in the discussion page) in
the next two days, it's status will be set to 'voting'.
_
From: Кирилл [mailto:mekil...@yandex.ru]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 1:50 AM
To: 'talk@openstreetmap.org'
Subject: [tagging] Feature
Hi,
Your documentation states for using osm2pqsql (listed below) :
*Before you can use osm2pqsql for the first time with
To import into 4326, use the parameter -l
Emilie Laffray
2009/10/1 John Mitchell mitchellj...@gmail.com
Hi,
Your documentation states for using osm2pqsql (listed below) :
So for the osm2pgsql command I add -l to it.
Correct?
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.comwrote:
To import into 4326, use the parameter -l
Emilie Laffray
2009/10/1 John Mitchell mitchellj...@gmail.com
Hi,
Your documentation states for using osm2pqsql
$ osm2pgsql --help
osm2pgsql SVN version 0.65-14123
Usage:
osm2pgsql [options] planet.osm
osm2pgsql [options] planet.osm.{gz,bz2}
osm2pgsql [options] file1.osm file2.osm file3.osm
This will import the data from the OSM file(s) into a PostgreSQL database
suitable for use
Thanks,
For the below information it noted that:
*This will import the data from the OSM file(s) into a PostgreSQL database
suitable for use by the Mapnik renderer*
I am assuming that this command will also work correctly if my renderer is
instead geoserver since I already have been using
Apollinaris Schoell writes:
don't think so. the ones doing the hard work in the background rarely
contribute to these childish discussions because they DO something
useful instead wasting their time.
First, you're contributing to these childish discussions as well; why
criticize
1 - 100 of 313 matches
Mail list logo
