Robin Paulson wrote:
one possible problem i can see:
it is a legal requirement of OSM to display that attribution and if
the tag is editable by anyone, then it can be changed, either through
malice, clumsiness or otherwise. this could lead to troublesome legal
wrangles
it's been talked
On 10/01/2008, Sebastian Spaeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's been talked about regarding a couple of other issues that have
cropped up (the naming dispute over cyprus for instance) - maybe we
need to lock some information, and allow it only to be edited by
certain privileged
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:39:38PM +, Tom Higgy wrote:
Just seen the post on opengeodata.org about Nestoria's entirely OSM
based site.
And because they use Google Maps API there is a Google logo on it and
Google terms of service but only the terse OSM copyleft which doesn't
look like
On Jan 9, 2008 11:50 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand why numbers are used instead of names. My question is why are
there no odd numbers listed? It just looked strange.
Future-proofing. It leaves gaps so that if new units are invented that fit
between existing ones you
At 09:44 PM 1/9/2008, Robin Paulson wrote:
can someone explain a few things about the way boundaries work, and
their relation to the is_in key?
as far as i can tell, when a location (say the suburb of balham, in
london) is added to the map, the is_in tag needs to be set, multiple
times. in this
Stephen Gower wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:11:35PM +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
the boundary data should be relatively easy to come by
Not where it isn't marked on the ground, and is only defined by
reference to the Copyrighted national mapping. The is the case in
many places in
On Jan 10, 2008 11:06 AM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Gower wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:11:35PM +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
the boundary data should be relatively easy to come by
Not where it isn't marked on the ground, and is only defined by
reference to
On 10/01/2008, Abigail Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 11:06 AM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Gower wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:11:35PM +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
the boundary data should be relatively easy to come by
Not where it isn't
On Jan 10, 2008 11:35 AM, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Greater London debatable or for a mapping/administritive meaning are
you counting the outside boundaries of the London Boroughs?
I personally do it by the London Transport zone, as your generally need a
10-12minute bus service so
On 09/01/2008, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please can we keep this to legal-talk to stop discussion fragmenting?
Thanks.
Longbow4u wrote:
After the
proposed revision of the GFDL by the Free Software Foundation our maps
will
probably be compatible with Wikipedia.
This problem can elegantly be solved as a layer on the output e.g. a
hyperlink / ballon on web based map.
OSM only need to indicate which nodes already has wikipedia entries
and what their identifiers are. Then we can prevent duplicates from
being rendered.
I suspect the most likely explanation
When I use the source tag (and the note tag) I just make sure it includes
the word someone might search for (sometimes I feel the need for a short
sentence).
So if anyone needs to know where everything is that's based on yahoo imagery
they can just search for values including 'yahoo' and they
On Jan 10, 2008 11:52 AM, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm right then compatibility isn't quite as much as an issue as the
discussion has made me think.
Wikipedia's position is indeed that they are allowed to illustrate GFDL
articles with cc-by-sa images, because the images and the
Hi all,
I was wondering is there an existing way to tag a marker that is something
for when you don't have a map, but of interest to the sorts or people that
are OSM mappers.
The sort of thing I am thinking of:
milestones/posts, that say how many miles to the next town
trigpoints and various
Hi,
Here's a small script that will automatically download and apply all the
required daily change files to make your planet file as up to date as possible.
just save the file some where convenient, i.e. the directory where your planet
file is located.
Then chmod the file to make it
Gregory wrote:
I don't know much legally but...
Oh, I don't know, you seem to have summed it up pretty nicely there. :)
[...]
If I'm right then compatibility isn't quite as much as an issue as the
discussion has made me think.
Yes, absolutely.
As Abi says, Wikipedia's current policy
80n wrote:
Sent: 10 January 2008 12:57 PM
To: Gregory
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] How to tag: milestones, trigpoints etc
I've been tagging Coal tax Markers as:
historic=monument
note=Coal Tax Marker
80n
I've used highway=milepost a fair bit too
Cheers
Andy
On Jan
Ah,
I'm not sure about the searching functionality, I don't think I played
with that. If you are trying to position the map without gpsd I think
you can edit a configuration file somewhere with your local long/lat.
- David
On 10/01/2008, Ian Haylock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
David Dean
On Jan 10, 2008 12:48 PM, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering is there an existing way to tag a marker that is something
for when you don't have a map, but of interest to the sorts or people that
are OSM mappers.
The sort of thing I am thinking of:
milestones/posts,
On Jan 10, 2008 12:53 AM, Abigail Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 11:50 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand why numbers are used instead of names. My question is why
are there no odd numbers listed? It just looked strange.
Future-proofing. It leaves gaps
On Jan 10, 2008 4:37 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? Trying to future-proof against hierarchies that have been around
for (in some cases) millenia? Ooh, I know, we could have negative numbers to
indicate planet, solar system, galaxy, etc. For future interstellar use.
I'm not
On Jan 10, 2008 8:55 AM, Abigail Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 4:37 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? Trying to future-proof against hierarchies that have been around
for (in some cases) millenia? Ooh, I know, we could have negative numbers to
indicate
Hi all,
Apologies for the admin related topic, but I don't know exactly where to
direct it. It is about applying for the creation a country-specific
mailinglist.
Who to approach to get a new mailinglist set up?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] absorbs my message, but no reply after a
week, so i guess there
Robin Paulson wrote:
can someone explain a few things about the way boundaries work, and
their relation to the is_in key?
as far as i can tell, when a location (say the suburb of balham, in
london) is added to the map, the is_in tag needs to be set, multiple
times. in this case, it would be set
Robin Paulson wrote:
On 11/01/2008, Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- There's no reason why you can't stick an admin boundary on a
natural=coastline way.
sounds good
the idea of tracing over an existing boundary is not something that
particularly appeals to me though, and as
Thomas Wood wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 6:34 PM, Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
What is more important to me, and this is question for all who know,
how to cope boundaries *between* two areas, like administrative
ones? How to cope with boundaries of different administrative
levels?
Robin Paulson wrote:
On 11/01/2008, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Tram_station
it will be moved to the approved features and map features pages
Should it be used for the stops on the track of a bus_guideway ;)
I do think that
why is that?
I try to map a bigger train-station with lots of single-railways. and
now, the whole trainstation is purple :-P
--
mario
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
On 11/01/2008, Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is more important to me, and this is question for all who know,
how to cope boundaries *between* two areas, like administrative
ones? How to cope with boundaries of different administrative
levels? If a line is a boundary between
On 10/01/2008 19:00, Robin Paulson wrote:
at this point, we will have a far better, more-rounded picture of what
is happening with tags, how they could be improved, etc.:
does namespacing need to be seriously considered?
should we have such a shallow depth of tags, or a more nested approach?
Robin Paulson wrote:
this proposal is for two things: a new tag, tourism=museum and the
deprecation of the old tag, historic=museum
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Museum
I was going to comment on the page, but it seems like a wider issue. Why
are some things like this only for nodes,
this has been on the proposals page for 8 months now, with very little
attention paid to it
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Checkpoint
a request for comments and opinions, please
thanks
___
talk mailing list
Robin Paulson wrote:
Do you mean that a commune (the lowest level of self government) can
be part of more than one unit of each of higher levels? Like this?
yes. some examples:
i think turkey lies partly in europe, partly in asia?
There are other examples at even this high a level as well.
further to my previous post about editing the wiki, are there any
mediawiki gurus here?
a set of templates (or even one!) for proposals would save a lot of
time, does anyone feel like volunteering to create one? hopefully,
this would give some guidelines for people when proposing tags, and
save a
Mario Salvini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
why is that?
I try to map a bigger train-station with lots of single-railways. and
now, the whole trainstation is purple :-P
A regular railway is usually *not* a monorail (= Einschienenbahn in German).
Illustration:
On 11/01/2008, Gerald A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/01/2008, Tony Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mediawiki templates require passing in arguments to the call to them,
which isn't really suitable for large clumps of text.
I'm not a template guru, but there are ways to create a
Hello everybody,
Kosmos rendering engine has a new version (1.3). The main new feature is
relief shading tool in Kosmos.Gui, which can automatically download and
process SRTM3 data for a given map area.
If you're interested, visit http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Kosmos.
Good night,
On 10/01/2008, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I still need a good term for those shops that you seem to have in
england as well, superdrug and Boots may be good examples (at least
the shops not dispensing :-). I think The body shop also falls under
this category.
I hesitate to use
this proposal has been languishing for 2+ months now, with little discussion
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Model%27s_Aerodrome
please could i get some comments
thanks
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
this proposal has no unanswered objections
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/ship
voting is now open
thanks
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
this tag has now been superseded by gridiron, rugby league, soccer, etc.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/football
in the interests of doing things properly, i've created a proposal for
deletion, similar to how we handle proposals for creation of tags.
i'd rather not
On 11/01/2008, Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- The border of a country is not the coastline, but (at the very
least) 12 nautical miles from the coastline and in some places, much
further than that.
ok, let's say i wanted to use this as a basis for drawing the national
i did a bit of work tidying this up, although it's basically sound as
far as i can see - should be pretty straightforward
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Waterfall
comments and opinions please
thanks
___
talk mailing list
voting has now closed on waterway=dam, with 14 approve votes, and no
object votes
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Dam
it has been moved to the approved features page
thanks
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
in a bid to keep things consistent, i've created a new proposal for
waterway=reservoir, and suggest deprecating landuse=reservoir
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/reservoir
comments and opinions please
thanks
___
talk mailing
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:11:03 +0100
Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin Paulson wrote:
On 11/01/2008, Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the kansas city metro area lies in missouri and kansas (US)
Ok, how about its administration. To which governor must a mayor of
kansas
Armijn Hemel wrote:
*,
zomaar een vraag: zien anderen ook in de AND data dat verschillende
wegen die niet meer dan 1 m breed zijn (voetpaden) getagged zijn als
'pedestrian' (volgens de wiki meer 'voetgangersgebied', als in:
afgesloten voor autoverkeer, maar niet per se ontoegankelijk voor
Nu we het toch over de tileserver hebben: Er waren plannen om daar
zondag, rond de OSM borrel (welke borrel begint er al om 2 uur btw? :)),
daarover te meeten.
Zijn die plannen er nog steeds? Zoja, ervoor of erna?
Qua borrel zou ik er wel voor zijn om het er VOOR te doen, en om gelijk
een
De wijzigingen vinden vooral plaats op level 17.
De map op tile.openstreetmap.nl is maar een demo.
Mijn updates in ypenburg waren 2 dagen later al zichtbaar op level 17,
maar nu nog steeds niet op de hogere levels.
De bedoeling was niet hier een kaart server te
plaatsen, maar de kaart is
On Thursday 10 January 2008 09:20:57 Lambertus wrote:
Een aardig voorbeeld is de Oude Gracht in Utrecht.
Volgens mij is hiervan alwel eens een melding geweest, het staat zelfs
in de wiki [1]. Fietspaden zijn als pedestrian getagd, wellicht
voetpaden ook. Deze fouten moeten natuurlijk
On Jan 10, 2008 11:40 AM, Gert Gremmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
De wijzigingen vinden vooral plaats op level 17.
aha, dat verklaart een hoop...!!
Waarom kan ik op de tile-server enkel tot level 16 gaan?
Helaas laat [EMAIL PROTECTED] verstek gaan met
updates van veel nederlandse tiles,
Ante Wessels wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 09:20:57 Lambertus wrote:
Een aardig voorbeeld is de Oude Gracht in Utrecht.
Volgens mij is hiervan alwel eens een melding geweest, het staat zelfs
in de wiki [1]. Fietspaden zijn als pedestrian getagd, wellicht
voetpaden ook. Deze fouten
hi,
Een aardig voorbeeld is de Oude Gracht in Utrecht.
Volgens mij is hiervan alwel eens een melding geweest, het staat zelfs
in de wiki [1]. Fietspaden zijn als pedestrian getagd, wellicht
voetpaden ook. Deze fouten moeten natuurlijk gecorrigeerd worden:
fietspad - cycleway
*??? Een weg waarop (meestal) geen auto's mogen komen krijgt een pedestrian
tag. ???**
*
volgens de wiki: heb ik alleen highway=pedestrian in stads-centra. Lees
maar:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
For town centres and civic areas, where wide expanses of hard
On Jan 10, 2008 11:40 AM, Gert Gremmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mijn updates in ypenburg waren 2 dagen later al zichtbaar op level 17,
maar nu nog steeds niet op de hogere levels.
Oh, waar? Kan je een permalink aageven?
Martijn van Oosterhout , voel je je geroepen ??
(of anderen ?)
Voor
Gerco-Kees Bloemsma wrote:
/??? Een weg waarop (meestal) geen auto's mogen komen krijgt een
pedestrian tag. ???//
/
volgens de wiki: heb ik alleen highway=pedestrian in stads-centra. Lees
maar:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
For town centres and
On Thu, January 10, 2008 7:11 pm, Lambertus wrote:
Ok, er valt wat voor te zeggen, maar...
De wiki pagina voor footway [1] zegt toch echt dat steegjes waar je
alleen maar te voet (eventueel ook fiets) mag komen footway moeten zijn.
Ook de wiki pagina voor pedestrian [2] zegt: For town
Hi!
Martin Trautmann schrieb:
Oder man könnte (Achtung: mein Lieblingsthema) einfach die Städte
als Areas einzeichnen, wie es, wie ich mittlerweile rausgefunden
habe, auch die FAQ als das korrekte Vorgehen bezeichnet:
Die Auswertung damit kommt mir zwar recht schwierig vor, das scheint
Hallo,
das Worldfile steht wieder zum herunterladen zur Verfügung. Die
Deutschlandkarte und die Weltkarte können jetzt wieder gleichzeitig in
QLandkarte installiert werden, da sie wieder unterschiedlich heissen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/User:Computerteddy
Viele Gruesse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Gernot Hillier wrote:
|
| Oder man k?nnte (Achtung: mein Lieblingsthema) einfach die St?dte als
| Areas einzeichnen, wie es, wie ich mittlerweile rausgefunden habe, auch
| die FAQ als das korrekte Vorgehen bezeichnet:
|
| Die Auswertung damit
Meine Antwort bezieht sich auf folgende Mail vom Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2008
16:15:
Nett.
Noch ein bischen mehr JavaScript und das Ding wäre noch um einiges
besser. Gibts irgendwo nen SVN oder Teilprojekt in dem es darum geht das
Ding auszubauen und auf die Hauptseite mit einzubetten?
Ich
Raphael Studer schrieb:
Ja, mit dem Validator-Plugin von JOSM gibt es die Möglichkeit das
automatisch fixen zu lassen. Allerdings kann es bei Punkten
ausserhalb des Download-Rechtecks sein, dass den doppelten Punkten
ein nicht heruntergeladener Weg zugeordnet ist. Bei Hochladen kommt
dann die
Hallo,
vielleicht habe ich ja nicht die aktuellen heruntergeladen, aber ich glaube
World und D haben immer noch diesselben Namen, nämlich:
6324.tdb
und
6324.img
Habe ich etwas übersehen?
Grüße
Cor
___
Talk-de mailing list
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
vielleicht habe ich ja nicht die aktuellen heruntergeladen, aber ich
glaube World und D haben immer noch diesselben Namen, nämlich:
6324.tdb
und
6324.img
Das ist richtig. Und auch im Moment noch so.
Habe ich etwas übersehen?
Ja, die Karten
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass Bushaltestellen seltsamerweise 10-20 Pixel
(bei max. zoom) nach links verschoben werden. Ist das normal?
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de
Ja, mit dem Validator-Plugin von JOSM gibt es die Möglichkeit das
automatisch fixen zu lassen. Allerdings kann es bei Punkten
ausserhalb des Download-Rechtecks sein, dass den doppelten Punkten
ein nicht heruntergeladener Weg zugeordnet ist. Bei Hochladen kommt
dann die etwas verwirrende
Moin!
FOSSGIS ist die Abkürzung für Freie und Open Source Software für
Geoinformationssysteme.
Die FOSSGIS 2008 wird vom 1.-3. April 2008 an der
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg stattfinden.
Der Call for Papers ist ab sofort offen!
Falls Sie einen Beitrag leisten möchten ...
Info:
Let me first explain my setup, this might be usefull to somebody in this
group.
I have a Nokia E61 phone, which is the center of my GPS world. At times I
borrow a bluetooth GPS module (also a Nokia make) from a guy at work. I came
across a utility written by Nokia called Nokia Sports Tracker.
I have played around a bit with the JOSM app. And this is where I need some
help. Im not sure what Im doing.I go about creating ways between the node
recorded from the GPS. But I see there is a node every couple of meters.
So do I create ways between every node? I know this will create huge
Pieren Pieren a écrit :
Quelqu'un a-t-il déjà tenté de créer les frontières administratives
(boundary=administrative) pour les départements et/ou les régions ?
J'ai vainement cherché une source dans le domaine public pour les
départements et aussi incroyable que cela puisse paraître, je n'ai
Etienne Cherdlu fait des essais en ce moment sur les petits niveaux de
zoom avec osmarender. Il utilise entre autre Paris pour voir le rendu.
Enfin bref, on peut voir Paris et ses alentours sur informationfreeway
sans tous les noms de villes, et avec plus de détail que d'habitudes à
ces
Pieren Pieren a écrit :
Quelqu'un a-t-il déjà tenté de créer les frontières administratives
(boundary=administrative) pour les départements et/ou les régions ?
J'ai vainement cherché une source dans le domaine public pour les
départements
Je connais bien un ingénieur issu de l'IGN par sa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
J'en profite pour signaler au personnes qui mappent sur Paris que je
m'occupe chaque semaine de mettre à jour les modifications de voirie
officielles qui paraissent au Bulletin Officiel de la Ville du
Département de Paris (BMO-BDO, publication bihebdomadaire).
Effectivement, l'avis de cette personne sera intéressant.
Pour ce qui concerne le tag admin_level, je n'ai pas l'impression qu'il soit
remis en cause. C'est plutot la façon de localiser des objets avec is_in
qui pose d'avantage questions, me semble-t-il.
Comme cela a déjà été mentionné, ce tag
Je pensais - à tort - qu'une présentation écrite avait été utilisée.
Il existe bien une page pour la presse sur le wiki
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Fr:Portal:Press) qui n'a pas
vraiment bougé depuis Aout 2007.
Je ne connaissait pas cette statistique de 5% par semaine, c'est pas mal !
http://maps.yahoo.com/broadband/#mvt=slat=52.949414lon=-1.178971mag=4
PS, I also discovered several other new areas of coverage last night.
See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Yahoo%21_Aerial_Imagery/Coverage
Gregory
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, January 10, 2008 2:19 pm, Gregory Williams wrote:
http://maps.yahoo.com/broadband/#mvt=slat=52.949414lon=-1.178971mag=4
PS, I also discovered several other new areas of coverage last night.
See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Yahoo%21_Aerial_Imagery/Coverage
Excellent,
77 matches
Mail list logo
