Hi,
a technical solution is sought, to display the corresponding
information whenever linz-sourced data is being viewed.
And it is ok for them that whatever clever technical attribution
scheme you devise is immediately switched off when OSM maps are
viewed through something else than
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Sent: 18 March 2008 10:54 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] import of dataset for new zealand
Robin Paulson wrote:
(c) Crown Copyright
At 12:48 PM 3/18/2008, 80n wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Sent: 18 March 2008 10:54 AM
To: mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.orglegal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk]
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for making your xyz data available. We are
incorporating it into a worldwide free open mapping project http://
www.openstreetmap.org, the purposes of which is described in more
detail at http://wiki
On 18/03/2008, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin Paulson wrote:
(c) Crown Copyright
w00t, Robin found his Shift key! ;)
thanks, incredibly constructive. haven't you got something better to do?
___
legal-talk mailing list
Robin Paulson wrote:
On 18/03/2008, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin Paulson wrote:
(c) Crown Copyright
w00t, Robin found his Shift key! ;)
thanks, incredibly constructive. haven't you got something better to do?
What, something better than having a sense of humour? No,
Hi,
This could take a little while, so we're thinking of changing the
language of _new_ user signups to instead of releasing their work as
CC, but as CC _or_ the ODL if the rest of the community vote on it.
1. It is, in my eyes, far from clear what exactly the community
will vote on (will
On 19/03/2008, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, something better than having a sense of humour? No, probably not.
Alternatively, you could respond to the seven lines of constructive,
substantive suggestion I made below that. But - oh look - you appear
to have snipped that.
Robin Paulson wrote:
i ignore people's suggestions when their first response is something
in that tone. maybe if you want your point to be taken seriously you
should make it in a serious way?
'k. Personally I find it more helpful to assess people's suggestions
according to the value of the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 05:38:37PM +, SteveC wrote:
Richard, Andy and I just had a conference call to review where we are
with the license.
Progress is going well.
We've engaged Jordan and sent off the changes we suggested to him, he
is integrating them and will be releasing a new
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I haven't been following recent OSM licence debates at all, but why
not also offer the choice of licensing contributions under the
PDDL[1] also? This does not prevent people from including such
contributions in an ODL-licensed dataset.
This would effectively
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
This could take a little while, so we're thinking of changing the
language of _new_ user signups to instead of releasing their work as
CC, but as CC _or_ the ODL if the rest of the community vote on it.
1. It is, in my eyes, far from clear what exactly
Charles Basenga Kiyanda wrote:
I'm also wondering. How can one legally agree to release a
contribution under a license which is unfinished? Or am I
misunderstanding the situation and the ODL is in fact done?
Technically speaking the user would be licensing their contributions
under the
hi,
as mentioned above, yesterday we was at a radio talk-show to launch the
milano micro mapping party initiative.
During the broadcast, a blind listener wrote us an email asking if the
data are suitable for blind people.
It could be of extreme interest to add information usefull for blind
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Jon Burgess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is correct. When the --slim option was working the entire import
was IO bound and took several times longer than the RAM approach.
You could try ionice but I don't think that helps control swap IO.
I looked at the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Edoardo Marascalchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
as mentioned above, yesterday we was at a radio talk-show to launch the
milano micro mapping party initiative.
During the broadcast, a blind listener wrote us an email asking if the
data are suitable for
On 17 Mar 2008, at 22:24, martin dodge wrote:
See pages 28-31 in flash version
http://fluidbook.microdesign.nl/geoinformatics/02-2008/
or (big) pdf of whole magazine for downlown
http://fluidbook.microdesign.nl/geoinformatics/02-2008/data/
document.pdf
The infrastructure of
Simone Cortesi ha scritto:
On 3/18/08, Edoardo Marascalchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ho comprato da loro per altre cose, hanno anche targhe magnetiche per
auto (vengono circa 5euro l'una comprese le spese di spedizione).
Attenzione: le targhe magnetiche comportano il pagamento della
On 3/18/08, Edoardo Marascalchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ho comprato da loro per altre cose, hanno anche targhe magnetiche per
auto (vengono circa 5euro l'una comprese le spese di spedizione).
Attenzione: le targhe magnetiche comportano il pagamento della tassa di
concessione
land information new zealand is a government org that holds data on
roads and properties for the entirety of new zealand. they have
recently given permission to use their data sets in osm, with a caveat
that we include an attribution statement:
Contains data sourced from Land Information New
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I looked at the code the other day and it seemed rather inefficient.
Fixing it will be a PITA though...
Would be very nice though, I'm think of looking into it when I have time...
I was pondering rewriting it from scratch with the aim to
Dear Florian Fischer
Thank you for the article on OpenStreetMap - it's great to see us
mentioned in geoinformatics. Unfortunately there is one small error:
The infrastructure of OpenStreetMap is based on Geoserver (based on
GeoTools) and many pieces of free software that have been developed
Frederik Ramm wrote:
And it is ok for them that whatever clever technical attribution
scheme you devise is immediately switched off when OSM maps are
viewed through something else than osm.org (e.g. informationfreeway,
cyclemap, ...) whom you cannot force to use your technical solution?
That is brilliant. I am happy to tout for potential students in the
computer science dept at this university, but don't think saying to the
head of computing Oi, check out this URL and pointing to the wiki page
will be very fruitfull. Could someone please write a very short blurb to
put it in
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 14:33 -0400, Blake Crosby wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
There is already a page in the wiki for trails
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Mapping/Features/Trail), but this
is really just tagging a way with permitted usage (such as footpath,
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
Sent: 18 March 2008 10:49 AM
To: Blake Crosby
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Tourist/Leisure Trails
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 14:33 -0400, Blake Crosby wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
There is already a page in the wiki for trails
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
land information new zealand is a government org that holds data on
roads and properties for the entirety of new zealand. they have
recently given permission to use their data sets in osm, with a caveat
that we include
Hi,
I want to ask the community how much a regular GPS cost in your
country. In the Philippines a local supplier charges approximately
530 U.S. dollars for a GARMIN Etrex Legend CX. This one is pretty
much expensive. Bulk orders from another country could be much
cheaper even with additional
SteveC wrote:
OL is the slippy map on the front page. The rest of it is custom ruby
on rails.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Component_overview
is helpful.
(The main editors are JOSM [Java] and Potlatch [Flash]; the main
renderers are Mapnik [C++] and Osmarender [XSLT/SVG]. There
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 10:55 +, Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
Sent: 18 March 2008 10:49 AM
To: Blake Crosby
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Tourist/Leisure Trails
Hello,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:03:48 +, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
land information new zealand is a government org that holds data on
roads and properties for the entirety of new zealand. they have
Steve Hill wrote:
Contours layer presented by openpistemap is simply great. Does it
exist a server publishing only this layer?
There is still the relief layer available, using addresses like
http://srtm.in-ulm.de/layer/relief/z8/row89/8_134-89.jpg
The tutorial on how to use these is here:
Mikel Maron wrote:
http://www.opengeodata.org/?p=284
Cool. Would many students please apply now between March 24 and March
31st for a project on our Wiki?
A link to our wiki page and idea pool is here:
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/streetmap/about.html
Sebastian
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to ask the community how much a regular GPS cost in your
country. In the Philippines a local supplier charges approximately
530 U.S. dollars for a GARMIN Etrex Legend CX.
Cheapest mail-order price in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edoardo Marascalchi wrote:
| hi,
| as mentioned above, yesterday we was at a radio talk-show to launch the
| milano micro mapping party initiative.
| During the broadcast, a blind listener wrote us an email asking if the
| data are suitable for blind
El Martes, 18 de Marzo de 2008, maning sambale escribió:
I want to ask the community how much a regular GPS cost in your
country. In the Philippines a local supplier charges approximately
530 U.S. dollars for a GARMIN Etrex Legend CX. This one is pretty
much expensive. Bulk orders from
Hi,
This type of junction is very common here in Calgary, I just wanted to
confirm that I'm constructed it correctly.
It's basically two divided carriage ways (parallel, opposite one way
streets with curb or larger seperator) crossing at a set of traffic
lights. In addition there are normally
Richard, Andy and I just had a conference call to review where we are
with the license.
Progress is going well.
We've engaged Jordan and sent off the changes we suggested to him, he
is integrating them and will be releasing a new version.
Once released he will consult with other interested
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 18 March 2008 5:03 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] 2 divided carriage-ways meeting at traffic lights.
Hi,
This type of junction is very common here in Calgary, I just wanted to
confirm that I'm constructed it correctly.
It's basically two divided
On 18/03/2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good to me. The routing will take into account that you can't travel
the wrong way down a one way street.
True, but that's only half the battle. It won't take you down the
wrong street. However, it may instruct you to
Adam Boardman wrote:
Do you have the openstreetmap on it?
Download from the phone over wifi at home (or gprs if I'm someplace I
wasnt expecting in advance).
nice software.. but i don't understand how the donwload of maps is
going on.
Can I download a map without being there in the
On 19/03/2008, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the key is the attribution
at present there is no method for attributing data in osm, so this is
a call to all:
I presume you've verified that putting it on the OSM web site would not
be adequate? I think there needs to be a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PPS. What's the best way to mark pedestrian overpasses/foot bridges?
highway=foot
bridge=yes
layer=1
Can you specify the height restriction for road underneath?
Sure. Place a node on the road under the bridge, and mark the node with
maxheight=. Assumed to be
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 23:43:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem I can see with this is that the source attribute can be
altered (or stripped).
Which is as it should be. If an object originating from that import is
significantly altered later, then it should be possible to reflect this
On 19/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is as it should be. If an object originating from that import is
significantly altered later, then it should be possible to reflect this in
the source tag.
of course, defining 'significantly altered' becomes an issue
maybe
Hi.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Ian Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I mentioned before to Franc, a blue sign does not a cycle route make.
True.
I don't believe there has ever been a RTA, or Sydney wide numbering system
for cycle routes.
I did some digging today and came up with
In the Brisbane Metro area, Pine Rivers shire (soon to be part of
Moreton Bay) has maps available of bike routes. I looked at one to
see how many there would be to map in the region. From what I can
tell, they've marked every wide footpath on the map, as well as shared
walkways through parks
Morgen,
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 06:43 +0100, Christoph Eckert wrote:
es gibt keinen offiziellen. Ich verwende einfach amenity=park_bench.
Wie sinnvoll es ist Parkbänke zu mappen weiß ich nicht, aber wenn mir welche
über den Weg laufen nehme ich sie mit.
Ich wollte das auch schon öfters mal
Am 17.03.08 schrieb Christian Karrié [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ich sehe die ganze Sache mit den Luftbildern mit einem weinenden und
einem lachenden Auge.
+ gut für die Übersicht, wo z.B. jetzt nochmals die Brücke ist oder
Imrisse von Wäldern
- schlecht für Strassen, Gebäude. Es passt einfach nicht
Moin,
Wir wollen ja eine offene Plattform
sein, und ein solcher Tunnel ist es sicherlich wert, gespeichert zu sein
(mindestens so sehr wie eine Parkbank oder Stromleitung, wie von manchen
Leuten gemapt).
was bitte gibt es an Leuten auszusetzen, die Parkb?nke mappen?
;)
Natürlich gar
Moin
Das naechste Treffen soll in den Raeumen des CCC stattfinden. Das geht nicht
an einem Dienstag.
Es stehen jetzt mehrere Termine zur Auswahl.
Bitte auf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Hamburger_Mappertreffen
diskutieren.
Michael
___
Hallo!
Auch dieses Jahr wird die Fachhochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg in Sankt
Augustin bei Bonn wieder die Konferenz rund um freie Software
veranstalten - und zwar vom 23. bis 24.8.2008.
(http://www.froscon.de/)
Ich habe dort letztes Jahr meine erste Konferenz dieser Art mitgemacht
(ich studiere
On 17/03/2008, Christian Karrié [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- schlecht für Strassen, Gebäude. Es passt einfach nicht mit den
GPS-Koordinaten überein, es leitet einen dazu an, Wege auf Basis der
Luftbilder zu generieren. Jedoch ist die Verzerrung in manchen Gebieten
sehr groß und deshalb nur
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Peer Sommerlund
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/03/2008, TK Soh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Peer Sommerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Date 1205879355 -3600
# Node ID
Have added specific info about UK rights of way to the Trail page; I believe
this matches what common practice is. See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Mapping/Features/Trail
Please let me know if there's anything wildly inaccurate there.
Thanks,
Nick
55 matches
Mail list logo
