I don't know much about AND (Automotive Navigation Data, or AND Data
:-)), but it seems kind of horrible in Mumbai. It's great to have
data, but won't this be a bad thing for Openstreetmap rather than a
good thing?
Roads are off a couple of houndred meters.
Erik Johansson wrote:
I don't know much about AND (Automotive Navigation Data, or AND Data
:-)), but it seems kind of horrible in Mumbai. It's great to have
data, but won't this be a bad thing for Openstreetmap rather than a
good thing?
Roads are off a couple of houndred meters.
Hello,
yesterday I noticed some bad edits in a zone I'm mapping. I
contacted the author (Israfil) and he promptly answered saying
that it was a mistake, not knowing that it was editing the real
map.
Some are new lines:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.5049lon=11.2177zoom=14layers=0BFT
Hi!
Thanks for the update!
Just got an issue with the new feature. Its really dangerous to be
able to shift whole ways that easy.
What happens is I accidently moved a large lake and then polatch
bugged out due to memory issues. When logged back in, the lake where
gone. Now I dont know how
On Sun, 11 May 2008, 80n wrote:
highway=road
This is suitably vague, but has a clear enough meaning.
Ah, ok - does this get rendered? (It isn't on Map_Features - maybe it
should be).
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
Did we ever decide what to do when a road continues but
we didn't continue down the road?
I tend to do fixme=Road continues or fixme=Footway continues.
Although to be honest, in most cases for roads I either follow them as far
as they go (when I am
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Jeffrey Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did we ever decide what to do when a road continues but
we didn't continue down the road?
I can't speak for the other 33,000 contributors, but I (and a few
others I know of) simply use isolated nodes as a kind of
On 12/05/2008 09:38, Steve Hill wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
Did we ever decide what to do when a road continues but
we didn't continue down the road?
I tend to do fixme=Road continues or fixme=Footway continues.
I put name=whatever (tbc) so it is clear to someone
Back when I started OSMing, I came across the tag 'complete=no', so this
is what I tend to use
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
Did we ever decide what to do when a road continues but
we didn't continue down the
Axel von Matern wrote:
Just got an issue with the new feature. Its really dangerous to be
able to shift whole ways that easy.
That should be fixed in 0.9a - it's more reluctant to move ways than 0.9 was.
What happens is I accidently moved a large lake and then polatch
bugged out due to
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2008, 80n wrote:
highway=road
This is suitably vague, but has a clear enough meaning.
Ah, ok - does this get rendered? (It isn't on Map_Features - maybe it
should be).
No. But you are welcome to add
I'm grouping a replies to several posts for this topic...
On 9 May 2008, at 19:13, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
Typos in real words are easier to detect than a mistake in entering
a number.
In the scenario I was suggesting numbers would only replace words for
type tags and users would never
On Mon, 12 May 2008, 80n wrote:
Ah, ok - does this get rendered? (It isn't on Map_Features - maybe it
should be).
No. But you are welcome to add it to any of the rendering engines.
Ok, I'll look into doing so. What is the procedure for adding this sort
of thing? Just post a patch on the
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:26 PM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I and others have been doing a lot of fixing of TIGER data all over
the US. There is still a lot to do and Richard has added some really
useful features to potlatch to speed it up.
I was thinking of running a TIGER mapping
On 12/05/2008 11:59, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Posted to talk and dev
This post really follows on from my consideration of Completeness metrics. A
number of experienced OSMers who have mapped out there areas have either
contacted me directly or posted through the lists about
I don't think we want another server. I can already demonstrate it:
I am currently experimenting with binary data downloads for my mobile
OSM viewer, mom http://mom.poco.org.uk/. I need data for scales from
3 (just coastlines and country boundaries for enormous areas) to scale
15 (almost
On Monday 12 May 2008 11:50:15 elvin ibbotson wrote:
If, for
example, the feature types were structured using a numerical system
such that so that all natural features began with 0, all highways
with 1, etc, but everything needed at scales smaller than 5 ended
with numbers smaller
On Friday 09 May 2008 11:27:21 elvin ibbotson wrote:
Much debate centres around the way features are tagged and how they
are rendered (for example recent discussion of golf course tagging,
the term 'highway', rendering power lines,...) and it seems that much
of this is inextricably
Hi!
The problems seem to get more bizarre... on my frontend I get a huge,
fat way covering the area. Tried to kill it. Also tried to press
undelete with no luck. If you got the time to check out whats
happening, its here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=59.2471lon=18.0506zoom=17
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Axel von Matern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problems seem to get more bizarre... on my frontend I get a huge,
fat way covering the area. Tried to kill it. Also tried to press
undelete with no luck. If you got the time to check out whats
happening,
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Brian Quinion wrote:
I like this - but would suggest a small change:
highway=crossing
crossing=zebra|toucan|pelican|...
No, get rid of the UK specific classifications of crossing completely -
they require too much background knowledge to interpret and are pointless
if
Hi Frederik,
Just quickly, I am interested and my employer - www.bioregional.com - could be
a partner on the bid. We're using OSM as part of a municipality
sustainability project so this would be right up our street. I will talk to
the council about getting them on board too.
I've copied my
The tag boundary=national_park is listed in both these pages :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Deprecated_features
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features#Boundary
I don't think this is ok. I searched to an explanation either for the
introduction of the tag and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Allan wrote:
| On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Jeffrey Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
|
| Did we ever decide what to do when a road continues but
| we didn't continue down the road?
|
| I can't speak for the other 33,000 contributors, but I
On Monday 12 May 2008 15:36:35 Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
| On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Jeffrey Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Did we ever decide what to do when a road continues but
| we didn't continue down the road?
|
| I can't speak for the other 33,000
I like this - but would suggest a small change:
highway=crossing
crossing=zebra|toucan|pelican|...
No, get rid of the UK specific classifications of crossing completely -
they require too much background knowledge to interpret and are pointless if
you have already split out the various
I have been following with interest the thread on tagging and rendering,
and would like to make a slight jump to comment on the inherent
limitations for rendering the results.
Whilst I do not wish to stifle the use of a wide-ranging tag-set, and
applaud the attempts by folk to get agreement on
On 12/05/2008 16:30, Steve Chilton wrote:
I have been following with interest the thread on tagging and rendering,
and would like to make a slight jump to comment on the inherent
limitations for rendering the results.
You're quite right of course, but equally there are other reasons to
David Earl wrote:
Here is what I was going to do:
1. use a set of ways like coastline (i.e. with an on the right rule,
because they'd be too long as one way), to define areas of completeness.
By definition, coastline would form one boundary.
2. Render these plus coastline to a new set
On Monday 12 May 2008, Andy Allan wrote:
Oh, I can think of a way. Yep, I can definitely think of some
shorthand tags for the most common crossing types. Trouble is, as
soon as I mention it, everyone starts uncontrollably ranting.
But that's the problem right? That no-one outside the UK
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
a) Being able to expand the boundary after each session is likely to be
a great motivator. I suspect that this progressive taming of the
wilderness or making order out of the void is what drives many mappers.
b) Applicability to small or
I can't remove this trans global way. My Potlatch just freez when
trying. Can someone give it a try?
/Axel
12 maj 2008 kl. 15.26 skrev Tom Hughes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Axel von Matern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problems seem to get more bizarre... on my frontend I get a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Martin wrote:
| Here is my list of traits.
|
[snip]
| pavement
Pavement is a dangerous word because in the UK it means sidewalk
(footpath), and in the USA it means the road surface. My Mum failed her
USA driving theory test because she didn't
Andy Allan wrote:
Seems sensible to me to have a shorthand. So where you have a type of
crossing that's for cyclists and pedestrians but not horses nor
canoes, and it's controlled by traffic lights (as opposed to not being
controlled at all), we could do with a shorthand way to tag it because
80n wrote:
highway=road
This is suitably vague, but has a clear enough meaning.
Isn't a value of unknown in use on several other tags? It is at least
on the whole access series of tags
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:access)
So highway=unknown would make sense to me.
-Alex
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 12 May 2008, Andy Allan wrote:
Oh, I can think of a way. Yep, I can definitely think of some
shorthand tags for the most common crossing types. Trouble is, as
soon as I mention it, everyone starts
On Friday 09 May 2008 21:57:51 OJ W wrote:
This page *tries* to explain the differences:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Highway
I suppose my summary would be something like:
Motorway: motor vehicles only, always dual-carriageway, always has
good level of emergency features,
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alex Mauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
Seems sensible to me to have a shorthand. So where you have a type of
crossing that's for cyclists and pedestrians but not horses nor
canoes, and it's controlled by traffic lights (as opposed to not
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
Starting with a single level of completeness makes sense, but I think it
should be public roads, named where feasible.
I have a different view. I think we should have a leveled scheme from the
beginning. I suggest the following:
Level 1:
David Earl wrote:
On 12/05/2008 16:30, Steve Chilton wrote:
I have been following with interest the thread on tagging and rendering,
and would like to make a slight jump to comment on the inherent
limitations for rendering the results.
You're quite right of course, but
Dave Stubbs wrote:
You just said that to the one guy who's actually writing rendering
rules which use this tag. Well done there.
Yeah, he's free to make use of his shortcuts on his own rendering
system. That doesn't make those shortcuts globally useful.
-Alex Mauer hawke
On 12/05/2008 18:06, Inge Wallin wrote:
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
Starting with a single level of completeness makes sense, but I think it
should be public roads, named where feasible.
I have a different view. I think we should have a leveled scheme from the
Brian Quinion wrote:
The only problems I can see is that because it
is centralised it is somewhat out of user control - so maybe it should
make sense to pull the list of presets from a wiki page (once a day?)
and there would be a small amount of server side load to implement it.
That would
David Earl wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On 12/05/2008 18:06, Inge Wallin wrote:
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
Starting with a
Alex Mauer wrote:
Isn't a value of unknown in use on several other tags? It is at least
on the whole access series of tags
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:access)
So highway=unknown would make sense to me.
Something like road=unknown might make sense, but because the
On 12/05/2008 20:02, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On 12/05/2008 18:06, Inge Wallin wrote:
On
Dave Stubbs wrote:
Some of us really couldn't care less either way. Frankly, please stop
talking about it -- you're not getting anywhere.
Actually, I think some fairly insightful suggestions have been made and
it is a useful discussion. You don't _have_ to read this thread if you
don't care
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:06:20PM +0200, Inge Wallin wrote:
Yes, but it would be good if we planned for at least some of the subsequent
levels right from the start.
I support this idea - I would call them levels as some areas might work
completely different. I would call the different
On Monday 12 May 2008 20:09:41 David Earl wrote:
On 12/05/2008 18:06, Inge Wallin wrote:
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote:
Starting with a single level of completeness makes sense, but I think it
should be public roads, named where feasible.
I have a different view. I
On Monday 12 May 2008 21:16:38 David Earl wrote:
So I think Inge is right - we need different measures for our own use.
But on the public map, all streets with names seems a pretty good
achievable and useful thing to show.
I don't think it is a good idea to call that just complete. I think it
Steve Hill wrote:
tag is used for lots of non-road things, highway=unknown could be
talking about any kind of highway, such as a footway. Quite a lot of
the time you know it is a road because you drove down it, but you don't
necessarily know what class of road it is.
Hmm, I would think
I'm very far from this in Korea, but I would guess in time some parts of the UK
will need to be rechecked at some point. How can we make a system
for rechecking an area? Maybe the completeness should be retired
after a period of time.
--
http://bowlad.com
Hello,
Just a quick update and I'm gone.
There's now a light v0 version:
V0: one summarized placemark per user at the last known position (very low
fat, should work on all machines running Google Earth)
v1: the most detailed one (a placemark per node). Without feedback I've
stopped pushing
I couldn't find the other thread on this topic.
How do you map an object, like a tower on top of a mountain, that
you don't have access to without expensive survey equipment?
My thought is to use a plumb bob to line up the unknown object
with some known objects. I would find something like a
On 9 May 2008, at 03:30, elvin ibbotson wrote:
On 9 May 2008, at 11:05, Dave Stubbs wrote:
As far as I see it there is no difference between mapping
11=autobahn,
and mapping motorway=autobahn.
I think you missed the point. At present we have highway=motorway and
I believe a German
Hi,
I'm very far from this in Korea, but I would guess in time some
parts of the UK will need to be rechecked at some point. How can we
make a system for rechecking an area? Maybe the completeness should
be retired after a period of time.
Once we have a few applications in place that get
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Brian Quinion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have a go at implementing a local macro system in JOSM and see
how well it works then it can be extended to pull from the server if
it seems worth having.
Well, JOSM already supports preset files which can be
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Quinion wrote:
The only problems I can see is that because it
is centralised it is somewhat out of user control - so maybe it should
make sense to pull the list of presets from a wiki page (once a day?)
and there
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Ari Torhamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
su, 2008-05-04 kello 15:40 +0200, Mike Collinson kirjoitti:
At 01:33 PM 4/05/2008, Ari Torhamo wrote:
la, 2008-05-03 kello 17:39 -0400, Ted Mielczarek kirjoitti:
Why else are we contributing
this data if not for people
Freek recently created this image which shows how much of the AND data is
untouched: http://www.vanwal.nl/osm/author_density_nl_20080502_full.png(warning
3 MB image). I think the z18 idea is good idea.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:36 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 12/05/2008 21:02,
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is terribly hard to know whether you have all the footpaths,
and I think we'd hardly ever mark anywhere complete if we did that.
I think it's terribly hard to know when a map is correct and complete,
regardless
On 12/05/2008 22:51, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is terribly hard to know whether you have all the footpaths,
and I think we'd hardly ever mark anywhere complete if we did that.
I think it's terribly hard to know when
So it might be useful to have a renderer that does everything on
request instead of storing large amounts of pregenerated tile images?
(i.e. so that the server requirements are no longer proportional to
the number of map styles that it serves)
If that could be made to work, then everyone could
Hi,
So it might be useful to have a renderer that does everything on
request instead of storing large amounts of pregenerated tile images?
It's called a WMS server, and I believe Fake Steve C recently had a
prototype on his blog.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
just thought this was a lovely, brilliant visualisation of osm usage.
Well done, good work!
Would love to see some of this in non-kml formats, somehow (google
earth doesn't work well for me). Or on the web.
(GeoRSS? GML? Worldwind? etc)
as an overlay over existing osm maps?
tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Lohoff schrieb:
| On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:06:20PM +0200, Inge Wallin wrote:
| Yes, but it would be good if we planned for at least some of the
subsequent
| levels right from the start.
|
| I support this idea - I would call them levels as
Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 10:52 PM
To: David Earl
Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM, David Earl [EMAIL
David Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 11:06 PM
To: Andy Allan
Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help provide
completeness tools
On 12/05/2008 22:51, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008
Florian Lohoff wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 8:29 PM
To: Inge Wallin
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help
providecompleteness tools
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:06:20PM +0200, Inge Wallin wrote:
Yes, but it would be good if we planned for at least
Jeffrey Martin wrote:
Sent: 12 May 2008 9:38 PM
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Developers requested to help
providecompleteness tools
I'm very far from this in Korea, but I would guess in time some parts of
the UK
will need to be rechecked at some point. How can we
I can give some ideas on this using basic surveying. JOSM measurement tools
will let you do the editing too so its not that difficult to get items
mapped in this way. Especially useful for descrete objects in an otherwise
fairly featureless landscape.
Until I get a moment to drop something on the
In theory, yes. In practice, maybe.
You would find that if you did a third measuring line, it probably
wouldn't intersect where the first two did. Small errors at the
measuring end cause massive errors at the other end. Even the guys
with the specialist measuring equipment working on a
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Gert Gremmen wrote:
Bij de macro kost een compatible
(met CHDK) Canon 460 slechts 69 ex.
Is dat de goedkoopste beschikbaar? Alleen geen idee hoe 'groothoek' het
is.
Stefan
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Ik weet niet of mensen hiermee kunnen helpen. Cycle-routing is wat wij
willen, maar hebben wij organisaties die mee kunnen tellen?
Ik denk persoonlijk dat dit een van de aangrijppunten is om een OSM
organisatie een boost te geven, dan wel een
On Mon, May 12, 2008 3:55 pm, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Ik weet niet of mensen hiermee kunnen helpen. Cycle-routing is wat wij
willen, maar hebben wij organisaties die mee kunnen tellen?
Bedrijven kunnen mee tellen. Ik lees bijv van Martijn P. wel eens dat hij
leuke dingen op de todo heeft
Ik heb er vanochtend een gehaald,
en de hack library laat zich prima
Installeren.
Nu nog een scriptje kopieren
Om elke 5 seconden een foto te maken (endless).
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Stefan de Konink
Verzonden: maandag 12
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Gert Gremmen wrote:
Ik heb er vanochtend een gehaald,
en de hack library laat zich prima
Installeren.
(Klinkt *erg* interessant... zouden we er ook een com port dan iets wat
direct GPS kan inladen op kunne hacken?)
Nu nog een scriptje kopieren
Om elke 5 seconden een
De snelheid van de camera is niet zo hoog.
De meesten hale niet meer dan 1 a 1.5 sec.
Verder zij nerwaarschuwingen ivm oververhitten
Van de beeldsensor bij volcontinue bedrijf.
Ik heb nog geen compoort hack gezien, maar
Wel een heleboel refs naar remote contol via usb.
Ergens eind deze maand ???
Amaryllo, hoe dat zo ???
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Stefan de Konink
Verzonden: maandag 12 mei 2008 18:28
Aan: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fiets tracks: automatisch foto's maken
On Mon, 12
Ik ben er vrijwel zeker van dat ik ga, dus ik wil er wel wat mee
doen...
At Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:19:16 +0200,
Ante Wessels wrote:
Uitnodiging, iemand zin om er iets mee te doen?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Outdoor geekevent (eth0)
Date: Wednesday 16 April 2008
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Gert Gremmen wrote:
Amaryllo, hoe dat zo ???
Laat die Amaryllo maar USB commando's doorsturen hoor... liefst inclusief
GPS coordinaten.
De laatste keer dat ik met de Nederlandse en dev persoon uit Azie sprak
was open source maken een probleem vanwege de SifrII code. Maar
But I think you are right Liz, it is relevant. I believe some osmers
collect street names by exception, that is, they compare what a
published map says with what street signs say, tick the confirmed ones,
and when they see an exception, note it. I think this makes their list
a derived work
Christoph Eckert schrieb:
ja, fällt mir bei uns in der Gegend auch auf. Allerdings sehe ich sowas
nicht
zwingend als Fehler. Einer der Autoren von Navit möchte beispielsweise
herausbekommen, ob eine Straße innerhalb oder außerhalb einer
geschlossenen
Ortschaft ist, um beim Routing auf die
Am Montag, 12. Mai 2008 05:42:13 schrieb Henry Loenwind:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
dazu, trac genau zu verfolgen, daher danke fuer den Hinweis.
Ok, Patch hängt am Ticket.
Zunächst erst einmal vielen Dank für eure stete Mühe. Die 632 ist in
polygonreichen Gebieten wesentlich besser benutzbar. Die
Simon Kokolakis schrieb:
Ne, also ich finde es sollte kein Kriterium sein, ob der Renderer ein
gutes oder schlechtes Ergebnis liefert.
Es ist ja mal gut, dass gut und schlecht absolut ist. In diesem sinne:
ein schlechtes ergebnis wäre gut.
--
Karl Eichwalder
Sven Geggus schrieb:
Henry Loenwind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Das passiert aber leider sehr einfach. z.B. Rechner runterfahren, 2
Wochen in Urlaub gehen, tah starten. Schwupp, alte Daten im Upload...
*argh*
Dann sollte man die scripten so anpassen, dass sie nur Dinge
hochladen, die
Hallo,
Ich habe in dem Stadtpark Hanny-Franke-Anlage in Eschborn
im Output des OSMArenderers in der stärksten Zoomstufe eine dunkelgrüne
Linie, die ich nicht zuordnen kann.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.14095lon=8.57844zoom=17layers=0BFT
Es handelt sich um eine Außenlinie für die
Am Montag 12 Mai 2008 02:19:44 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
Leider schleicht es immer noch ordentlich.
Schalte doch einfach die Polygonfuellerei ab, wenn Du einen langsameren
Rechner hast - so wichtig ist das doch nicht. Ich selber arbeite
meistens sogar mit dem Wireframe-Modus, weil mir
2 Präsentationen in Hamburg:
Am 6. Juni 2008 ist OSM zum Communities Meeting Hamburg 2008 eigeladen.
Location: Lehmann's
http://linuxwiki.de/Communities/MeetingHamburg2008
Ich will die Vorstellung nicht alleine vorbereiten und suche gerade für
den softwarespezifischen Part Unterstützung.
Am
Ich habe in dem Stadtpark Hanny-Franke-Anlage in Eschborn
im Output des OSMArenderers in der stärksten Zoomstufe eine
dunkelgrüne
Linie, die ich nicht zuordnen kann.
[...]
Es handelt sich um eine Außenlinie für die Grünfläche, die jedoch in
der Mitte liegt.
Da war ein Fußweg als
Ich habe in dem Stadtpark Hanny-Franke-Anlage in Eschborn
im Output des OSMArenderers in der stärksten Zoomstufe eine
dunkelgrüne
Linie, die ich nicht zuordnen kann.
[...]
Es handelt sich um eine Außenlinie für die Grünfläche, die jedoch
in
der Mitte liegt.
Da war ein Fußweg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karl Eichwalder schrieb:
Sven Geggus schrieb:
Henry Loenwind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Das passiert aber leider sehr einfach. z.B. Rechner runterfahren, 2
Wochen in Urlaub gehen, tah starten. Schwupp, alte Daten im Upload...
*argh*
Dann sollte
Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 12:25 +0200 schrieb Daniel van Gerpen:
Ich habe das Verhalten unter Linux reproduzieren koennen
Ist es bei Dir auch abgeschmiert? Wie hat sich das geäußert? Is ganz
wichtig für mich, also danke schonmal.
___
Talk-de mailing
On Montag, 12. Mai 2008, Stefan Hirschmann wrote:
Wollte heute wieder mal was mit JOSM taggen, aber JOSM ignoriert meine
Hintergrundfarbe (heute erst josm-latest.jar) herunter geladen.
Sieht man den Track nach dem Laden der OSM-Daten überhaupt noch? Wenn
nicht, ist es wohl dieser Bug:
Wenn ich Bilder vom Yahoo Server herunterlade, kann ich immer nur die Bilder
sehen, oder die OSM Daten.
Wie kriege ich das transparent?
Außerdem muß ich meinen Firefox immer erst wieder schließen damit ich ein
zweites oder drittes Tile runterladen kann.
Wie ändere ich das?
Gruß Sven
On Montag, 12. Mai 2008, Sven Sommerkamp wrote:
Wenn ich Bilder vom Yahoo Server herunterlade, kann ich immer nur die
Bilder sehen, oder die OSM Daten.
Wie kriege ich das transparent?
Warten bis dieser Bug behoben ist oder den Vorschlag dort selber lokal in
den Source einbauen:
Daniel Naber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sieht man den Track nach dem Laden der OSM-Daten überhaupt noch? Wenn
nicht, ist es wohl dieser Bug: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/736
Jupp. Das selbe hier. Wo bekomme ich denn jetzt auf die schnelle eine
funktionierende josm Version her.
Sven
--
Hi,
Sieht man den Track nach dem Laden der OSM-Daten überhaupt noch? Wenn
nicht, ist es wohl dieser Bug: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/736
Jupp. Das selbe hier. Wo bekomme ich denn jetzt auf die schnelle eine
funktionierende josm Version her.
Alte Versionen sind grundsaetzlich immer
Andreas Jacob wrote:
Am Montag, 12. Mai 2008 05:42:13 schrieb Henry Loenwind:
Wie gesagt, draw.rawgps.trianglelines ist bei mir mehr als 10 mal
schneller als einfache Linien - und ich verstehe es nicht...
Mal in's Blaue hinein vermutet. Die Engines von Grafikkarten bzw. die
ansteuernden
Dirk-Lüder Kreie wrote:
Karl Eichwalder schrieb:
Stichworte: Hochrechnen, wie lang ein tile normalerweise unterwegs
ist. Wird diese zeit überschritten, kann das tile neu vergeben
Macht er schon, wenn auch nicht dynamisch.
Ich verstehe nicht ganz, was das damit zu tun hat, dass ein ZIP auf
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
