On 4 Sep 2009, at 09:25, Christoph Boehme wrote:
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
We would also need to consider slope, steps and lifts between layers
and the situation where a lift only connects some layers but not all
of them. A lift is currently represented as a single node
On 4 Sep 2009, at 10:28, Liz wrote:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Mike Harris wrote:
Peter
Excellent summary - very well balanced. I would get particularly
suspicious
of motivation where there was no response to courteous attempts to
get in
touch to discuss.
again general agreement
Slight
On 4 Sep 2009, at 11:23, Peter Körner wrote:
tagging@ would be a start.
And vandalism@
I would prefer counter-vandalism@
I also support Richard's suggestion of tagging@
Personally I think the wiki is an under-supported resource and much
load would be taken off talk if it was better
a reasonable chance of good weather on
at least one of those days.
Should we offer this as a little way of saying thank you to someone
who has done a lot of work for OSM to date?
If so, the who??? Suggestions please.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
On 3 Sep 2009, at 10:05, Pieren wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Dave
Stubbsosm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
As far as I know most of the tools used for reverting currently are
also public -- the problem being, they're dangerous to use if you
don't know what you're doing, not at
On 3 Sep 2009, at 14:34, Peter Körner wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Peter Körnerosm-
li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
Making 10 changesets of more than 10 features each over a period
of at
least 2 weeks without attracting reverts or complaints should be
On 3 Sep 2009, at 14:04, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
I agree that there should be a 'easy revert' for a single changeset.
This might result in a 'clean' revert (where none of the features
have
been touched since),
This page indicates that the last way says the last editor was Liam123
on 2 June 2009
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23180071
However, if one clicks the 'edit' button it goes to Potlatch and if
one then clicks 'h' for history then it says the last editor is Mr
Mark on 23 July
On 3 Sep 2009, at 21:18, SteveC wrote:
On 3 Sep 2009, at 07:04, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Ok, so I have just had an RSS alert that Liam123 is back editing
again today after a delay of 3 weeks.
Probably because kids are back at school now.
Look at his first changeset
On 3 Sep 2009, at 22:17, Someoneelse wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
... But I really need people familiar
with the region who tell me that they are reasonably sure that the
edits
are bogus.
If it helps, I've just looked at a selection of 20 of the 60 ways
edited
in changeset 2308178 by
Liam123 is back, however some of his edits moving bus stops might be
reasonable.
This might be ok (moving bus stop to side of road)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/469765466
Here he has added goods=yes to a railway line. Is this correct?
On 3 Sep 2009, at 23:15, Mark Williams wrote:
David Earl wrote:
On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote:
This looks like messing with a street and yahoo photography shows
it as going through a house. This appears to be straight forward
vandalism
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way
On 2 Sep 2009, at 13:18, Bjarki Sigursveinsson wrote:
I can confirm that the changes this user has made in Iceland are
completely disruptive and illogical. The user has gone all around
the country and either promoted or demoted roads in a seemingly
random way without any regard to the
On 2 Sep 2009, at 14:54, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Lester Caineles...@lsces.co.uk
wrote:
Bjarki Sigursveinsson wrote:
I can confirm that the changes this user has made in Iceland are
completely disruptive and illogical. The user has gone all around
On 2 Sep 2009, at 20:30, Peter Körner wrote:
Sybren A. Stüvel schrieb:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:17:11PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote:
A revert is changing a lot of things in one time, which would be
much more time-consuming with e.g. josm. I see this (doing a lot of
things with just a single
On 2 Sep 2009, at 21:52, MP wrote:
be added at the right side of every changeset line. One click might
report succeed or conflict/failed, do it manually.
Until this is possible I want to try to (or at least collect all
necessary information to) write an external tool for this.
Adding
On 2 Sep 2009, at 22:35, Peter Körner wrote:
Peter Miller schrieb:
On 2 Sep 2009, at 21:52, MP wrote:
Until this is possible I want to try to (or at least collect all
necessary information to) write an external tool for this.
Adding revert to main site could attract vandals (ok, let's just
On 28 Aug 2009, at 16:49, Nick Black wrote:
Hello,
snip
*Next Meeting of the Local Chapters Group*
The local chapters working group will meet at 6pm BST on Weds 30th
September to discuss these issues and others. The agenda of the
meeting is:
* What is the process for creating
/Village]searchp=ids.srf
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterborough-Lincoln_Line
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 28 Aug 2009, at 12:12, Peter Childs wrote:
2009/8/28 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
2009/8/28 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
Anyone fancy a bit of detective work on a railway line? Question: Is
there an operating railway line to the east of Sleaford in
Linclonshire and how many
On 28 Aug 2009, at 15:41, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
To confirm: double track, southbound freight-only, northbound out-of-
use (there's track there but it's overgrown). I found a message from
aforementioned train driver on some Usenet archive somewhere:
Very useful thanks.
So I guess I
On 28 Aug 2009, at 16:11, Matt Williams wrote:
2009/8/28 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
On 28 Aug 2009, at 15:41, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
To confirm: double track, southbound freight-only, northbound out-
of-
use (there's track there but it's overgrown). I found a message from
On 28 Aug 2009, at 20:15, Matt Williams wrote:
2009/8/28 Chris Hill chillly...@yahoo.co.uk:
In many towns and cities in the UK there are small ways behind rows
of
houses. In my part of the world (Yorkshire) we know them as a
tenfoot
(they are traditionally 10 feet wide).
I have not
On 27 Aug 2009, at 11:12, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 27/08/09 11:05, Tom Hughes wrote:
In fact I can't find any map which shows either the tunnel or the
approach roads as the A102(M) - they all shown as the A102 for the
whole
length from the junction with the A12/A13 to the north to the
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Import#Rights_to_NaPTAN_data
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 26 Aug 2009, at 10:08, Chris Hill wrote:
The orange (maybe brownish) roads can be secondary, tertiary or
unclassified. I've compared the NPE roads to some roads that I know
well and they cover what I would say are secondary, tertiary or
unclassified. Secondary have reference numbers.
On 20 Aug 2009, at 13:21, Thomas Wood wrote:
2009/8/17 Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com:
I'll start the imports tomorrow. I think it'd be wise to spread them
around the country so one group of people aren't entirely swamped
with
several counties.
As such, I'll start with Hull,
On 26 Aug 2009, at 18:46, Mark Williams wrote:
Thomas Wood wrote:
[]
Regarding remaining counties, Essex is definitely a priority, we may
as well just upload the remaining counties as and when we can.
(Which'll probably be when the new dev server is up with a sane
python
environment)
On 24 Aug 2009, at 20:18, Péter Connell wrote:
Wonder if we need some openjourneyplanner thing - obviously a
massive task.
... but who owns bus timetables?
The argument is raging as we speak This is a great blog post on
the subject which shows how hard the agencies are being pushed
On 22 Aug 2009, at 12:03, Chris Hill wrote:
Well I'm pleased that they agree with me, but I'm not the oracle!
This is another source quoting the same general information. Do the
Scottish and Northern Irish counties generally extend to the low
water mark too? Drawing from the NPE maps
On 23 Aug 2009, at 15:52, Bogus Zaba wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 22 Aug 2009, at 12:03, Chris Hill wrote:
Well I'm pleased that they agree with me, but I'm not the oracle!
This is another source quoting the same general information. Do
the Scottish and Northern Irish counties
On 23 Aug 2009, at 15:50, Chris Hill wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 22 Aug 2009, at 12:03, Chris Hill wrote:
Well I'm pleased that they agree with me, but I'm not the oracle!
This is another source quoting the same general information. Do
the Scottish and Northern Irish counties
? They could
be added as a new section on the main naptan page.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
On 20 Aug 2009, at 13:21, Thomas Wood wrote:
2009/8/17 Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com:
I'll start the imports tomorrow. I think it'd be wise to spread them
around the country so one group of people aren't entirely swamped
with
several counties.
As such, I'll start with Hull,
On 18 Aug 2009, at 20:08, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:48:03 +0300, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/8/18 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
On 18 Aug 2009, at 14:57, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
Could somebody please revert this changeset:
http
On 17 Aug 2009, at 19:13, SteveC wrote:
On 17 Aug 2009, at 11:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/17 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
You may wish to set up a Belgium equivalent for this page to act
as a
record of such reverts. As you can see we have been having some
problems
On 18 Aug 2009, at 09:17, Nick Black wrote:
John,
I said:
so if you can't make it but would like to, please add your name to
the wiki so we can have a second call at a better time.
No-one is trying to exclude you - especially not the people who are
trying set up local groups and make
On 18 Aug 2009, at 17:47, Peter Childs wrote:
2009/8/16 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
--- On Sun, 16/8/09, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
I'd recommend synchronising this with wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miniature_railway
A lot of work has been done there between
On 18 Aug 2009, at 14:08, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
My main comment was that the proposal didn't 'sit' well with the
government regional structures.
I do have to make the comment though that the government regional
structures are rather arbitrary and do not reflect real cultural
regions.
On 18 Aug 2009, at 01:07, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
Thank you very much for your efforts on this, Thomas, and everyone
else involved - I've been waiting for the London import for a while,
and it's fantastic to see this data in OSM!
+1
I have one bug to report: Is it possible that special
the main
transport modes.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport
And here is the category for public transport:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Public_transport
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
On 11 Aug 2009, at 07:43, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 11 Aug 2009, at 06:41, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 Aug 2009, at 23:09, Bogus Zaba wrote:
With Denbighshire however I made a new relation (192442) and am
slowly
adding various ways that will make up this boundary. Not sure
however
On 8 Aug 2009, at 11:11, Simon Ward wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 01:11:02PM +0100, Nick Barnes wrote:
To my mind, nobody ought to be able to edit live map data unless:
1 - They have uploaded n tracks,
2 - They have had m edits approved by a moderator
3 - They are vouched for by somebody
.
One small suggestion - you might like to use a 'thermal' colour range;
currently I am not able to guess which colour is associated with the
highest coverage and the lowest etc. Feel free to use colours used by
OSM Mapper in the 'thermal' range if that is useful.
Regards,
Peter Miller
On 10 Aug 2009, at 23:09, Bogus Zaba wrote:
I have been working on these two relations. Wrexham is finished and
the
entries on the WikiProject Wales are complete, because somebody
already
put them there - I just fixed the relation (137981) and some of its
members.
It is great that you
On 7 Aug 2009, at 10:08, Ed Loach wrote:
Thanks Roger,
If they're PlusBus zones, then Clacton railway station lies outside
the Clacton zone as it currently stands, and while Harwich
International (formerly Harwich Parkeston Quay) is probably a
boundary point for the Harwich zone (though
On 7 Aug 2009, at 17:07, Christoph Böhme wrote:
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com schrieb:
Which leads to a question of terminology...
Is 'transit' a synonym for 'public transport'? or not. If not then
what is the difference?
As a non-native speaker of english I find it easier
This is an interesting category of tools and resources available for
maintaining Wikipedia against vandalism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_counter-vandalism_tools
Regards,
Peter
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 7 Aug 2009, at 13:32, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:21 PM, David
Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
3 more changesets today from Liam123 for reversion.
I have added them to the revert page and have copied this email the
Andy.
http
I have create a new top level page for 'transit' and redirected
'public transport' to that page.
Take a look here and tell me what you think, and do of course make it
better!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Transit
I am also proposing to write basic articles for each of the individual
On 6 Aug 2009, at 14:07, Frankie Roberto wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
snip
b) splitting the pages down into smaller components - eg railways,
bus stops, train services, train stations, etc. Whilst it's good to
have an overall
3 more changesets today from Liam123 for reversion.
I have added them to the revert page and have copied this email the
Andy.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GB_revert_request_log
I will send him another message, not that this seems to help really.
Thanks Andy,
Regards,
Peter
On 4 Aug 2009, at 23:37, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still keen to try and nail this public transport service vs
infrastructure issue.
I have create a new wiki-page 'Public transport schema 2' based on
Oxomoa's proposal on the main wiki based on the last edit made before
the
On 5 Aug 2009, at 13:05, Frankie Roberto wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Roger Slevin
ro...@slevin.plus.com wrote:
Before anyone answers your question, please bear in mind that there
is no clear definition of a “coach” ... and I have dealt with a
feedback to traveline on this
On 5 Aug 2009, at 13:13, Richard Mann wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
IMHO the solution is simple. Name it after what you are mapping.
For vehicles:
The route the cyclist follows is route=bicycle.
The route bus 5 follows is route=bus.
The route tram
On 5 Aug 2009, at 14:41, Richard Mann wrote:
Yes Frederik could tidy things up, but it's best not to change
things arbitrarily (ie substituting line for route), because it just
makes it harder to remember what is correct. The lack of presets for
relations in Potlatch makes it doubly
On 5 Aug 2009, at 12:30, David Earl wrote:
David Earl wrote:
David Earl wrote:
liam123 has been active again this morning - the first changeset
for a
while:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2043351
I have no idea whether this represents valid data or rubbish. It
seems
On 5 Aug 2009, at 14:28, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Can I suggest that you (David) immediately add this to the GB Revert
Request log (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/
GB_revert_request_log) , send Liam123 asking him
On 1 Aug 2009, at 22:51, Thomas Wood wrote:
2009/8/1 Christoph Böhme christ...@b3e.net:
Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com schrieb:
I think all outstanding coding issues have now been dealt with.
There's one minor tagging issue to address - should the source tag
be
on the data or
the import on the NaPTAN page [2] or on talk-
transit[3].
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Request_for_Import
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN
[3] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Regards,
Peter Miller
the import on the NaPTAN page [2] or on talk-
transit[3].
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Request_for_Import
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN
[3] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Regards,
Peter Miller
On 27 Jul 2009, at 22:14, Christoph Böhme wrote:
Hi
Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com schrieb:
Locality Classification was added as a possible nice to have to the
version 2 schema but it has not been populated, and no guidance has
been created to indicate how this field should be used
On 28 Jul 2009, at 18:41, Christoph Böhme wrote:
o...@edwardbetts.com schrieb:
Christoph Böhme christ...@b3e.net wrote:
Many places have wikipedia entries (even villages). If we can manage
to automatically look the entries up and extract the relevant
information (population size) from the
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cambridgeshire
Any ideas?
Peter Miller
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Progress on English boundaries has been amazing recently.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_England
. Wales and Scotland seem to need champions and are not so far
advanced for some reason.
What is really good is that we now have people using them for useful
purposes (see Peter
On 28 Jul 2009, at 13:33, Chris Hill wrote:
Why is this 'great'? What is the point of boundary=ceremonial? If
you change a boundary=administrative to boundary=ceremonial what
does this do except break existing renders and tools? If you *add*
boundary=ceremonial then this is available
On 27 Jul 2009, at 17:25, Bogus Zaba wrote:
Sorry if this contains some really stupid questions, but i have poked
around the mailing list and the wiki and not been able to answer them
for myself.
1. Given that we are not allowed to use official OS data (many threads
on this topic), how is
On 27 Jul 2009, at 21:03, Bogus Zaba wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 27 Jul 2009, at 17:25, Bogus Zaba wrote:
snip
for me anyway.
There seem to be problems with r and j at present for at least some
boundaries.
Boundaries are created using ways and relations. You can read about
them
On 24 Jul 2009, at 00:48, Mark Williams wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 22 Jul 2009, at 15:18, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
snip
So for the future, if there's another changeset that needs sorting
out, please consider
Just to let you know that I have added Frankie Roberto as an admin for
the list as per an earlier discussion. Thanks for helping out Frankie.
I have also changed the setting for talk-transit so that replies go to
the whole list by default which seemed to be what the majority who
expressed
I have create a wiki page for reversion requests for GB data and have
added all Liam123s recent changesets to it with a reference to the
discussions of the nature of his edits.
I believe that this will be a suitable interface between mappers and
the people who do the actual reversion
On 22 Jul 2009, at 13:29, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
I have create a wiki page for reversion requests for GB data and have
added all Liam123s recent changesets to it with a reference to the
discussions of the nature
On 22 Jul 2009, at 15:18, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Without going through every edit in the changeset it will be hard to
determine. If we do have to go through every changeset then we
might as well
revert them by
On 22 Jul 2009, at 15:18, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Without going through every edit in the changeset it will be hard to
determine. If we do have to go through every changeset then we
might as well
revert them by
where we also
have updated images and check out other parts of the world in the
'from time to time' set.
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 21 Jul 2009, at 10:05, Alice Kaerast wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:00:25 +0100 (BST)
Steve Hill st...@nexusuk.org wrote:
If there is a user who (by general consensus) is making nonsense
edits and is continuing to do so after having been
On 21 Jul 2009, at 13:17, Nick Allen wrote:
Hi,
One persons edits have created much talk as we are all worried about
damage to the work that has been put into the project, and rightly so.
When I started editing over a year ago I was worried (rightly on
occasion) that I was damaging rather
.
Do be aware that a vandal is very unlikely to sign the new license so
at present it is important that we remove the edits rather than repair
on top of edits.
Regards,
Peter Miller
(If we had a revert button next to a changeset, and I agree with the
cautious voices who said
On 16 Jul 2009, at 20:11, Ed Avis wrote:
http://www.spatialknowledge.eu/ABCAtlas/openlayers.html is a scan
of the
London 'ABC Street Atlas' from 1933/34. It is suggested on the OSM
wiki as
a data source; is it judged okay to copy information such as street
names and
layout from
On 16 Jul 2009, at 20:11, Ed Avis wrote:
http://www.spatialknowledge.eu/ABCAtlas/openlayers.html is a scan
of the
London 'ABC Street Atlas' from 1933/34. It is suggested on the OSM
wiki as
a data source; is it judged okay to copy information such as street
names and
layout from
I am proposing that we get all Liam123's edits removed from OSM.
My reasoning is firstly many of his edits are clearly just plain wrong
and are certainly breaking previously good maps. Secondly that he has
failed to respond to a polite message asking him for an explanation.
Thirdly, given
On 19 Jul 2009, at 11:54, Chris Hill wrote:
Peter Reed wrote:
Of the authorities I have managed to measure, the following all
show more road mapped than the DfT believes exists:
Having mapped every road in Hull (Kingston-upon-Hull since today is
a Sunday), some are fairly new and may
On 16 Jul 2009, at 11:31, Chris Hill wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Since this is a Freedom of Information Act request, and they have
refused to supply me the requested information I'll ask the Office
of the Information Commissioner for a ruling. Not expecting much,
but
On 14 Jul 2009, at 20:04, Martin - CycleStreets wrote:
Nice to meet you all at SOTM!
Peter Miller wrote:
OSM coverage of cycle demonstration towns is pretty good already
and it
would be truly weird for the Cambridgeshire County Council to pay for
someone to survey Cambridge
On 15 Jul 2009, at 14:13, Abigail Brady wrote:
This is certainly worth pursuing. Unfortunately, the real problem
comes in rural areas where, for example, boundaries are defined to
be the paths of things like hedges that aren't there any more,
previous courses of rivers, etc. There are
/Boundary_Committee_for_England
Regards,
Peter Miller
Councils may indeed have the English written versions - it would be
worth asking them
I have had more success with the Crown estates who were very
helpful, but once again their GIS system is based on licenced OS
data and therefore
the
world and learning from other places.
Regards,
Peter Miller (PeterIto)
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
___
Talk-us mailing list
So.. where is the coastal boundary of Wales? Is it at the high-water
mark, or somewhere further out. Any ideas?
In order to get something on the map I have created a complete
boundary for Wales using high-water mark and included islands as
exclaves. Happy for evidence that I am wrong and
.
Regards,
Peter
Cheers, Chris
Peter Miller wrote:
So.. where is the coastal boundary of Wales? Is it at the high-water
mark, or somewhere further out. Any ideas?
In order to get something on the map I have created a complete
boundary for Wales using high-water mark and included islands
On 6 Jul 2009, at 21:24, Melchior Moos wrote:
Hi,
2009/7/6 Brian Prangle bpran...@googlemail.com
I've experimented with the section of the West Coast Mainline
between B'ham New St and B'ham International: I've added a train
(i.e service) relation with ref=WCML and also a railway (i.e
from
government has been from the Scottish Government's Sustainable
Transport section
http://www.cyclestreets.net/about/
Possibly they can provide more information. I will forward the thread
to them.
Regards,
Peter
Richard
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil
funding
from the Cycle Demonstration Towns project for our journey planner
Regards,
Peter
Richard
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
I notice that councils across England are being encouraged to
contribute to the cost of collecting data
On 3 Jul 2009, at 00:11, Richard Weait wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 19:02 +0100, Peter Miller wrote:
Any chance of opengolfmap? I am needing a map to show the interaction
between an existing golf course and a proposed cycle route. I can add
the data to the map but I am not aware of anything
On 2 Jul 2009, at 17:32, Steve Hill wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Hurricane McEwen wrote:
I just went to visit openpistemap.org and I get a blank map. Anyone
run
in to the same issue?
Errm.. yes, damn. :(
Any chance of opengolfmap? I am needing a map to show the interaction
between an
On 2 Jul 2009, at 21:19, si...@mungewell.org wrote:
Any chance of opengolfmap? I am needing a map to show the interaction
between an existing golf course and a proposed cycle route. I can add
the data to the map but I am not aware of anything that will render
it.
There is loads of work going on around the country on the boundaries
project which is great to see. Here are a list of all the main
administrative boundaries (for England and Wales) and the status of
those boundaries. Scotland is a blank canvas if anyone feels motivated
to do the work:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 13:29, Ed Loach wrote:
However, Hampshire (England) is not rendering. I have looked at
the
data with various tools and can't see what is wrong.
The best tool for finding errors in boundaries is this one, but
it
fails for Hamphire for some reason:-
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:27, Ed Loach wrote:
Ed: I notice you have tweeked the 'non-simple' way today. Do
you think
it is now simple? If not do you want to try and sort it.
I checked the way quite a bit. It shares most of its nodes with a
section of a beach area, but that shouldn't be an
--- Cross posted from Talk West Midlands
On 1 Jul 2009, at 19:39, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi everyone
I've added a railway relation for the West Coast Mainline as it
runs thoruh New Street - so far I've got as far from Rugby Junction
to Sandwell Dudley station. I've named it as
On 26 Jun 2009, at 17:51, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Sent: 26 June 2009 4:41 PM
To: Thomas Wood
Cc: talk-gb-westmidla...@openstreetmap.org; talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-transit] NaPTAN and the new
PTtagging schema
301 - 400 of 697 matches
Mail list logo
