[OSM-talk] Thoughts on an enhanced GPX api

2009-07-28 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:04 AM, René Affourtitraffour...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry to break the threading I can break threading too! So when a junction is reconstructed a local user can place a bounding box over that junction and all GPS points in that box are marked as outdated (or deleted,

Re: [OSM-talk] Thoughts on an enhanced GPX api

2009-07-28 Thread John Smith
--- On Tue, 28/7/09, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: * The data is versioned, and anyone can edit it I have a lot of GPX tracks that could be improved, e.g. by deleting I'd say deleting sections, but not editing... Only very erroneous information should be touched up by

Re: [OSM-talk] Thoughts on an enhanced GPX api

2009-07-28 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:49 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote: --- On Tue, 28/7/09, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: * The data is versioned, and anyone can edit it I have a lot of GPX tracks that could be improved, e.g. by deleting I'd say deleting sections,

Re: [OSM-talk] Thoughts on an enhanced GPX api

2009-07-28 Thread Tom Hughes
On 28/07/09 11:33, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:04 AM, René Affourtitraffour...@gmail.com wrote: * All the data is losslessly inserted into the database This means that we can get waypoint/segment/time/ele/whatever data out again. It would probably be simplest

Re: [OSM-talk] Thoughts on an enhanced GPX api

2009-07-28 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Tom Hughest...@compton.nu wrote: On 28/07/09 11:33, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:04 AM, René Affourtitraffour...@gmail.com  wrote: * All the data is losslessly inserted into the database This means that we can get