On 28/08/09 13:07, wynnd...@lavabit.com wrote:
On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
lock=yes
lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
Why would you want to repeat the
Peter Childs schrieb:
2009/8/28 wynnd...@lavabit.com:
On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
lock=yes
lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
: [OSM-talk] waterway=lock
On 27/08/09 14:27, Mike Harris wrote:
On a related canal issue, I have a problem with deciding
how to tag a
canal bridge as a segment of a way. The way will often already have
name= and ref= tags as a highway; but I want to add a name=
and ref=
tag
@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] waterway=lock
On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
lock=yes
lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
Why would you want to repeat
On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just to use name.
This was the original tag. However, it has various problems - for
example, it makes it hard to render a lock as a single
On 27/08/09 14:27, Mike Harris wrote:
On a related canal issue, I have a problem with deciding how to tag a canal
bridge as a segment of a way. The way will often already have name= and ref=
tags as a highway; but I want to add a name= and ref= tag for the canal
bridge. Not keen on name_1 or
On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
lock=yes
lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
Why would you want to repeat the name of a canal on its individual nodes?
Isnt that
2009/8/28 wynnd...@lavabit.com:
On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
lock=yes
lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
Why would you want to repeat the name of a canal
Peter Childs wrote:
The Canal way will need to be split at the lock gates, (or in
some cases where a diversion starts (due to some rivers
going over weirs) while there is a lock for boats.
(UK-specific tagging stuff follows)
Ideally I'd like to discourage people from using a (non-closed)
2009/8/28 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Peter Childs wrote:
The Canal way will need to be split at the lock gates, (or in
some cases where a diversion starts (due to some rivers
going over weirs) while there is a lock for boats.
(UK-specific tagging stuff follows)
Ideally I'd
Just looking at Keepright and I can see loads of waterway=lock
What is the preferred way to record the information?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just to use name.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lock
2009/8/27 Jack Stringer jack.ix...@googlemail.com:
Just looking at Keepright and I can see loads of waterway=lock
What is the preferred way to record the information?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just to
-talk] waterway=lock
Just looking at Keepright and I can see loads of waterway=lock
What is the preferred way to record the information?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just
to use name.
http
13 matches
Mail list logo
