Re: [talk-au] vic.gov.au lacking OSM attribution

Related to this - I noticed today that on this page: https://nbnco-customer.force.com/directcustomer/s/new-developments-application - when a user types in an address it'll then geolocate it and pop-up an OSM map powered by Leaflet. The Leaflet link is present but the OSM attribution is not

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

Hi Andrew, thanks for all these hints. I probably should have read up on the tags a bit better. A case of too late mapping. I've followed your suggestions and added the tags up and downstream of the roundabout with this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78947187 I do welcome

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Address changes

On 28/12/19 09:15, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: Thanks, fellas. Sorry, for a moment there I got Govt & Common Sense mixed up again! :-( The older I get the less I tend to mix those two. I think the Government see the use of the data is ok and long as you are not going to make money out of it.

[talk-au] highway link is not linked to adequate highway/link ??

From: Mateusz Konieczny mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com> > Subject: Re: [talk-au] highway link is not linked to adequate highway/link ?? >> Is it intentional that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696446485#map=18/-32.14717/115.92374

Re: [talk-au] Adding polygons of the aerodromes

The Royal Flying Doctor Service (RFDS) have an Australian database of around 2200 airstrips and airports although not all are in use or are certified for use by the RFDS.These range from - Domestic/intl airports with regular commuter flights, - Local council run airfields like Colac and

Re: [talk-au] Adding polygons of the aerodromes

I'd say there is zero chance that any fixed wing aircraft have used that strip in the past year. It's closed to fixed wing craft, and it's absolutely not safe for use. If it is approved redevelopment (it's NPWS land, not council) it will likely be redeveloped with only a single paved runway. My

Re: [talk-au] vic.gov.au lacking OSM attribution

Hi Mathew, I would also be inclined to email frvquesti...@mfb.vic.gov.au and fireservicesref...@cfa.vic.gov.au as the site may well have been developed in house without any knowledge by Mapbox staff. I also

Re: [talk-au] Adding polygons of the aerodromes

On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 19:59, Nemanja Bračko wrote: > Hi, > > I have redefined my query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/PfU > Just looked at that query for SEQ - NNSW area & it appears that there are a lot of aerodromes not showing up? I understand that minor airstrips without IATA / ICAO codes

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Address changes

Thanks, fellas. Sorry, for a moment there I got Govt & Common Sense mixed up again! :-( Graeme > >> ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

Hi Sebastian, 1. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes is says "Use the lanes =* key to tag how many traffic lanes there are on a highway ." and "Count excludes cycle lanes.". So in this case there are only 2 traffic lanes. So simply use:

[talk-au] vic.gov.au lacking OSM attribution

Was on https://www.vic.gov.au/fire-services-reform#fire-rescue-victoria and saw that there's map on the page that looked remarkably similar to a Mapbox layer, the map seems to be using the government's own library but lacks attribution to OSM. A check of the HTML code in inspect element showed

Re: [talk-au] Adding polygons of the aerodromes

I think if there's some kind of distinguishable boundary from the imagery it's okay to convert to an area, even if it's approximate. There's not too much harm since you can always take the centroid if you prefer a node. On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 20:59, Nemanja Bračko wrote: > Hi, > > I have

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Address changes

They may be legally obligated to make it public, but that doesn't mean they waive all rights under the copyright act and so hence we err on the side of caution. 27 Dec 2019, 06:44 by graemefi...@gmail.com: > > Assuming for a moment that it is actually open data (why else would they > be offering

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Address changes

Many reasons, like making a licensing mistake, result of contradictory orders, internal politics. In Poland my local government publishes excellent datasets - with terms of use that forbid doing anything with them. Even browsing datasets on website they made and own is against published terms

Re: [talk-au] highway link is not linked to adequate highway/link ??

Thanks for asking after getting an unclear warning! Is it intentional that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696446485#map=18/-32.14717/115.92374=N is highway=trunk? I would tag it at highway=primary, maybe highway=trunk_link is defensible, but it is unclear to me why it would highway=trunk

Re: [talk-au] Adding polygons of the aerodromes

Hi, I have redefined my query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/PfU Are you okay to manually add polygons around the airports only if they have *iata* or *icao* tags? Thanks, Nemanja On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 9:39 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/12/19 16:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:

[talk-au] highway link is not linked to adequate highway/link ??

I've made an approximation of the new grade-separated interchange of Nicholson & Armadale Rds in Perth in the changeset below. I get the warning "highway link is not linked to adequate highway/link" on all the trunk_links I have added, and looking at the wiki on link roads, I can't work-out why ?

Re: [talk-au] Adding polygons of the aerodromes

On 27/12/19 16:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 15:39, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: Node: Katoomba Airfield (1042094263) is a little difficult. I notice that the airfield is marked as "disused", but in the article, the new