Re: [Talk-gb-london] Thu 22nd Feb - Pedestrian Infrastructure Mapathon

decorative sidewalk than we have out in the suburbs (quickly mapped for the renderer, usually without crossings). Hopefully I'll manage to get to one of your pub meet-ups as well. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Talk-gb-london mailing

Re: [Talk-gb-london] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database (CID) conflation

is actually rather high, inspite of TfL - it's certainly orders of magnitude better than TfL's own maps, which seem relentless riddled with strange errors. On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:11 PM Robert Skedgell <mailto:r...@hubris.org.uk>> wrote: TfL have recently posted this on Facebook: &q

Re: [Talk-gb-london] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database (CID) conflation

the conflation done by the contractors was quite poor, but most of it was of much lower quality and should have been reverted. On 10/08/2023 16:57, Robert Skedgell wrote: As the project was quietly abandoned in January 2023, is it time for a post mortem of this incomplete project? On 15/11/2022 12:0

Re: [Talk-gb-london] Millennium Bridge temp closure

You could use a conditional restriction, perhaps something like foot:conditional=no @ 2023 Oct 14-2023 Nov 05 Wheelchair:conditional=no @ 2023 Oct 14-2023 Nov 05 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions On 12/10/2023 11:20, Matthew Scanlon wrote: Hi The Millennium Bridge

Re: [OSM-talk] When two bots go to war

. This way, bots could be used to keep things up to date automatically, but would not automatically override any manually applied changes by other mappers between runs. (A sensible bot owner would have the bot send them a report of any tags that couldn't be updated for manual review.) Robert. On Thu

Re: [Talk-gb-london] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database (CID) conflation

As the project was quietly abandoned in January 2023, is it time for a post mortem of this incomplete project? On 15/11/2022 12:01, Whittaker, Ed via Talk-gb-london wrote: Hello Following very helpful feedback earlier in the year, we are now looking to recommence efforts to complete the

[OSM-talk] ODbl concerns

mprove OSM. If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, Robert Potter Helping people use the power of location to make better decisions Manager, Spatial Data Strategy Department of Transport and Planning 1 Spring Street MELBOURNE 3000 M 0402 484 739 F 03

Re: [Talk-gb-london] Tube exits

On 07/04/2023 10:08, Bjoern Hassler wrote: Hello everyone and happy long weekend! I'd like to launch a campaign to collect accurate London tube exit information and how to get there from the platform. The exits are typically already in OSM, but often they are only labelled partially. I do

[talk-au] DTP Data Wavier Submitted

OpenData platform by the Department of Transport and Planning is able to be used in OpenStreetMap, including and most requested has been the GTFS supply. Regards, Robert Potter Department of Transport and Planning (Victoria, Australia) - OpenStreetMap Wiki<https://wiki.openstreetmap.

[Talk-gb-london] #waymap-project-SB cycleway vandalism

was done. https://osmcha.org/changesets/131431567/ I hate to think what else I'll find. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london

Re: [Talk-gb-london] [Talk-GB] Separate sidewalks added by #waymap-project-SB in West London

ail/talk-gb/2021-October/027947.html> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023, 08:56 Robert Skedgell, <mailto:r...@hubris.org.uk>> wrote: We have had a large number of separate sidewalks added around Shepherds Bush, mostly by user alisonlung (possibly based in the USA) with some contributi

Re: [Talk-gb-london] Separate sidewalks added by #waymap-project-SB in West London

escription that this user's enthusiasm has somewhat over-reached their skillz ;) If possible though, an effort should be made to explain and educate them as to what technicalities they are getting wrong, so they can direct their considerable energies more productively :) On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:57

[Talk-gb-london] Separate sidewalks added by #waymap-project-SB in West London

by these users on residential streets, leaving crossings as nodes on the highway -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london

Re: [Talk-gb-london] [Talk-GB] Is TfL data allowed on OSM?

Hi Andy, Many thanks for taking the time to look into this. So far, the following are my concerns with the TfLCID import: 1) Community "engagement" with talk-gb-london appears to operate in write-only mode. Ed Whittaker from TfL's contractor Sweco has posted twice (13/05/2022 and

Re: [Talk-gb-london] Update on TfL CID conflation plans

Is @AyushS183 one of yours? Apologies if not. I'm less than delighted with an import of TfLCID data where in at least one location no attempt was made to check the imported data against available imagery or infrastructure mapped in OSM. Chobham Road (w10818748) no longer has cycle lanes on

Re: [Talk-gb-london] Conflating TfL CID cycle data to OSM

., but I'm happy to change those if you were planning to use another key. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london

[Talk-si] Eurovelu 9, del Slovenija

Hallo Nachbarn! The Austrian forum is currently discussing Eurovelo 9, part Slovenia: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=849233#p849233 Please don't be put off by the German language, contributions in Slovenian are of course just as welcome. Best regards Robert --- Automatic

Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing

d have thought that you should be able to deduce the correct post town in almost every case. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-at] Probleme mit User / Qualitätsoffensive Salzburg usw.

Johann Haag schrieb: Wir sind in Österreich für eine gedeihliche Qualitätsdiskussion mit dem grundsätzliche Problem konfrontiert, dass Österreichs Protagonisten bislang auf das Instrument eines eigenen Local Chapter verzichten. Mit in Anonymität auftretenden Identitäten kann man schwer in einen

Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing

between the two that could use either scheme, though if the main property/building has a number on the main street, you wouldn't be able to use the sub-street approach. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Anglican churches

ps at e.g. https://osm.mathmos.net/nameless/amenity/place_of_worship simply denote the type of OSM object: node, way or relation. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing

of a single property on a street corner having two formal addresses, one on each street, not for the case of two streets in a hierarchy. Robert. On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 12:47, Dave Abbott wrote: > I am trying to make sure I tag addresses correctly. I am currently > trying to unders

Re: [Talk-GB] Anglican churches

so what their name is, please have a look. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-at] OSM Gebäude, Dachfläche oder Grundriss

ugdach: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vbfHph7ffcwJGFDCwfqOme Das Flugdach ist in basmap.at eingezeichnet Mein Eindruck: je jünger die Bearbeitung, umso eher stammt sie vom Luftbild. LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-at] OSM Gebäude, Dachfläche oder Grundriss

Johann Haag schrieb: Neben der Garagenzufahrt eignen sich als weiteres Indiz der jeweilige Gebäudeanschluss zu Nebengebäuden. Zieht man den regional üblicherweise bekannten Typischen Dachüberstand ab, so gelingen solche Anschlüsse auch ohne künstliche Erker oder andere Verrenkungen. Sorry,

Re: [Talk-GB] What is needed for something to be classified as a 'cycle route' (London)

On 15/12/2020 15:06, Simon Still wrote: > > >> On 15 Dec 2020, at 14:35, Robert Skedgell > <mailto:r...@hubris.org.uk>> wrote: >> >> If 1057 is used on a carriageway >> rather than on a lane or track, it presumably indicates a route, >

Re: [Talk-GB] What is needed for something to be classified as a 'cycle route' (London)

On 15/12/2020 13:26, Simon Still wrote: > See discussion on  > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95752985#map=18/51.46201/-0.12146=C > > > There appear to be a large number of sections of road in some areas of >

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

Am 10.12.2020 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann > Die Alpenvereine sind keine Alleinherrscher … So ist es. OSM darf das Beste von allen vereinen. > Das Symbol für "alpine Route" hab ich noch nie auf einem Wegweiser gesehen. Hier siehst du es:

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

eine Karte, die es renderd. LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

r multi-use or unspecified usage, open to all non-motorized vehicles …” Hier liegt die Betonung eindeutig auf die Verkehrsfläche und ist damit auch ein Weg im Sinne des §2 StVO 1960 und des §1319a(2) ABGB. Ein T6 path geht weit über eine Verkehrsfläche hinaus und hat viel me

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

a successful outcome at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/public_rights_of_way_gis_data_9 before using the Wiltshire data. Many other councils have made their data available under terms we can use in OSM, as you can see from https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/open-data/ . Robert. -- Robe

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 12:37, Dave F wrote: > On 08/12/2020 12:08, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB > > wrote: > >> Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway > >> (https://www.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

ata_9 . I maintain a table of which authorities we have PRoW data for and what licence it can be used under at https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/open-data/ . Any updates and corrections to this would be most welcome. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB m

Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application

may well support it. If anyone is looking to create some sort of reporting tool for PRoW faults, I'd suggest a system that will use Open311 if the council supports it, and otherwise send the report through FixMyStreet. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker __

Re: [Talk-GB] No U-turn on a long stretch of road

This probably won't help routers much, but you could at least tag the positions of the signs as nodes on the highway with traffic_sign=GB:614 + direction=forward|backward On 05/12/2020 14:27, Edward Bainton wrote: > Sorry I should have made clear  > > Rather than seeking to capture a subjective

Re: [OSM-talk] I’m running for OSMF board and I’ve set up office hours for questions

h, or is otherwise exposed to the Produced Work aware that Content was obtained from" OpenStreetMap? I think this is a crucial point that the OSM community needs an answer to, given your candidacy for the OSMF Board. Many thanks, Robert. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] I’m running for OSMF board and I’ve set up office hours for questions

see how you can claim that your current attribution does that. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

hich have been available (and being used) in popular OSM editors for some time now? Do we have some specific permission to use those layers, and if so does that permission apply to the new house number layer as well? Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Recycling Points

gt; > Is it really a problem? It is if you want to be able to micro-map such a site and the individual containers within it. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Recycling Points

ng individual parking spaces within a car-park.) Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

OSM 2. Richtet sich an Wanderer 3. Hat eine Legende für Wanderwege 4. Deckt zumindest ein Kontinent ab 5. Aktualisiert zumindest 1x jährlich 6. Stellt sac_scale zumindest in 2 Gruppen dar „trail_visibility“ darzustellen halte ich für keine Mindestanforderung. LG Rob

Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN wiki page

you look at a housing estate with lots of little roads. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-at] ALS-Daten frei zugänglich

Friedrich Volkmann schrieb: Wenn ich Talent für Schönreden hätte, wär ich Unternehmer oder Makler geworden und stinkreich. Die Unternehmer in dieser Gruppe, die ziemlich sicher alle nicht "stinkreich" sind, können auf solche fehlplatzierten Kommentare in Zukunft gut verzichten. Danke!

Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN wiki page

On 17/11/2020 14:53, Cj Malone wrote: > On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 14:10 +, Jez Nicholson wrote: >> Whilst i'm here, am I correct that a UPRN can *only* be on a single >> thing? >> So anything in >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=ref%3AGB%3Auprn#values mo >> re >> than once is an

Re: [Talk-at] ALS-Daten frei zugänglich

Patrick Strasser-Mikhail schrieb: https://www.landesentwicklung.steiermark.at/cms/beitrag/12803182/142970647/ Was in dem Beitrag ziemlich interessant wirkt, ist - für mich zumindest - dass sie behaupten, dass das BEV demnächst ein 1m-Modell mit orthometrischen Höhen in data-gv-at zur

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

ehört das Kartendesign nicht zu unseren Aufgaben. Wir schauen auf die Richtigkeit der Daten. LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

Max Berger schrieb am Sep 19, 2020; 4:10pm > Hier eine Gegend mit allen Arten von sac_scales: > https://opentopomap.org/#map=16/47.44846/11.78192 Super Testfall, Danke. Die Gegend um den Krahnsattel hat alle Wege von T1 bis T6 und einen Klettersteig. Diese Overpass Abfrage visualisiert alle

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

Am 19.09.20 um 15:29 schrieb Marcus MERIGHI: > fuer mich ist das thema nicht eingeschlafen... Das Thema poppt offenbar immer wieder hoch: Diskussion 2015: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31856 Carto Issue, offen seit 2015:

Re: [Talk-GB] "Survey Me" Tool Update

On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 13:02, ael via Talk-GB wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 12:11:42PM +0000, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > > For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at > > https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . > > I took a l

[Talk-GB] "Survey Me" Tool Update

on between OSM data and Retail Points can be found at https://osm.mathmos.net/chains/ . Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-at] ALS-Daten frei zugänglich

besteht aber kein Grund zur Beunruhigung, OSM hat die Erlaubnis die Open Government Data der Steiermark zu verwenden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Austria " Federal State of Styria (Land Steiermark, OGD-Portal) - Special CC BY-Statement for OpenStre

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

Am 31. Oktober 2020 23:32 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann ... Hallo Richard, Lass dich von Friedrich nicht ins Bockshorn jagen, das ist seine Meinung und nicht die der Mapper in Österreich. Und nimm seinen Kommunikationsstil nicht persönlich, der entgleist öfters. LG Robert

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM UK's first tile layer

noticeable in our detailed mapping.) Are you doing such a transformation, and are you sure what you're doing is sufficiently accurate? Robert. -- Robert Whittaker -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Q4 2020 Quarterly Project: Defibrillators

ED is being actively maintained) but it would be a good source of hints for them in who to contact to get the missing devices registered with them. Robert. [1] https://www.thecircuit.uk/ [2] https://www.bhf.org.uk/how-you-can-help/how-to-save-a-life/defibrillators/ndn-the-circuit -- Robert

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging modal filters and school streets

Would it be worth adding something like traffic_intervention:website to link to the relevant traffic order in The Gazette (an OGL source) or the relevant highway authority's website? On 27/09/2020 00:53, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Here is the outline proposal: > > """ > The traffic_intervention

Re: [Talk-at] Aufgelassenen Wanderweg mappen?

igener Begehung. LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] (Halb-)mechanischer Edit von Ärztenamen in Tirol

Stefan Tauner schrieb: Da dieses Schema für den deutschen Sprachraum unüblich ist, würde ich das gerne auf "Dr. " ändern (bzw. wäre ich natürlich auch nicht böse, wenn das jemand anderer hackt ;) Ich würde das ggf. per Overpass laden, exportieren in einem Texteditor, mit sed oder vl. auch etwas

Re: [Talk-at] Mapper A* beschädigt reihenweise Relationen

, ich räum den Scherbenhaufen nicht weiter auf. LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

ür den Grundsatzbeschluss 1997 in Chamonix? [1] http://media.alpenverein.it/crmpilot/Wege/Markierungsrichtlinien%20dt%20Web.pdf [2] https://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/themen/sport/berg-und-ski/berg_und_ski/TirolerBergwegekonzept2018.pdf LG Robert __

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

ap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Key:sac_scale Bitte diskutiert mit. LG Robert Referenzen [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Wandern [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sac_scale ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-at] JOSM basemap.at Orthofoto maximale Zoomstufe

Florian Kargl schrieb: Gibt es eigentlich einen Grund warum in den JOSM image presets für das basemap.at Orthofoto nur die maximale Zoomstufe 19 eingestellt ist? [1] In Städten sind die Orthofotos bis Zoomstufe 20 verfügbar. [2] An sich musst du da mit den Leuten reden, die das in die

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

Marcus MERIGHI schrieb: 1) ich kenne jetzt sechs faelle, in denen menschen auf von mir eingetragenen steigen in bergnot gerieten. zum (und mit) glueck in keinem fall (ganz) schlimme folgen. Weißt du in diesen Fällen, ob sie OSM-basierte Karten verwendet haben, um dort hin zu kommen?

Re: [Talk-at] Mapper A* beschädigt reihenweise Relationen

gesagt. Stillschweigend akzeptieren mag ich es dennoch nicht. Zumindest aufzeigen, wenn es auch nichts ändert. > Daher mein Rat: Solchen Leuten nicht zu viel auf einmal schreiben. Guter Tipp, das könnte funktionieren. LG Robert ___ Tal

Re: [Talk-at] Mapper A* beschädigt reihenweise Relationen

x." :-) LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

[Talk-at] Mapper A* beschädigt reihenweise Relationen

tun? LG Robert [1] http://osm-talk-at.1116557.n5.nabble.com/Talk-at-CS-87122017-reparieren-oder -reverten-td3579.html [2] https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10398194 ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https

Re: [Talk-at] Fwd: What's new @ GeoDaten Burgenland

h zu funktionieren. Funktioniert perfekt, Danke! LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@opens

Re: [Talk-at] Fwd: What's new @ GeoDaten Burgenland

en? Wenn du die Einträge in https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps/Austria direkt änderst, stehen sie sofort allen JOSM Benutzern zur Verfügung. JOSM nutzt diese Daten direkt beim Starten. Anleitung siehe https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps (Info stammt von Michael Kleidt)

Re: [Talk-GB] How closely do we map lamp posts?

On 02/09/2020 22:37, Lester Caine wrote: > On 02/09/2020 19:00, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: >> I don't know the area. but they look like the existing posts to me. >> Has the cycle path been realigned around them to provide better vision >> splays/ stopping room to motorists? >> >>

Re: [Talk-GB] Pedestrian priority and highway=cycleway

If iD really is prompting changing highway=cycleway->highway=footway without preserving cycle access, we can expect to see cycle routing becoming badly broken in a lot of places. Some of these edits were made 3 weeks ago and nothing like that appears to have been reported elsewhere. There also

Re: [Talk-GB] Pedestrian priority and highway=cycleway

that > also mangling tagging conventions. I genuinely don’t know! > > Gareth > >> On 3 Sep 2020, at 10:42, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> On 03.09.20 11:29, Robert Skedgell wrote: >>> I believe the most appropriate base tagging

Re: [Talk-GB] Pedestrian priority and highway=cycleway

Rather than reverting, I restored access and left the top-level highway=* tag alone. I only noticed these changes when plotting a route in Komoot and noticing that I needed to create/drag a lot of extra waypoints in order to get the expected behaviour. Hopefully Komoot will behave responsibly and

Re: [Talk-GB] Pedestrian priority and highway=cycleway

On 03/09/2020 10:41, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 03.09.20 11:29, Robert Skedgell wrote: >> I believe the most appropriate base tagging, following the duck tagging >> principle for highway=*, for most of the paths in QEOP would be: >> highway=cycleway + segrega

[Talk-GB] Pedestrian priority and highway=cycleway

posals-on-a-review-of-the-highway-code BCC to DWG because of the impact in cycle routing. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

s Tirol“: https://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/themen/sport/berg-und-ski/berg_und_ski/TirolerBergwegekonzept2018.pdf Kapitel „3. Richtlinien“, PDF-Seiten 7 bis 11 Kapitel "3.5.11 Wanderkarten" PDF-Seite 21 Liebe Grüße Robert ___

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

ht alles schwarz/weiß. Der Graubereich sollte aber einen nicht abhalten ein klares Ziel zu formulieren. LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

ahrung erfordert, ist m.E. etwas anderes als ein Wanderweg, den jeder gesunde Mensch ungefährdet begehen kann. LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

werden. Oder zumindest solange als „Nicht-Wege“ maskiert werden, bis ein etabliertes Tagging dafür existiert. LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinf

Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

PPete schrieb: Letztendlich bleibt die Eigenverantwortlichkeit das man sich vor so einer alpinen Tour über geeignetes Kartenmaterial informiert. Und zweitens muss man sich ev. als Kartenanbieter auch fragen ob ich wirklich jedes hochalpine Steiglein aus den OSM-Daten in meine Karte

Re: [Talk-at] GIS Stmk als JOSM Hintergrundbild

Am Sonntag, 23. August 2020 16:35 schrieb Horst Willingshofer: > Kann mir irgendwer helfen wie ich die aktuellsten Orthofotos > aus dem GIS-Stmk als Hintergrundbild in JOSM verwenden kann? solltest du schon haben - GIS Steiermark verwendet die Orthofotos von basemap.at LG

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

buildings and pavements sticking out into roads. Perhaps it would be useful if someone could to do a correct transformation of (e.g.) the OS OpenMap Local Functional Sites data to a format and CRS that can be unambiguously read by JOSM, in order to help our imagery alignment. Robert. -- Robert

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

On 16/08/2020 17:46, Ken Kilfedder wrote: > I should think that in places where there is a good, cycle-dedicated way > roughly parallel to a canal, a pedestrian-respecting router would recommend > that cyclists stick to the cycle-dedicated way. A good example of this might be where NCN route 1

Re: [Talk-at] CS 87122017 reparieren oder reverten?

edacht. :-) LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

On 14/08/2020 19:14, Simon Still wrote: > > >> On 14 Aug 2020, at 16:47, Ken Kilfedder > > wrote: >> >> I believe most of the canal towpaths are 'pedestrian priority' too - >> at least there are signs to that effect all over the place.  Well >> worth tagging

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

On 14/08/2020 13:55, Simon Still wrote: > See the blog posts that I linked to.   > Plus  >  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TfL_Cycling_Infrastructure_Database  > > (Our involvement has now ended but TfL should be continuing to use CID > info to improve OSM accuracy)  > > More discussion

[Talk-at] CS 87122017 reparieren oder reverten?

verfolgte. Wie ist eure Meinung dazu? LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] OSM AT Erreichbarkeit

Hör auf, hier kompletten Blödsinn zu verbreiten. KaiRo Johann Haag schrieb: Leider wird auch die Webseite nicht gewartet, Anfragen bleiben monatelang unbeantwortet. Das bedeutet, in Österreich an OpenStreetMap interessierte, werden auf ein Abstellgleis gelenkt. Es ist längst an der Zeit,

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

On 13/08/2020 15:41, Simon Still wrote: > > In my view there is definitely scope to look at adding more info to > cycle routes/tracks/cycleways to give more information to routing > algorithms about the real experience of using them. > > Would welcome input on what as we’re doing more on this at

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

ns volunteer webinar last night, and there was concern about getting various OSM-based maps and routers updated. So if there's a more convenient data format for OSM mappers, I think there's a good chance Sustrans would look in to it for us. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker

Re: [Talk-GB] Street-name toids

perhaps a better solution would be to persuade OS that they should be including the USRNs in OS Open Roads -- as these are now the promoted 'gold standard' open unique identifiers for streets. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@o

Re: [Talk-at] Anfrage Mountainbike-Weg

e mtb:* Tags nur die Schwierigkeit beschreiben und nicht > die Berechtigung +1 S.a.: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69460 LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.or

Re: [Talk-GB] OSMUK Instagram ideas

of the COVID-19 related highway changes, e.g. modal filters implemented with planters might be worth including. There's an obvious visual and routing impact in real life, as rendered by OSM Carto and for routing engines. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ T

Re: [Talk-GB] And the USRN tag proposal page

agged with footway=sidewalk or cycleway=sidewalk -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-at] Haben Kirchen eine Hausnummer?

neu errichtet. Die Adresse ist nun „Am Kirchberg 3“. Was folgt daraus für die Kirche? LG Robert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-GB] Surveying rural buildings

rt and activity tracking apps like Strava and Training Peaks (both via Mapbox), VeloViewer, etc. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Scheduled Monument

in accordance with, English law and the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Electric vehicle charging points

OSM charge point objects that shouldn't be there. But if I could sort out some way of matching between the two datasets, I would then be able to add the charge points in the Registry that are "missing" in OSM to https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . -- Rob

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

Friedrich Volkmann schrieb: Soll das heißen, dass ihr alle drei diese wichtige Info, von der zumindest du schon wusstest, dass ich darauf warte, 4 Tage lang zurückgehalten habt? Kann sein, Keiner von uns wird dafür bezahlt, sich mit OSM zu beschäftigen und daher reagieren wir manchmal

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

Friedrich Volkmann schrieb: On 13.07.20 08:46, Norbert Wenzel wrote: Friedrich, mittlerweile ist ein Mail eingetroffen, mit der Bitte um eine Änderung der URL. Bei mir nicht und bei Robert auch nicht. Auf dem Account, den sowohl ich als auch Norberet und Markus lesen, ist am 9. Juli eine

Re: [Talk-GB] Paths on Wimbledon Common

On 10/07/2020 13:35, David Woolley wrote: > On 10/07/2020 13:11, Colin Smale wrote: >> What does "legally accessible" mean? Are they Public Footpaths? Do we >> tag all Public Footpaths with an explicit "foot=yes" or is >> "designation=public_footpath" enough? >> > > I don't know the situation in

Re: [Talk-at] geoimage.at geändert

Friedrich Volkmann schrieb: On 26.12.19 17:36, Robert Kaiser wrote: Friedrich Volkmann schrieb: On 26.12.19 16:20, Robert Kaiser wrote: Ja, das haben sie vor einiger Zeit an alle geschrieben, die bei Geoimage registriert sind, so auch auf unsere Info-Adresse: Nicht an alle. Ich bin dort

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >