I have too much work those days for keeping me up to date to
osm-threads, but what I read here is interessant.
*May I suggest to ask someone to make a proposition and organise a
vote* : I think it worth trying to reach legitimacy and global
agreement about our discussions here, and do not speak
Dear all,
I like this discussion that so far I have only read as it shows
clearly that citizens speaking both Flemish and French, living
everywhere in Begium, can really cooperate and discuss in a
constructive way to work the difficult task to map the reality that
has been legally decided.
We
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:16, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
...
My main concern is to somehow discern the border of the German language area
(after all, it's the only border not at level 4).
I don't know if it's realistic, but maybe the German language area
could be the only
Benoit Leseul wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:16, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
...
My main concern is to somehow discern the border of the German language area
(after all, it's the only border not at level 4).
I don't know if it's realistic, but maybe the German
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:04:56AM +0200, Ben Laenen wrote:
Ralf Hermanns wrote:
I think there is conflicting information here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative and here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Boundaries
On the
Benoit Leseul wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 20:27, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
Benoit Leseul wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:18, Luc Van den Troost luc.a...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Comunities are made up of people, not of area. So putting
communitie-borders on the
Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
Level 10 could be used for hamlets, these are small local communities,
often some residential landuse around a little church or chapel.
They have always been part of a muncipality or village. eg Terlanen in
Overijse (boundary not yet mapped or defined)
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:04:56 +0200, Ben Laenen wrote:
Ralf Hermanns wrote:
I think there is conflicting information here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative and
here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Boundaries
On the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Don't have much time to reply, so a short one:
Always look at the country specific page to get the answers. The
international
page is just there for some guiding, but the countries have to make
their
own rules. As is the
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:22:28 +0200, Andre Engels wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Don't have much time to reply, so a short one:
Always look at the country specific page to get the answers. The
international
page is just there for some guiding, but
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:18, Luc Van den Troost luc.a...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Comunities are made up of people, not of area. So putting
communitie-borders on the map is kind of insane.
In terms of boundaries, the belgian constitution defines four
linguistic areas (régions
Maarten Deen wrote:
Then why is this information not on the international page?
Because someone (Loll78) changed the correct entities in the table last
January and because I'm not checking each wiki edit?
There is
absolutely no reason to have conflicting information on a wiki.
In this list
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 20:27, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
Benoit Leseul wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:18, Luc Van den Troost luc.a...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Comunities are made up of people, not of area. So putting
communitie-borders on the map is kind of insane.
In terms of
13 matches
Mail list logo
