Hi Lennard and the others.
Perhaps you can explain how 'abandoned' and 'disused' SHOULD be
interpreted in relation to the rendering rules. As far as I have seen,
the wiki pages about railways do not mention this.
If both should appear on the map, then probably 'historical tracks' that
are no
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:11:15 +0100, Luc Van den Troost wrote
Hi Lennard and the others.
(...)
Historical items then might be mapped in a different way that is usefull
for, for instance, a separate rendering or different layer. That
would not only be the case for historical railway tracks,
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:11:15 +0100, Luc Van den Troost
luc.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another 'historical' point is that it is a pitty that OSM doesn't offer
a kind of 'time-machine'. On one side it would be nice to see the growth
of OSM that way, on the other side the map we are currently making
Luc Van den Troost wrote:
Perhaps you can explain how 'abandoned' and 'disused' SHOULD be
interpreted in relation to the rendering rules. As far as I have seen,
the wiki pages about railways do not mention this.
I can only explain at the moment how these situations handled on the
mapnik
... Yes, fully agreed ... (and I wasn't being terribly serious as it was
getting near time to go and open a bottle of foreign wine (;) and watch a
movie).
Although it may sometimes be useful to supplement the internationally
applicable / useful with an indication of regional / national
Hi,
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
semi-manual intervention but in few days we should have much improved
map data.
Regards,
- M -
___
talk
Can I draw some attention to this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divided_road
I was going to propose exactly the same thing, pretty much. Maybe I'd
quibble with some of the naming.
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there is a
median strip pretty
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there is a
median strip pretty unsatisfactory. Even disregarding the effort, the
end result never renders well: usually the street name is written
twice, the one-way arrows get messy etc.
Begin forwarded message:
From: paul everett tap...@t-online.de
Date: 3 December 2009 04:57:41 GMT
To: legal-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: question about commercial use. import of data in OSM format
Hi,
I am a plugin developer, developing plugins for cinema4D. I am
working on a
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there is a
median strip pretty unsatisfactory. Even disregarding the effort, the
end result never renders
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Richard Mann
That's a problem with the rendering, not with the mapping.
Unless you want to write routines for pre-processing two almost-parallel
ways back into a single way so it can be rendered neatly, I suggest it's a
mapping problem. Don't make work for
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's a problem with the rendering, not with the mapping.
Unless you want to write routines for pre-processing two almost-parallel
ways back into a single way so it can be rendered neatly, I suggest
Sorry, one last example, also nearby:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-37.826282lon=144.947554zoom=18layers=B000FTF
This mess might be much more understandable if pairs of lanes that
were physically together were rendered as pairs (with a line between
them), and those that were on separate
On 03/12/2009, at 10.39, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there
is a
median strip pretty unsatisfactory. Even disregarding the effort, the
end result never renders well: usually the street name is
Ok, I've mocked up what it might look like.
Complicated to show you though:
1) http://www.geowiki.com/halcyon/
2) Lat: -37.821995 Lon: 144.919573
3) Add these lines to the of end of the big edit box:
way[highway=service][!divider]
{ color: white; width: 3; casing-width: 5; }
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Can I draw some attention to this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divided_road
I was going to propose exactly the same thing, pretty much. Maybe I'd
quibble with some of the naming.
I am also working on a proposal (let's
That's great news Margus, thanks for letting us know!
I'm always pleased to see more CORINE :)
Cheers, Joseph
2009/12/3 Margus Värton mar...@dakar.ee:
Hi,
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it allows to define things like: there is a kerb between the footway and the
street, but on given nodes there is a lowered kerb to crossover.
Yes, it's certainly quite expressive, at the cost of complexity - and
Oops, I also meant to point out a screenshot of my mockup:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Stevage_Divided_road.png
(And an earlier version:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/images/archive/9/9e/20091203113817!Stevage_Divided_road.png
)
Sorry for the spam.
Steve
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Stevage_Divided_road.png
If dividers are so small and do not create any turn restrictions, I
just ignore them.
But you are lucky to have a source which allow you to go so deep in
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it allows to define things like: there is a kerb between the footway and
the
street, but on given nodes there is a lowered kerb to crossover.
Yes, it's certainly
moved to proposal from user-space to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 03/12/2009, at 10:19 PM, Mike Collinson wrote:
- Whether friendly or unfriendly, they never have any obligation to merge in
their data improvements into our database.
- However, you or I can.
Does that make sense?
I completely agree that they don't have to do anything towards merging
To be fair, 'village green' has an explicit definition in English law, which is
presumably why whoever originally defined it put the word 'English' in. Agreed,
that it doesn't have to be in a village, but can be in (or, indeed, outside)
any sized population centre.
See
On 03/12/2009, at 10:19 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
That was my interpretation too. It appears to me that if some well-meaning
body released a set of data under the ODbL (which presumably we recommend as
an appropriate licence for geodata) then the OSM project would not be able to
use it. In other
It's both, a rendering issue when the names are duplicated and a
mapping issue about representing the turn restrictions. Note that It's
a very old definition in OSM to say that we duplicate the ways when
there is a physical division between the two ways (it's physically
impossible to cross the
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Nick Black nickbla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Mapzen POI Collector was released into the App Store this morning.
Mapzen POI Collector is a free iPhone app that makes it really
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there is a
median strip pretty unsatisfactory.
I was thinking about this recently when we had the map everything as
areas thread, and I have to agree with you to
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
wrote:
Agreed, while it's sensible for two ways in a dual carriageway, it seems
OTT to have two ways for a road simply because it's got white lines down
the middle. It seems to me to be introducing unnecessary
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not sure how this would work without using areas, though. And
even then, it'll be complicated. I think the proposal at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divided_road is
far too kludgy and temporary
What do
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not sure how this would work without using areas, though. And
even then, it'll be complicated. I think the proposal at
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
It doesn't seem to be general enough, but instead as an incomplete
lump of special cases.
It covers the small, but salient, case of divided roads. Nothing more.
We're just talking about one key here.
So routers are going to have to
2009/12/2 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
You shouldn't need to add :area for it to render. :area just means
only use this rule if the way is closed (i.e. start and end points
are the same).
So you might do:
way [highway] [!junction] :area { fill-color: grey; }
which would
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 08:47, Margus Värton mar...@dakar.ee wrote:
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
semi-manual intervention but in few days we should have much
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I should also have asked whether the widths of the roads are
accurately measured. Presumably we need to know the width of each road
and the distance between them, at each point. But if you want to model
the roads that
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there other downsides I'm missing?
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention a big problem. Using forward/backward
breaks when a way is reversed. So divider=u_turn_forward and
divider=u_turn_backward are a bad idea.
Steve Bennett wrote:
Why? Primarily as a landmark, I would think. The fact that there is a
median strip is more important, relatively, than that there is a
median strip which is 83cm wide, surfaced in terracotta pavers
overgrown with moss...
Anyway, to back up slightly here, the benefits of
2009/12/3 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 08:47, Margus Värton mar...@dakar.ee wrote:
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
semi-manual intervention but in few days we
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
And I think that's eventually where we're going. The distance between
the centerlines is only part of the equation, but I wouldn't want to
throw that information away. This is all moot, however, because I now
understand that you
2009/12/3 Anthony o...@inbox.org
Are there other downsides I'm missing?
I think the biggest downside is that it creates two accepted ways to
map the same thing. Even that, I suppose, is not a problem, if we
make it clear that the old way, which contains more information, is
preferable.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/3 Anthony o...@inbox.org
Are there other downsides I'm missing?
I think the biggest downside is that it creates two accepted ways to
map the same thing. Even that, I suppose, is not a problem, if we
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, put it this way: if this was implemented, I would duplicate far
fewer roads in future.
If it worked (and I really haven't delved into the details enough to
check), I might be convinced to add division information
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I don't know. I read over the proposal again and I don't even get it,
actually. Is the way supposed to be split before and after each
intersection?
Maybe I should write up the proposal as I see it, but all I'm proposing is:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, put it this way: if this was implemented, I would duplicate far
fewer roads in future.
If it worked (and I really haven't delved into the details
(Weird, did this email not get sent before - so many emails going back
and forth. Oops.)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
no, I think this is a big con: there are (and will always be) people who
change the map to different schemes, sometimes
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
ie:
|
=+=
|
With junction=fourway or whatever at the +.
fourway would be the only tag that's not ambiguous. Your junction
was already solved properly by turn restrictions.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's take this situation:
B
|
A==C
You're going from A to B. I'm saying that the router doesn't attempt to make
the turn because the way A-C is marked as divided=median, and there's
nothing
2009/12/2 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com
so... do any of us know enough to mark this border on the OSM map?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6712250/Wrong-maps-landed-British-sailors-in-Iranian-captivity.html
http://osm.org/go/zDsi62--
let's ask the different
There have been no comments to the covered proposal since the first
flurry. I'd like to move this to the Approved page if the group has no
objection, so I'll allow another day for comments, and then move it to
voting.
Yes, I know there are those who are dead set against voting, but that's
the
2009/12/2 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de
Hi
as an programmer my first bolean thoughts where
An as a foreign national my thoughts were And I thought OSM was an
international project...
what does not mean you can't use features that appear only in some parts of
the world. I never
Begin forwarded message:
From: paul everett tap...@t-online.de
Date: 3 December 2009 04:57:41 GMT
To: legal-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
First of all, please subscribe to the legal@ mailing list in order to post
questions. Emailing the list owner is awkward.
I am a plugin developer,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 17:10, Margus Värton mar...@dakar.ee wrote:
So my suggestion is to ask from Iceland's local environment agency or
ministry.
Actually I do not see much reason to reject Your proposal.
We've already looked into doing that but every ministry in Iceland has
an explicit
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
I'd have mentioned Estonia in the document if I knew about it, I only
mentioned France, including a screenshot of how the attribution is
displayed (requested by the lady...)
In Estonia we have a requirement to tag data mentioning Corine Land
Cover and version of
Hi,
OpenStreetMap mug is amazing! Do you plan to produce it also in bigger size?
I think cca 0.5 l, some one like
http://www.eshop-pro.cz/img/p/5830-8430-thickbox.jpg :-)
Current mug is too small for common every-day use (at least for me) and it's
pity but if bigger mug would be available, I
2009/12/3 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
Unless you want to write routines for pre-processing two almost-parallel
ways back into a single way so it can be rendered neatly, I suggest it's a
mapping problem. Don't make work for other people if you don't have to.
I thought
I've recently been given access to daily per-day GPS dumps for a bunch
of GPS devices. I'd like to produce some statistics from these GPX
files on a daily basis, like how many kilometers each device traveled,
charts per device / group of devices and so forth.
Is there any GPX analysis software
Nick,
Nick Black wrote:
Mapzen POI Collector is a free iPhone app that makes it really easy to
collect POIs for OpenStreetMap. Users locate themselves using the
iPhone's built in GPS, position a pin at the location of the POI they
want to add and then choose from a range of pre-selected
Hello Mappers,
It is Queensland's (Australia) 150th birthday, and to celebrate, the Surveying and Spatial
Sciences Institute (SSSI) organised the placement of a number of commemorative
permanent marks around the state.
http://sssiq150.org/About-SSSI-Q150-Project.aspx
These marks are part
2009/12/4 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Nick,
I assume that the POI collector not only lets you collect new POIs but
also modify existing ones. For this, the existing ones must be shown as
active elements on the map that the device displays. Given that the OSM
server proper is too slow
2009/12/4 nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au:
These marks are part tourist attraction, part survey control. Most are
located where a car with an in-built GPS can drive right up to it, so
the driver can check the accuracy of their GPS signal.
The Gympie co-ords are wonky to say the least, it
2) There is a divided road that has been sketched out roughly, simply
to indicate the division. (Very common, I think) Converting this to a
simple divided=* tag doesn't lose information, and better indicates
the actual level of information stored.
Here's one that looks like 2):
Awesome, nice to finally get some proper criticism :)
I'll write up the proposal as I see it. I think most of these comments are
assuming that somehow a single divider=* tag is going to replace all split
roads, including dual carriageway motorways etc. That's not what I'm
suggesting.
I like the
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Again, this proposal is not primarily about rendering. That's a nice benefit
in some cases. The goals are:
1) More appropriate data structure
How is this more appropriate, you are loosing real world information
to improve rendering.
2) Better
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Again, this proposal is not primarily about rendering. That's a nice
benefit
in some cases. The goals are:
1) More appropriate data structure
How is this more
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
The main focus is *adding* information to roads currently mapped as single
(non-divided) roads. Gaining information. Not losing. There are a huge
number of places that this will add information that was not previously
mapped.
This opens up a can of
Hi,
I had mailed some people on the OSMF board with regard to getting the
in.openstreet.org domain pointed to the Indian server, but they said that so
far the OSMF has not taken a decision on subdomains. However they pointed out
that a dot in domain with the openstreetmap word in it is not
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
I had mailed some people on the OSMF board with regard to getting the
in.openstreet.org domain pointed to the Indian server, but they said that so
far the OSMF has not taken a decision on subdomains.
We still would
However they pointed out
that a dot in domain with the openstreetmap word in it is not against OSM
policies, and we are free to use it (as long as we stick with OSM data and
licenses).
By the way, regarding the license, I do not see the Creative-Common logo on
the experimental map of India
Il giorno 03 dicembre 2009 08.12, Roberto Moretti ilr...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
EdoM aveva anche scritto all'accademia della Crusca per sentire il
loro parere. Ma non credo abbiano risposto.
E invece sì che avevano risposte: tutte le scelte che abbiamo preso sono
conformi a quanto suggerito
Ciao a tutti,
negli ultimi giorni ho ricalcato alcuni dei layer WMS della regione
Toscana basandomi sull'autorizzazione che hanno lasciato per e-mail a
Federico Cozzi[1].
Ho iniziato correggendo i confini del mio comune che sulla base del
dato Istat presentavano errori di centinaia di metri,
2009/12/3 Gian-Paolo Pallari gianpaolo.pall...@gmail.com:
- Perchè nessuno, almeno nella mia zona, usa questi layer? In attesa
di un rilascio dei dati che ne permetterebbe l'importazione e quindi
vanificherebbe il tempo speso per il ricalco?
Ciao,
sono quello che ha ottenuto l'autorizzazione
- Perchè nessuno, almeno nella mia zona, usa questi layer? In attesa
di un rilascio dei dati che ne permetterebbe l'importazione e quindi
vanificherebbe il tempo speso per il ricalco?
Io li uso, e anche parecchio :)
Tuttavia spesso risultano non corretti, credo che certi livelli non
siano
Ciao Federico,
Il giorno 03 dicembre 2009 10.58, Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com ha scritto:
2009/12/3 Gian-Paolo Pallari gianpaolo.pall...@gmail.com:
Ciao,
sono quello che ha ottenuto l'autorizzazione al ricalco.
Se scorri tutta la discussione che il mio messaggio aveva originato,
Ciao Stefano,
Il giorno 03 dicembre 2009 11.01, Stefano Pallicca palli...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Io li uso, e anche parecchio :)
Tuttavia spesso risultano non corretti, credo che certi livelli non
siano molto aggiornati, cmq spesso bastano e avanzano.
sicuramente non sono aggiornati, credo
Mi sembra di aver letto che in Josm c'è il modo di selezionare oggetti
sovrapposti ma non ho trovato come.
Premendo il tasto centrale del mouse (spesso è montato assieme alla rotellina).
---
Stefano
___
Talk-it mailing list
Il 03/12/2009 12:04, Stefano Salvador ha scritto:
Mi sembra di aver letto che in Josm c'è il modo di selezionare oggetti
sovrapposti ma non ho trovato come.
Premendo il tasto centrale del mouse (spesso è montato assieme alla
rotellina).
Strabello!!!
Non si finiscono mai di imparare
Stefano Pallicca wrote:
Un'altra domanda, che forse esula un po' dall'argomento, è come
tracciare i confini che, ad esempio, coincidono come un fiume. Anch'io
ieri mi sono messo a ritracciare i confini del mio comune, che avevano
un errore spesso notevole rispetto ai dati presenti sul WMS.
Nel caso di un fiume invece mi chiedo se, in caso di variazioni del corso,
la cartografia dei confini venga variata di conseguenza. In questo caso la
sovrapposizione su osm mi sembrerebbe corretta.
Quando l'uomo decide di controllare il territorio, e` il fiume che
deve smettere di cambiare
Sarebbe possibile modifucare il template per:
- aggiungere testo oltre al titolo ed ai link
- aggiungere icone ai vari link
Lo farei io se sapessi come
Mi piacerebbe anche sapere dove trovare queste info
Ciao
Alberto
___
Talk-it mailing
Ho visto che USGS offre un webservice che ti restituisce la quota a
partire dalle coordinate.
http://gisdata.usgs.gov/XMLWebServices/TNM_Elevation_Service.php
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Scusate la domanda...
c'e' qualcuno che usa gpsbabel da interfaccia su windows?
--
Cristina Moretto
more...@fbk.eu
FBK - Fondazione Bruno Kessler
FreeIT - Free Information Technology
Via Sommarive, 18 - 38100 Povo (Trento), Italy
http://www.fbk.eu/
+39 0461 314582
+39 338 7051131
Fax:+39 0461
In data giovedì 03 dicembre 2009 14:54:44, Maurizio Napolitano ha scritto:
Ho visto che USGS offre un webservice che ti restituisce la quota a
partire dalle coordinate.
http://gisdata.usgs.gov/XMLWebServices/TNM_Elevation_Service.php
Ho gia' risolto con i tiff srtm, comunque grazie :)
Ho usato
Cristina Moretto ha scritto:
Scusate la domanda...
c'e' qualcuno che usa gpsbabel da interfaccia su windows?
A me funzionama lo uso solo per tradurre files.
Ciao
Alberto
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
2009/12/3 Matteo Gottardi matg...@tin.it:
In data giovedì 03 dicembre 2009 14:54:44, Maurizio Napolitano ha scritto:
Ho visto che USGS offre un webservice che ti restituisce la quota a
partire dalle coordinate.
http://gisdata.usgs.gov/XMLWebServices/TNM_Elevation_Service.php
Ho gia' risolto
Il 03/12/2009 11:57, Gian-Paolo Pallari ha scritto:
Mi piacerebbe sapere cosa accade al confine allo spostamento di un fiume
Ad un confine comunale non so; so però che se hai una proprietà il cui
confine è stabilito da un corso d'acqua, quello rimane anche e la sede
del corso d'acqua cambia.
2009/12/3 Carlo Stemberger carlo.stember...@gmail.com:
Mi piacerebbe sapere cosa accade al confine allo spostamento di un fiume
Ad un confine comunale non so
Penso che dipenda da come è stabilito il confine.
Se il confine è lungo il fiume da qui a qui mi sembrerebbe
ragionevole che si sposti
Roberto Moretti wrote:
Ciao,
si, io uso la GUI su XP SP3.
Lo uso per scaricare i dati sia del iblue 747 che del Garmin.
Qualche info in particolare?
si, cercavo di capire se con quella interfaccia si possono cancellare i
dati presenti sul ricevitore gps...
non mi ritrovo molto con quei
2009/12/2 Fabri erfab...@gmail.com
I costi di spedizione in Europa si aggirano intorno ai 10€ per una o due
tazze. Quindi la vorrei comprare...unica cosa...alla registrazione sul
sito, firefox mi avverte che il sito usa un certificato di sicurezza
non valido e inaffidabile inquanto l'autorità
2009/12/2 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com
la forza del nostro progetto è la comunità. i dati non sono niente e
non valgono nulla.
sottoscrivo tutto quello che ha detto Simone.
+1
- In FVG ho visto che avere gli edifici non è un ostacolo ai
novellini, anzi è un aiuto
+1
Stefano Salvador ha scritto:
Ciao a tutti,
sto cercando di capire come mappare correttamente i torrenti, cioè
quei corsi d'acqua anche importanti che per la maggior parte del tempo
sono in secca o quasi. Il problema in Friuli è particolarmente sentito
in quanto i principali fiumi sono a
Cristina Moretto ha scritto:
si, cercavo di capire se con quella interfaccia si possono cancellare i
dati presenti sul ricevitore gps...
non mi ritrovo molto con quei bottoni...
Si può.
Nella parte Ingresso clicchi sul tasto che si trova a destra della
scritta opzioni.
Si apre una
Ako je vjerovati unisima u hrvatskom dnevniku samo dvojica mappera nesto
rade: http://www.openstreetmap.org/diary/hr
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the
2009/12/3 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com
Ako je vjerovati unisima u hrvatskom dnevniku samo dvojica mappera nesto
rade
Vjerojatnije samo dvojica pišu o tome. :)
Ima ljudi koji se strgaju od posla, ali nisu blogerski tip. Mogu iz osobnog
iskustva sa nedavnog zajedničkog mapiranja
Kada sam prije par mjeseci gledao Križevci su bili dosta slabo ucrtani na
karti, a pogledajte sada: http://osm.org/go/0Iu1JR57--
Pohvale Dim-u (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dim), koliko vidim on je
glavni krivac za ovako dobru kartu. Ako je još netko radio na Križevcima
javite se.
Ako
2009/11/29 Dražen Odobašić dodoba...@gmail.com
Toliko od mene, napišite dojmove...
Ne znam prati li Marko ovu listu, ali očito je pisao o mapiranju u nedjelju,
a nije ovdje javio. :)
http://akuzativ.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/tumarati-s-neznancima/
Željko
Marjan Vrban wrote:
Evo malo sam uvatio vremena pa slažem ceste prema onoj birokratskoj
shemi, za koju mislim da ju je prihvatila većina? Jel to izglasano ili šta
da se wiki već sredi, i da imamo pravila kartiranja za RH.
Evo mog prijedloga, može ići i u wiki ako se slažete:
1. primary -
On Četvrtak, 03. Prosinac 2009. 10:20:31 Valent Turkovic wrote:
Ako je vjerovati unisima u hrvatskom dnevniku samo dvojica mappera nesto
rade: http://www.openstreetmap.org/diary/hr
Ako je ovo bio pokušaj nagovaranja na pisanje dnevnika na OSM-u, podržavam :)
no naravno da ima više od dvoje
I'm a bit confused, in the past Aurora is part of Quezon Province
(hence Region 4), but Wikipedia says its part of region 3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_the_Philippines
Can someone enlighten me. Thanks in advance.
--
cheers,
maning
Just a reminder, we will have a micro-mapping meetup on Saturday
December 12, 2009. This event coincides with OSM's Christmas Party.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Christmas_Party_2009
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:17 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's mark this date!
On 03/12/2009, at 6:12 AM, Mike Collinson wrote:
We have now fully updated the OSM Contributors agreement section of the
main proposal. I hope that meets concerns about clarity of the change-over
process.
http://www.osmfoundation.org/images/3/3c/License_Proposal.pdf
A while ago on the
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
