[Talk-GB] Amenity Editing

2009-07-02 Thread Jack Stringer
As I have mentioned before I am interested in improving the data on Amenities such as Pubs, Fast Food places. Most of this data can be found openly on the companies own website so I doubt they will have issues with us including the data as they want to be found on the maps. This also works for

[Talk-GB] UK Boundaries progressing really well, however why is Hampshire, England not rendering?

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Miller
There is loads of work going on around the country on the boundaries project which is great to see. Here are a list of all the main administrative boundaries (for England and Wales) and the status of those boundaries. Scotland is a blank canvas if anyone feels motivated to do the work:

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Boundaries progressing really well, however why is Hampshire, England not rendering?

2009-07-02 Thread Chris Hill
Not sure if this is the problem, but part of the boundary relation does not follow a boundary=administrative way, it follows a road. This is just west of Vernham Dean [1]. The boundary also follows the river Enbourne again without a way tagged boundary=administrative [2]. [1]

Re: [Talk-GB] Amenity Editing

2009-07-02 Thread David Earl
Jack Stringer wrote: As I have mentioned before I am interested in improving the data on Amenities such as Pubs, Fast Food places. Most of this data can be found openly on the companies own website so I doubt they will have issues with us including the data as they want to be found on the

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Boundaries progressing really well, however why is Hampshire, England not rendering?

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Miller
On 2 Jul 2009, at 13:29, Ed Loach wrote: However, Hampshire (England) is not rendering. I have looked at the data with various tools and can't see what is wrong. The best tool for finding errors in boundaries is this one, but it fails for Hamphire for some reason:-

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Boundaries progressing really well, however why is Hampshire, England not rendering?

2009-07-02 Thread Ed Loach
Ed: I notice you have tweeked the 'non-simple' way today. Do you think it is now simple? If not do you want to try and sort it. I checked the way quite a bit. It shares most of its nodes with a section of a beach area, but that shouldn't be an issue. None of the nodes are included in the way

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Boundaries progressing really well, however why is Hampshire, England not rendering?

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Miller
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:27, Ed Loach wrote: Ed: I notice you have tweeked the 'non-simple' way today. Do you think it is now simple? If not do you want to try and sort it. I checked the way quite a bit. It shares most of its nodes with a section of a beach area, but that shouldn't be an

Re: [Talk-GB] Amenity Editing

2009-07-02 Thread Tom Chance
Hi Jack, On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:32:16 +0100, Jack Stringer wrote: It would be nice to get enough data together that we could start to do a similar thing to Google with having a popup when you mouse over the fast_food icon showing you the extra details. I think it would be good, so two

[Talk-GB] Anyone in Newport

2009-07-02 Thread SteveC
Can fix this? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8129695.stm If not already :-) Best Steve ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Bus routes

2009-07-02 Thread Oliver Lewis
I want to add some bus routes around where I used to live to the map. What is an acceptable source to supplement my memory? Can I use an online timetable, like these ones, to work out the route? I know the area quite well so I just need the list of stops to derive the route.

Re: [Talk-GB] Amenity Editing

2009-07-02 Thread Jack Stringer
Not a bad idea. One other thought - we can always pull in data from Wikipedia and link to pages using the wikipedia= tag: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/External_links#Wikipedia No point in trying to duplicate this page, though I doubt Wikipedia has an entry for your

Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Railway route relations

2009-07-02 Thread Richard Mann
Route Codes were used on the Southern, and provision was also made for them to appear on the front of Turbos and Networkers, though it wasn't much used (and very little north of the Thames). Each route code in theory tells you the stopping pattern. None of the current operators is very keen on

Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Railway route relations

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Childs
Forgive me for asking. How does the Route Code relate to the number on the front of the Train. eg Charing Cross to Gillingham via Lewisham has a 62 on the front but if it goes via Greenwich its 85 (I think) Does the number on the front of the time-table mean anything? Oh and the Routes listed

Re: [Talk-GB] Railway route relations

2009-07-02 Thread Richard Mann
LDHS = long distance high speed (aka InterCity) LSE = london south east (aka Network SouthEast) FGW = First Great Western NXEA = National Express East Anglia S-bahn are stopping services RE are Regional Express (about the equivalent of London-Northampton). Long distance services aren't showing.

Re: [Talk-GB] Amenity Editing

2009-07-02 Thread Jack Stringer
If we get lists of places we are looking for then we can find them on the map and fill the gaps. It also helps us to see what we are still missing from the maps. The list below is only a quick list. Amenities to get data for, Airports Ambulance Stations Banks Bus Stations Bus Stops (is there

Re: [Talk-GB] Amenity Editing

2009-07-02 Thread Jack Stringer
There is also an issue of keeping the data up to date - having loads of data in OSM is great, but we run the risk of it going stale if we're not careful. In that case you might as well let Google win the war when it comes to maps with data on them. Like I said before with such a large userbase

Re: [Talk-GB] Amenity Editing

2009-07-02 Thread Chris Hill
The last time you brought this up it was pointed out that web sites have copyright on them and this is a problem for your plans. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you can ignore it. Using copyright data without permission IS A SHOW-STOPPER. Please don't continue to ignore the